Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

As the global incidence of end-stage organ failure increases, the gap between organ donors and recipients continues to widen. This study was conducted to determine the association between organ donation awareness and organ donation willingness among students of a Saudi university.

Design and methods

This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Multi-stage stratified random sampling was used to select the required 723 sample size. Estimation of proportion of students who were aware about organ donation and those who were willing to donate their organs was performed using EpiInfo^© Version 7. Association between organ donation awareness and willingness was determined using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Nearly 98% of the participants were aware that organ donation saves lives (95% CI: 96.27%-98.53%); 84.09% were aware that Islam allows organ donation (95% CI: 81.25%- 86.58%); 64.87% were aware that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia (95% CI: 61.32%-68.26%); 32.64% were aware that the government gives incentives to the family of an organ donor (95% CI: 29.32%-36.14%). Over half (56.71%) of the students (95% CI: 53.07-60.28%) expressed willingness to donate their organs. Positive association was found between awareness on the position of Islam on organ donation (OR=2.7023, p<0.0001) and awareness of that organ donation can be successfully performed in Saudi Arabia (OR=1.9447, p=0.0001).

Conclusions

Awareness that Islam allows organ donation and awareness that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia increased the students’ willingness to donate.

Keywords

Organ donation organ donation willingness university students

Introduction

Organ transplantation involves harvesting biological tissues or solid organs, from a living or a deceased person to a living recipient. ^1–3 Organ transplantation is often the only treatment option for patients diagnosed with end stage organ failure. Organ transplantation significantly decreases the cost of health care for governments and provides organ failure patients a better quality of life, allowing them to remain productive for many years after the procedure. ^4–8 Transplantation is one of the most successful medical advances in the past 60 years.^9,10 Post-transplantation survival has increased to a median of 11 years due to advances in both antibiotics and in immunotherapy.¹¹ By 2019, an average of 14.5 organ transplantation procedures are done per hour.¹²

Significance for public health

Organ transplantation is often the only treatment option for patients with end stage organ disease. However, there is a global shortage for organ donors such that many patients die while waiting for organ donors. This study examined the sociocultural factors that may affect the organ donation attitude and willingness of Saudi university students. The result of this study provides valuable insight that could be used in health education and policy development.

The success in organ transplantation has resulted in an increase in the demand for organ donors. With the steady increase in organ failure cases, the consequent demand for organ transplantation has resulted to a global increase in the need for organ donation. ^8,13,14 However, the number of available donors has not improved proportionately to match the actual requirement.^7,15 Patients considered eligible for transplantation frequently wait expectantly for a donor organ because of the deficit in organs, with many dying in the process.^16,17

The shortage of organ donors is a worldwide phenomenon. According to the Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation, less than 10% of the actual demand is fulfilled as the need for solid organ donation rises.⁷ It is estimated that as much as 20% of people in waiting list die before a donor can be found.^10,18,19 Regional disparities in organ donation exist. This is believed to be related to several factors including a country's socioeconomic status and the availability of technology required for implementing organ transplantation procedures. Organizational approaches to organ donation and policy factors also contribute to transplantation discrepancies.^7,20

Compared to Western countries, people from the Middle East were reported to have a higher level of willingness to donate.⁷ However, like many countries in the Gulf Region, Saudi Arabia has a relatively low organ donation rate of 3.77 per million population. ²¹ The comparable organ donation estimates in Saudi Arabia lag far behind, with 22 potential deceased donors per million population and a procurement rate of 20%.²³ Organ transplantation is relatively new in Saudi Arabia.²⁴ Currently, there are only a few facilities where transplantation is performed in Saudi Arabia.¹¹ The Saudi Centre for Organ Transplantation (SCOT) was established to supervise organ donation and the transplantation program.²⁵ Like in many parts of the world, there is a shortage crisis for organ donors in Saudi Arabia.²⁶ There are currently more than 20, 971 people waiting for organ donors in the Kingdom. From 1986 to 2017, the total number of possible donors reported to SCOT was only 12,503.²⁷ Organ transplantation performed outside Saudi Arabia tend to be more expensive costing more than 486 million Saudi Riyals. In contrast, it would only cost 108 million Saudi Riyals if performed inside the Saudi Arabia.²⁸

Organ donation is mainly influenced by three factors: knowledge, attitude and behavior. However, culture and religion have both been documented to affect donation-related decisions.¹⁸ There are complex relationships between legal, moral, ethical, economic, logistical and humanitarian factors that affect organ donation willingness and actual transplantation.²⁹ Almost all the religions of the world allow organ transplantation and donation unless it would be dangerous for the life of the donor.^26,30 But while the major faiths support organ donation and transplantation, there are many religious- based misconceptions about organ donation.^31,32 In 1982, the Fatwa of Senior Ulama Commission in Saudi Arabia declared that it is permissible to donate an organ or a part of it from a living or deceased donor to a Muslim if it is necessary.¹

Despite the wide acceptance of organ transplantation as a treatment modality, controversies regarding organ donation persist.¹⁵ It is believed that organ donation awareness and education programs are crucial in a society.²⁵ However, there is insufficient research that actually measures awareness on organ donation among Saudi people and even more limited researches about organ donation outside the country's capital. Considering these gaps, this study was conducted to determine the association between awareness on organ donation and willingness to donate among university students.

Design and methods

The study utilized an analytic cross-sectional design. The study population consisted of King Faisal University (KFU) undergraduate students. The university is located Hofuf, Al-Ahsa, in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia.

The sample size was calculated using EpiInfo^® ver. 7 using the current KFU student population of 37 607, expected frequency of 64.4% based on the reported awareness level on organ donation from a study conducted by Agrawal et al., confidence level of 95%, and design effect of 2.⁵ Multi-stage stratified cluster sampling was used to select the colleges from within the university and study participants within each college to obtain the required sample size of 698 participants. A total of 723 students were surveyed from two health colleges (College of Applied Medical Sciences and College of Medicine) and two non-health colleges (College of Arts and College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology).

The survey tool was subjected to content validation. It was then pre-tested among students who were not included in the study before administering to the study participants. The study questionnaire consisted of three sections: 1) demographic variables such as college, age and gender; 2) awareness section, consisting of five questions on awareness of the benefits of organ donation, the existence of organ donation facilities in Saudi Arabia, incentives given by government, the position of Islam on organ donation, and that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia; and 3) willingness to participate in organ donation. Awareness about organ donation and willingness to participate in organ donation were asked as direct questions answerable by “yes” or “no”.

Students participated on a voluntary basis and were assured of their anonymity and the confidentiality of their responses. Following the approval of the research proposal by the Department of Public Health of the College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, ethical clearance was sought from the Research Ethics Committee of the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia (KFU - REC/2019-11 – 03).

Data was collected by direct query using self-administered questionnaires. Collated data were encoded in Microsoft Excel and were subsequently cleaned for missing data before statistical treatment using EpiInfo^® ver. 7. Descriptive analysis was applied to the demographic data. In addition, estimation of proportion was used to determine the relative proportion of students who were aware and unaware about the benefits of organ donation, the existence of organ donation facilities in Saudi Arabia, incentives given by government, the position of Islam on organ donation, and that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia. Estimation of proportion was also used to determine the proportion of students who were either willing or unwilling to participate in organ donation as well as the motivations and obstacles of KFU students toward organ donation. Simple logistic regression was performed for the sociodemographic variables and the five domains of awareness and the students’ willingness to donate their organs. Those that were found to be statistically significant at alpha level of 25% were subjected to multiple logistic regression to determine the association between awareness on organ donation and willingness to donate.

Results

Demographic profile of study participants

A total of 723 university students participated in the survey consisting of 407 (56.29%) females and 316 (43.71%) males.

Participants from the health colleges (Applied Medical Sciences and Medicine) comprised 50.48% of the respondents while students from the non-health colleges (College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology and the College of Arts) comprised 49.52% of the study participants. The age group distribution was as follows: below 20 (315, 43.57%), 21-22 (324, 44.81%), 23-24 (76, 10.51%), and 25 and above (8, 1.11%).

Awareness on organ donation

Majority of the participants were aware that organ donation saves lives. Seven out of ten students were aware that there are hospitals in Saudi Arabia where organ donation can be performed. Only 32.64% of the respondents were aware that the government gives incentives to the family of an organ donor. Majority of the respondents were aware of the position of Islam regarding organ donation and that Islam allows organ donation. Over half of the respondents were aware that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia (Table 1).

As seen in Table 2, a slightly higher proportion of female students were aware that organ donation saves lives. Similarly, a higher proportion of health students were aware that organ donation saves lives. There was almost no difference in the proportion of students based on awareness that organ donation saves lives between the two age groups.

Regarding awareness that there are hospitals in Saudi Arabia where organ donation can be performed, a slightly higher proportion of awareness was seen among male students, among health students and among the older age group. There was a generally low proportion of awareness regarding incentives given to the family of organ donors. A slightly higher proportion of male students and those coming from the non-health colleges were aware of incentives given to families of organ donors. There was very little difference in the proportion of students who were aware and unaware of incentives between the gender groups. There were almost no differences seen in the proportion of students who were aware about the position of Islam on organ donation when they are grouped by gender, type of college and age. Finally, no differences were observed in the awareness on successful organ donation between gender groups. However, a slightly higher proportion of students from health colleges and among older students responded to be aware that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia.

Willingness and attitude towards organ donation

Among the 723 study participants, 410 (56.71%, 95% CI: 53.07 – 60.28%) were willing to donate their organs while 313 (43.29%, 95% CI: 39.72 – 46.93%) of respondents were not willing to donate their organs (Table 3). When comparing the gender groups, a higher proportion of female students were willing to donate. A higher proportion of students from health colleges were willing to donate their organs when compared to students from non-health colleges. A slightly higher proportion of younger university students were willing to donate their organs. Among the 410 respondents who were willing to donate their organs, 93.41% (95% CI: 90.59 – 95.44%) were willing to donate their organs to their family members. In addition, 59.02% were willing to donate to their friends (95% CI: 54.20 – 63.68%), 52.68% to a stranger (95% CI: 47.85 – 57.47%). Only 44.63% (95% CI: 39.89 – 49.47 %) were willing to donate their organs to their neighbours. Most (366, 89.27%) of study participants (95% CI: 85.90 – 91.91%) who expressed willingness to donate want to help people while 50.24% of them view donation as a good deed according to Islam. Only 5.61% of study participants who were willing to donate do so in order to get financial reward.

Crude association between awareness on organ donation and willingness to participate in organ donation

Using simple logistic regression, awareness that organ donation saves lives, awareness of the position of Islam on organ donation, and awareness that organ donation is successfully performed in Saudi Arabia were found to be significantly associated with willingness to donate (Table 4). Students who were aware that organ donation saves lives were 1.9 times more likely to be willing to donate their organs (p=0.1980). Those who were aware that Islam allows organ donation were 2.54 times more likely to be willing to donate their organs (p<0.0001). Additionally, those who were aware that organ donation is successfully performed in Saudi Arabia were 2.04 times more likely to be willing to donate their organs (p<0.0001). There was no significant association between awareness of organ donation facilities and willingness to donate (OR=1.0671, p=0.6890). Awareness that the government provides incentives to the family of organ donors was similarly not associated with the willingness to donate an organ (OR= 0.9789, p=0.8941).

Adjusted association between awareness on organ donation and willingness to participate in organ donation

As seen in Table 5, when gender, age group and type of college were held constant, students who were aware that organ donation saves lives were 1.1 times more likely to donate their organs compared to those who were not aware of the benefits of organ donation (OR =1.1117, p=0.8383). Students who were aware that Islam allows organ donation were 2.7 times more likely to donate their organs compared to those who were unaware that Islam permits organ donation when the sociodemographic variables were held constant (p<0.0001) (Table 6). As seen in Table 7, when the sociodemographic variables were controlled, students who were aware that organ donation is successfully performed in Saudi Arabia were 1.94 times more likely to donate their organs compared to students who were not aware (p=0.0001).

Table 1.

Awareness on the benefits of organ donation among university students.

Awareness domains	Count	Percentage	95% CI
Organ donation saves lives
Aware	706	97.65	96.27	98.53
Unaware	17	2.35	1.47	3.73
Existence of organ donation hospitals in Saudi Arabia
Aware	500	69.16	65.70	72.41
Unaware	223	30.84	27.59	34.30
Incentives to organ donors
Aware	236	32.64	29.32	36.14
Unaware	437	67.36	63.86	70.68
Position of Islam on organ donation
Aware	608	84.09	81.25	86.58
Unaware	115	15.91	13.32	18.75
Successful organ transplantation
Aware	469	64.87	61.32	68.26
Unaware	254	35.13	31.74	38.68

Discussion

The study assessed the organ donation awareness and organ donation willingness of university students in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. It also determined the students’ attitude toward organ donation and factors that affect organ donation willingness.

The result of the current study showed that almost all (97.65%) of the students were aware that organ donation saves lives with only slight differences in awareness between gender groups and type of college. There was a higher proportion of students from the health colleges (71.78%) than from non-health colleges (57.82%) who were aware that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia.

Table 2.

Distribution of university students based on awareness on donation.

Sociodemographic variable	Aware			Unaware
	Count	Proportion (%)	95% CI	Count	Proportion (%)	95% CI
Awareness that organ donation saves lives
Gender
Male	303	95.89	93.09-97.58	13	4.11%	2.42-6.91
Female	403	99.02	97.50-99.62	4	0.98%	0.38-2.50
Type of college
Non-health¹	343	95.81	93.20-97.44	15	4.19%	2.56-6.80
Health²	363	99.45	98.02-99.85	2	0.55%	0.15-1.98
Age group
Younger³	489	97.41	95.62-98.48	13	2.59%	1.52-4.38
Older⁴	217	98.19	95.43-99.50	4	1.81%	0.50-4.57
Awareness of the existence of organ donation hospitals in Saudi Arabia
Gender
Male	225	71.20	65.98-75.92	91	28.80%	24.08-34.02
Female	275	67.57	62.87-71.93	132	32.43%	28.07-37.13
Type of college
Non-health¹	232	64.80	59.72-69.57	126	35.20%	30.43-40.28
Health²	268	73.42	68.67-77.70	97	26.58%	22.30-31.33
Age group
Younger³	338	67.33	63.11-71.29	164	32.67%	28.71-36.89
Older⁴	162	73.30	66.96-79.01	59	26.70%	20.99-33.04
Awareness on incentives given to donors
Gender
Male	100	31.65	26.76-36.97	216	68.35	63.03-73.24
Female	136	33.42	29.01-38.13	271	66.58	61.87-70.99
Type of college
Non-health¹	130	36.31	31.50-41.42	228	63.69	58.58-68.50
Health²	106	29.04	24.62-33.90	259	70.96	66.10-75.38
Age group
Younger³	154	30.68	26.80 – 34.85	348	69.32	65.15 – 73.20
Older⁴	82	37.10	30.72 – 43.84	139	62.90	56.16 – 69.28
Awareness on the position of Islam on organ donation
Gender
Male	265	83.86	79.40 – 87.51	51	16.14	12.49 – 20.60
Female	343	84.28	80.42 – 87.49	64	15.72	12.51 – 19.58
Type of college
Non-health¹	299	83.52	79.32 – 87.00	59	16.48	13.00 – 20.68
Health²	309	84.66	80.60 – 87.99	56	15.34	12.01 – 19.40
Age group
Younger³	418	83.27	79.75 – 86.28	84	16.73	13.72 – 20.25
Older⁴	190	85.97	80.68 – 90.27	31	14.03	9.73 – 19.32
Awareness on successful organ transplantation
Gender
Male	203	64.24	58.81 – 69.33	113	35.76	30.67 – 41.19
Female	266	65.36	60.61 – 69.82	141	34.64	30.18 – 39.39
Type of college
Non-health¹	207	57.82	52.65 – 62.83	151	42.18	37.17 – 47.35
Health²	262	71.78	66.96 – 76.15	103	28.22	23.85 – 33.04
Age group
Younger³	315	62.75	58.44 – 66.87	187	37.25	33.13 – 41.56
Older⁴	154	69.68	63.16 – 75.67	67	30.32	24.33 – 36.84

College of Computer Science and College of Arts

College of Applied Medical Sciences and College of Medicine

younger than 22 years

22 years and over.

Knowledge on organ donation has previously been reported to vary among students of different college programs.²⁶ In the current study, only 84.09% of the university students in the current study were aware that organ donation is permissible in Islam. Regional variation in awareness levels within Saudi Arabia has been observed. A study in a university in central part of Saudi Arabia revealed that nearly half of the students think there were misconceptions of the Islamic perspective.³³ Another study in Al-Kharj showed that 64.4% of the respondents were aware that organ donation is permissible.¹⁶ Willingness to participate in organ donation among the university students was lower than what was reported in a recent Saudi study where 74.1% of the study respondents were willing to donate an organ.³⁴ However, organ donation willingness in the current study was higher compared to another study conducted in Riyadh City which showed that only 47% of the participants had willingness to donate organs and tissues.¹

The current study showed that female students were more than twice as likely to be willing to donate their organs compared to male students. Female Saudi students’ attitude towards organ donation has already been reported to be higher than that of men in an earlier study.³⁵ The higher organ donation willingness among women found in the current study was also consistent with more recent studies conducted in Saudi Arabia.^36,37 The current study revealed that nearly 30% of students who expressed non-willingness to donate lack of knowledge about organ donation. More so, although the respondents were all Muslims, the current study revealed that 12.78% of those who were unwilling to donate considered religious beliefs as a barrier for organ donation. A study conducted among Saudis in Madinah City showed that 21.7% of the participants lacked awareness on organ donation and 6.8% cited religion as the primary reason to refuse organ donation.³⁴ The current study showed that among the five awareness domains, only awareness on the position of Islam on organ donation and awareness that organ donation can be performed within Saudi Arabia were significantly associated with university students’ willingness to donate when all other variables were held constant. This supports hypothesis that religious belief influences organ donation attitude. Awareness on the existence of hospitals/facilities where organ donation can be performed in Saudi Arabia did not affect the students’ willingness to donate. This implies that awareness on the existence of facilities alone does not contribute to an increase in the willingness to donate. The same was true regarding awareness on the provision of incentives by the government to the family of donors.

Table 3.

Distribution of university students based on willingness to donate.

Sociodemographic variable	Willing to donate			Unwilling to donate
	Count	Proportion (%)	95% CI	Count	Proportion (%)	95% CI
Gender
Male	141	44.62	39.24–50.13	175	55.38	49.87–60.76
Female	269	66.09	61.36–70.52	138	33.91	29.48–38.64
College
Non-health¹	172	48.04	42.92–53.21	186	51.69	46.79–57.08
Health²	238	65.21	60.18–69.91	127	34.79	30.09–39.82
Age group
Younger³	292	58.17	53.81–62.40	210	41.83	37.60–46.19
Older4	118	53.39	46.58–60.11	103	46.61	39.89–53.42

College of Computer Science and College of Arts

College of Applied Medical Sciences and College of Medicine

younger than 22 years; 422 years and over.

Table 4.

Crude association between sociodemographic variables and awareness domains and willingness to donate.

Variables	OR	95% CI		p-value
Gender
Female	2.4192*	1.7883	3.2727	0.0000
Male	1.0000
Type of college
Health	2.0265*	1.5028	2.7327	0.0000
Non-health	1.0000
Age groups
Older	0.8239*	0.5993	1.1327	0.2330
Younger	1.0000
Awareness that organ donation saves lives
Aware	1.9000*	0.7150	5.0490	0.1980
Unaware	1.0000
Awareness of the existence of organ donation hospitals in Saudi Arabia
Aware	1.0671	0.7764	1.4667	0.6890
Unaware	1.0000
Awareness on incentives to donors
Aware	0.9789	0.7154	1.3395	0.8941
Unaware	1.0000
Awareness on the position of Islam on organ donation
Aware	2.5498*	1.6901	3.8468	0.0000
Unaware	1.0000
Awareness that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia
Aware	2.0492*	1.5029	2.7941	0.0000
Unaware	1.0000

*significant at α=0.25.

The study has several limitations. The results apply to students of this university and do not necessarily reflect the organ donation awareness and organ donation willingness of other university students in other regions of Saudi Arabia or of the Saudi Arabia population in general. Because the data was collected using selfadministered questionnaires, misclassification of responses could not be completely discounted. A cause-and-effect relationship could not be determined because of the study design. The researchers merely asked the participants about their willingness to donate their organs. However, future organ donation cannot be predicted based solely from the collected data. Other demographic variables that could affect the willingness to donate organs were not investigated.

Table 5.

Adjusted association between awareness that organ donation saves live and willingness to donate.

Variables	OR	95% CI		p-value
Awareness that organ donation saves lives
Aware	1.1117	0.4022	3.0723	0.8383
Unaware	1.0000
Gender
Female	2.3826	1.7178	3.3047	<0.0001
Male	1.0000
Age groups
Older	1.0001	0.7001	1.4286	0.9995
Younger	1.0000
Type of college
Health	1.9887	1.4567	2.7149	<0.0001
Non-health	1.0000

Table 6.

Adjusted association between awareness that Islam allows organ donation and willingness to donate.

Variables	OR	95% CI		p-value
Awareness on the position of Islam on organ donation
Aware	2.7023	1.7585	4.1527	<0.0001
Unaware	1.0000
Gender
Female	2.4275	1.7438	3.3792	<0.0001
Male	1.0000
Age groups
Older	0.9701	0.6752	1.3938	0.8697
Younger	1.0000
Type of college
Health	2.0269	1.4798	2.7763	<0.0001
Non-health	1.0000

Table 7.

Adjusted association between awareness that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia and willingness to donate.

Variables	OR	95% CI		p-value
Awareness that organ donation is successfully done in Saudi Arabia
Aware	1.9447	1.4061	2.6896	0.0001
Unaware	1.0000
Gender
Female	2.4073	1.7314	3.3469	<0.0001
Male	1.0000
Age groups
Older	0.9640	0.6717	1.3836	0.8424
Younger	1.0000
Type of college
Health	1.8530	1.3532	2.5374	0.0001
Non-health	1.0000

This study has shown that there was a very high level of awareness on organ donation among university students, particularly on the idea that organ donation may save lives. Awareness that Islam permits organ donation and that organ donation procedures are successfully performed within the country were positively associated with organ donation willingness.

Based on the study findings, the researchers recommend that inter-institutional collaboration between the Ministry of Higher Education, the Ministry of Health and the Saudi Centre for Organ Transplantation should be undertaken to promote organ donation among university students. The availability of facilities together with success rates and information campaigns about the safety of organ donation must be emphasized as these factors were shown to be perceived as obstacles to organ donation willingness. Education about organ donation and religion is crucial.³⁰ Because the cadaver is considered holy and sacred in Islam this may affect the perception of the population on organ donation as whole. There is a need to raise awareness that organ donation is not prohibited by Islam.^31,38 The key messages that Islam permits organ and tissue transplantation that is intended to save human lives must be promoted as an understanding that religion allows organ donation is important in the development of positive attitude toward organ transplantation.³⁹ Organ donation awareness campaigns aimed at increasing the number of potential donors is still limited. The important role of health professionals as an important link between patients in need of organ donation and potential donors cannot be overemphasized. Likewise, family and friends have the highest potential to impact donation.^40,41 The university should therefore partner with the community and advocate to health-care professionals to motivate people about the legal and procedural details of organ donation. Comprehensive community campaigns that link health professionals and the community is in order.

Future researchers should conduct a similar study in a community setting to collect more information from different population groups. Other demographic variables that may affect attitude towards organ donation should be investigated to identify other factors that may influence organ donation willingness. The study should be replicated in other universities to check the consistency of study findings among university students of different regions within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The World Health Organization has called for countries to be self-sufficient in terms of organ donation and transplantation.²⁴ It has been reported that low proportion of organ donation is related to several factors including organizational structure of organ donation in the country, legislature and existing health care systems.⁴² Therefore advocacy for policies in support of the opt-out option where a person has to formally declare non-willingness must be considered in Saudi Arabia.¹⁷ The Saudi Centre for Organ Transplantation currently plays a central role in all aspects of transplantation in Saudi Arabia including education on all levels, allocation, coordination and procurement. ^1,24–26 SCOT has published a directory that regulates the practice of organ donation and transplantation in the Saudi Arabia.²⁴ A recent development in organ donation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is that Saudi residents may now register to become organ donors using the Tawakkalna, a mobile application developed by the Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA).⁴³

Footnotes

Contributions: All the authors made substantive intellectual contributions to this study from its conceptualization, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding: No grant was received to conduct of this study.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and materials: The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical approval: Ethical clearance was provided by the Research Ethics Committee of the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia (KFU – REC/2019 – 11 – 03).

Informed consent: The manuscript does not contain any individual person's data in any form.

Consent for publication: Participants of the study gave full consent to have the results published.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the study participants for their contribution to the research. The authors especially thank Dr. Edric Estrella for his guidance in the statistical analysis.

References

Alsharidah

Al-Dossari

AlMahmoud

. Assessment of knowledge and attitude toward organ donation among the Saudi population in Riyadh City. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2018;29:1326–32.

Hamed

Awad

Youssef

. Knowledge and attitudes about organ donation among medical students in Egypt: A questionnaire. J Transplant Technol Res 2016;6:1–4.

Tamuli

Sarmah

Saikia

Organ donation– “attitude and awareness among undergraduates and postgraduates of North- East India”. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:130–6.

Robbins

. Disincentives to kidney donation. Nephrol Nursing J 2019;46:429–31.

Agrawal

Binsaleem

Al-Homrani

. Knowledge and attitude towards organ donation among adult population in AlKharj, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2017;28:81–9.

Sampaio

Fernandes

Kirsztajn

. Knowledge of medical students on organ donation. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2020;66:1264–9.

Mekkodathil

El-Menyar

Sathian

. Knowledge and willingness for organ donation in the Middle Eastern region: A meta-analysis. J Relig Health 2020;59:1810–23.

Vincent

Kumar

Parameswaran

Kar

. Knowledge, attitude, and perception on organ donation among undergraduate medical and nursing students at a tertiary care teaching hospital in the southern part of India: A cross-sectional study. J Educ Health Promot 2019 30;8:161.

Krupic

Sayed-Noor

Fatahi

The impact of knowledge and religion on organ donation as seen by immigrants in Sweden. Scand J Caring Sci 2017;31:687–94.

10.

Tarzi

Asaad

Tarabishi

. Attitudes towards organ donation in Syria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Ethics 2020;21:123.

11.

AlHabeeb

AlAyoubi

Tash

. Attitude of the Saudi community towards heart donation, transplantation, and artificial hearts. Saudi Med J 2017;38:742–7.

12.

Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation [Internet]. Transplant Observatory, home page. Accessed: 2021 Jul 25. Available from: http://www.transplant-observatory.org/

13.

Dibaba

Goro

Wolide

. Knowledge, attitude and willingness to donate organ among medical students of Jimma University, Jimma Ethiopia: cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2020;20:799.

14.

Khalid

Muneeb

. Level of knowledge and attitude regarding organ donation: a community-based study from Karachi, Pakistan. BMC Res Notes 2019;12:309.

15.

Rydzewska-Rosołowska

Jamiołkowska

Kakareko

. Medical students’ attitude toward organ donation in a single medical university. Transplant Proc 2020;52:695–9.

16.

Al Bshabshe

Wani

Rangreze

. Orientation of university students about brain-death and organ donation: A crosssectional study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2016;27:966–70.

17.

Sayedalamin

Imran

Almutairi

. Awareness and attitudes towards organ donation among medical students at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67:1–64.

18.

Vijayalakshmi

Sunitha

Gandhi

. Knowledge, attitude and behaviour of the general population towards organ donation: an Indian perspective. Nat Med J India 2016;29:257–61.

19.

Health Resources & Services Administration [Internet]. Organ Donation Statistics. Accessed: 23 December 2019. Available from: https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics-stories/statistics.html#waiting-list

20.

Becker

Roberts

de Nadal

. Optimizing organ donation: expert opinion from Austria, Germany, Spain and the UK. Ann Transplant 2020;25:e921727.

21.

International Registry on Organ Donation and Transplantation [Internet]. Database. Accessed: 2021 Jul 25. Available from: https://www.irodat.org/?p=database

22.

Mixon

Jr Upadhyaya

. Donor compensation and the elimination of the organ shortage in Spain: Evidence from break point analysis. J Stat Economc Methods 2017;6:9–15.

23.

Shaheen

Souqiyyeh

Attar

. Organ donation from deceased donors: A proactive detection program in Saudi Arabia. Exp Clin Transplant 2015;13:1–3.

24.

Shaheen

. Organ transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Transplantation 2016;100:1387–9.

25.

Alnajjar

Alzahrani

. Awareness of brain death, organ donation, and transplantation among medical students at single academic institute. Saudi J Anaesth 2020;14:329–34.

26.

Majeed

. Saudi nursing and medical student's knowledge and attitude toward organ donation-a comparative cross-sectional study. Int J Health Sci 2016;10:209–17.

27.

Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation [Internet]. Home page. Accessed: 2021 Jul 25. Available from: https://www.scot.gov.sa/en

28.

Saudi Centre for Organ Transplantation [Internet]. Annual Report for Organ Transplantation in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2019. Accessed: 1 August 2021. Available from: https://www.scot.gov.sa/Files/b9b9f784-84f0-49f0-8a37-8824f4d23c13.pdf

29.

Athar

. A Gift of life: an islamic perspective in organ donation and transplantation. J Transplant Technol Res 2015;5:1000146.

30.

Krupic

. The impact of religion and provision of information on increasing knowledge and changing attitudes to organ donation: an intervention study. J Relig Health 2019;59:2082–95.

31.

Islam

. Organ donation and transplantation issues in Islam and present situation. J Law Policy Global 2014;22:99–103.

32.

Akbulut

Ozer

Firinci

. Attitudes, knowledge levels and behaviors of Islamic religious officials about organ donation in Turkey: National survey study. World J Clin Cases 2020;8:1620–31.

33.

Almohsen

Alobaishy

Alghammas

. Attitudes and beliefs on organ donation among students in a university in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2016;37:591.

34.

Jabri

Sandokji

Alzughaibi

. Awareness, beliefs and barriers of organ donation among Saudis in Madinah city, Saudi Arabia. J Health Educ Res Dev 2016;4:187.

35.

Elsafi

Al-Adwani

Al-Jubran

. Factors influencing the willingness of allied health students to donate organs or tissues. Transplant Proc 2017;49:1215–20.

36.

Almutairi

. Knowledge, attitude, and willingness towards organ donation among medical and health sciences students in Central Region, Saudi Arabia. Transpl Res Risk Managt 2020;12:23–8.

37.

Bukhari

. Willingness for solid-organ donation in Saudi Arabia: A skyscape view. Exp Clin Transplant 2021 Online ahead of print.

38.

Shuriye

. Muslim views on organ transplant. IIUM Engin J 2011;12:2:260.

39.

Lei

Deng

Zhang

. Level of organ donation–related knowledge and attitude and willingness toward organ donation among a group of university students in Western China. Transplant Proc 2018;50:2924–31.

40.

Ismail

Lim

Mahadevan

. Knowledge, attitude and factors influencing public willingness towards organ donation among hospital patients and relatives in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 2020;75:260–5.

41.

Teoh

Lau

Far

. Attitudes, acceptance, and registration in relation to organ donation in Hong Kong: a crosssectional study. Hong Kong Med J 2020;26:192–200.

42.

Özkan

Baykara-Acar

Acar

Opposition to organ donation and transplant by midwifery, nursing, and social work students. Exp Clin Transplant 2015;2:179–87.

43.

Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority. Tawakkalna. Accessed: 21 November 2121. Available from: https://ta.sdaia.gov.sa/en/index

Association between Organ Donation Awareness and Willingness among Saudi University Students

Abstract

Background

Design and methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Design and methods

Results

Demographic profile of study participants

Awareness on organ donation

Willingness and attitude towards organ donation

Crude association between awareness on organ donation and willingness to participate in organ donation

Adjusted association between awareness on organ donation and willingness to participate in organ donation

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

References