This study examined the contribution of tactile and kinesthetic perceptions to handwriting legibility and speed of 177 Taiwanese children in first and second grade. Five standardized instruments assessed tactile and kinesthetic perceptions using handwriting legibility and speed as outcome measures. Fine motor coordination, mental processing speed, age, and gender were measured and served as covariates. Pearson correlations and regression analyses examined the relationship between handwriting and tactile and kinesthetic perceptions. Handwriting speed and legibility both significantly correlated with tactile perception, kinesthetic perception, and covariates. Results from the regression analysis supported tactile and kinesthetic perceptions as being significant predictors of both handwriting speed (F (6,170) = 25.87, p < .001, R = .477) and legibility (F (6,170) = 11.043, p < .001, R = .280). Tactile perception contributed more to handwriting speed and legibility than kinesthetic perception. Tactile and kinesthetic perception should be assessed when evaluating handwriting. When children have difficulty writing quickly or legibly, professionals should assess children's tactile and kinesthetic abilities.
AmundsonS. J. (1992). Handwriting: Evaluation and intervention in school settings. In Case-SmithJ.PehoskiC. (Eds.), Development of hand skills in the child (pp. 63–78). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
2.
BenbowM. (2005). Principles and practices of teaching handwriting. In HendersonA.PehoskiC. (Eds.), Hand function in the child (2nd ed., pp. 321–344). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
3.
BrooksB. L.ShermanE. M.StraussE. (2010). Test Review: NEPSY-II: A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Second Edition. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 80–101. doi:10.1080/09297040903146966.
4.
CermakS. (2005). Perceptual functions of the hand. In HendersonA.PehoskiC. (Eds.), Hand function in the child (2nd ed., pp. 63–88). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
5.
ChangS. H. (1997). Relationship between handwriting and perceptual performance in third-grade Chinese children(Master's thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1384887).
6.
CharterR. A. (2001a). Coefficients alpha for the tactual performance test trials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 893.
7.
CharterR. A. (2001b). Difference score reliability for tactual performance test trials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 941–942. doi:10.2466/PMS.92.3.911-942.
8.
CharterR. A. (2001c). Tactual performance test trials: Internal consistency reliability using the Gilmer-Feldt coefficient. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93, 363–366. doi:10.2466/PMS.93.5.363-366.
9.
ChowS. M. K.HendersonS. E. (2003). Interrater and test-retest reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children for Chinese preschoolers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 574–577.
10.
CornhillH.Case-SmithJ. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732–739.
11.
DondersJ.JankeK. (2008). Criterion validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 651–655. doi:10.1017/S1355617708080752.
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
13.
FederK. P.MajnemerA. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49, 312–317.
14.
FederK. P.MajnemerA. (2003). Children's handwriting evaluation tools and their psychometric properties. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(3), 65–84. doi:10.1080/J006v23n03_05.
15.
FederK. P.MajnemerA.BourbonnaisD.PlattR.BlayneyM.SynnesA. (2005). Handwriting performance in pre-term children compared with term peers at age 6 to 7 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 163–170. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2005.tb01110.x.
16.
FloydR. G.McGrewK. S.EvansJ. J. (2008). The relative contributions of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities in explaining writing achievement during childhood and adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 132–144. doi:10.1002/pits.20284.
17.
GandeviaS. C.ButlerJ. E.HodgesP. W.TaylorJ. L. (2002). Balancing acts: Respiratory sensations, motor control and human posture. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 29, 118–121. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03611.x.
18.
GardnerE. P. (1988). Somatosensory cortical mechanisms of feature detection in tactile and kinesthetic discrimination. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 66, 439–454. doi:10.1139/y88-074.
19.
GoodwinA. W.WheatH. E. (2004). Sensory signals in neural populations underlying tactile perception and manipulation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 53–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131032.
20.
GrahamS.WeintraubN.BerningerV.SchaferW. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in Grades 1–9. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52. doi:10.1080/00220679809597574.
21.
Hamstra-BletzL.BloteA. W. (1990). Development of handwriting in primary school: A longitudinal study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 759–770. doi:10.2466/PMS.70.3.759-770.
22.
HendersonS. E.SugdenD. A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. London, England: Psychological Corporation.
23.
HsuY. W.CherngR. J.YuT. Y.Cheng-SeaM. J. (2004). Comparison of the performance of preschoolers from Taiwan and USA in the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Formosan Journal of Physical Therapy, 29, 307–316.
24.
KhalidP. I.YunusJ.AdnanR. (2010). Extraction of dynamic features from hand drawn data for the identification of children with handwriting difficulty. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 256–262. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.09.009.
25.
KloveH. (1963). Clinical neuropsychology. In ForsterF. M. (Ed.), The medical clinics of North America (pp. 1647–1658). New York: Saunders.
26.
KnightsR. M.IvanL. P.VentureyraE. C.BentivoglioC.StoddartC.WinogronW.BawdenH. N. (1991). The effects of head injury in children on neuropsychological and behavioural functioning. Brain Injury, 5, 339–351. doi:10.3109/02699059109008107.
27.
KnightsR. M.MouleA. D. (1968). Normative data on the motor steadiness battery for children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 643–650.
28.
KorkmanM. (1998). NAPSY — A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
29.
LaszloJ. I.BairstowP. J. (1983). Kinaesthesis: Its measurement, training and relationship to motor control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 411–421. doi:10.1080/14640748308402142.
30.
LauneyK. B.CarrollJ.Van HornK. R. (2007). Concurrent validity of the WISC-IV in eligibility decisions for students with educable mental disabilities. Psychological Reports, 100, 1165–1170. doi:10.2466/PR0.100.3.1165-1170.
31.
LiY. R. (2002). Student homework practices in Taipei city elementary schools (Unpublished master's thesis). Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan.
32.
MarshallP. S.ForstotM.CalliesA.PetersonP. K.SchenckC. H. (1997). Cognitive slowing and working memory difficulties in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 58–66.
33.
MatthewsC. G.KloveH. (1964). Instruction manual for the Adult Neuropsychology Test Battery. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Medical School.
34.
McCutchenD. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3.
35.
NobackC. R.StromingerN. L.DemarestR. J.RuggieroD. A. (2005). The human nervous system: Structure and function (6th ed., pp. 155–328). Totowa, NJ: Human Press.
36.
NorusisM. (2008). SPSS 16.0 Guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
ParushS.LifshitzN.YochmanA.WeintraubN. (2010). Relationships between handwriting components and underlying perceptual-motor functions among students during copying and dictation tasks. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30, 39–48. doi:10.3928/15394492-20091214-06.
38.
PremingerF.WeissP. L.WeintraubN. (2004). Predicting occupational performance: Handwriting versus keyboarding. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 193–201.
39.
ReismanJ. (1999). Minnesota Handwriting Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
40.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
41.
RosenblumS.GoldstandS.ParushS. (2006). Relationships among biomechanical ergonomic factors, handwriting product quality, handwriting efficiency, and computerized handwriting process measures in children with and without handwriting difficulties. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 28–39. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.1.28.
42.
RueckriegelS. M.BlankenburgF.BurghardtR.EhrlichS.HenzeG.MerglR.. (2008). Influence of age and movement complexity on kinematic hand movement parameters in childhood and adolescence. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 26, 655–663. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2008.07.015.
43.
SchludermannE. H.SchludermannS. M.MerrymanP. W.BrownB. W. (1983). Halstead's studies in the neuropsychology of aging. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2, 49–172. doi:10.1016/0167-4943(83)90016-X.
44.
SudsawadP.TromblyC. A.HendersonA.Tickle-DegnenL. (2002). Testing the effects of kinesthetic training on handwriting performance in first-grade students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 26–33. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.1.26.
TsengM. H. (1998). Development of pencil grip position in pre-school children. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 18, 207–224.
47.
TsengM. H.ChowS. M. (2000). Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 83–88.
48.
van HoornJ. F.MaathuisC. G.PetersL. H.Hadders-AlgraM. (2010). Handwriting, visuomotor integration, and neurological condition at school age. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52, 941–947. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03715.x.
49.
VolmanM. J.Van SchendelB. M.JongmansM. J. (2006). Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: A search for underlying mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 451–460. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.4.451.
50.
WannJ. (1991). The control of pen pressure in handwriting: A subtle point. Human Movement Science, 10, 223–246. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90005-I.
51.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
52.
WeintraubN.Drory-AsayagA.DekelR.JokobovitsH.ParushS. (2007). Developmental trends in handwriting performance among middle school children. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 27, 104–112.
53.
WeintraubN.GrahamS. (2000). The contribution of gender, orthographic, finger function, and visual-motor processes to the prediction of handwriting status. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 121–140.
54.
ZivianiJ.HayesA.ChantD. (1990). Handwriting: A perceptual motor disturbance in children with myelomeningocele. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 12–26.
55.
ZivianiJ.WallenM. (2005). The development of graphomotor skills. In HendersonA.PehoskiC. (Eds.), Hand function in the child (2nd ed., pp. 217–236). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
