The purpose of this study was to examine changes in infant goal-directed actions after a period of experience with crawling. Sixty-four infants from ages 24 to 54 weeks were divided into pre-crawling (n = 33) and crawling (n = 31) groups and the mean number of goal-directed actions was compared using an analysis of covariance to control for the effect of age. Three infants were selected for longitudinal observations on a bimonthly basis providing descriptive examples of daily observations. Controlling for age, the main effect for crawling status was statistically significant (F(1, 61) = 11.13, p = .001), with crawlers demonstrating a greater mean number of goal-directed actions than precrawlers. This study is the first to compare the goal-directed actions of precrawlers and crawlers, confirming an increase in infant goal-directed actions after infants gained experience with crawling.
AdolphK. E. (2008). Learning to move. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 213–218.
2.
AdolphK. E.BergerS. E., & LeoA. J. (2010). Developmental continuity? Crawling, cruising, and walking. Developmental Science, 210, 1–13.
3.
AdolphK. E.VereijkenB., & DennyM. A. (1998). Learning to crawl. Child Development, 69, 1299–1312.
4.
BaiD. L., & BertenthalB. I. (1992). Locomotor status and the development of spatial search skills. Child Development, 63, 215–226.
5.
BaranekG. T.BarnettC. R.AdamsE. M.WolcottN. A.WatsonL. R., & CraisE. R. (2005). Object play in infants with autism: Methodological issues in retrospective video analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 20–30.
6.
BehneT.CarpenterM.CallJ., & TomaselloM. (2005). Unwilling versus unable? Infants' understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41, 328–337.
7.
BellM. A., & FoxN. A. (1997). Individual differences in object permanence performance at eight months: Locomotor experience and brain electrical activity. Developmental Psychobiology, 31, 287–297.
8.
BensonJ. B. (1990). The development and significance of crawling in infancy. In ClarkJ. E. & HumphreyJ. H. (Eds.), Advances in motor development research (pp. 41–56). New York: AMS Press.
9.
BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F.McAdooH. P., & CollC. G. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States. Part I: Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development, 72, 1844–1867.
CamposJ. J.MummeD. L.KermoianR., & CamposR. G. (1994). A functionalist perspective on the nature of emotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 284–303.
12.
ClearfieldM. W. (2004). The role of crawling and walking experience in infant spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 214–241.
13.
ClearfieldM. W.OsborneC. N., & MullenM. (2008). Learning by looking: Infants' social looking behavior across the transition from crawling to walking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 297–307.
14.
CohnE. S., & LewC. (2010). Occupational therapy's perspective on the use of environments and contexts to support health and participation in occupations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, S57–S69.
15.
DaumM. M.PrinzW., & AscherslebenG. (2009). Means-end behavior in young infants: The interplay of action perception and action production. Infancy, 14, 613–640.
16.
DennisC. W.StansfieldS. A.BeckerM.BakerK.DaviesE.LemelinL., & LarinH. M. (2011, June). The WeeBot: Feasibility of a mobility option for infants. Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Quality of Life Technology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17.
FolioR. M., & FewellR. (1983). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
18.
GallowayJ. C.RyuJ., & AgrawalS. K. (2008). Babies driving robots: Independent mobility in very young infants. Journal of Intelligent Service Robotics, 1, 123–134.
19.
GrayJ. (1997). A phenomenological perspective on occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4, 5–17.
20.
GrossJ.HayneH.PerkinsN., & McDonaldB. (2006, June). Amount of crawling and walking experience has varying effects on cognitive development during infancy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the XVth Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Westin Miyako, Kyoto, Japan. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p94676_index.html
21.
GustafsonG. E. (1984). Effects of the ability to locomote on infants' social and exploratory behaviors: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 20, 397–405.
22.
HamlinJ. K.HallinanE. V., & WoodwardA. L. (2008). Do as I do: 7-month-old infants selectively reproduce others' goals. Developmental Science, 11, 487–494.
23.
HaufP.AscherslebenG., & PrinzW. (2007). Baby do-baby see! How action production influences action perception in infants. Science Direct, 22, 16–32.
24.
HendrixR. R., & ThompsonR. A. (2011). Development of self-produced locomotion in the first year: Changes in parent perceptions and infant behaviour. Infant and Child Development, 20, 288–300.
25.
IzardC. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
26.
JeannerodM. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
JohnsonS. C.SlaughterV., & CareyS. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 233–238.
28.
KermoianR., & CamposJ. J. (1988). Locomotor experience: A facilitator of spatial cognitive development. Child Development, 59, 908–917.
29.
LewisM., & MichalsonL. (1983). Children's emotions and moods. New York: Plenum Press.
30.
LuoY., & BaillargeonR. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 601–608.
31.
LynchA.RyuJ. C.AgrawalS., & GallowayJ. C. (2009). Power mobility training for a 7-month-old infant with spina bifida. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 21, 362–368.
32.
PierceD. (2000). Maternal management of the home as a developmental play space for infants and toddlers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 290–299.
33.
PierceD. (2001). Untangling occupation and activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 138–146.
34.
ShimizuY. A., & JohnsonS. C. (2004). Infants 'attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Developmental Science, 7, 425–430.
35.
SommervilleJ. A., & WoodwardA. L. (2005). Pulling out the intentional structure of human action: The relation between action production and processing in infancy. Cognition, 95, 1–30.
36.
SullivanM. W., & LewisM. (1993). Contingency, means-end skills, and the use of technology in infant intervention. Infants and Young Children, 5, 58–77.
37.
WoodwardA. L. (2009). Learning about intentional action. In WoodwardA. & NeedhamA. (Eds.), Learning and the infant mind (pp. 91–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
