The purpose of this microethnographic study is to explore ways to better understand engagement in occupation of children with autism spectrum disorder. Using video data, moments of engagement were examined in a child with autism spectrum disorder during the daily classroom activity of Circle Time. The interpretive frame focused on mediated action, the interaction between the agent, and cultural tools. Three scenes were analyzed using narrative and micro-analytic strategies. Analyses of two scenes highlighted how social and material mediators offer opportunities for engagement. Other children with autism provided appropriate scaffolds and demonstrated evidence of intersubjectivity, whereas material tools provided proximal prompts that enabled the child to engage. The third scene suggests that engagement may not always be observable (i.e., engagement may be a subjective state). Implications for practice and methodological insights are offered.
BagatellN.MiriglianiG.PattersonC.ReyesY., & TestL. (2010). The effectiveness of therapy ball chairs on classroom participation in children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 895–903.
2.
BrunerJ. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BryanL. C., & GastD. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553–567.
4.
CarnahanC.Musti-RaoS., & BaileyJ. (2009). Promoting active engagement in small group learning experiences for students with autism and significant learning needs. Education & Treatment of Children, 32, 37–61.
5.
DawsonG.RogersS.MunsonJ.SmithM.WinterJ.GreensonJ. (2009). Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: The Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics, 125, e17–e28.
6.
DonnellanA. M.LearyM., & RobledoJ. (2006). I can't get started: Stress and the role of movement differences for individuals with the autism label. In BaronM. G.GrodenJ.GrodenG., & LipsittL. (Eds.), Stress and coping in autism (pp. 205–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
EricksonF. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In LeCompteM. D.MillroyW., & PreissleJ. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201–225). New York: Academic Press.
8.
ErikssonL.WelanderJ., & GranlundM. (2007). Participation in everyday school activities for children with and without disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 485–502.
9.
FrankG., & PolkinghorneD. (2010). Qualitative research in occupational therapy: From the first to the second generation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30, 51–57.
10.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C., & ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
11.
GreenD.CharmanT.PicklesA.ChandlerS.LoucasT.SimonoffE. (2009). Impairment of movement skills of children with autistic spectrum disorders. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51, 311–316.
12.
HobsonR. P., & LeeA. (1998). Hello and goodbye: A study of social engagement in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 117–127.
13.
HumphryR. (2005). Model of process transforming occupations: Exploring societal and social influences. Journal of Occupational Science, 12, 36–41.
14.
HumphryR. (2009). Occupation and development: A contextual perspective. In CrepeauE. B.CohnE.S., & SchellB. A. B. (Eds.), Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 22–32). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
15.
HumphryR., & WakefordL. (2006). An occupation-centered discussion of development and implications for practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 258–267.
16.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.
17.
KasariC.GulsrudA. C.WongC.KwonS., & LockeJ. (2010). Randomized controlled caregiver mediated joint engagement intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1045–1056.
18.
KishidaY.KempC., & CarterM. (2008). Revision and validation of the Individual Child Engagement Record: A practitioner-friendly measure of learning opportunities for children with disabilities in early childhood settings. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33, 158–170.
19.
KoegelL.SinghA., & KoegelR. (2010). Improving motivation for academics in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1057–1066.
20.
LawlorM. C. (2003). The significance of being occupied: The social construction of childhood occupations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 424–434.
21.
LawlorM. C. (2009). Narrative, development, and engagement: Intersections in therapeutic practice. In JensenU. & MattinglyC. (Eds.), Narrative, self and social practice (pp. 72–84). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.
22.
MarcoE. J.HinkleyL. B.HillS. S., & NagarajanS. S. (2011). Sensory processing in autism: A review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatric Research, 69, 48R–54R.
23.
MattinglyC. M. (2008). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
McWilliamR., & CaseyA. M. (2007). Engagement of every child in the preschool classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
McWilliamR. A., & BaileyD. B. (1995). Effects of classroom social structure and disability on engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 123–147.
26.
McWilliamR. A., & de KruifR. E. L. (1998). E-Qual III: Children's engagement codes. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
27.
MesibovG.SheaV., & SchoplerE. (2004). The TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. New York: Springer Publishing.
28.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
ParkM. (2008). Making scenes: Imaginative practices of a child with autism in a therapy session. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 22, 234–256.
31.
PereiraE.laCourK.JonssonH., & HemmingssonH. (2010). The participation experience of children with disabilities in Portuguese mainstream schools. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73, 598–606.
32.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
RubleL. A., & RobsonD. M. (2007). Individual and environmental determinants of engagement in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1457–1468.
34.
SchillingD. L., & SchwartzI. S. (2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 423–432.
35.
VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language (HanfmannE. & VakarG., Trans. & Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
WatlingR. L., & DietzJ. (2007). Immediate effects of Ayres's Sensory Integration-based intervention on children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 574–583.
37.
WertschJ. W. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
38.
WertschJ. W. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
WimporyD. C.HobsonR. P., & NashS. (2007). What facilitates social engagement in preschool children with autism?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 564–573.
