The current study examined the relationship between two separate but complementary methods of assessing executive functions in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS): (1) a neurocognitive approach with the Tower of London−DX (TOL-DX) test and (2) a functional top-down approach with the Executive Function Performance Test (EFPT). Sixty-eight individuals with MS (79% female) and 38 healthy controls (68% female) were administered both the TOL-DX test and the EFPT. For the group with MS, significant differences were found on the TOL-DX test and the EFPT executive components and functional tasks. For the group with MS, the number of moves to complete the TOL-DX tasks was significantly positively correlated to the Organization and Sequencing executive components of the EFPT and the Simple Cooking and Bill Payment tasks of the EFPT. The results demonstrate the relationship of executive function behavior and performance of instrumental activities of daily living tasks.
AmatoM. P.PonzianiG.SiracusaG., & SorbiS. (2001). Cognitive dysfunction in early-onset multiple sclerosis: A reappraisal after 10 years. Archives of Neurology, 58, 1602–1606.
2.
BaumC., & EdwardsD. F. (1993). Cognitive performance in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type: The Kitchen Task Assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 431–436.
3.
BaumC.MorrisonT.HahnM., & EdwardsD. (2003). Test manual for the executive function performance test. St. Louis, MO: Washington University.
4.
BaumC. M.ConnorL. T.MorrisonT.HahnM.DromerickA. W., & EdwardsD. F. (2008). Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Executive Function Performance Test: A measure of executive function in a sample of people with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 446–455.
5.
BaumC. M.EdwardsD.YonanC., & StorandtM. (1995). The relation of neuropsychological test performance to performance of functional tasks in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 69–75.
6.
BeattyW. W.BlancoC. R.WilbanksS. L.PaulR. H., & HamesK. A. (1995). Demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients who continue to work. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair, 9, 167–173.
7.
BobholzJ. A., & RaoS. M. (2003). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A review of recent developments. Current Opinion in Neurology, 16, 283–288.
8.
BrassingtonJ. C., & MarshN. V. (1998). Neuropsychological aspects of multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology Review, 8, 43–77.
9.
Cahn-WeinerD. A.MalloyP. F.BoyleP. A.MarranM., & SallowayS. (2000). Prediction of functional status from neuropsychological tests in community-dwelling elderly individuals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 187–195.
10.
CallahanC. D. (2001). The assessment and rehabilitation of executive function disorders. In JohnstoneB. & StonningtonH. H. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of neurological disorders: A practical guide to rehabilitation professionals. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
11.
CarlsonM. C.FriedL. P.XueQ. L.Bandeen-RocheK.ZegerS. L., & BrandtJ. (1999). Association between executive attention and physical functional performance in community-dwelling older women. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54, S262–S270.
12.
ChiaravallotiN. D., & DeLucaJ. (2008). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurology, 7, 1139–1151.
13.
CohenJ. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
14.
CulbertsonW. C., & ZillmerE. A. (2001). The Tower of London, Drexel University, Examiner's manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
15.
DeLucaJ.CheluneG. J.TulskyD. S.LengenfelderJ., & ChiaravallotiN. D. (2004). Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis?Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 550–562.
16.
DemareeH. A.GaudinoE. A.DeLucaJ., & RickerJ. H. (2000). Learning impairment is associated with recall ability in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 865–873.
17.
DenneyD. R.SworowskiL. A., & LynchS. G. (2005). Cognitive impairment in three subtypes of multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 967–981.
18.
DobleS. E.FiskJ. D.FisherA. G.RitvoP. G., & MurrayT. J. (1994). Functional competence of community-dwelling persons with multiple sclerosis using the assessment of motor and process skills. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75, 843–851.
19.
FischerJ. S. (2001). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. In CookS. D. (Ed.), Handbook of multiple sclerosis (pp. 233–255). New York: Marcel Dekker.
20.
FogelB. S.BrockD.GoldsheiderF., & RoyallD. (1994). Cognitive dysfunction and the need for long-term care: Implications for public policy. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.
21.
FoongJ.RozewiczL.QuaghebeurG.DavieC. A.KartsounisL. D.ThompsonA. J. (1997). Executive function in multiple sclerosis: The role of frontal lobe pathology. Brain, 120, 15–26.
22.
GoveroverY. (2004). Categorization, deductive reasoning, and self-awareness: Association with everyday competence in persons with acute brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 737–749.
23.
GoveroverY., & HinojosaJ. (2002). Categorization and deductive reasoning: Predictors of instrumental activities of daily living performance in adults with brain injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 509–516.
24.
GoveroverY.KalmarJ.Gaudino-GoeringE.ShawarynM.MooreN.B.HalperJ. (2005). The relation between subjective and objective measures of everyday life activities in persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86, 2303–2308.
25.
GrafmanJ.RaoS. M., & LitvanI. (1990). Disorders of memory. In RaoS. M. (Ed.), Neurobehavioral aspects of multiple sclerosis (pp. 102–117). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
HauserS. L.DawsonD. M.LehrichJ. R.BealM. F.KevyS. V.PropperR. D. (1983). Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomized, three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH. New England Journal of Medicine, 308, 173–180.
27.
JeffersonA. L.Cahn-WeinerD.BoyleP.PaulR. H.MoserD. J.GordonN. (2006). Cognitive predictors of functional decline in vascular dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 752–754.
28.
KalmarJ. S.GaudinoE. A.MooreN. B.HalperJ., & DeLucaJ. (2008). The relationship between cognitive deficits and everyday functional activities in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 22, 442–449.
29.
KatzN.TadmorI.FelzenB., & Hartman-MaeirA. (2006). The Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) in schizophrenia and its relation to functional outcomes. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 1–14.
30.
KesslerH. R.CohenR. A.LauerK., & KauschD. F. (1992). The relationship between disability and memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Neuroscience, 62, 17–34.
31.
KibbyM. Y.Schmitter-EdgecombeM., & LongC. J. (1998). Ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: Focus on the California Verbal Learning Test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 523–534.
32.
LazeronR. H.RomboutsS. A.ScheltensP.PolmanC. H., & BarkhofF. (2004). An fMRI study of planning-related brain activity in patients with moderately advanced multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10, 549–555.
33.
McDonnellG. V., & HawkinsS. A. (2001). An assessment of the spectrum of disability and handicap in multiple sclerosis: A population-based study. Multiple Sclerosis, 7, 111–117.
34.
ParmenterB. A.ZivadinovR.KerenyiL.GavettR.Weinstock-GuttmanB.DwyerM. G. (2007). Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting and Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Sorting Tests in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 215–223.
35.
PetzoldA.EikelenboomM. J.KeirG.GrantD.LazeronR. H.PolmanC. H. (2005). Axonal damage accumulates in the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis: Three year follow up study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 76, 206–211.
36.
PhillipsL. H.KliegelM., & MartinM. (2006). Age and planning tasks: The influence of ecological validity. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 62, 175–184.
37.
PoserC. M.PatyD. W.ScheinbergL.McDonaldW. I.DavisF. A.EbersG. C. (1983). New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology, 13, 227–231.
38.
RaoS. M.LeoG. J.EllingtonL.NauertzT.BernardinL., & UnverzagtF. (1991). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II: Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology, 41, 692–696.
39.
SchultheisM. T.GarayE., & DeLucaJ. (2001). The influence of cognitive impairment on driving performance in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 56, 1089–1094.
40.
SchulzD.KoppB.KunkelA., & FaissJ. H. (2006). Cognition in the early stage of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, 253, 1002–1010.
41.
UnterrainerJ. M., & OwenA. M. (2006). Planning and problem solving: From neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. Journal of Physiology — Paris, 99, 308–317.
42.
VoelbelG. T.ChiaravallotiN., & DeLucaJ. (2007). Functional Neuroimaging in Multiple Sclerosis. In HillaryF. & DeLucaJ. (Eds.), Functional imaging clinical population. New York: Guildford Press.
