An Examination of the Construct Validity of the Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test—Third Edition (MVPT-3) Using Rasch Analysis with Adult Participants

Abstract

Visual perceptual skills of adults are often assessed by occupational therapists using standardized tests. The Motor-Free Visual Perception Test—Third Edition (MVPT-3) is a frequently used test, although its construct validity has not been thoroughly evaluated. The purpose of the study was to consider the construct validity of the MVPT-3 by evaluating its scalability/interval level measurement, unidimensionality, lack of differential item functioning (DIF), and hierarchical ordering of its items when completed by a group of adult participants. The visual perceptual performance scores from a sample of 221 participants 20 years or older (49 adults with neurological impairment and 172 adults without) were used to complete a Rasch analysis (RA) of the MVPT-3. When analyzed using RA, the MVPT-3 exhibited adequate measurement properties. However, several MVPT-3 scales exhibited RA misfit (items 40, 45, 54, 56, 61, 64) or DIF (items 57, 60, 61). The construct validity, scalability, unidimensionality, hierarchical ordering, and lack of DIF requirements were met by most (87.7%; 8 of 65 items) of the MVPT-3 scale items. When using the MVPT-3 to assess adult clients, clinicians should consider the items that exhibited RA misfit or DIF when interpreting scores.

Keywords

visual perception testing assessment validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Anastasi

, & Urbina

(1997). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Bond

T. G.

, & Fox

C. M.

(2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown

G. T.

Rodger

, & Davis

(2008). Construct validity of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test—Revised. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools & Early Intervention, 1(1), 33–60.

Brown

Mullins

, & Stagnitti

(2008). The reliability of performance of healthy adults on three visual perceptual tests. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 438–447.

Canivez

G. L.

(2005). Review of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test—3rd ed. In Spies

R. A.

& Plake

B. S.

(Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 635–638). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

Chalfant

J. C.

, & Scheffelin

M. A.

(1969). Central processing dysfunctions in children: A review of the research (Contract PH-43-67-61). Bethesda, MD: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Colarusso

R. P.

, & Hammill

D. D.

(1972). Motor-free visual perception test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

Colarusso

R. P.

, & Hammill

D. D.

(1996). Motor-free visual perception test—revised. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

10.

Colarusso

R. P.

, & Hammill

D. D.

(2003). Motor-free visual perception test—3rd ed. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

11.

Doble

S. E.

, & Fisher

A. G.

(1998). The dimensionality and validity of the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 4–24.

12.

Downing

S. M.

(2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37, 830–837.

13.

Goodwin

L. D.

(2002). Changing conceptions of measurement validity: An update on the new Standards. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 100–106.

14.

Hart

D. L.

Velozo

C. A.

Lai

J. S.

, & Dobrzykowski

E. A.

(1997). The reliability and validity of the Orthopedic Rehabilitation Outcome Scale. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, 1, 1–7.

15.

King

J. D.

(2005). Review of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test—3rd ed. In Spies

R. A.

& Plake

B. S.

(Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 638–640). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

16.

Kirkpatrick

L. A.

, & Feeney

B. C.

(2001). A simple guide to SPSS for Windows for versions 8.0, 9.0, & 10.0. Scarborough, ON: Nelson/Thomson Learning.

17.

Mallinson

Mahaffey

, & Kielhofner

(1998). The Occupational Performance History Interview: Evidence for three underlying constructs of occupational adaptation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 219–228.

18.

Messick

(1989). Validity. In Linn

R. L.

(Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–104). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.

19.

Messick

(1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.

20.

Nunnally

, & Bernstein

(1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Smith

R. M.

(1991). The distribution properties of Rasch item fit statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 541–565.

22.

Smith

R. M.

(1992). Applications of Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.

23.

Wright

B. D.

, & Linacre

J. M.

(1998). A user's guide to Bigsteps Winsteps Rasch-Model computer program. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.

24.

Wright

B. D.

, & Masters

G. N.

(1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.