The Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) (Goldberg, Brintnell, & Goldberg, 2002) demonstrated sufficient psychometric properties in a sample of 122 adults. The EMAS was found to have adequate test—retest (r = .71) and internal consistency (α = .88) reliability; significant positive correlations between the EMAS and the subscales of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale and the Sources of Meaning Profile and negative zero-order correlations were found with short form versions of the Boredom Proneness Scale and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales. Step-wise multiple regression analysis results showed the Sources of Meaning Profile, Boredom Proneness Scale, and Competence subscale of the Basic Psychological Needs scale best predicted the EMAS. These results lend additional construct validity evidence in support of the EMAS as a brief measure of meaningful activity participation.
AndrewsD.NonneckeB., & PreeceJ. (2003). Conducting research on the internet: Online survey design, development and implementation guidelines. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 185–210.
2.
AntonyM. M.BielingP. J.CoxB. J.EnnsM. W., & SwinsonR. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181.
3.
BarbaletJ. M. (1999). Boredom and social meaning. British Journal of Sociology, 50, 631–646.
4.
BeltonT., & PriyadharshiniE. (2007). Boredom and schooling: A cross-disciplinary exploration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37, 579–595.
5.
BondT. G., & FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
BrackeP.BruynoogheK., & VerhaegheM. (2006). Boredom during day activity programs in rehabilitation centers. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 191–215.
7.
CantorN., & SandersonC. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In KahnemanD.DienerE., & SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: SAGE Publications.
8.
CarlsonM. (1996). The self-perpetuation of occupations. In ZemkeR. & ClarkF. (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 143–157). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
9.
ChristiansenC. H. (1999). Defining lives: Occupation as identity: An essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 547–558.
10.
ClaraI. P.CoxB. J., & EnnsM. W. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the depression-anxiety-stress scales in depressed and anxious patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 61–67.
11.
ClarkF.ParhamD.CarlsonM. E.FrankG.JacksonJ.PierceD. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy's future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 300–310.
12.
ClarkL. A., & WatsonD. (1991). Tripartate model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.
13.
CorvinelliA. (2005). Alleviating boredom in adult males recovering from substance use disorder. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 21(2), 1–11.
14.
CorvinelliA. (2007). An emerging theory of boredom in recovery for adult substance users with HIV/AIDS attending an urban day treatment program. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 23(2), 27–49.
15.
CrabtreeJ. L. (1998). The end of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 205–214.
CrumbaughJ. C., & MaholickL. T. (1969). Manual of Instruction for the Purpose in Life Test. Munster, IN: Psychometric Affiliates.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Rowe.
19.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
20.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination theory. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
23.
DeutskensE.RuyterK. D.WetzelsM., & OosterveldP. (2004). Response-rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15, 21–36.
24.
EakmanA. M.CarlsonM. E., & ClarkF. A. (in press). Factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the engagement in meaningful activities survey for older adults. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health.
25.
EklundM.ErlandssonL.-K.PerssonD., & HagellD. (2009). Rasch analysis of an instrument for measuring occupational value: Implications for theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 118–128.
26.
FahlmanS. A.MercerK. B.GaskovskiP.EastwoodA. E., & EastwoodJ. D. (2009). Does a lack of life meaning cause boredom? Results from psychometric, longitudinal, and experimental analyses. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 307–340.
27.
FarmerR., & SundbergN. D. (1986). Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4–17.
28.
FarnsworthL. (1998). Doing, being, and boredom. Journal of Occupational Science, 5, 140–146.
29.
FergusonJ. M., & TromblyC. A. (1997). The effect of added-purpose and meaningful occupation on motor learning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 508–515.
30.
FisherA. B. (1998). Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 509–521.
31.
FranklV. E. (1959/1984). Man's search for meaning. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32.
GagneM. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.
33.
GoldbergB.BrintnellE. S., & GoldbergJ. (2002). The relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life in persons disabled by mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 18(2), 17–44.
34.
HammellK. W. (2004). Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 296–305.
35.
HarrisM. B. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of boredom proneness and boredom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 576–598.
36.
HasselkusB. R. (2002). The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
37.
HenryJ. D., & CrawfordJ. R. (2005). The short-form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.
38.
HinojosaJ., & KramerP. (1997). Fundamental concepts of occupational therapy: Occupation, purposeful activity, and function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 864–866.
39.
IkiuguM. N. (2005). Meaningfulness of occupations as an occupational-life-trajectory attractor. Journal of Occupational Science, 12, 102–109.
40.
JacksonJ.CarlsonM.MandelD.ZemkeR., & ClarkF. (1998). Occupation in lifestyle redesign: The well elderly study occupational therapy program. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 326–336.
41.
JonssonH., & JosephssonS. (2005). Occupation and meaning. In ChristiansenC. H. & BaumC. M. (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well being (pp. 116–132). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
42.
KaplowitzM. D.HadlockT. D., & LevineR. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101.
43.
KashdanT. B.JulianT.MerrittK., & UswatteG. (2006). Social anxiety and posttraumatic stress in combat veterans: Relations to well-being and character strengths. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 561–583.
44.
KassS. J.VodonovichS. J., & CallanderA. (2001). State-trait boredom: Its relationship to absenteeism, tenure and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 317–327.
45.
KaufmanE. R. (1986). The ageless self: Sources of meaning in late life. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
46.
KielhofnerG. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
47.
KingG. A. (2004). The meaning of life experiences: Application of a meta-model to rehabilitation sciences and services. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74, 72–88.
48.
KlingerE. (1977). Meaning & void. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
49.
LongC. (2004). On watching paint dry: An exploration of boredom. In MolineuxM. (Ed.), Occupation for occupational therapists (pp. 78–89). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
50.
MartinM.SadloG., & StewG. (2006). The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 193–211.
51.
McGiboneyG. W., & CarterC. (1988). Boredom proneness and adolescents' personalities. Psychological Reports, 63, 395–398.
52.
MikulasW. L., & VodonovichS. J. (1993). The essence of boredom. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 3–12.
53.
NakamuraJ., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (2005). The concept of flow. In SnyderC. R. & LopezE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of positive experience (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
NelsonD. L. (1988). Occupation: Form and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 633–641.
55.
NelsonD. L. (1996). Therapeutic occupation: A definition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 775–782.
56.
ParkC. L., & FolkmanS. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 115–144.
57.
PedhazurE. J., & SchmelkinL. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
PekrunR.GoetzT.TitzW., & PerryR. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105.
59.
PerssonD.ErlandssonL.-K.EklundM., & IwarssonS. (2001). Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation: A tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 7–18.
60.
PragerE. (1996). Exploring personal meaning in an age-differentiated Australian sample: Another look at the Sources of Meaning Profile (SOMP). Journal of Aging Studies, 10, 117–136.
61.
ReisH. T.SheldonK. M.GableS. L.RoscoeJ., & RyanR. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.
62.
RekerG. T., & WongP. T. P. (1988). Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. In BirrenJ. E.BengstonV. L. & DeutchmanD. E. (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 214–246). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
63.
RyanR. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
64.
RyffC. D., & KeyesL. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
65.
SchultzR., & HeckhausenJ. (1996). A lifespan model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 702–714.
66.
SheehanK. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review [Electronic Version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6. Retrieved May 14, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html.
67.
SilvaP. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
StaffordS. P., & GregoryW. T. (2006). Heidegger's phenomenology of boredom, and the scientific investigation of conscious experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 155–196.
69.
StreinerD. L., & NormanG. R. (2003). Health measurement scales (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
TromblyC. A. (1995). Occupation: Purposefulness and meaningfulness as therapeutic mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 960–972.
71.
UmbachP. D. (2004). Web surveys: Best practices. New Directions for Institutional Research, 121, 23–38.
72.
VodanovichS. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 137, 569–595.
73.
VodanovichS. J.WallaceJ. C., & KassS. J. (2005). A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the boredom proness scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 295–303.
74.
VodanovichS. J.WeddleC., & PiotrowskiC. (1997). The relationship between boredom proneness and internal and external work values. Social Behavior and Personality, 25, 259–264.
75.
WattJ. D., & VodanovichS. J. (1999). Boredom proneness and psychosocial development. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 303–314.
76.
WeinsteinL.XieX., & CleanthousC. C. (1995). Purpose in life, boredom, and volunteerism in a group of retirees. Psychological Reports, 76, 482.
77.
WilcockA. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 248–256.
78.
WuC.-Y.ChenS.-P., & GrossmanJ. (2000). Facilitating intrinsic motivation in clients with mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 16(1), 1–14.
79.
YerxaE. J.ClarkF.FrankG.JacksonJ.ParhamD.PierceD. (1989). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(1), 1–17.
80.
ZikaS., & ChamberlainK. (1992). On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 133–145.
81.
ZimolagU., & KrupaT. (2009). Pet ownership as a meaningful community occupation for people with serious mental illness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 126–137.
