Actions link meaning to particular places over time. This study examined how familiar places, in turn, inspired or influenced actions in the rehabilitation process for individuals who had experienced stroke. The aim of this study was to describe the meanings of actions in different places during 1 year of rehabilitation after stroke. The interview data were longitudinal and collected on four occasions during the first year after stroke (e.g., at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Seven categories emerged from the data analysis using a constant comparative method: (1) workplace in mind, (2) experiences at home enabling reflection, (3) rehabilitation setting creates uncertainty, (4) retrieving inspiration from familiar places, (5) matching the complexity of tasks across places, (6) understanding the reality by confrontation, and (7) on the way to place integration. From these themes, a core or overarching theme emerged: the desire for place integration inspires engagement in rehabilitation. The central finding in this study revealed a strong relationship between the desire to be reintegrated into familiar places, such as work and home, and motivation to engage in rehabilitation. Further, this desire for place integration was a constant driving force over the year that motivated the participants to find activities on their own that matched the task demands at their workplaces.
AlaszewskiA.AlaszewskiH.PotterJ., & PenhaleB. (2007). Working after a stroke: Survivors' experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29, 1858–1869.
2.
BeckerG. (1993). Continuity after a stroke: Implications of life-course disruption in old age. The Gerontologist, 33, 148–158.
3.
BorgJ.GerdleB.GrimbyB., & SunnerhagenStibrandt K. (2006). Rehabiliteringsmedicin, Teori och praktik [Rehabilitation Medicine: Theory and Practice]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications ACE.
5.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
6.
ChiovittiR., & PiranN. (2003). Rigour and grounded theory research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 427–435.
7.
ChristiansenC., & BaumC. (1997). Person-environment-occupational performance: A conceptual model for practice. In ChristiansenC. & BaumC. (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Enabling function and well-being (2nd ed., pp. 46–70). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
8.
CutchinM. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation to environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 303–312.
9.
DickieV.CutchinM. P., & HumphreyR. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 83–93.
10.
EriksonA.KarlssonG.BorellL., & ThamK. (2007). The lived experience of memory impairment in daily occupations after acquired brain injury. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 27, 84–94.
11.
EriksonA.KarlssonG.SöderströmM., & ThamK. (2004). A training apartment with electronic aids to daily living: Lived experiences of persons with brain damage. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 261–271.
12.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
13.
GuidettiS.AsabaE., & ThamK. (2009). Meaning of context in recapturing self-care after stroke or spinal cord injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 323–332.
14.
HamiltonT. B. (2004). Occupations and places. In ChristiansenC. H. & TownsendA. (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 173–196). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
15.
HasselkusB. R., & RosaS. A. (1997). Meaning and occupation. In ChristiansenC. H. & BaumC. M. (Eds.). Occupational therapy: Enabling function and well-being (2nd ed., pp. 364–377). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
16.
JohanssonU. (2004). Long-term outcome after brain injury: With a focus on return to work. Life satisfaction and participation. Doctoral thesis. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Umeå, Sweden.
17.
JohanssonU., & ThamK. (2006). The meaning of work after acquired brain injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 60–69.
18.
KielhofnerG. (2004). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
19.
KielhofnerG. (2008). The environment and human occupation. In KielhofnerG. (Ed.), Model of human occupation: Theory and application (4th ed., pp. 85–100). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
20.
KielhofnerG., & ForsythK. (2002). Thinking with theory: A framework for therapeutic reasoning. In KielhofnerG. (Ed.), Model of human occupation: Theory and application (3rd ed., pp. 99–113). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
21.
LawM.CooperB.StrongS.StewartD.RigbyP., & LettsL. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
22.
LawM.PolatajkoH.BaptisteS., & TownsendE. (2002). Core concepts of occupational therapy. In TownsendE. (Ed.), Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (pp. 29–56). Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications ACE.
23.
LawtonM. P. (1983). Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. The Gerontologist, 23, 349–357.
24.
LexellJ. (2007). Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injuries in Sweden. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22, 229–233.
25.
Merleau-PontyM. (2002/1945). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T., & HunglerB. P. (2001). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
28.
RowlesG. D. (1983). Place and personal identity in old age: Observations from Appalachia. Journal of Environment Psychology, 3, 299–313.
29.
RowlesG. D. (1991). Beyond performance: Being in place as a component of occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 265–271.
30.
RowlesG. D. (2009). The meaning of place as a component of self. In CrepeauE. B.CohnE. S., & SchellB. A. B. (Eds.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 80–89). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
31.
SaldanaJ. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek, CA: Almira Press.
StewartD., & LawM. (2003). The environment: Paradigms and practice in health, occupational therapy and inquiry. In LettsL.RigbyP., & StewartD. (Eds.), Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 3–15). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
34.
TeasellR. W., & KalraL. (2005). What's new in stroke rehabilitation: Back to basics. Stroke, 36, 215–217.
35.
TromblyC. A. (2002). Conceptual foundations for practice. In TromblyC. A. & RadomskiM. V. (Eds.), Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (5th ed., pp. 1–15). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
36.
von KochL.HolmqvistL. W.WottrichA. W.ThamK., & de Pedro-CuestaJ. (2000). Rehabilitation at home after stroke: A descriptive study of an individualized intervention. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, 574–583.
WottrichA. W.von KochL., & ThamK. (2007). The meaning of rehabilitation in the home environment after acute stroke from the perspective of a multiprofessional team. Physical Therapy, 87, 778–788.
