Abstract
This randomized study compared the effect of two teaching/learning methods (hands-on versus demonstration) on immediate, 15-minute, and 24/48-hour recall in 60 university students. Each student either made no-bake cookies or observed the demonstrated process. Inter-rater reliability concerning recall scores was strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = .98). Analysis of variance across all three levels of recall supported the hands-on condition (F [1,58] = 4.45, p = .039). However, only one of the three t tests (recall at 24/48 hours) comparing hands-on learning to demonstration at the three points of recall, was statistically significant (t [58] = 2.48, p = .008, with effect size d = .648). Generally, the results are consistent with occupational therapy theory, but the lack of a statistically significant difference in terms of immediate recall requires probing as to the meaningfulness of the occupational form to the particular individuals being observed. Meta-analysis of various studies investigating this important principle of occupational therapy is needed to clarify the results of this study in the context of other related studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
