Educating Supervisors of Employees with Diabetes

Abstract

The worksite presents special challenges not only for employees with diabetes, but also for their supervisors. Supervisors wonder whether certain behaviors are willful misconduct or indicative of health problems, as well as if and how to accommodate employees with diabetes to meet the needs of the employees and the company, within the law. The purpose of this research was to pilot test an innovative educational program for supervisors of employees with diabetes to benefit employees' health and diabetes control while meeting the legal requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Nine supervisors completed a 6-hour program that included innovative teaching strategies—“living the life” of a person with diabetes for 2 days and case studies to practice decision making according to the ADA. The program increased supervisors' reported self-efficacy for supervising employees with diabetes and should improve work life for employees with diabetes, ultimately decreasing employers' health care costs.

References

American Diabetes Association. (2007a). Diabetes statistics. Retrieved August 23, 2007, from http://diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics.jsp

American Diabetes Association. (2007b). Direct and indirect costs of diabetes in the United States. Retrieved August 23, 2007, from http://diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/cost-of-diabetes-in-us.jsp

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Making a difference: The business community takes on diabetes. Atlanta, GA: Author.

Detaille

S. I.

Haafkens

J. A.

van Kijk

F. J.

(2003). What employees with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus and hearing loss need to cope at work. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 29(2), 134–142.

Duke

D. J.

(2004, May/June). Diabetes in the workplace. Diabetes Self-Management, 21(3), 62, 64–66.

Fitzgerald

J. T.

Funnell

M. M.

Hess

G. E.

Barr

P. A.

Anderson

R. M.

Hiss

R. G.

(1998). The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care, 21(5), 706–710.

Fleury

(1992). The application of motivational theory to cardiovascular risk reduction. Image, 24(3), 229–239.

Franz

M. J.

(Ed.). (2003). Diabetes education and program management: A core curriculum for diabetes educators (5th ed.). Chicago: American Association of Diabetes Educators.

10.

Lavigne

J. E.

Phelps

C. E.

Mushlin

Lednar

W. M.

(2003). Reductions in individual work productivity associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics, 21(15), 1123–1134.

11.

Linnan

(2004). The future of workplace health in America. Retrieved May 12, 2008, from http://welcoa.org/contentdelivery/pdf/may_jun_04_aa.pdf

12.

Lorig

K. R.

Sobel

D. S.

Stewart

A. L.

Brown

B. W.

Bandura

Ritter

(1999). Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization. Medical Care, 37(1), 5–14.

13.

Trief

P. M.

Aquilino

Paradies

Weinstock

R. S.

(1999). Impact of the work environment on glycemic control and adaptation to diabetes. Diabetes Care, 22(4), 569–574.

14.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Prevention makes common “cents.” Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/prevention

15.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2004). Questions and answers about diabetes in the workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Retrieved August 23, 2007, from www.eeoc.gov/facts/diabetes/html

16.

Weinstock

(2003, November). Reducing health disparities: Why and how companies are making it their business. Retrieved June 1, 2005, from www.businessgrouphealth.org/pdfs/business_case_issuebrief.pdf