Case-Managed Reentry and Employment: Lessons from the Opportunity to Succeed Program

Abstract

The Opportunity to Succeed (OPTS) program was designed to reduce substance abuse relapse and criminal recidivism by providing comprehensive, case-managed reentry services to felony offenders who had drug offense histories. This article describes how a process and impact evaluation of the multisite OPTS program illuminates the importance of employment and related services for returning prisoners. The process component documented high levels of employment service utilization and referrals. The impact component—which utilized an experimental design—found that compared to probation and parole clients under routine supervision, OPTS clients had significantly higher levels of full-time employment during the first year after prison release. In turn, high levels of employment were associated with reductions in self-reported commission of person and property crimes, as well as reductions in drug dealing during a one-year follow-up period. The article highlights the evaluation findings and discusses challenges that may be encountered in providing employment services, and suggests avenues that should be considered to enhance reentry success.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

A. J.

, & Shipley

(1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.

Bradburn

N. M.

(1996). Temporal representation and event dating. Paper presented in Conference on the Science of Self-Report, Implications for Research and Practice. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.

Bushway

S. D.

(1996). The impact of a criminal history record on access to legitimate employment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

Bushway

, & Reuter

(2001). Labor markets and crime. In Wilson

& Petersilia

(Eds.), Crime: Public policies for crime control (pp. 191–225). Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

Chaiken

J. M.

, & Chaiken

M. R.

(1982). Varieties of criminal behavior. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.

Cloward

, & Ohlin

L. E.

(1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York: Free Press.

Cohen

A. K.

(1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Crutchfield

, & Pitchford

S. R.

(1997). Work and crime: The effects of labor stratification. Social Forces 76 (1), 93–118.

10.

Fagan

, & Freeman

R. B.

(1999). Crime and work. In Tonry

(Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, (pp. 113–178). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Farrington

D. P.

Gallagher

Morley

St. Ledger

R. J.

, & West

D. J.

(1986). Unemployment, school leaving, and crime. British Journal of Criminology 6, 335–356.

12.

Freedman

Thorton

Camburn

Alwin

, & Young-Marco

(1988). The life-history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37–68.

13.

Gottfredson

, & Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Holzer

H. J.

(1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

15.

Horney

Osgood

D.W.

, & Marshall

I.H.

(1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review 60, 655–673.

16.

Inciardi

Lockwood

, & Quinlan

J.A.

(1993). Drug use in prisons: Patterns, processes, and implications for treatment. The Journal of Drug Issues 23 (1), 119–129.

17.

Joreskog

K.G.

, & Sorbom

(1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

18.

Kling

J. R.

(2000). The effect of prison sentence length on the subsequent employment and earnings of criminal defendants. Unpublished manuscript. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

19.

Langan

P. A.

, & Levin

D. J.

(2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (NCJ 193427)

20.

Lemert

(1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Needels

(1996). Go directly to jail and do not collect? A long-term study of recidivism, employment, and earnings patterns among prison releasees. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency 33, 471–496.

22.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Rossman

Gouvis

Buck

, & Morley

(1999). Confronting relapse and recidivism: Case management and aftercare services in the OPTS program. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

24.

Rossman

Sridharan

Gouvis

Buck

, & Morley

(1999). Impact of the Opportunity to Succeed (OPTS) aftercare program for substance-abusing felons: Comprehensive final report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

25.

Sampson

, & Laub

(1993). Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Sampson

R. J.

, & Wilson

W. J.

(1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In Hagan

& Peterson

(Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–54). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

27.

Thornberry

, & Christenson

R. L.

(1984). Unemployment and criminal involvement: An investigation of reciprocal causal structures. American Sociological Review 56, 609–627.

28.

Travis

, & Lawrence

(2002). Beyond the prison gates: The state of parole in America. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.

29.

Uggen

, & Thompson

(2003). The socioeconomic determinants of ill-gotten gains: Within-person changes in drug use and illegal earnings. American Journal of Sociology 109, 146–185.