Over the past decade, women have accounted for an increasing proportion of arrestees, probationers, and prison inmates. The growing number of women in the criminal justice system, and their unique characteristics and needs, has prompted a call for correctional programs to be more gender responsive and gender specific. Furthermore, gender has frequently been identified as a correlate of recidivism in correctional populations, yet due to relatively small sample sizes, conclusions and analytic methods have been somewhat limited. Using data collected from a sample of adult probationers discharged from supervision in Illinois, the current study examined the factors that predict recidivism for men and women, including variables such as demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, offense types, and sentence conditions. Results showed that a number of factors were associated with the recidivism of both male and female offenders, whereas others were associated with recidivism in one group or the other. The implications of these findings are that female probationer recidivism appears to be influenced by some different factors. Females may respond better to certain types of probation services, and they may also be overclassified in terms of risk.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BelknapJ. (1996). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
BelknapJ., & HolsingerK. (1998). An overview of delinquent girls: How theory and practice have failed and the need for innovative changes. In ZaplinR. T. (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 31–64). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
3.
BloomB.BrownM., & Chesney-LindM. (1996). Women on probation and parole. In LurigioA. J. (Ed.), Community corrections in America: New directions and sounder investments for persons with mental illness and codisorders (pp. 60–76). Seattle, WA: National Coalition for Mental and Substance Abuse Health Care in the Justice System.
4.
BloomB., & Chesney-LindM. (2002). Women in prison: Vengeful equality. In MuraskinR. (Ed.), It's a crime: Women and justice (pp. 3–11). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BonczarT. (1997, December). Characteristics of adults on probation, 1995. Bureau of Justice Statistics special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998). Correctional populations in the United States, 1995. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Correctional populations in the United States, 1996. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Chesney-LindM., & BloomB. (1997). Feminist criminology: Thinking about women and crime. In MacleanB. & MilovanovicD. (Eds.), Thinking critically about crime (pp. 54–65). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Collective Press.
9.
CovingtonS. (1998). Women in prison: Approaches in the treatment of our most invisible population. In HardenJ. & HillM. (Eds.), Breaking the rules (pp. 141–155). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
10.
ErezE. (1989). Gender, rehabilitation, and probation decisions. Criminology, 27, 307–327.
11.
FortuneE., & BalbachM. (1992). Project Met: A community-based educational program for women offenders. In MoyerI. (Ed.), The changing roles of women in the criminal justice system (pp. 61–75). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
12.
HepburnJ. R., & AlbonettiC. A. (1994). Recidivism among drug offenders: A survival analysis of the effect of offender characteristics, types of offense, and two types of intervention. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10 (2), 159–179.
13.
KleinD. (1995). The etiology of female crime: A review of the literature. In PriceB. R. & SokoloffN. J. (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women (pp. 30–53). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
KlosakJ. M. (1999). The course of their lives: Female offenders on probation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
15.
MaltzM. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The declining significance of significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(4), 434–463.
16.
MaxwellS. R.BynumT.GrayM. K., & CombsT. (2000). Examining probationer recidivism in Michigan. Corrections Compendium, 25 (12), 1–4, 18–19.
17.
McCordJ. (1993). Descriptions and predictions: Three problems for the future of criminological research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 412–425.
18.
MorashM.BynumT. S., & KoonsB. A. (1998). Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
19.
MorganK. (1993). Factors influencing probation outcome: A review of the literature. Federal Probation, 57, 23–29.
20.
MuraskinR. (2002a). Ain't I a women (3rd Ed.). In MuraskinR. (Ed.), It's a crime: Women and justice. (pp. 3–11). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
MuraskinR. (2002b). It's a crime: Women and justice (3rd Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1998). CASA studies show alcohol and drugs implicated in crimes of 80% of men and women in prison (Press release). New York: Columbia University.
23.
OlsonD.AdamsS., & AdkinsR. (2001). Results from the 2000 Illinois probation outcome study. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
24.
OlsonD. & LurigioA. (2000). Predicting probation outcomes: Factors associated with probation rearrest, revocations, and technical violations during supervision. Justice Research and Policy, 2 (1), 73–86.
25.
OlsonD.LurigioA., & SengM. (2000). A comparison of female and male probationers: Characteristics and case outcomes. Women and Criminal Justice, 11 (4), 65–80.
26.
PetersiliaJ. (1997). Probation in the United States. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 149–200). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
RafterN. (1990). Partial justice: Women, prisons and social control. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
28.
RitchieB.E. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 368–389.
29.
SimonR. & LandisJ. (1991). The crimes women commit, the punishments they receive. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
30.
SimonR. & SharmaN. (1979). The female defendant in Washington D.C.: 1974 and 1975. Washington, DC: Institute for Law and Social Research.
31.
SimsB. & JonesM. (1997). Predicting success or failure on probation: Factors associated with felony probation outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 314–327.
32.
SmartC. (1976). Women, crime, and criminology: A feminist critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33.
SnellT., & MortonD. (1994). Women in prison. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
34.
SpohnC. & BeichnerD. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multistate study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 2, 149–184.
35.
SteffensmeierD. (1993). National trends in female arrests, 1960–1990: Assessment and recommendations for research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 411–441.
36.
United States Department of Justice. (1996). Uniform crime reports 1960–1995. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
