The Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey is a comparative organizational research platform from which studies of police organizational structures can be launched. This article briefly describes the survey and its origin, discusses its capacity to provide measures of organizational dimensions, and considers how the survey results can best be used to increase our understanding of police organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlauP. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review35 (2), 201–218.
2.
BlauP., & SchoenherrR. (1971). The structure of organizations. New York: Basic Books.
3.
HeaphyJ. (Ed.). (1978). Police practices: The general administrative survey, Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.
4.
HogueC. (2002, March 22). E-mail to author.
5.
KingW. (1997). LEMAS: What's up with that? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.
6.
LangworthyR. (1986). The structure of police organizations. NewYork: Praeger.
7.
MaguireE. (1997). Structural change in large municipal police organizations during the community policing era. Justice Quarterly14 (3), 547–576.
8.
MaguireE. (forthcoming). Organizational structure in American police agencies: Context, complexity and control. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9.
MaguireE.SnipesJ.UchidaC., & TownsendM. (1998). Counting cops: Estimating the number of police departments and police officers in the United States. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management21 (1), 97–120.
10.
MaguireE., & ZhaoJ. (1998). 1998 survey of large municipal police agencies. Omaha, NE: Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
11.
MaguireE., & UchidaC. (2000). Measurement and explanation in the comparative study of American police organizations. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 4. Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 491–557). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
12.
OstromE.ParksR., & WhitakerG. (1978). Police agency size: Some evidence on its effects. Police Studies1 (1), 34–46.
13.
Police Executive Research Forum. (1981). Survey of police operational and administrative practices, 1981, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
14.
UchidaC.BridgeforthC., & WellfordC. (1984). Law enforcement statistics: The state of the art. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of Maryland.
15.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996). Law enforcement management and administrative statistics, 1990. Codebook to accompany ICPSR 9749. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
16.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Law enforcement management and administrative statistics, 1987. Codebook to accompany ICPSR 9222. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
17.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998a). Directory of law enforcement agencies, 1992. Codebook to accompany ICPSR 2266. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
18.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998b). Directory of law enforcement agencies, 1996. Codebook to accompany ICPSR 2260. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
19.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Law enforcement management and administrative statistics (LEMAS): 1997 sample survey of law enforcement agencies. Codebook to accompany ICPSR 2700. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
20.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Directory of law enforcement agencies, 1986. Codebook to accompany ICPSR 8696. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
21.
WalkerS., & KatzC. (1995). Less than meets the eye: Police department bias-crime units. American Journal of Police16 (1), 29–48.
22.
WeisburdD., & LumC. (2001). Translating research into practice: Reflections on the diffusion of crime mapping innovation. Keynote address at the Fifth Annual International Crime Mapping Research Conference, Dallas, TX. Available online at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/cmrc/conferences/01conf/Papers.html.
