In response to widespread allegations of racial and ethnic discrimination in traffic stops, a practice that has been labeled “racial profiling,” law enforcement agencies are now collecting data on traffic stops that include the race or ethnicity of drivers. Interpreting these data to determine whether a pattern of race discrimination exists poses enormous difficulties. Specifically, it is not clear what baseline (often referred to as “the denominator”) should be used to assess the racial and ethnic distribution of people stopped. Using the first traffic stop data reports from the San Jose Police Department as a case study, this paper examines baselines that are commonly used or discussed as appropriate. The paper argues that resident population data and/or official crime data are not adequate as baselines. As an alternative, the paper proposes an approach based on police early warning systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpertG. (1997). Police pursuit: Policies and training. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2.
AlpertG. (2001). Traffic stop data study: Miami-Dade, Florida. In progress.
3.
AlpertG., & WalkerS. (2000). Police accountability and early warning systems: Developing policies and programs. Justice Research and Policy, 2 (2), 59–72.
4.
American Civil Liberties Union. (1999). Driving while black. New York: Author.
5.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2000, May 18). Pittsburgh police chief calls traffic-stop data emerging “national standard.” [Online.] Available: www.aclu.org, News.
6.
Amnesty International. (1998). Rights for all. London: Author.
7.
BachmanJ.G.JohnstonL. D., & O'MalleyP. M. (1988). Monitoring the future: Questionnaire responses from the nation's high school seniors. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
8.
BennettW. J.DiIulioJ. J., & WaltersJ. P. (1996). Body count. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9.
BlackD. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
10.
BlumsteinA. (1982). On the racial disproportionality of United States' prison populations. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73 (3), 1259–1281.
11.
BrattonW., & KnoblachP. (1998). Turnaround. New York: Random House.
12.
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1996). National assessment of structured sentencing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 1998. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Contacts between police and the public: Findings from the 1999 national survey. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
BushG. (2001, February 28). Racial profiling. Memorandum for the Attorney General. U.S. Newswire.
17.
Center on Constitutional Rights. (1997). Proceedings of the National Emergency Conference on Police Brutality and Misconduct. New York: Center on Constitutional Rights.
18.
Christopher Commission. (1991). Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. Los Angeles: Author.
19.
ClintonB. (1999). Fairness in law enforcement: Collection of data. Washington, DC: The White House.
20.
CohenJ. D.LennonJ., & WassermanR. (2000). Eliminating racial profiling: A third way approach. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
21.
ColeD. (1999). No equal justice. New York: New Press.
22.
Cops rap veto of traffic-stop tally. (1999, September 30). San Francisco Chronicle, p. 15.
23.
DavisK. (1975). Police discretion. St. Paul: West.
24.
FaganJ., & DaviesG. (2000). Street stops and broken windows: Terry, race and disorder in New York City. Fordham Urban Law Journal, XXVIII (December), 457–504.
25.
FyfeJ. (1979). Administrative interventions on police shooting discretion: An empirical examination. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7 (Winter), 309–323.
26.
FyfeJ. J.GreeneJ. R.WalshW. F.WilsonO. W., & McLarenR. C. (1997). Police administration, 5th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Gallup News Service. (1999). Racial profiling is seen as widespread, particularly among young black men. Princeton, NJ: Author.
28.
GardinerJ. (1969). Traffic and the police. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29.
GellerW. A., & ScottM. (1992). Deadly force: What we know. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
30.
GoldbergJ. (1999, June 20). The color of suspicion. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 51ff.
31.
HarrisD. (1997). “Driving while black” and all other traffic offenses: The Supreme Court and pretextual traffic stops. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87 (2), 544–582.
32.
HarrisD. (1999). The stories, the statistics, and the law: Why “driving while black” matters. Minnesota Law Review, 84 (December), 265–326.
33.
HindelangM. (1978). Race and involvement in common law personal crimes. American Sociological Review, 43 (February), 93–109.
34.
Home Office. (2000). Profiling populations available for stops and searches. [Police Research Series, Paper 131.] London: Home Office.
35.
Human Rights Watch. (1998). Shielded from justice. New York: Human Rights Watch.
36.
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1989). Building integrity and reducing drug corruption in police departments. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
JohnstonL. D.BachmanJ. G., & O'MalleyP. M. (1997). Monitoring the future: Questionnaire responses from the nation's high school seniors. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
38.
Kansas City police go after their “bad boys.” (1991, September 10). New York Times, p. 1.
39.
KatzC. (1997). Police and gangs: A study of a police gang unit. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
40.
KennedyR. (1997). Race, crime, and the law. New York: Vintage Books.
41.
KnepperP. (1996). Race, racism and crime statistics. Southern University Law Review, 24 (Fall), 71–112.
42.
LamberthJ. (2000). Statistical report. [Online.] Available: www.aclu.org, In the Courts.
43.
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. (2000). Justice on trial: Racial disparities in the American criminal justice system. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
LempertR. (1984). From the editor. Law and Society Review, 18 (4), 505–513.
45.
LempertR. (1989). Humility as a virtue: On the publicization of policy-relevant research. Law and Society Review, 23 (1), 145–161.
46.
LeoR. A., & ThomasG. C.III. (1998). The Miranda debate. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
47.
MaclinT. (1998). Race and the fourth amendment. Vanderbilt Law Review, 51 (March), 333–393.
48.
MannC. R. (1993). Unequal justice. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
49.
MastrofskiS. D.ParksR. B.ReissA. J.Jr.WordenR. E.DeJongC.SnipesJ. B., & TerrillW. (1998). Systematic observation of public police: Applying field research methods to policy issues. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
MeeksK. (2000). Driving while black. New York: Broadway Books.
51.
MillerJ. (1996). Search and destroy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
National Advisory Commission. (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New York: Bantam Books.
53.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1998). Nationwide survey regarding speeding and other unsafe driving actions. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
54.
National Research Council. (1989). A common destiny: Blacks and American society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OaksD. (1970). Studying the exclusionary rule in search and seizure. University of Chicago Law Review, 37 (Summer), 665–757.
57.
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (1999). Police department information systems technology enhancement project. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58.
Police Executive Research Forum. (1981). Survey of police operational and administrative practices. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
Police Executive Research Forum. (2001). Traffic stop policies and practices: Report and recommendations. Washington, DC: Author. Forthcoming.
60.
Police identities a sticking point in racial-profile study of drivers. (2000, October 2). Providence Journal, p. 27.
61.
Racial profiling ban lauded. (1999, September 21). Omaha World Herald, p. 9.
62.
RamirezD.McDevittJ., & FarrellA. (2000). A resource guide on racial profiling data collection systems: Promising practices and lessons learned. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
63.
ReissA. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven: Yale University Press.
64.
RussellK. (1998). The color of crime. New York: New York University Press.
65.
Sacramento Police Department. (2000). Data collection project. [Online] Available: www.sacpd.org.
66.
San Diego Police Department. (2000). Vehicle stop study mid-year report. San Diego: Author.
67.
San Jose Police Department. (1999). Vehicle stop demographic study: First report. San Jose: Author.
68.
San Jose Police Department. (2000). Vehicle stop demographic study: Second report. San Jose: Author.
69.
ScullyR. T. (1999, May 3). Alleged race profiling by police exaggerated. Omaha World Herald, p. 17.
70.
Sentencing Project. (1995). Young black Americans and the criminal justice system: Five years later. Washington, DC: Author.
71.
SheltonH. (1999, May 12). Testimony for the NAACP, House Judiciary Committee.
72.
ShermanL. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence. New York: Free Press.
73.
ShermanL. W., & CohnE. (1989). The impact of research on legal policy: The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Law And Society Review, 23, (1), 117–144.
74.
ShermanL. W.ShawJ. W., & RoganD. P. (1995). The Kansas City gun experiment. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
75.
SilvermanE. (1999). NYPD battles crime. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
76.
SkolnickJ. H. (1994). Justice without trial (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
77.
SmithD. A.VisherC. A., & DavidsonL. A. (1984). Equity and discretionary justice: The influence of race on police arrest decisions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75 (Spring), 234–249.
78.
SpitzerE. (1999). The New York City police department's “stop and frisk” practices. New York: Attorney General of New York.
79.
SuffettD. (1966). Bail setting: A study of courtroom interaction. Crime and Delinquency, 12, 318–331.
80.
TaylorJ., & WhitneyG. (1999). Crime and racial profiling by U.S. police: Is there an empirical basis?Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 24 (4), 485–510.
81.
ThompsonA. C. (1999). Stopping the usual suspects: Race and the fourth amendment. New York University Law School, 74 (October), 956–1013.
82.
TorresD. A. (1987). Handbook of state police: Highway patrols, and investigative agencies. New York: Greenwood Press.
83.
Traffic Stops Statistics Study Act of 1999. H. R. 1443. (1999).
84.
Trenton charges 2 troopers with faking drivers' race. (1999, April 29). New York Times, p. 27.
85.
UlmerJ. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
86.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1981). Who is guarding the guardians?Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
87.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2000). Revisiting who is guarding the guardians: A report on police practices and civil rights in America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
88.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000). Racial profiling: Limited data available on motorist stops [GAO/GGD-00-41]. Washington, DC: Author.
89.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1997). Police integrity: Public service with honor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
90.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Principles for promoting police integrity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
91.
United States v. City of Pittsburgh. (W. D. Pa., 1997).
92.
United States v. New Jersey. (1999).
93.
VernieroP. (1999). Interim report of the state police review team regarding allegations of racial profiling. Trenton: Attorney General of New Jersey.
94.
WalkerS. (1993). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
95.
WalkerS. (1997). Complaints against the police: A focus group study of citizen perceptions, goals, and expectations. Criminal Justice Review, 22 (Autumn), 207–225.
96.
WalkerS. (2000). Police interactions with racial and ethnic minorities. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
97.
WalkerS. (2001). Sense and nonsense about crime (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
98.
WalkerS., & AlpertG. (2000). Early warning systems: Concept, history, and issues [IQ Service Report, No. 8, August]. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
99.
WalkerS.AlpertG., & KenneyD. (2000). Responding to the problem police officer: A national evaluation of early warning systems. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.
100.
WalkerS.SpohnC., & DeLoneM. (2000). The color of justice [2nd ed.]. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
101.
Wave of abuse laid to a few officers. (1992, October 4). Boston Globe, p. 1.
102.
WeisburdD.GreenspanR.HamiltonE. E.WilliamsH., & BryantK. A. (2000). Police attitudes toward abuse of authority: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
103.
WestleyW. A. (1970). Violence and the police. Cambridge: MIT Press.
104.
WilbanksW. (1987). The myth of a racist criminal justice system. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
105.
WilsonJ. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
106.
WilsonO. W. & McLarenR. C. (1977). Police administration [4th ed.]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
107.
ZingraffM. (2001). Traffic stop data study: North Carolina state police. In progress.
