This study focused on the immediate justice system response to violent youths in juvenile versus adult court. We examined 557 violent young offenders from Pennsylvania, of whom 138 were judicially waived to adult court and 419 were retained in juvenile court. Statistical analyses revealed that the transferred youths were more likely to be released from secure custody prior to a final disposition of their charges. Of those offenders who were released, the transferred youths also were more likely to recidivate and exhibited more serious predispositional recidivism than did the retained juveniles. These findings suggest the presence of an initial “custody gap” for violent youths waived to the adult criminal system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichJ. H., & NelsonF. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-045). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
BachmanR., & PaternosterR. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
BarnesC. W., & FranzR. S. (1989). Questionably adult: Determinants and effects of the juvenile waiver decision. Justice Quarterly, 6 (1), 117–135.
4.
BernardT. J. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BishopD. M. (2000). Juvenile offenders in the adult criminal justice system. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 81–167). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E., & HenrettaJ. C. (1989). Prosecutorial waiver: Case study of a questionable reform. Crime & Delinquency, 35 (2), 179–201.
7.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E.Lanza-KaduceL., & WinnerL. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference?Crime & Delinquency, 42 (2), 171–191.
8.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.MartinS. E., & TonryM. (1983). Research on sentencing: The search for reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.RothJ., & VisherC. (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals.”Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
BortnerM. A. (1986). Traditional rhetoric, organizational realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court. Crime & Delinquency, 32 (1), 53–73.
11.
BortnerM. A., & ReedW. L. (1985). The preeminence of process: An example of refocused justice research. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 413–425.
12.
ButtsJ. A. (1997). Necessarily relative: Is juvenile justice speedy enough?Crime & Delinquency, 43 (1), 3–23.
13.
CampbellD. T., & StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In GageN. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1–76). Chicago: Rand McNally.
14.
ChampionD. J. (1989). Teenage felons and waiver hearings: Some recent trends, 1980–1988. Crime & Delinquency, 35 (4), 577–585.
15.
ClarkeE. E. (1996). A case for reinventing juvenile transfer. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 47, 3–22.
16.
ClarkeS. H., & KochG. G. (1980). Juvenile court: Therapy or crime control, and do lawyers make a difference?Law and Society Review, 14, 263–308.
17.
ClemmentM. J. (1997). A five-year study of juvenile waiver and adult sentences: Implications for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 8 (2 & 3), 201–219.
18.
CookT. D., & CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
19.
Crimes Code of Pennsylvania, 18 PA C.S. Sec. 2301 (2000). Binghamton, NY: Gould Publications.
20.
DanneferD. (1984). Who signs the complaint? Relation distance and the juvenile justice process. Law and Society Review, 18, 249–271.
21.
DeFrancesC. J., & StromK. J. (1997). Juveniles prosecuted in state criminal courts (Report No. NCJ-164265). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics/Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
EigenJ. P. (1981a). The determinants and impact of jurisdictional transfer in Philadelphia. In HallJ. C.HamparianD. M.PettiboneJ. M., & WhiteJ. L. (Eds.), Major issues in juvenile justice information and training: Readings in public policy (pp. 333–350). Columbus, OH: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
23.
EigenJ. P. (1981b). Punishing youth homicide offenders in Philadelphia. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72 (3), 1072–1093.
24.
EmersonR. (1981). On last resorts. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1–22.
25.
EmpeyL. T.StaffordM. C., & HayC. H. (1999). American delinquency: Its meaning and construction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26.
FaganJ. (1990). Social and legal policy dimensions of violent juvenile crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17 (1), 93–133.
27.
FaganJ. (1995). Separating the men from the boys: The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. In HowellJ. C.KrisbergB.HawkinsJ. D., & WilsonJ. J. (Eds.), A sourcebook: Serious, violent, & chronic juvenile offenders (pp. 238–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
FaganJ., & DeschenesE. P. (1990). Determinants of judicial waiver decisions for violent juvenile offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81 (2), 314–347.
29.
FaganJ.ForstM., & VivonaT. S. (1987). Racial determinants of the judicial transfer decision: Prosecuting violent youth in criminal court. Crime & Delinquency, 33 (2), 259–286.
30.
FaganJ., & GuggenheimM. (1996). Preventive detention and the judicial prediction of dangerousness for juveniles: A natural experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology86 (2), 415–448.
31.
FarringtonD. P. (1986). Age and crime. In TonryM., & MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
FarringtonD. P. (1998). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. In TonryM., & MooreM. H. (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 24, pp. 421–475). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
FeilerS. M., & SheleyJ. F. (1999). Legal and racial elements of public willingness to transfer juvenile offenders to adult court. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27 (1), 55–64.
34.
FeldB. C. (1987). The juvenile court meets the principle of the offense: Legislative changes in juvenile waiver statutes. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78 (3), 471–533.
35.
FeldB. C. (1988). In re Gault revisited: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 34, 393–424.
36.
FeldB. C. (1989). Bad law makes hard cases: Reflections on teen-aged axe-murderers, judicial activism, and legislative default. Journal of Law and Inequality, 8 (1), 1–101.
37.
FeldB. C. (1993). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 197–280). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
FlahertyM. (1980). An assessment of the incidence of juvenile suicide in adult jails, lock-ups, and juvenile detention centers. Champaign, IL: Community Research Forum.
39.
ForstM.FaganJ., & VivonaT. S. (1989). Youths in prisons and training schools: Perceptions and consequences of the treatment-custody dichotomy. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 40, 1–14.
40.
ForstM. L., & BlomquistM. E. (1991). Cracking down on juveniles: The changing ideology of youth corrections. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 5, 323–375.
41.
FrazierC. E., & BishopD. M. (1995). Reflections on race effects in juvenile justice. In LeonardK. K.PopeC. E., & FeyerhermW. H. (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 16–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
FrazierC. E., & CochranJ. C. (1986). Detention of juveniles: Its effects on subsequent juvenile court processing decisions. Youth and Society, 17, 286–305.
43.
FritschE., & HemmensC. (1995). Juvenile waiver in the United States 1979–1995: A comparison and analysis of state waiver statutes. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46, 17–35.
44.
GillespieL. K., & NormanM. D. (1984). Does certification mean prison: Some preliminary findings from Utah. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 35, 23–34.
45.
GriffinP.TorbetP., & SzymanskiL. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions (Report No. NCJ-172836). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
46.
HamparianD.EstepL. K.MunteanS. M.PrestinoR.SwisherR. G.WallaceP. L., & WhiteJ. L. (1982). Youth in adult court: Between two worlds. Columbus, OH: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
47.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
HoughtalinM., & MaysG. L. (1991). Criminal dispositions of New Mexico juveniles transferred to adult court. Crime & Delinquency, 37 (3), 393–407.
49.
HowellJ. C. (1996). Juvenile transfers to the criminal justice system: State of the art. Law & Policy, 18 (1 & 2), 17–60.
50.
HowellJ. C. (1997). Juvenile justice and youth violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
JensenE. J., & MetsgerL. K. (1994). A test of the deterrent effect of legislative waiver on violent juvenile crime. Crime & Delinquency, 40 (1), 96–104.
52.
KinderK.VenezianoC.FichterM., & AzumaH. (1995). A comparison of the dispositions of juvenile offenders certified as adults with juvenile offenders not certified. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46, 37–42.
53.
MeddisS. V. (1993, October 29). Poll: Treat juveniles the same as adult offenders. USA Today, pp. A1, A11.
54.
MenardS. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
MyersD. L. (1997, March). Excluding juvenile offenders from juvenile court: The effects of Pennsylvania's recent legislation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Louisville, KY.
56.
MyersD. L. (2001). Excluding violent youths from juvenile court: The effectiveness of legislative waiver. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
57.
NeterJ.WassermanW., & KutnerM. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models (2nd ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
58.
PaternosterR., & IovanniL. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6 (3), 359–394.
59.
Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges' Commission. (1992). The Juvenile Act. 42 PA C.S. Sec. 6301 et seq. Harrisburg, PA: Juvenile Court Judges' Commission.
60.
Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges' Commission. (1996). The Juvenile Act. 42 PA C.S. Sec. 6301 et seq. Harrisburg, PA: Juvenile Court Judges' Commission.
61.
PodkopaczM. R., & FeldB. C. (1995). Judicial waiver policy and practice: Persistence, seriousness and race. Journal of Law and Inequality, 14 (1), 73–178.
62.
PodkopaczM. R., & FeldB. C. (1996). The end of the line: An empirical study of judicial waiver. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86 (2), 449–492.
63.
PoulosT. M., & OrchowskyS. (1994). Serious juvenile offenders: Predicting the probability of transfer to criminal court. Crime & Delinquency, 40 (1), 3–17.
64.
ReddingtonF. P., & SappA. D. (1997). Juveniles in adult prisons: Problems and prospects. Journal of Crime and Justice, 20 (2), 139–152.
65.
RoyscherM., & EdelmanP. (1981). Treating juveniles as adults in New York: What does it mean and how is it working? In HallJ. C.HamparianD. M.PettiboneJ. M., & WhiteJ. L. (Eds.), Major issues in juvenile justice information and training: Readings in public policy (pp. 265–293). Columbus, OH: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
66.
RudmanC.HartstoneE.FaganJ., & MooreM. (1986). Violent youth in adult court: Process and punishment. Crime & Delinquency, 32 (1), 75–96.
67.
SagatunI.McCollumL. L., & EdwardsL. (1985). The effect of transfers from juvenile to criminal court: A loglinear analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 8, 65–92.
68.
SampsonR. J. (1986). Effects of socioeconomic context on official reaction to juvenile delinquency. American Sociological Review, 51, 876–885.
69.
SchwartzI. M.GuoS., & KerbsJ. J. (1993). The impact of demographic variables on public opinion regarding juvenile justice: Implications for public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 39 (1), 5–28.
70.
ShermanL. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30 (4), 445–473.
71.
SickmundM.SnyderH. N., & Poe-YamagataE. (1997). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1997 update on violence (Report No. NCJ-165703). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
72.
SingerS. I. (1993). The automatic waiver of juveniles and substantive justice. Crime & Delinquency, 39 (2), 253–261.
73.
SingerS. I. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SingerS. I., & McDowallD. (1988). Criminalizing delinquency: The deterrent effects of the New York juvenile offender law. Law and Society Review, 22 (3), 521–535.
75.
SmithD. A., & PaternosterR. (1990). Formal processing and future delinquency: Deviance amplification as a selection artifact. Law and Society Review, 24 (5), 1109–1131.
76.
SnyderH. N., & SickmundM. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 National Report (Report No. NCJ-178257). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
77.
SprottJ. B. (1998). Understanding public opposition to a separate youth justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 44 (3), 399–411.
78.
StromK. J.SmithS. K., & SnyderH. N. (1998). Juvenile felony defendants in criminal courts (Report No. NCJ-165815). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics/Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
79.
ThomasC. W., & BilchikS. (1985). Prosecuting juveniles in criminal courts: A legal and empirical analysis. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76 (2), 439–479.
80.
TorbetP.GableR.HurstH. I.MontgomeryI.SzymanskiL., & ThomasD. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime (Report No. NCJ-161565). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
81.
WinnerL.Lanza-KaduceL.BishopD. M., & FrazierC. E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime & Delinquency, 43 (4), 548–563.
82.
WolfgangM.FiglioR., & SellinT. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
WolfgangM.ThornberryT., & FiglioR. (1987). From boy to man: From delinquency to crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84.
WordesM., & BynumT. S. (1995). Policing juveniles: Is there bias against youths of color? In LeonardK. K.PopeC. E., & FeyerhermW. H. (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 47–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
