AndrewsD. A., & BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16, 39–55.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithS. J.GuzzoL.BrewsA.RettingerJ., & RoweR. (2011). Sources of variability in estimates of predictive validity: A specification with Level of Service general risk and need. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 413–432. doi: 10.1177/0093854811401990
3.
AndrewsD. A., & DowdenC. (2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of program integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173–187.
4.
AndrewsD. A., & DowdenC. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88–100.
5.
AndrewsD. A.ZingerI.HogeR. D.BontaJ.GendreauP., & CullenF. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404.
6.
BontaJ., & AndrewsD. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and treatment (Corrections User Report 2007–06). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
7.
DowdenC., & AndrewsD. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214.
8.
FixsenD.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M., & WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication #231). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
9.
HaasS. M., & DeTardo-BoraK. A. (2009, Spring). Inmate reentry and the utility of the LSI-R in case planning. Corrections Compendium, 11–16, 49–52.
10.
HaasS. M.HamiltonC. A., & HanleyD. (2005, March). The impact of correctional orientation on support for the offender reentry initiative. Charleston, WV: Mountain State Criminal Justice Research Services.
11.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E., & QuinseyV. L. (2009). Allegiance or fidelity: A clarifying reply. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 82–89.
12.
LatessaE. (2004). The challenge of change: Correctional programs and evidence-based practices. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(4), 547–560.
13.
LipseyM. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147. doi: 10.1080/15564880802612573
14.
LipseyM., & LandenbergerN. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral programs for juvenile and adult offenders: A meta-analysis of controlled intervention studies. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.
15.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J., & HolsingerA. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 corrections programs?Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93.
16.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J., & SmithP. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00388.x
17.
LowenkampC. T.PealerJ.SmithP., & LatessaE. J. (2006). Adhearing to the risk and need principles: Does it matter for supervision-based programs?Federal Probation, 70(3), 3–8.
18.
McMurranM. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 83–100.
19.
PearsonF. S.LiptonD. S.ClelandC. M., & YeeD. S. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 48(3), 476–496.
20.
PetrosinoA., & SoydanH. (2005). The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism: Results from meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 435–450.
21.
PrzybylskiR. (2012). Special issue on evidence-based policy and practice: Editor's introduction. Justice Research and Policy, 14(1), 1–16.
22.
RhineE. E.MawhorrT. L., & ParksE. C. (2006). Implementation: The bane of effective correctional programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(2), 347–357.
23.
ShortellS. M. (2004). Increasing value: A research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health-care delivery in the United States. Medical Care Research and Review, 61(3), 12S–30S.
24.
TaxmanF. S., & BelenkoS. (2012). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. New York: Springer Publishing.
25.
VanVoorhisP.CullenF. T.LinkeB. G., & WolfeN. T. (1991). The impact of race and gender on correctional officers' orientation to the integrated environment. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 28(4), 472–501.
26.
WestH. C., & SabolW. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
27.
WilsonJ. A., & DavisR. C. (2006). Good intentions meet hard realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 303–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00380.x