In this article we apply a developmental psychology analysis to sex offender laws and policies for adolescents to examine how such laws and policies, derived primarily from downward extension of adult criminal predatory sexual offender statutes and policies, serve the early identification of predators, constraint of such behavior, and/or engagement in rehabilitation. This focus is framed within advances in the past 20 years in the understanding of neurobiology and the social development of adolescence and in the understanding of the makeup of the population potentially coming under juvenile sex offender regulations. We find a significant mismatch between the prevailing laws and policies and the scientific knowledge about adolescents' development and the intended service to public safety. We provide suggestions from the attending empirical knowledge for increasing differentiation in the understanding of and treatment of adolescents and adult offenders. We also suggest heterogeneity, or subgroup differences, within the adolescent population now considered offenders are an important contributor to the mismatch. We discuss the benefits of structuring policies and laws so they are grounded in a developmental understanding of behavior, which will likely lead to a reduction in recidivism and an increase in public safety. Similarly, important research efforts to shore up understanding are proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertD., & SteinbergL., (2011). Judgment and decision making in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 221–224.
2.
BarnoskiR. (2005, December). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Notification levels and recidivism (Document No. 05-12-1203). Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rpt-files/05-12-1203.pdf
3.
BatastiniA. B.HuntE.Present-KollerJ.DeMatteoD. (2011). Federal standards for community registration of juvenile sex offenders: An evaluation of risk prediction and future implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(3), 451–474.
4.
BlakemoreS.BurnettS., & DahlR. (2010). The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 926–933.
5.
BorduinC. M.SchaefferC. M., & HeiblumN. (2009). A randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with juvenile sexual offenders: Effects on youth social ecology and criminal activity. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 77(1), 26–37.
6.
BowaterB. M. (2008). Comment: Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006: Is there a better way to tailor the sentences of juvenile sex offenders?The Catholic University Law Review, 57, 817–851.
7.
BrownB. B., & LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In LernerR. M. & SteinbergL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 74–103). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
CaldwellM. F. (2002). What we do not know about juvenile sexual reoffense risk. Child Maltreatment, 7(4), 291–302.
9.
CaldwellM. F. (2007). Sexual offense adjudication and sexual recidivism among juvenile offenders. Sex Abuse, 19, 107–113.
10.
CaldwellM. F. (2010). Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 197–212.
11.
CaldwellM. F., & DickinsonC. (2009). Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 941–956.
12.
CaseyB. J.JonesR. M., & HareT. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 111–126.
13.
CauffmanE., & SteinbergL. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741–760.
14.
ChaffinM. (2008). Our minds are made up-don't confuse us with the facts: Commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 12(2) 110–121.
15.
CheinJ.AlbertD.O'BrienL.UckertK., & SteinbergL. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14, F1–F10.
16.
EisenbergN.MorrisA.McDanielB., & SpinradT. L. (2009). Moral cognitions and prosocial responding in adolescence. In LernerR. M. & SteinbergL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229–265). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
EnnissB. (2008). Quickly assuaging public fear: How the well-intended Adam Walsh Act led to unintended consequences. Utah Law Review, 2, 697–717.
FishmanM.GardinerK., & GlosserA. (2006). Exploring community responses to statutory rape final report. Prepared for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Retrieved from: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/SR/CommResp
20.
ForbesS. G. (2011). Sex, cells, and SORNA: Applying sex offender registration laws to sexting cases. William & Mary Law Review, 52, 1717–1746.
21.
FriedrichW. N.FisherJ.BroughtonD.HoustonM., & ShafranC. R. (1998). Normative sexual behavior in children: A contemporary sample. Pediatrics, 101(4), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.pediatrics.corg/cgi/content/full/101/4/e9
22.
FriedrichW. N.GrambschP.BroughtonD.KuiperJ., & BeilkeR. L. (1991). Normative sexual behavior in children. Pediatrics, 88(3), 456–464.
23.
GardnerM., & SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635.
24.
GarfinkleE. (2003). Coming of age in America: The misapplication of sex-offender registration and community notification laws to juveniles. California Law Review, 91, 163–206.
25.
HansonR. K., & BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362.
26.
HarrisA. J.Lobanov-RostovskyC., & LevensonJ. S. (2010). Widening the net: The effects of transitioning to the Adam Walsh Act's federally mandated sex offender classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 503–519.
27.
HatzenbuehlerM.Nolen-HoeksemaS., & DovidioJ. (2009). How does stigma “get under skin?”Psychological Science, 20(10), 1282–1289.
28.
JacobsW. L.KennedyW. A., & MeyerJ. B. (1997). Juvenile delinquents: A between-group comparison study of sexual and nonsexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(3), 201–217.
29.
KuhnD. (2009). Adolescent thinking. In LernerR. M. & SteinbergL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 152–186). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
LetourneauE. J., & ArmstrongK. S. (2008). Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 20(4), 393–408.
31.
LetourneauE. J.BandyopadhyayD.ArmstrongK. S., & SinhaD. (2010). Do sex offender registration and notification requirements deter juvenile sex crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 553–569.
32.
LetourneauE. J., & MinerM. H. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legislative and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse, 17(3), 293–312.
33.
LewisD. O.ShankokS. S., & PincusJ. H. (1979). Juvenile male sexual assaulters. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(9), 1194–1196.
34.
LyonsD. (2011, June). Sex offender law: Down to the wire. State Legislatures, 26–29.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.
NisbetI. A.WilsonP. H., & SmallboneS. W. (2004). A prospective longitudinal study of sexual recidivism among adolescent sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 223–234.
39.
PascoeE. A., & Smart RichmanL. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531–554.
40.
PetznickT. (2011). Only young once, but a registered sex offender for life: A case for reforming California's juvenile sex offender registration system through the use of risk assessments. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 16, 228.
41.
QuinnD. M., & ChaudoirS. R. (2009). Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: The impact of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, and cultural stigma on psychological distress and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 634–651.
42.
RonisS. T., & BorduinC. M. (2007). Individual, family, peer, and academic characteristics of male juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 153–163.
43.
RubensteinM.YeagerC. A.GoodsteinC., & LewisD. O. (1993). Sexually assaultive male juveniles: A follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(2), 262–265.
44.
RyanG.LeverseeT., & LaneS. (2010). Juvenile sexual offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (Kindle edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
45.
SalernoJ. M.NajdowskiC. J.StevensonM. C.WileyT. R. A.BottomsB. L.VacaR.Jr., & PimentelP. S. (2010). Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: Prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 58–83.
46.
SampleL. L., & KadleckC. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators' accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), 40–62.
47.
SchubertD. J. (2010). Challenging Ohio's Adam Walsh Act: Senate Bill 10 blurs the line between punishment and remedial treatment of sex offenders. University of Dayton Law Review, 35(2), 277–301.
48.
ScottE. S.ReppucciN. D., & WoolardJ. L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 19(3), 221–244.
SteinbergL. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69–74.
52.
SteinbergL. (2012). Should the science of adolescent brain development inform public policy?Issues in Science and Technology, Spring. Retrieved from http://www.issues.org/28.3/steinberg.html
53.
SteinbergL.CauffmanE.WoolardJ.GrahamS., & BanichM. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults? Minors' access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA “flip-flop.”American Psychologist64, 583–594.
54.
SteinbergL.O'BrienL.CauffmanE.GrahamS.WoolardJ., and BanichM. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44.
TewksburyR. (2002). Validity and utility of the Kentucky sex offender registry. Federal Probation, 66(1), 21–26.
57.
TolanP. H. (2002). Crime prevention: Focus on youth. In WilsonJ. Q. & PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Crime (pp. 109–128). Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
58.
TolmanD. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
TrivitsL. C., & ReppucciN. D. (2002). Application of Megan's Law to juveniles. American Psychologist, 57(9), 690–704.
60.
TruscottD. (1993). Adolescent offenders: Comparison for sexual, violent, and property offence. Psychological Reports, 73, 657–658.
61.
ValliantP. M., & BergeronT. (1997). Personality and criminal profile of adolescent sexual offenders, general offenders in comparison to nonoffenders. Psychological Reports, 81, 483–489.
62.
VandiverD. M. (2006). A prospective analysis of juvenile male sex offenders: Characteristics and recidivism rates as adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(5), 673–688.
63.
Van WijkA.LoeberR.PardiniD.BullensR., & DoreleijersT. (2005). Violent juvenile sex offenders compared with violent juvenile nonsexual offenders: Explorative findings from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(3), 333–352.
64.
WorlingJ. R., & CurwenT. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications for risk prediction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(7), 965–982.
65.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J., & HelfandM. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on U.S. adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28, 153–224.
66.
ZimringF. E.PiqueroA. R., & JenningsW. G. (2007). Sexual delinquency in Racine: Does early sex offending predict later sex offending in youth and young adulthood?Criminology & Public Policy, 6(3), 507–534.
67.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006)(codified as amended in scattered sections of 42. U.S.C.).
Children's Safety and Violent Crime Reduction Act of 2006, Congressional Record, 109th Congress p. S8018 (July 20, 2006) (testimony of Sen. George Allen, VA). Retrieved from www.thomas.loc.gov
National Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification (Office of Attorney General). Federal Register, 73(128), 38030-38070 (July 2, 2008).
82.
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
83.
Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) 42 U.S.C. §16911 et seq. (2011).
84.
Supplemental Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification (Office of Attorney General). Federal Register, 78(7), 1630–1640 (January 11, 2011).
85.
United States v. W.B.H., No. 09-13435, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24729, (11th Cir. Dec. 13, 2011).
