Introduction

Bertram R. Blase K. Shern D. Shea P. , & Fixsen D. (2011). Policy research brief: Implementation opportunities and challenges for prevention and promotion initiatives. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors.

Boruch R. (2007). Encouraging the flight of error: Ethical standards, evidence standards, and randomized trials. In Julnes G. & Rog D. (Eds.), Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation series, Number 113). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Cook T. D. (2006). Describing what is special about the role of experiments in contemporary educational research: Putting the “gold standard” rhetoric into perspective. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6, 1–7.

Cook T. D. Scriven M. Coryn C. L. S. , & Evergreen S. D. (2010), Contemporary thinking about causation in evaluation: A dialog with Tom Cook and Michael Scriven. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 105–117.

Eno Louden J. Skeem J. Camp J. Vidal S. , & Peterson J. (2010). Supervision practices in specialty mental health probation: What happens in officer-probationer meetings? Law and Human Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9260-2. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/h6u3j5q237032387/.

Fixsen D. L. Blase K. A. Timbers G. D. , & Wolf M. M. (2001). In search of program implementation: 792 replications of the teaching-family model. In Bernfeld G. A. Farrington D. P. , & Leschied A. W. (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 149–166). London: Wiley.

Fixsen D. L. Naoom S. F. Blase K. A. Friedman R. M. , & Wallace F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication #231). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.

Hicks D. Larson C. Nelson C. M. Olds D. , & Johnson E. (2008). The influence of collaboration on program outcomes: The Colorado nurse family partnership. Evaluation Review, 32, 453–474.

Julnes G. , & Rog D.J. (2007). Current federal policies and controversies over methodology in evaluation. In Julnes G. & Rog D. (Eds.), Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation series, Number 113). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Laub J. H. (2011). The National Institute of Justice response to the report of the National Research Council: Strengthening the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

Lewin K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Cartwright D. (Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Lipsey M. W. Howell J. C. Kelly M. R. Chapman G. , & Carver D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

Lum C. (2011, January). On the recent pushback against “evidence-based” policing. The Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy Bi-annual Newsletter (Issue 5). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy.

Nutley S. Walter I. , & Davies H.T. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol, United Kingdom: The Policy Press.

Paparozzi M. A. , & Gendreau P. (2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85(4), 445–466.

Przybylski R. (2008). What works: Effective recidivism reduction and risk focused prevention programs: A compendium of evidence-based options for preventing new and persistent criminal behavior. Denver: Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice.

Randolph F. Blasinsky M. Morrissey J. P. Rosenheck R. A. Cocozza J. , & Goldman H. H. (2002). Overview of the ACCESS program. Psychiatric Services, 53(8), 945–948.

Reed G. M. (2005). What qualifies as evidence of effective practice? Clinical expertise. In Norcross J. C. Beutler L. E. , & Levant R. F. (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Schwandt T. A. (2005). The centrality of practice to evaluation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 95–105.

Sherman L. W. (2010). Less prison, more police, less crime: How criminology can save the states from bankruptcy (Research for the Real World: National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Seminar Series Interview with Lawrence Sherman, Ph.D., April 2010). Retrieved from http://nij.ncjrs.gov/multimedia/video-sherman.htm#tab1

Sherman L. W. (2012). Building a global tipping point for evidence-based crime policy. Presentation at the 12th Annual Jerry Lee Crime prevention Symposium, Hyattsville, Maryland, April 24, 2012.

Skeem J. L. , & Manchak S. (2008). Back to the future: From Klockars' model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 220–247.

Small S. M. Reynolds A. J. O'Connor C. , & Cooney S. M. (2005). What works, Wisconsin? What science tells us about cost-effective programs for juvenile delinquency prevention. Madison, WI: School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Smyth K. F. , & Schorr L. B. (2009). A lot to lose: A call to rethink what constitutes “evidence” in finding social interventions that work (Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Sparrow M. (2011). Governing science. New Perspectives in Policing, Harvard Executive Session on Policing and Public Safety. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2007). Understanding evidence-based practices for co-occurring disorders (Overview Paper 5). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Travis J. (2012). Summoning the superheroes, harnessing science and passion to create a more effective and humane response to crime. In Mauer M. & Epstein K. (Eds.), To build a better criminal justice system: 25 experts envision the next 25 years of reform. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.

United States Government Accountability Office (2009). Program evaluation: A variety of rigorous methods can help identify effective interventions. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.

Weisburd D. (2011). From the director. Translational Criminology, Summer 2011, 1. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy.