Hurricane Katrina accomplished what no law enforcement initiative could ever achieve: It completely eradicated the New Orleans drug market. However, Katrina did little to eliminate the demand for drugs. This article documents the process of the drug market reconstitution that occurred 2005–2008 based on in-depth interviews and focus groups with predominately low-income drug users and sellers. Before Katrina, the drug market was largely characterized by socially-bonded participants involved with corporate style distribution. After Katrina, a violent freelance market emerged. The conclusion draws recommendations for law enforcement for dealing with drug markets after a major disaster.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiernackiP., & WaldorfD. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.
2.
BourgoisP. (1995). In search of respect: Selling crack in el barrio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BreecherE. (1972). Licit and illicit drugs: The consumer union report on narcotics, stimilants, inhalants, hallucinogens & marijuana — including caffeine, nicotine and alcohol. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
4.
BrownsteinH., & TaylorB. (2007). Measuring the stability of illicit drug markets: Why does it matter?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, s52–s60.
5.
BultmannR.CaulkinsJ.FiechtingerG., & TraglerG. (2008). How should policy respond to disruptions in markets for illegal drugs?Contemporary Drug Problems, 35(Summer), 371–395.
6.
CaulkinsJ. (1993). Local drug markets' response to focused police enforcement. Operations Research, 41(5) (Sept-Oct), 848–863.
7.
CepedaA.ValdezA.KaplanC., & HillL. (2010). Patterns of substance use among Hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston, Texas. Disasters, 34(2), 426–446.
8.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CooperC., & BlockR. (2006). Disaster: Hurricane Katrina and the failure of homeland security. New York: New York Times.
10.
CourtwrightD. T. (2001). Dark paradise: A history of opium addiction in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11.
CurtisR., & WendelT. (2000). Toward the development of a typology of illegal drug markets. Crime Prevention Studies, 11, 121–152.
12.
CurtisR., & WendelT. (2007). ‘You're always training the dog’: Strategic interventions to reconfigure drug markets. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 867–892.
13.
DegenhardtL.DayC.GilmoreS., & HallW. (2006). The “lessons” of the Australian “heroin shortage.”Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 1(11), 1–7.
14.
DegenhardtL.ReuterP.CollinsL., & HallW. (2005). Evaluating explanations of the Australian ‘heroin shortage’. Addiction, 100, 459–469.
15.
DunlapE., & GolubA. (2011). Drug markets during the Katrina disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management. (Forthcoming).
16.
DunlapE.JohnsonB. D.KotarbaJ., & FacklerJ. (2009). Making connections: New Orleans evacuees' experiences in obtaining drugs. Journal of Psycho-active Drugs, 41(3), 219–226.
17.
DunlapE.JohnsonB. D., & MorseE. (2007). Illicit drug markets among New Orleans' evacuees before and soon after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 981–1006.
18.
EckJ. & MaguireE. (2000). Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In BlumsteinA. and WallmanJ. (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 207–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
FloryK.HankinB. L.KloosB.CheelyC.TureckiG. (2009). Alcohol and cigarette use and misuse among Hurricane Katrina survivors: Psychosocial risk and protective factors. Substance Use and Misuse, 44(12), 1711–1724.
20.
FussellE.SastryN., & VanLandinghamM. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return mirgation to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 20–42.
21.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
22.
GreenbaumT. L. (1988). The practical handbook and guide to focus group research. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
23.
HenryG. T. (1990). Practical sampling (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 21). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
HofferL. (2006). Junkie business: The evolution and operation of a heroin dealing network. Belmont, CA: Thomas Higher Education.
25.
JacobsB.TopalliV.WrightR. (2000). Managing retaliation: Drug robbery and informal sanctions. Criminology, 38(1), 171–198.
26.
JohnsonB. D. (2003). Patterns of drug distribution: Implications and issues. Substance Use and Misuse, 38(11–13), 1789–1806.
27.
JohnsonB. D.DunlapE., & BenoitE. (2010). Organizing “mountains of words” for data analysis, both qualitative and quantitative. Substance Use and Misuse, 54(5), 648–672.
28.
JohnsonB.D.GolubA., & DunlapE. (2000). The rise and decline of hard drugs, drug markets, and violence in inner-city New York. In BlumsteinA. & WallmanJ. (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 164–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KuzmarovJ. (2009). The myth of the addicted army: Vietnam and the modern war on drugs. Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
30.
LeeS. (2006). When the levees broke: A requiem in four acts. New York: Home Box Office.
31.
LevittJ. I., & WhitakerM. C. (Eds.). (2009). Hurricane Katrina: America's unnatural disaster. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
32.
MacCounR., & ReuterP. (2001). Drug war heresies: Learning from other vices, times, and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MooreM., & KleimanM. A. R. (1997). The police and drugs. In GainesL. K. & KraskaP. (Eds.), Drugs, crime, and justice: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 227–248). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
34.
MovagharA. R.FarhoodianA.GoodarziR. R. (2005). A qualitative study of changes in demand and supply of illicit drugs and the related interventions in Bam during the first year after the earthquake: A summary report. Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies in Colloboration with Research Center for Environmental Health. Tehran University of Medical Sciences and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
35.
MovagharA. R.GoodarziR. R.IzadianE.MohammadiM. R.HosseiniM., & VazirianM. (2005). The impact of Bam earthquake on substance users in the first 2 weeks: A rapid assessment. Journal of Urban Health, 82(3), 370–377.
36.
MustoD. (1973). The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
National Research Council. (2001). Informing America's policy on illegal drugs: What we don't know keeps hurting us. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38.
ReuterP. (2009). Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 52, 275–284.
39.
RitterA. (2006). Studying illicit drug markets: Disciplinary contributions. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17, 453–463.
40.
SviridoffM.SaddS.CurtisR., & GrincR. (1992). The neighborhood effects of New York City's Tactical Narcotics Team on three Brooklyn precincts. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
41.
TaylorB., & BrownsteinH. (2003). Toward the operalization of drug market stability: An illustration using arrestee data from crack cocaine markets in four urban communities. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(1), 73–98.
42.
VlahovD.GaleaS.AhernJ.ResnickH., & KilpatrickD. (2004). Sustained increased consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana among Manhattan residents after September 11, 2001. American Journal of Public Health, 94(2), 253–254.
43.
WeisburdD.WyckoffL. A.ReadyJ.EckJ. E.HinkleJ. C., & GajewskiF. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549–592.
WoodE.SpittalP. M.SmallW.KerrT.LiK.HoggR. S.TyndallM. W.MontanerJ. S. G.SchechterM. T. (2004). Displacement of Canada's largest public illicit drug market in response to a police crackdown. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(10), 1551–1556.
