The presence of race differentials in case outcomes has recently been explained by a focus on the characteristics of the decision makers within the context of the interplay between discretion, a reliance on stereotyping, and the perceptions of decision makers. We continue this line of inquiry by assessing what effects the gender of the intake officer may have in understanding the treatment of male youth. Using data from juvenile court records within a single juvenile court jurisdiction, the research is guided by two general questions. Do female and male officers make similar intake decisions once relevant legal and extralegal considerations related to the youth are controlled? Do female and male officers rely on similar legal and extralegal considerations and give equal weight to those considerations when making intake decisions? The results from our inquiry have implications for broadening the scope of the contexts of intake juvenile justice decision making, especially in terms of how the characteristics of decision makers influence case outcomes. The implications of the results may also better inform efforts that address the equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile justice system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsL. S. (2002). Rethinking girls “at-risk”: Gender, race, and class intersections and adolescent development. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 6(2), 47–64.
2.
BazemoreG., & FederL. (1997). Judges in the punitive juvenile court: Organizational, career and ideological influences on sanctioning orientation. Justice Quarterly, 4(1), 87–114.
3.
BellD.Jr., & LangK. (1985). The intake dispositions of juvenile offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(4), 309–328.
4.
BishopD. M. (2005). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice processing. In HawkinsD. & Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 23–82). The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Mental Health and Development, Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
BishopD. M., & FrazierC. E. (1988). The influence of race in juvenile justice processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25(3), 242–263.
6.
BishopD. M., & FrazierC. (1992). Gender bias in juvenile justice processing: Implications of the JJDP Act. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(4), 1162–1186
7.
BishopD. M., & FrazierC. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 392–414.
8.
BishopD. M.LeiberM., & JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Journal of Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 8(3), 213–233.
9.
BridgesG., & SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
10.
BrittonD. (1997). Perceptions of the work environment among correctional officers: Do race and gender matter?Criminology, 35(1), 85–106.
11.
BrubakerS. J., & FoxK. (2010). Urban African American girls at risk: An exploratory study of service needs and provision. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(3), 250–265.
12.
Bureau of the Census. (2000). 2000 census of population: General population characteristics. Available at www.census.gov.
13.
ButtsJ., & MearsD. P. (2001). Reviving juvenile justice in a get-tough era. Youth & Society, 33(2), 169–198.
14.
Chesney-LindM., & SheldenR. G. (2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
15.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
16.
Cooper-PatrickLGalloJ., & GonzalesJ. (1999). Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA, 282(6), 583–589.
17.
CrouchB., & AlpertG. (1982). Sex and occupational socialization among prison guards: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9(2), 159–176.
18.
DalyK. (1997). Different ways of conceptualizing sex/gender in feminist theory and their implications for criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 1(1), 25–51.
19.
DavisT.SeveryL., & KrausS. (1993). Predictors of sentencing decisions: The beliefs, personality variables and demographic factors of juvenile justice personnel. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(6), 451–477.
20.
EbyC. (2001, February 25). Black Hawk sentences among the state's toughest. Waterloo Courier, pp. A1, A7.
21.
EdgellP., & TranbyR. (2007). Religious influences on understandings of racial inequality in the United States. Social Problems, 54(2), 263–288.
22.
EngenR.SteenS, & BridgesG. (2002). Racial disparities in the punishment of youth: A theoretical and empirical assessment of the literature. Social Problems, 49(2), 194–220.
23.
EpsteinC. (1988). Descriptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
FeldB. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.
GieleJ. Z. (1988). Gender and sex roles. In SmelserN. J. (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 291–323). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
GrahamS., & LoweryB. (2004). Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law & Human Behavior, 28(5), 483–504.
29.
GruhlJ.SpohnC., & WelchS. (1981). Women as policy makers: The case of trial judges. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 308–322.
30.
GuevaraL.HerzD., & SpohnC. (2006). Gender and juvenile justice decision making: What role does race play?Feminist Criminology, 1(4), 258–282.
31.
HomantR., & KennedyD. (1985). Police perceptions of spouse abuse: A comparison of male and female officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(1), 29–47.
32.
Iowa Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning and Statistics. (2000, April). Youth development approach for Iowa's children and families. Formula grant application and three-year comprehensive plan. Des Moines, Iowa: Author.
33.
JohnsonD., & ScheubleL. (1991). Gender bias in the disposition of juvenile court referrals: The effects of time and location. Criminology, 29(4), 677–699.
34.
LambertE., & HoganN. (2009). A test of the importation and work environment models: The effects of work ethic, importance of money, and management views on the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of correctional staff. Journal of Crime and Justice, 32(1), 61–92.
35.
LambertE.PaolineE.HoganN., & BakerD. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in correctional staff work attitudes and perceptions of the work environment. Western Criminology Review, 8(1), 16–31.
36.
LeiberM. J. (2000). Gender, religion, and correctional orientations among a sample of juvenile justice personnel. Women and Criminal Justice, 11(2), 15–44.
37.
LeiberM. J. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime & Delinquency, 48(1), 3–45.
38.
LeiberM. J. (2003). The contexts of juvenile justice decision making: When race matters. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
39.
LeiberM. J. (in press). Race, pre- and post-adjudication detention, and juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency.
40.
LeiberM. J.BishopD., & ChamlinM. (in press). Juvenile justice decision-making before and after the implementation of the disproportionate minority contact (DMC) mandate. Justice Quarterly.
41.
LeiberM. J.BrubakerS. J. & FoxK. C. (2009). A closer look at the individual and joint effects of gender and race on juvenile court decision making. Feminist Criminology, 4(4), 333–358.
42.
LeiberM. J., & FoxK. C. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency, 51(4), 470–497.
43.
LeiberM. J., & JohnsonJ. D. (2008). Being young and black: What are their effects on juvenile justice decision making?Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 560–581.
44.
LeiberM. J., & MackK. Y. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40(1), 34–70.
45.
LeiberM. J., & RodriguezN. (in press). The implementation of the disproportionate minority confinement/contact (DMC) mandate: A failure or success?Journal of Race and Justice.
46.
LeiberM. J., & StairsM. J. (1999). Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 56–86.
47.
LeiberM. J.WoodrickA. C., & RoudebushE. M. (1995). Religion, discriminatory attitudes and the orientations of the juvenile justice personnel. Criminology, 33(3), 431–449.
48.
MallicoatS. (2007). Gendered justice: Attributional differences between males and females in the juvenile courts. Feminist Criminology, 2(1), 4–30.
49.
MartinS., & JurikN. (1996). Doing justice, doing gender: Women in law and criminal justice occupations. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage Publications.
50.
MauerM., & KingR. (2007). Uneven justice: State rates of incarceration by race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
51.
MolgaardV.SpothR., & RedmondC. (2000). Competency Training Families Program: For parents and youth 10–14 (2000 National Report Series Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
52.
OdemM. (1995). Delinquent daughters: Protecting and policing adolescent female sexuality in the United States, 1885–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
53.
PlattA. M. (1977). The child savers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
PopeC. E., & FeyerhermW. (1993). Minorities and the juvenile justice system: Full report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
55.
PoteyevaM., & SunI. (2009). Gender differences in police officers' attitudes: Assessing current empirical evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(5), 512–522.
56.
PuzzancheraC. & AdamsB. (2008, April). An interpretation of the national DMC relative rate indices for juvenile justice system processing in 2005. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. Available at www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/dmcdb/pdf/dmc_interpretations.pdf.
57.
RodriguezN. (2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: Reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24(4), 629–656.
58.
RodriguezN.SmithH. & ZatzM. (2009). “Youth is enmeshed in a highly dysfunctional family system”: Exploring the relationship among dysfunctional families, parental incarceration, and juvenile court decision making. Criminology, 47(1), 177–2078.
59.
SabinJ. A.NosekB.GreenwaldA., & RivaraF. (2009). Physicians' implicit and explicit attitudes about race by MD race, ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 20(3), 896–913.
60.
SampsonR., & LaubJ. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processings: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review, 27, 285–311.
61.
SanbornJ.Jr. (1996). Factors perceived to affect delinquent dispositions in juvenile court: Putting the sentencing decision into context. Crime & Delinquency, 42(1), 99–113.
SingerS. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SpohnC. (2008). How do judges decide: The search for fairness and justice in punishment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SteenS.BondC.BridgesG., & KubrinC. (2005). Explaining assessments of future risk: Race and attributions of juvenile offenders in presentence projects. In HawkinsD. & Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 23–82). The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
66.
SteenS.EngenR., & GaineyR. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43(2), 435–468.
67.
SteffensmeierD., & HebertC. (1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge's gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants. Social Forces, 77(3), 1163–1196.
68.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ., & KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797.
69.
ThompsonE. H. (1991). Beneath the status characteristics: Gender variations in religiousness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 381–394.
70.
TittleC., & CurranD. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23–58.
71.
Van VoorhisP.CullenF.LinkB., & WolfeN. (1991). The impact of race and gender on correctional officers' orientation to the integrated environment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28(4), 472–500.
72.
VisherC. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21(1), 5–8.
73.
WardG., & KupchikA. (2009). Accountable to what? Professional orientations towards accountability-based juvenile justice. Punishment & Society, 11, 85–109.
74.
WordenA. (1993). The attitudes of women and men in policing: Testing conventional and contemporary wisdom. Criminology, 31(2), 203–235.
