Over the last decade in New York State, the crime rate has declined, the rate of imprisonment has decreased, and violence behind bars has dropped. This essay examines the role played by the state's correctional agency in effecting these trends. The analysis focuses on the agency's efforts to right-size, to respond to circumstances with agility, to maintain professionalism, and to use success to build success. Recent sentencing reforms in New York are also considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckA. J., & ShipleyB. (1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
DrakeE.AosS., & MillerM. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Governor's Office, New York State. (2009, April 24). Governor Paterson signs Rockefeller drug reforms into law: Sweeping reform ends harsh sentences for non-violent addicts (press release). Retrieved from http://www.ny.gov/govenor/press/press_0424091.html.
LanganP. A., & LevinD. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16.
LawrenceA. (2009). Cutting corrections costs: Earned time policies for state prisoners. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
17.
LevittS.D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 163–190.
18.
LiedkaR.PiehlA. M., & UseemB. (2006). The crime-control effect of incarceration: Does scale matter?Criminology and Public Policy, 5(2), 245–275.
19.
MearsD. P., & WatsonJ. (2006). Towards a fair and balanced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Quarterly, 23(2), 233–270.
20.
NaginD. S.CullenF. T., and Lero-JonsonC. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
New York State Department of Correctional Services. (2008). Unusual incident report, January–December 2007. Albany, NY: Author.
24.
New York State Department of Correctional Services. (2009a, April). Sentencing commission presentation: Background data for the Department of Correctional Services. On file with the author.
25.
New York State Department of Correctional Services. (2009b, August 6). Key element of drug law reform takes effect as older offenders, general population inmates transfer into shock incarceration (press release). Retrieved from http://www.docs.state.ny.us/pressrel/shockexpansion09.html.
PetersiliaJ. (2008). California's correctional paradox of excess and deprivation. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 37). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
SpelmanW. (2008). Specifying the relationship between crime and prisons. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 149–178.
34.
StephanJ. (2008). Census of state and federal correctional facilities, 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available online at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/csfcf05.pdf.
35.
SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C., & BriggsC. S. (2008). The sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control: A case study of supermax and its effect in Illinois. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 94–122.
36.
ThalerR. H., & SunsteinC. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37.
UseemB., & PiehlA. M. (2008). Prison state: The challenge of mass incarceration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
WilsonA. (2009). Rockefeller drug laws information sheet. Partnership for Responsible Drug Information. Retrieved from http://www.prdi.org/rocklawfact.html.
40.
WilsonJ. Q. (2008). Criminal justice. In SchuckP. H. & WilsonJ.Q. (Eds.), Understanding America: The anatomy of an exceptional nation. New York: Public Affairs.
