Increasingly, professionally trained human service workers are employed on a contingency basis. This article reports findings from an exploratory qualitative study in which contingent direct service staff and permanent agency administrators were interviewed to ascertain their views on contingency work arrangements in the human services. Two broad research questions guided this inquiry: (1) what are the rationales for contingency employment from the perspectives of the staff who obtain it and the agencies that utilize it; and (2) what are the effects of contingency employment on the contingent workers and the agency? Findings are placed in the broader context of neoliberalism and its impact on the human service sector with focus on the fiscal factors that drive contingency arrangements and the fragmenting of human service work environments as a result.
AbramovitzM. & ZelnickJ. (2018). Business as usual? A wake-up call for the human services: Results from the Human Service Workforce study.New York: Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College of the City University of New York.
2.
AbramovitzM. & ZelnickJ. (2015). Privatization in the human services: Implications for direct practice. Journal of Clinical Social Work, 43(3), 282–293.
3.
AdamsC. & PerlmutterF. (1995). Leadership in hard times: Are nonprofits well-served?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(3), 253–262.
4.
AlacovskaA. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(1/2), 1563–1589.
5.
AronowitzE. (2012). A brief (but explosive) history of pay-per-session social work practice in mental health clinics. Currents. Downloaded May 4, 2017 from http://www.naswnyc.org/?377.
6.
BiebricherT. (2018). The political theory of neoliberalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BranchE. & HanleyC. (2018). A racial-gender lens on precarious nonstandard employment. In KallebergA. & VallasS. (Eds.), Precarious Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 31), pp. 183–214. London: Emerald Publishing.
8.
BrodkinE. (2013). Commodification, inclusion, or what? Workfare in everyday organizational life. In BrodkinE. & MarstonG., (Eds.), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organizations and workfare politics, pp. 143–166. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9.
BrownW. (2019). In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the west. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
BrownW. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism's stealth revolution. Cambridge: Zone.
11.
BungerA., McBeathB., ChuangE., & Collins-CamargoC. (2017). Institutional and market pressures on interorganizational collaboration and competition among private human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 13–29.
BurghardtS. (2021). The end of social work: A defense of the social worker in times of transformation.San Diego: Cognella Press.
14.
CallisonW., & ManfrediZ. (Eds.) (2020). Mutant neoliberalism: Market rule and political rupture. New York: Fordham University Press.
15.
CaplanM. & RicciardelliL. (2016). Institutionalizingeneoliberalism: 21st century capitalism, market sprawl, and social policy in the United States. Poverty & Public Policy, 8(1): 20–38.
16.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
ChildressH. (2019). The adjunct underclass: How America's colleges betrayed their faculty, their students, and their mission. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
18.
CooperM. (2014). Cut adrift: Families in insecure times. Berkeley: University of California Press.
HackerJ. (2008). The great risk shift: The new economy insecurity and the decline of the American dream.New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
HallG. (2016). The uberfication of the university. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
HasenfeldY. & GarrowE. (2012). Nonprofit, human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review, 86(2), 295–322.
31.
HellerN. (2017). Is the gig economy working?The New Yorker, May15, 1–27.
32.
HirschB. (2016). Dual labor markets at work: The impact of employers' use of temporary agency work on regular workers' job stability. ILR Review, 69(5), 1191–1215.
33.
HolmK., TorkelsonE., & BäckströmM. (2016). New types of employment, new ways to be uncivil? A thematic analysis of temporary agency workers' exposure to workplace incivility. Psychology, 7, 74–84.
34.
HydeC. (2020). Does contingency work in human service agencies compromise practice and practice ethics? An exploratory study. Ethics and Social Welfare, 14(1), 39–51.
35.
KallebergA. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s-2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
KallebergA. & VallasS. (Eds). (2018). Precarious Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 31). London: Emerald Publishing.
37.
KotskoA. (2018). Neoliberalism's demons: On the political theology of late capital.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
KovesiC. & KernL. (2018). “I choose to be here”: Tensions between autonomy and precarity in the craft market vendors' work. City & Community, 17, 170–186.
39.
LambertS. (2008). Passing the buck: Labor flexibility practices that transfer risk onto hourly workers. Human Relations, 61(9), 1203–1227.
40.
LandsbergisP., GrzywaczJ., & LaMontagneA. (2014). Work organization, job insecurity, and occupational health disparities. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 57, 495–515.
41.
LewchukW. (2017). Precarious jobs: Where are they, and how do they affect well-being?The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 402–419.
42.
MarthinsenE. (2019). Neoliberalisation, the social investment state and social work. European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 350–361.
43.
MillerD. & HokenstadT. (2014). Rolling downhill: Effects of austerity on local government social services in the United States. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 41(2), 93–108.
44.
NewmanK. & WinstonH. (2016). Reskilling America: Learning to labor in the twenty-first century. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
45.
PadgettD. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research, (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.
46.
PentarakiM. & DionysopoulouK. (2019). Social workers: A new precariat? Precarity conditional of mental health social workers working in the non-profit sector in Greece. European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 301–313.
47.
PerlmutterF. (1988). Administering alternative social agencies: Educational implications. Administration in Social Work, 12(2), 109–118.
48.
PerlmutterF. (1985). The politics of social administration. Administration in Social Work, 9(4), 1–11.
49.
PerlmutterF. (1983). Caught in between: The middle management bind. Administration in Social Work, 7(3–4), 147–161.
50.
PerlmutterF. & AdamsC. (1994). Family service executives in a hostile environment. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 75(7), 439–446.
51.
PerlmutterF., BaileyD. & NettingE. (2001). Managing human resources in the human services: Supervisory challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
PerlmutterF. & CrookW. (2004). Changing hats: From social work practice to administration, (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press.
53.
RaoA (2018). “You don't dare plan much”: Contract work and personal life for international early-career professionals. In KallebergA. & VallasS. (Eds.), Precarious Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 31), pp. 429–454. London: Emerald Publishing.
54.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers, (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.
55.
SelbergR. (2013). Nursing in times of neoliberal change: An ethnographic study of nurses' experiences of work intensification. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3 (2), 9–35.
56.
SossJ., FordingR., & SchramS. (2013). Performance management as a disciplinary regime: Street-level organizations in a neoliberal era of poverty governance. In BrodkinE. & MarstonG. (Eds.), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organizations and workfare politics, pp. 125–139. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
57.
StandingG. (2014). The precariat: A new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Press.
58.
StegerM. & RoyR. (2010). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
WallaceM. & KwakJ. (2018). Bad jobs in a troubled economy: The impact of the great recession in America's major metropolitan areas. In KallebergA. & VallasS. (Eds.), Precarious work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 31), pp. 125–146. London: Emerald Publishing.
60.
WashburnJ. (2005). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of higher education. New York: Basic Books.
61.
WeilD. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
WeirichT., PerlmutterF. & RichanW. (1977). Interorganizational behavior patterns of line staff and services integration. Social Service Review, 51(4), 674–689.
63.
ZackaB. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
ZulloR. (2008). Is social service contracting coercive, competitive or collaborative?Administration in Social Work, 30(3), 25–42.
