This paper acknowledges the labor productivity problem in healthcare, and investigates individual differences as determinants of psychological empowerment, which may be a partial solution to the problem. Using data from 363 clinical nurses, two individual differences - aversive personalities and job/organization fit - representing a bipolar division of employees, were examined for their linkage with psychological empowerment. As hypothesized, the aversive personality psychopathy was negatively linked to empowerment. Employees with longer time in healthcare, higher in religiosity, whose job-related needs are satisfied by the hospital, and who believe that their abilities are a good fit with their job demands are more likely to be psychologically empowered. Easy, reliable tests to screen for high psychopathy in hiring and placing individuals in jobs in which empowerment is desired, and managerial interventions to increase need satisfaction and demand-ability fit, may increase empowerment and thus productivity with no increase in wage costs.
AlfesK., ShantzA., & AlahakoneR. (2015). Testing additive versus interactive effects of person-organization fit and organizational trust on engagement and performance. Personnel Review, 45, 1323–1339.
2.
ArgyrisC. (1998). Empowerment: The emperor's new clothes. Harvard Business Review, 76, 98–106.
3.
ArnoldK., TurnerN., BarlingJ., KellowayE. K., & McKeeM. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 193–203.
4.
AshforthB. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 207–242.
5.
AtwaterL.E., OstroffC., YammarinoF.J., & FleenorJ.W. (1998). Self-other agreement: Does it really matter?Personnel Psychology, 51, 577–598.
6.
BanduraA. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.
7.
BartramT., KarimiL., LeggatS. G., & StantonP. (2014). Social identification: Linking high performance work systems, psychological empowerment, and patient care. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 2401–2419.
8.
BlairC. A., HoffmanB. J., & HellandK. R. (2008). Narcissism in organizations: A multisource appraisal reflects different perspectives. Human Performance, 21, 254–276.
9.
BlauP.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life.New York: John Wiley.
10.
BoddyC. R. (2006). The dark side of management decisions: Organisational psychopaths. Management Decision, 44, 1461–1475.
11.
BooneC., Den HartogD. N., BoselieP., & PaauweJ. (2011). The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: Examining the role of person– organisation and person–job fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 138–162.
12.
BoudriasJ. S., MorinA. J. S., & BrodeurM. M. (2012). Role of Psychological Empowerment in the Reduction of Burnout in Canadian Healthcare. Nursing & Health Sciences, 14, 8–17.
13.
BretzR. D., & JudgeT. A. (1994). Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.
14.
BriefA. P., & NordW. R. (1990). Meanings of Occupational Work. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15.
BrowningA. (2013). Moral distress and psychological empowerment in critical care nurses caring for adults at end of life. American Journal of Critical Care, 22, 143–151.
16.
CableD. M., & DerueD. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subject fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 5, 875–884.
17.
CableD., & JudgeT. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.
18.
CableD. M., & JudgeT. A. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 546–561.
19.
ChenG., KirkmanB. L., KanferR., AllenD., & RosenB. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331–346.
20.
ChristieR., & GeisF. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press: New York.
21.
CicoliniG., ComparciniD., SimonettiV. (2014). Workplace empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction: A systematic literature review. Journal oof Nursing Management22, 855–871.
22.
CloningerC. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well-being.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
ColeN. (1995). Research translation: How employee management improves manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 80.
24.
CookJ., & WallT. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 53, 39–52.
25.
CongerJ. A., & KanungoR. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.
26.
deCharmsR. (1968). Personal causation: The internal determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.
27.
D'InnocenzoL., LucianoM.M., MathieuJ. E., MaynardM. T., & ChenG. (2016). Empowered to perform: A multilevel investigation of the influence of empowerment on performance in hospital units. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1290–1307.
28.
DeciE. L., ConnellJ. P., & RyanR. M. (1989). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
29.
DowgwilloE. A., & PincusA. L. (2017). Differentiating dark triad traits within and across interpersonal circumplex Surface. Assessment, 24, 24–44.
30.
EcclesT. (1993). The deceptive allure of empowerment. Long Range Planning, 26(6), 13–21.
31.
EdwardsJ. R. (1991). Person-job fit: a conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique”, in CooperC. L. and RobertsonI. T. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 6, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, pp. 283–357.
32.
FaulknerJ., & LaschingerH. (2008). The effects of structural and psychological empowerment on perceived respect in acute care nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 16, 214–221.
33.
FehrB., SamsomD., & PaulhusD. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In SpielbergerC. D. & ButcherJ. N. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 77–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
FikeG. C., & Smith-StonerM. (2016). Hours per patient day: Understanding this key measure of productivity. American Nurse Today, 11, 664–669.
35.
ForresterR. (2000). Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 67–80.
36.
Foster-FishmanP. G., & KeysC. B. (1997). The person/environment dynamics of employee empowerment: An organizational culture analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(3), 345–369.
37.
GistM. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 17, 472–485.
38.
GouldnerA. E. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American SociologicalReview, 25, 161–174.
39.
GregurasG. J., & DiefendorffJ. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465–477.
40.
GustafsonS. B., & RitzerD. R. (1995). The dark side of normal: A psychopathy-linked pattern called aberrant self-promotion. European Journal of Personality, 9, 147–183.
41.
HareR. D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R) (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems, Toronto, Canada.
42.
HarpazI. (1998). Cross-national comparison of religious conviction and the meaning of work. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 32, 143–170.
43.
HolcombB. R., HoffartN., & FoxM. H. (2002). Defining and measuring nursing productivity: A concept analysis and pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38, 378–386.
44.
JansenK. J., & Kristof-BrownA. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial issues, 193–212.
45.
JonasonP. & JacksonC. (2016). The Dark Triad traits through the lens of reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 273–277.
46.
JonasonP. K., LiN. P., & BussD. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373–378.
47.
JonasonP. K., & WebsterG. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.
48.
JonasonP. K., WebsterG. W., SchmittD. P., LiN. P., & CryselL. (2012). The antihero in popular culture: A life history theory of the dark triad. Review of General Psychology, 16, 192–199.
49.
JonesD. N. & PaulhusD. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 51, 679–682.
50.
JonesD. N. & PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of darkpersonality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.
51.
JudgeT. A., & CableD. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359–393.
52.
JudgeT. A., LePineJ. A., & RichB. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 762–776.
53.
JudgeT. A., PiccoloR. F., & KosalkaT. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.
54.
KanterR. M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
55.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the organization. New York: Basic Books.
56.
KirkmanB. L., TeslukP. E., & RosenB. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual-level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personnel Psychology54, 645–667.
57.
KraimerM. L., SeibertS. E., & LidenR. C. (1999). Psychological empowerment as amultidimensional construct: A test of construct validity. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 59, 127–142.
58.
Kristof-BrownA., ZimmermanR., & JohnsonE. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
59.
Kristof-BrownA. L. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671.
60.
KutcherE. J., BraggerJ. D., Rodriguez-SrednickiO., & MascoJ. L. (2010). The Role of religiosity in stress, job attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 319–337.
61.
LaschingerH. K. S., FineganJ., ShamianJ., & WilkeP. (2003). Workplace empowerment as a predictor of nurse burnout in restructured healthcare settings. Healthcare Quarterly, 6, 1–11.
62.
LaschingerH. K. S., WilkP., ChoJ. & GrecoP. (2009). Empowerment, engagement and perceived effectiveness in nursing work environments: Does experience matter?Journal of Nursing Management, 117, 636–646.
63.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.
64.
LiH., ShiY., LiY., XingZ., WangS., YingM., ZhangM., & SunJ. (2018). Relationship between nurse psychological empowerment and job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74, 1264–1277.
65.
LidenR. C., WayneS. J., & SparroweR. T. (2000). Anexamination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.
66.
Maden-EyiustaC. (2016). Job resources, engagement, and proactivity: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(8), 1234–1250.
67.
MaloneT. W. (1997). Is empowerment just a fad? Control, decision making and IT. Sloan Management Review, 38, 23–35.
68.
Maples-KellerJ. L., & MillerJ. D. (2018). Insight and the Dark Triad: Comparing self- and meta-perceptions in relation to psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(1), 30–39.
69.
MarquetD. (2015). 6 myths about empowering employees, Harvard Business Review, 2–4.
70.
MayD. R., GilsonR. L., & HarterL. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.
71.
MaynardM. T., GilsonL. L., & MathieuJ. E. (2012). Empowerment – fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38, 1231–1281.
72.
MaynardM. T., LucianoM. M., D'InnocenzoL. D., MatthieuJ. E., & DeanM.D. (2014). Modeling time-lagged reciprocal psychological empowerment-performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1244–1253.
73.
McCulloughM. E., & WilloughbyB. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135–69.
74.
McHoskeyJ. (1995). Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 77, 755–759.
75.
MorfC.C., & RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of Narcissism: A dynamic self - regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
76.
MunroD., BoreM., PowisD. (2005). Personality factors in professional ethical behaviour: studies of empathy and narcissism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 49–60.
77.
MorrisL. (1966). Training, empowerment, and change. Training and Development, 50, 7–54.
78.
NeumannC. S., & HareR. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899.
79.
NewtonC., TeoS.T.T., PickD., YeungM. & SalamonsonY. (2013) Flexibility in changepractices and job outcomes for nurses: exploring the role of subjective fit. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 2800–2811.
80.
O'BoyleE. H., ForsythD. R., BanksG. C., & McDanielM. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–580.
81.
PajevicM., Vukosavljevic-GvozdenT., StevanovicN., & NeumannC. (2018). The relationship between the Dark Tetrad and a two-dimensional view of empathy. Personality and Individual Differences. 123, 125–130.
82.
PaulhusD. L., & WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
83.
PincusA. L., AnsellE. B., PimentelC. A., CainN. M., WrightA. G., & LevyK. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365–379.
84.
QuinnR.E. & SpreitzerG. M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamics, 26, 37–49.
85.
RaskinR., & TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
86.
RauthmannJ. F., & KolarG. P. (2012). How “dark” are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884–889.
87.
RauthmannJ. F., & WillT. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 391–404.
88.
RhodewaltF., & MorfC. C. (1998). On self-aggrandizement and anger: A temporal analysis of narcissism and affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 672–685.
89.
RosenthalS. A., & PittinskyT. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617–633.
90.
SahniN., KumarP., LevineE., & SinghalS. (2019). The productivity imperative for healthcare delivery in the United States. McKinsey Center for US Health system Reform white paper. McKinesy & Company: Detroit, MI.
91.
SaksA. M., & AshforthB. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395–426.
92.
SchneiderB. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.
93.
ScrogginsW. A. (2008). The relationship between employee fit perceptions, job performance, and retention: Implications of perceived fit. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 20, 57–71.
94.
SeibertS. E., SilverS. R., & RandolphW. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal47(3), 332–349.
95.
Shapira-LishchinskyO. & BenolielP. (2018). Nurses' psychological empowerment: An integrative approach. Journal of Nursing Management, 27, 1–10.
96.
SimonH. A. (1951). A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica, 19, 293–305.
97.
SinghalS., & CoeE. (2016). The next imperatives for US health care. McKinsey white paper. McKinesy & Company: Detroit, MI.
98.
SmileyR.A., LauerP., BienemyC., BergJ. G., ShiremanE., ReneauK. A., & AlexanderM. (October, 2018). The 2017 National Nursing Workforce Survey. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9 (3), supplement (S1–S54).
99.
SoyerR. B., RoverporJ., KopelmanR. E., MullinsL. S., & WatsonP. J. (2001). Further assessment of the construct validity of four measures of narcissism: Replication and extension. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 245–258.
100.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.
101.
SpreitzerG. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483–504.
102.
SpreitzerG. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In: BarlingJ. and CooperC. L. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
103.
SpreitzerG. M., NobleD. S., MishraA. K., & CookeW. N. (1999). Predicting process improvement team performance in an automotive firm: Explicating the roles of trust and empowerment. Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Groups in Context, 2, 71–92.
104.
StawB. M., & EpsteinL. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 523–556.
105.
SzabóE., & BereczkeiT. (2017). Different paths to different strategies? Unique associations among facets of the Dark Triad, empathy, and trait emotional intelligence. Advanced Cognitive Psychology, 13, 306–313.
106.
ThomasK. W., & VelthouseB. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.
107.
TorpeyE. (April, 2018). Employer outlook for bachelor'slevel occupations. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
108.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019a). Occupational Outlook Handbook: Registered Nurses.
109.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019b). Occupational Outlook Handbook: Nurse Anesthetists, Nurse Midwives, and Nurse Practitioners.
110.
Van BogaertP., PeremansL., de WitM., Van heusdenD., FranckE., TimmermansO., & HavensD. S. (2015). Nurse managers' perceptions and experiences regarding staffnurse empowerment: A qualitativestudy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 15–85.
111.
VazireS., & FunderD. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.
112.
WangG., & LeeP. D. (2009). Psychological empowerment and job satisfaction. Group &Organization Management, 34, 271–296.
113.
WhiteB. A. (2014). Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116–121.
114.
WilliamsK. M., PaulhusD. L., & HareR. D. (2007). Capturing the Four-factor Structure of Psychopathy in College Students via Self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 205–219.
115.
WuW., WangH., LeeH-Y., LinY-T., & GuoF. (2019). ow Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism affect sustainable entrepreneurial orientation: The moderating effect of psychological resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–13.
