Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A number of investigations have recently been performed with electrocutaneous stimulation in order to transmit information from machine to man. In one field of rehabilitation engineering, cutaneous sensation has been employed to substitute the lost sensory channel: for example 1n cases of the blind, the deaf, etc. Electrocutaneous stimulation and recent advances on microelectronics enable sensory aids for the handicapped to become more portable. However, the sensation elicited by electrocutaneous stimulation is unstable and unreliable. In this study a lot of parameters of electrocutaneous stimulation were experimentally evaluated by psychophysical methods in order to find an optimum condition of the stimulation. Most investigations have averted the following problems: stable and painless sensation must be elicited while stimuli are applied to the skin. The threshold values of skin sensation are very much scattered by the inhomogeneity of skin impedance and the distribution of tactile receptors. The contact of an electrode with the skin surface is also inhomoge-neous. A sudden pricking sensation is often associated with electrocutaneous stimuli of constant current under the pain threshold. Adaptation effects are also associated with the stimuli. They must be eliminated to elicit stable and comfortable sensation. In this paper, the authors found an optimum condition of electrocutaneous stimulation. This wave form can elicit skin sensation at any point on the skin. Bipolar constant voltage pulse trains in bursts are suitable for our purpose.

Keywords

electrocutaneous stimulation threshold skin sensations dynamic range pulse train sensory aid tactile adaptation Information transmission electrode

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Collins

C.C.

Saunders

F.A

.: Pictorial display by direct electrical stimulation of the skin, J. Biomed. Syst. 1, 3–16, 1970.

Collins

C.C.

Madey

J.M

.: Tactile sensory replacement, Proc. San D1eqo Biomed. Symp. 13, 15–26, 1974.

Bliss

J.C.

katcher

M.H.

Roger

C.H.

Shepard

R.P

.: Optical-to-tactile image conversion for the blind, IEEE Tr. on Man - Machine Systems MMS-U, 58–65.

bach-y-Rita

: Brain Mechanics in Sensory Substitution, Academic Press, New York, 1972.

Ifukube

Yoshimoto

Shoji

: Reprinted from Bulletin of the Research Institute of Applied Electricity, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan, 29, 41–56, l9?7.

Saunders

F.A

.: An electrotactile sound detector for the deaf, IEEE Tr. on Audio & Electroacoust. AU-21, 285–288, 1973.

Bach-y-Rita

Collins

C.C.

Saunders

F.A.

White, B., Scadden

: Vision substitution by tactile image projection, Nature 221, 963–964, 1969.

Kato

.: Human coqnitional ability for electrical stimulation signals, in Advance External Control of Human Extremities, ETAN, Belgrade 69–84, 1970.

Kume

Ohzu

: Basic Study on Electrocutaneous Stimulation for Vision Substitution Systems, Proc Third Symposium on Sensory Substitution, Tokyo, 37–43, 1977 (in Japanese).

10.

Tachi

Tanie

Abe

: Effects of pulse height and pulse width on the magnitude sensation of electrocutaneous stimuli, Jap. J. Med. Electron. & B1ol. Eng. 5, 13–18, 1977 (in Japanese).

11.

Bliss

J.C

.: Human operator describing functions with visual and tactile displays, 3rd Annual NASA University Conference on Manual Control NASA sp-144, 67–80, 1976.

12.

von Bekesy

: Sensory Inhibition, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1967.

13.

McNeal

D.R

.: Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve, IEEE Tr. on Biomedical Engineering BME-23, 329–337, 1976.

14.

Butikofer

Lawrence

P.O

.: Electrocutaneous nerve stimulation - I: Model and experiment, IEEE Tr. on Biomedical Enqineerinq BME-25, 526–531, 1978.

15.

Butikofer

Lawrence

P.D

.: Electrocutaneous nerve stimulation - II: Stimulus waveform selection, IEEE Tr. on Biomedical Enqineerinq BME-26, 69–75, 1979.

16.

Rollman

G.B

.: Electrocutaneous stimulation: Psychometric functions and temporal integration, Percep. & Phychophys. 5, 289–293 1969.

17.

Saunders

F.A.

Collins

C.C

.: Electrical stimulation of the sense of touch, J. Biomed. Syst. 2, 27–37, 1971.

18.

Mason

J.M.

Maickay

N.A.M

.: Pain sensations associated with electrocutaneous stimulation, IEEE Tr. on Biomedical Enqineerinq BME-23, 405–409, 1976.

19.

Szeto

A.Y.J.

Prior

R.E.

Lyman

: Electrocutaneous tracking: A methodology for evaluating sensory feedback codes, IEEE Tr. on Biomedical Engineering BME-26, 47–49, 1979.

20.

Melen

R.D.

Meindl

J.D

.: Electrocutaneous stimulation in a reading aid for the blind, IEEE Tr. on Biomedical Enqineerinq 18, 1–3, 1971.

21.

Saunders

F.A

.: Recommended Procedures for Electrocutaneous Displays, in Functional Electrical Stimulation: Application in Neural Prostheses

F.T

Hambrech and J.B. Reswick Eds, Dekker, New York, 303–309, 1977.

22.

Gibson

R.H

.: Electrical Stimulation of Pain and Touch, in Skin Senses, D.R. Kenshalo Ed., Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 223–261, 1972.

23.

Mason

J.L.

Mackay

N.A.M

.: Cutaneous stimulation for sound localization aid, Proc. Cornahan Conference on Electric Prothetics 1–4, 1973.

24.

Collins

C.C

.: Personal communication, February l978.

25.

Rogers

C.H

.: Choice of stimulator frequency for tactile array, IEEE Tr. on Man-Machine Systems MMS-11, 1970.

26.

Yalbot

W.H

. .: The sense of flutter vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand, J. Neurophysiol. 31, 301–334 1968.

27.

Kume

Ohzu

: In preparation.

28.

Alles

O.S

.: Information transmission by phantom sensation, IEEE Tr. on Man-Machine Systems MMS-11, 85–91. 1970.

29.

Geldard

F.A.

Sherrick

.: Multiple cutaneous stimulation: The discrimination of vibratory patterns, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 37, 797–801, 1965.

30.

Omura

: Electro-acupuncture: Its electro-physiological basis and criteria for effectiveness and safety - Part I, Acup. & Electro-Therap. Res. 1, 157–181, 1975.

31.

Omura

: Critical evaluation of the methods of measurement of “tingling threshold,” “pain threshold,” and “pain tolerance” by electrical stimulation, Acup. 8 Electro-Therap. Res. 2, 161–236, 1977.

32.

Omura

Sabolovic

Savolovic

Kooby

& Heller

S.I

.: Threshold potentials for “tingling sensation,” “muscle contraction,” and “pain sensation” during experimental and therapeutic electrical stimulation via stylostixis (electro-acupuncture) in patients with chronic pain or neuro-muscular problems and in apparently healthy human volunteers, Abstracts of the Second World Conqress on Pain of the International Association for the Study of Pain, held in Montreal, Canada, August 27-September 1, 1978, page 125.

33.

Zotterman

(editor): Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series, Volume 27, Sensory Functions of the Skin in Primates with Special Reference to Man, Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Wenner Gren Center, Stockholm, Sweden, January, 1976, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.

Electrocutaneous Stimulation for Information Transmission – I: Optimum Waveform Eliciting Stable Sensation without Discomfort

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References