AdelmanH.2008. ‘Blaming the United Nations’, Journal of International Political Theory4(1): 9–33.
2.
AdelmanH.2009. ‘Punishing the United Nations for Rwanda and Darfur, in ErskineT. (ed.), How Should We Respond to Delinquent Institutions? Blaming, Punishing and Rehabilitating Collective Moral Agents in International Politics (forthcoming).
3.
BrownC.‘“Delinquent’ States, Guilty Consciences and Humanitarian Politics in the 1990s’, Journal of International Political Theory4(1): 55–71.
4.
CarmolaK.2009. ‘Abu Ghraib and the Complications of Institutional Responsibility’, in ErskineT. (ed.), How Should We Respond to Delinquent Institutions? Blaming, Punishing and Rehabilitating Collective Moral Agents in International Politics (forthcoming).
5.
CoffeeJ. C.Jr.1981. ‘No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment’, Michigan Law Review79: 386–460.
6.
CrawfordN.2009. ‘Collective Responsibility for Systemic Military Atrocity’, in ErskineT. (ed.), How Should We Respond to Delinquent Institutions? Blaming, Punishing and Rehabilitating Collective Moral Agents in International Politics (forthcoming).
7.
DobsonL.2008. ‘Plural Views, Common Purpose: On How to Address Moral Failure by International Political Organizations’, Journal of International Political Theory4(1): 34–54.
8.
ErskineT.2001. ‘Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States’, Ethics & International Affairs15: 67–85.
9.
ErskineT. (ed.). 2003. Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
ErskineT. (ed.). 2004a. Assigning Duties to Institutions: Debating Hard Cases, Global Society18(1). Special Issue.
11.
ErskineT.2004b. ‘“Blood on the UN's Hands’.? Assigning Responsibilities to an Intergovernmental Organization’, Global Society18(1): 21–42.
12.
ErskineT.2008. ‘Locating Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Agency in International Relations’, in Reus-SmitC.SnidalD. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 699–707.
13.
ErskineT. (ed.). 2009a. How Should We Respond to Delinquent Institutions? Blaming, Punishing and Rehabilitating Collective Moral Agents in International Politics (forthcoming).
14.
ErskineT.2009b. ‘Kicking Bodies and Damning Souls: The Danger of Harming “Innocent” Individuals While Punishing “Delinquent’ States’, in ErskineT. (ed.), How Should We Respond to Delinquent Institutions? Blaming, Punishing and Rehabilitating Collective Moral Agents in International Politics (forthcoming).
15.
Ethics & International Affairs.2001. Special Section on ‘Collective Moral Agency’, 15: 67–115.
16.
FrostM.2008. ‘The Delinquency of Anarchical Societies: Transformation, not Punishment; Restyling, not Rehabilitation’, Journal of International Political Theory4(1): 72–83.
17.
HattoriT.2009. ‘Locating “Delinquency’.: A Critical Realist Approach to Responsibility, Blame, and Sanction in Commercial Sovereign Debt’, in ErskineT. (ed.), How Should We Respond to Delinquent Institutions? Blaming, Punishing and Rehabilitating Collective Moral Agents in International Politics (forthcoming).
18.
KroslakD.2003. ‘The Responsibility of Collective External Bystanders in Cases of Genocide: The French in Rwanda’, in ErskineT. (ed.), Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
LangT.2003. ‘The United Nations and the Fall of Srebrenica: Meaningful Responsibility and International Society’, in ErskineT. (ed.), Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
O'NeillO.1996. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
WilliamsB.1965. ‘Consistency in Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXIX: 103–24.