Most papers analyze the broadcast demand for a single league. However, professional football clubs participate in two or more tournaments simultaneously every season. Hence, the perception of fans may differ. This is a relevant topic, since television rights constitute the main source of revenue for professional football. The Brazilian football market is an appropriate laboratory to test it: The first division teams play two national-level tournaments, including a state-level championship, and the top clubs also compete in an international championship. The dataset comprises 458 broadcast matches in Brazil from 2013 to 2015. The singularity of this sample is that all matches are broadcast by the same free-to-air television channel. Three panel data linear regressions with local team fixed effects are carried out. The results indicate differences in the broadcast demand among tournaments. Marginal effects might help television channels, leagues, and clubs find optimal broadcast rights deals.
BergmannA., & SchreyerD. (2019). Factors that shape the demand for international football games across different age groups. International Journal of Sport Finance, 14(1), 13–23.
2.
BorlandF., & MacdonaldR. (2003). Demand for sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 478–502.
3.
BucksS. (1987). Television audience measurement research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29(3), 265–278.
4.
BuraimoB., & SimmonsR. (2008). Do sports fans really value uncertainty of outcome? Evidence from the English premier league. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3, 146–155.
5.
BuraimoB., & SimmonsR. (2009). A tale of two audiences: Spectators, television viewers and outcome uncertainty in Spanish football. Journal of Economics and Business, 61, 326–338.
6.
BuraimoB., & SimmonsR. (2015). Uncertainty of outcome or star quality? Television audience demand for English premier league football. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 22(3), 449–469.
7.
CoatesD., HumphreysB. R., & ZhouL. (2014). Reference-dependent preferences, loss aversion, and live game attendance. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 959–973.
8.
CoxA. (2018). Spectator demand, uncertainty of results, and public interest: Evidence from the English Premier League. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(1), 3–30.
9.
CzarnitzkiD., & StadtmannG. (2002). Uncertainty of outcome versus reputation: Empirical evidence for the First German Football Division. Empirical Economics, 27(1), 101–112.
10.
DomzalT. J., & KernanJ. B. (1983). Television audience segmentation according to need gratification. Journal of Advertising Research, 23(5), 37–49.
11.
EmmettB. P. (1956). The television audience in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A Series A (General), 199(3), 284–311.
12.
FeehanP., ForrestD., & SimmonsR. (2002). Premier League soccer: Normal or inferior good?European Sport Management Quarterly, 3, 31–45.
13.
ForrestD., & SimmonsR. (2002). Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sports: The case of English soccer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician), 51, 229–241.
14.
ForrestD., SimmonsR., & BuraimoB. (2005). Outcome uncertainty and the couch potato audience. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(4), 641–661.
15.
FujakH., & FrawleyS. (2016). Broadcast inequality in Australian football. Communication & Sport, 4(2), 187–211.
16.
GantzW. (1981). An exploration of viewing motives and behaviours associated with television sports. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 25(3), 263–275.
17.
GarciaJ., & RodriguezP. (2009). Sports attendance: A survey of the literature 1973-2007. Rivista di Diritto ed Economia Dello Sport, 5(2), 111–151.
18.
GasparettoT., & BarajasA. (2018). Fan preferences: One country, two markets and different behaviours. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(3), 330–347.
19.
GasparettoT., BarajasA., & Fernandez-JardonC. M. (2018). Brand teams and distribution of wealth in Brazilian State Championships. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 8(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-03-2017-0016
20.
GoodhardtG. J., EhrenbergA. S. C., & CollinsM. A. (1975). The television audience: Patterns of viewing.Farnborough, UK: Saxon House, Lexington Books.
21.
HumphreysB. R., & PerezL. (2019). Loss aversion, upset preference, and sports television viewing audience size. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 78, 61–67.
22.
HumphreysB. R., & ZhouL. (2015). The Louis-Schmelling paradox and the league standing effect reconsidered. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(8), 835–852.
JenaF., & ReillyB. (2016). Testing the uncertainty outcome hypothesis using data from second tier soccer in Ireland. Applied Economics Letters, 23(18), 1257–1260.
25.
MadalozzoR., & VillarR. B. (2009). Brazilian football: What brings fans to the game?Journal of Sports Economics, 10(6), 639–650.
26.
MartinsA. M., & CróS. (2018). The demand for football in Portugal: New insights on outcome uncertainty. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(4), 473–497.
27.
NealeW. C. (1964). The peculiar economics of professional sports. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(1), 1–14.
28.
NollR. G. (2003). The organization of sports leagues. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(A), 530–551.
29.
PawlowskiT., & AndersC. (2012). Stadium attendance in German professional football: The (un)importance of uncertainty of outcome reconsidered. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 1553–1556.
30.
PeelD. A., & ThomasD. A. (1992). The demand for football: Some evidence on outcome uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 17, 323–331.
31.
PerezL., PuenteV., & Rodriguez. (2017). Factors determining TV soccer viewing: Does uncertainty of outcome really matter?International Journal of Sport Finance, 12(2), 124–139.
32.
RothmanJ., & RautaI. (1969). Towards a typology of television audience. Journal of the Market Research Society, 11(1), 45–69.
33.
RottenbergS. (1956). The baseball players’ labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 242–258.
34.
ScellesN. (2017). Star quality and competitive balance? Television audience demand for English Premier League football reconsidered. Applied Economics Letters, 24(19), 1399–1402.
35.
SchreyerD., SchmidtS. L., & TorglerB. (2016). Against all odds? Exploring the role of game outcome uncertainty in season ticket holders’ stadium attendance demand. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 192–217.
36.
SchreyerD., SchmidtS. L., & TorglerB. (2018). Game Outcome uncertainty and television audience demand: New evidence from German football. German Economic Review, 19(2), 140–161
37.
SzymanskiS. (2001). Income inequality, competitive balance and the attractiveness of team sports: Some evidence and a natural experiment from English soccer. The Economic Journal, 111, F69–F84.
38.
TainskyS., & JasielecM. (2014). Television viewership of out-of-market games in league markets: Traditional demand shifters and local team influence. Journal of Sport Management, 28(1), 2014.
39.
TainskyS., & McEvoyC. D. (2012). Television broadcast demand in markets without local teams. Journal of Sports Economics, 13(3), 250–265.
40.
TainskyS., XuJ., MillsB. M., & SalagaS. (2016). How Success and uncertainty compel interest in related goods: Playoff probability and out-of-market television viewership in the National Football League. Review of Industrial Organization, 48(1), 29–43.
41.
TheilH. (1967). Economics and information theory.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
