Change detection in sparse repeat CT scans with non-rigid deformations

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Detecting and interpreting changes in the images of follow-up CT scans by the clinicians is often time-consuming and error-prone due to changes in patient position and non-rigid anatomy deformations. Thus, reconstructed repeat scan images are required, precluding reduced dose sparse-view repeat scanning.

OBJECTIVE:

A method to automatically detect changes in a region of interest of sparse-view repeat CT scans in the presence of non-rigid deformations of the patient’s anatomy without reconstructing the original images.

METHODS:

The proposed method uses the sparse sinogram data of two CT scans to distinguish between genuine changes in the repeat scan and differences due to non-rigid anatomic deformations. First, size and contrast level of the changed regions are estimated from the difference between the scans’ sinogram data. The estimated types of changes in the repeat scan help optimize the method’s parameter values. Two scans are then aligned using Radon space non-rigid registration. Rays which crossed changes in the ROI are detected and back-projected onto image space in a two-phase procedure. These rays form a likelihood map from which the binary changed region map is computed.

RESULTS:

Experimental studies on four pairs of clinical lung and liver CT scans with simulated changed regions yield a mean changed region recall rate > 86%and a mean precision rate > 83%when detecting large changes with low contrast, and high contrast changes, even when small. The new method outperforms image space methods using prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) reconstruction, particularly for small, low contrast changes (recall = 15.8%, precision = 94.7%).

CONCLUSION:

Our method for automatic change detection in sparse-view repeat CT scans with non-rigid deformations may assist radiologists by highlighting the changed regions and may obviate the need for a high-quality repeat scan image when no changes are detected.

Keywords

3D Radon space low-dose sparse repeat CT scanning non-rigid transformation repeat scan change detection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

G.H.

, Tang

and Leng

, Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets, Medical Physics 35(2) (2008), 660–663.

Zhao

, James

L.P.

, Moskowitz

C.S.

, et al., Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, Radiology 252(1) (2009), 263–271.

Werner-Wasik

, Xiao

, Pequignot

, et al., Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study, International Journal of Radiation Oncology 51(1) (2001), 56–61.

Cleary

and Peters

T.M.

, Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 12 (2010), 119–142.

Davies

H.E.

, Wathen

C.G.

and Gleeson

F.V.

, The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimize them, BMJ Journal 342 (2011), d947.

McCollough

C.H.

, Bruesewitz

M.R.

and Kofler

J.M.

, CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options, Radiographics 26(2) (2006), 503–512.

Shamul

and Joskowicz

, Radon space dose optimization in repeat CT scanning, –, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 36(12) (2017), 2436–2448.

Crawford

C.R.

and Kak

A.C.

, Aliasing artifacts in computerized tomography, Applied Optics 18(21) (1979), 3704–3711.

Sidky

E.Y.

and Pan

, Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained total-variation minimization, Physics Medicine and Biology 53(17) (2008), 4777–4807.

10.

Liu

, Ma

, Fan

, et al., Adaptive-weighted total variation minimization for sparse data toward low-dose X-ray computed tomography image reconstruction, Physics in Medicine and Biology 57(23) (2012), 7923–7956.

11.

Dang

, Wang

A.S.

, Sussman

M.S.

, et al., dPIRPLE: a joint estimation framework for deformable registration and penalized-likelihood CT image reconstruction using prior images, Physics in Medicine and Biology 59(17) (2014), 4799–4826.

12.

Pourmorteza

, Dang

, Siewerdsen

J.H.

, et al., Reconstruction of difference in sequential CT studies using penalized likelihood estimation, Physics in Medicine and Biology 61(5) (2016), 1986–2002.

13.

Brody

W.R.

, Digital subtraction angiography, –, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 29(3) (1982), 1176–1180.

14.

J.P.

and Betke

, Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time –preliminary experience, Radiology 218(1) (2001), 267–273.

15.

Vivanti

, Szeskin

, Joskowicz

, et al., Automatic detection of new tumors and tumor burden evaluation in longitudinal liver CT scan studies, International Journal of Computer-Aided Radiology and Surgery 12(11) (2017), 1945–1957.

16.

Shamul

and Joskowicz

, Automatic change detection in sparse repeat CT scanning, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 39(1) (2020), 48–61.

17.

Zeng

, Fessler

J.A.

and Balter

J.M.

, Estimating 3-D respiratory motion from orbiting views by tomographic image registration, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 26(2) (2007), 153–63.

18.

Adelman

and Joskowicz

, Deformable registration and region-of-interest image reconstruction in sparse repeat CT scanning, –, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology 28(6) (2020), 1069–1089.

19.

Wang

and Gu

, High-quality four-dimensional cone-beam CT by deforming prior images, Physics in Medicine and Biology 58(2) (2012), 231–46.

20.

Medan

, Shamul

and Joskowicz

, Sparse 3D Radon space rigid registration of CT scans: method and validation study, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 36(2) (2017), 497–506.

21.

De Nunzio

, Tommasi

, Agrusti

, et al., Automatic lung segmentation in CT images with accurate handling of the hilar region, Journal of Digital Imaging 24(1) (2011), 11–27.

22.

Heimann

, Van Ginneken

M.A.

, et al., Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 28(8) (2009), 1251–1265.

23.

, Hoffman

E.A.

and Reinhardt

J.M.

, Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20(6) (2001), 490–498.

24.

Žabić

, Wang

, Morton

and Brown

K.M.

, A low dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors, Medical Physics 40(2) (2013), 031102.

25.

Eguchi

, Yoshizawa

, Kawakami

, et al., Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness, PloS One 9(5) (2014), e97867.

26.

Yoshimura

, Murakami

and Kim

, Angiomyolipoma of the liver with least amount of fat component: imaging features of CT, MR, and angiography, Abdominal Imaging, 27(2) (2002), 184–187.

27.

and Wang

, Compressed sensing based interior tomography, Physics in Medicine and Biology 54(9) (2009), 2791.

28.

Huang

, Zhang

, Ma

, et al., Iterative image reconstruction for sparse-view CT using normal-dose image induced total variation prior, PloS One 8(11) (2013), e79709.