Projection decomposition algorithm for dual-energy computed tomography via deep neural network

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been widely used to improve identification of substances from different spectral information. Decomposition of the mixed test samples into two materials relies on a well-calibrated material decomposition function.

OBJECTIVE:

This work aims to establish and validate a data-driven algorithm for estimation of the decomposition function.

METHODS:

A deep neural network (DNN) consisting of two sub-nets is proposed to solve the projection decomposition problem. The compressing sub-net, substantially a stack auto-encoder (SAE), learns a compact representation of energy spectrum. The decomposing sub-net with a two-layer structure fits the nonlinear transform between energy projection and basic material thickness.

RESULTS:

The proposed DNN not only delivers image with lower standard deviation and higher quality in both simulated and real data, and also yields the best performance in cases mixed with photon noise. Moreover, DNN costs only 0.4 s to generate a decomposition solution of 360 × 512 size scale, which is about 200 times faster than the competing algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS:

The DNN model is applicable to the decomposition tasks with different dual energies. Experimental results demonstrated the strong function fitting ability of DNN. Thus, the Deep learning paradigm provides a promising approach to solve the nonlinear problem in DECT.

Keywords

Dual-energy computed tomography material decomposition deep learning stack auto-encoder

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ying

, Naidu

and Crawford

C.R.

, Dual energy computed tomography for explosive detection, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology 14(4) (2006), 235–256.

Vilches-Freixas

, Létang

J.M.

, Ducros

and Rit

, Optimization of dual-energy CT acquisitions for proton therapy using projection-based decomposition, Medical Physics (2017).

Goo

H.W.

and Goo

J.M.

, Dual-energy CT: New horizon in medical imaging, Korean Journal of Radiology 18(4) (2017), 555–569.

Hong

and Chin

T.Y.

, Dual-energy CT in gout-A review of current concepts and applications, Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 64(1) (2017), 41–51.

, Wang

, Luo

D.H.

et al., Diagnostic value of single-source dual-energy spectral computed tomography for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas, Journal of X-ray Sciece and Techology 25(5) (2017), 793–802.

Stenner

, Berkus

and Kachelriess

, Empirical dual energy calibration (EDEC) for cone-beam computed tomography, Medical Physics 34(9) (2007), 3630–3641.

Shen

, Xing

, Zhang

et al., Hybrid decomposition method for dual energy CT, Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 2016, pp. 1–4.

Zhao

, Li

and Chen

, K-edge eliminated material decomposition method for dual-energy X-ray CT, Appl Radiat Isot 127 (2017), 231–236.

Brendel

and Schlomka

J.P.

, Empirical projection-based basis-component decomposition method, Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering 7258 (2009), 72583Y–72588Y-8.

10.

Jaccard

, Rogers

T.W.

, Morton

E.J.

and Griffin

L.D.

, Detection of concealed cars in complex cargo X-ray imagery using deep learning, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology 25(3) (2017), 323–339.

11.

Sun

, Zheng

and Qian

, Automatic feature learning using multichannel ROI based on deep structured algorithms for computerized lung cancer diagnosis, Computers in Biology and Medicine 89 (2017), 530–539.

12.

Wang

, A perspective on deep imaging, IEEE Access 4(99) (2016), 8914–8924.

13.

Schmidt

T.G.

and Zimmerman

K.C.

, Material Decomposition of Multi-spectral X-Ray Projections Using Neural Networks, US Patent, US20150371378, 2015.

14.

Zimmerman

K.C.

and Schmidt

T.G.

, Experimental comparison of empirical material decomposition methods for spectral CT, Physics in Medicine & Biology 60(8) (2015), 3175–3191.

15.

Lee

W.J.

, Kim

D.S.

, S.W. et al., Material depth reconstruction method of multi-energy X-ray images using neural network, International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012, pp. 1514–1517.

16.

Bengio

, Lamblin

, Popovici

and Larochelle

, Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (2007), 153–160.

17.

Hinton

, Osindero

and Teh

Y.W.

, A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural Computation 18(7) (2014), 1527–1554.

18.

Salakhutdinov

and Hinton

, Deep boltzmann machines, Journal of Machine Learning Research 5(2) (2009), 1967–2006.

19.

Denton

, Gross

and Fergus

, Semi-Supervised Learning with Context-Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks, 2016.

20.

Bengio

, Goodfellow

I.J.

and Courville

, Deep Learning, Book in preparation for MIT Press (2016). http://www.deeplearningbook.org.

21.

Rumelhart

D.E.

, Hinton

G.E.

and Williams

R.J.

, Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature 323 (1986), 533–536.

22.

Poludniowski

, Landry

, Deblois

et al., SpekCalc: A program to calculate photon spectra from tungsten anode x-ray tubes, Physics in Medicine & Biology 54(19) (2009), N433–N438.

23.

Seltzer

S.M.

, XCOM: Photon Cross Sections Database, 2005.

24.

, Wang

, Cai

et al., Projection decomposition algorithm for X-ray dual-energy computed tomography based on isotransmission line fitting, Acta Optica Sinica 36(8) (2016), 0834001.

25.

and Zhang

, Projection decomposition algorithm of X-ray dual-energy computed tomography based on projection matching, Acta Optica Sinica 31(3) (2011), 82–87.

26.

, Christner

J.A.

, Leng

et al., Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: Radiation dose and image quality, Medical Physics 38(12) (2011), 6371–6379.