Three novel accurate pixel-driven projection methods for 2D CT and 3D EPR imaging

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This work aims to explore more accurate pixel-driven projection methods for iterative image reconstructions in order to reduce high-frequency artifacts in the generated projection image.

METHODS:

Three new pixel-driven projection methods namely, small-pixel-large-detector (SPLD), linear interpolation based (LIB) and distance anterpolation based (DAB), were proposed and applied to reconstruct images. The performance of these methods was evaluated in both two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) images via the modified FORBILD phantom and three-dimensional (3D) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) images via the 6-spheres phantom. Specifically, two evaluations based on projection generation and image reconstruction were performed. For projection generation, evaluation was using a 2D disc phantom, the modified FORBILD phantom and the 6-spheres phantom. For image reconstruction, evaluations were performed using the FORBILD and 6-spheres phantom. During evaluation, 2 quantitative indices of root-mean-square-error (RMSE) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were used.

RESULTS:

Comparing to the use of ordinary pixel-driven projection method, RMSE of the SPLD based least-square algorithm was reduced from 0.0701 to 0.0384 and CNR was increased from 5.6 to 19.47 for 2D FORBILD phantom reconstruction. For 3D EPRI, RMSE of SPLD was also reduced from 0.0594 to 0.0498 and CNR was increased from 3.88 to 11.58. In addition, visual evaluation showed that images reconstructed in both 2D and 3D images suffered from high-frequency line-shape artifacts when using the ordinary pixel-driven projection method. However, using 3 new methods all suppressed the artifacts significantly and yielded more accurate reconstructions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Three proposed pixel-driven projection methods achieved more accurate iterative image reconstruction results. These new and more accurate methods can also be easily extended to other imaging modalities. Among them, SPLD method should be recommended to 3D and four dimensional (4D) EPR imaging.

Keywords

Accurate pixel-driven projection iterative image reconstruction computed tomography electron paramagnetic resonance imaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Christodoulou

A.G.

, et al., Fast dynamic electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oxygen imaging using low-rank tensors, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 270 (2016), 176–182.

Qiao

, et al., 3D pulse EPR imaging from sparse-view projections via constrained, total variation minimization, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 258 (2015), 49–57.

Zeng

G.L.

and Gullberg

, Ray-driven backprojector for backprojection filtering and filtered backprojection algorithms. in Publ by IEEE; 1994.

Ahn

A.H.

and Halpern

H.J.

, Simulation of 4D spectral-spatial EPR images, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 187(1) (2007), 1–9.

Ahn

K.H.

and Halpern

H.J.

, Spatially uniform sampling in 4-D EPR spectral-spatial imaging, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 185(1) (2007), 152–158.

Peters

, Algorithms for fast back-and re-projection in computed tomography, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 28(4) (1981), 3641–3647.

Gao

, Fast parallel algorithms for the x-ray transform and its adjoint, Medical Physics 39(11) (2012), 7110–7120.

Siddon

R.L.

, Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dmensional CT array, Medical Physics 12(2) (1985), 252–255.

Joseph

P.M.

, An improved algorithm for reprojecting rays through pixel images, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1(3) (1982), 192–196.

10.

Ertas

, et al., Iterative image reconstruction using non-local means with total variation from insufficient projection data, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology 24(1) (2016), 1–8.

11.

De Man

and Basu

, Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions, Physics in Medicine and Biology 49(11) (2004), 2463.

12.

Man

B.D.

and Basu

, Distance-driven projection and backprojection, in Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2002 IEEE 2002. IEEE.

13.

Jian-Lin

, et al., Fast parallel algorithm for three-dimensional distance-driven model in iterative computed tomography reconstruction, Chinese Physics B 24(2) (2015), 028703.

14.

Zeng

G.L.

and Gullberg

G.T.

, Unmatched projector/backprojector pairs in an iterative reconstruction algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 19(5) (2000), 548–555.

15.

Long

, Fessler

J.A.

and Balter

J.M.

, 3D forward and back-projection for X-ray CT using separable footprints, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 29(11) (2010), 1839–1850.

16.

Zwicker

, et al., EWA splatting, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8(3) (2002), 223–238.

17.

Bian

, et al., Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT, Physics in Medicine and Biology 55(22) (2010), 6575.

18.

Qiao

, et al., Comparison of parabolic filtration methods for 3D filtered back projection in pulsed EPR imaging, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 248 (2014), 42–53.

19.

, et al., Simulation tools for two-dimensional experiments in x-ray computed tomography using the FORBILD head phantom, Physics in Medicine and Biology 57(13) (2012), N237.

20.

Sidky

E.Y.

, Jørgensen

J.H.

and Pan

, Convex optimization problem prototyping for image reconstruction in computed tomography with the Chambolle–Pock algorithm, Physics in Medicine and Biology 57(10) (2012), 3065.

21.

Redler

, Epel

and Halpern

H.J.

, Maximally spaced projection sequencing in electron paramagnetic resonance imaging, Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering 45(1) (2015), 33–45.

22.

Zhang

, et al., Artifact reduction in short-scan CBCT by use of optimization-based reconstruction, Physics in Medicine and Biology 61(9) (2016), 3387.

23.

Xia

, et al., Optimization-based image reconstruction with artifact reduction in C-arm CBCT, Physics in Medicine and Biology 61(20) (2016), 7300.

24.

Zhang

, et al., Investigation of optimization-based reconstruction with an image-total-variation constraint in PET, Physics in Medicine and Biology 61(16) (2016), 6055.