In practice, mis-calibrated detector pixels give rise to wide and faint ring artifacts in the reconstruction image of the In-line phase-contrast computed tomography (IL-PC-CT). Ring artifacts correction is essential in IL-PC-CT. In this study, a novel method of wide and faint ring artifacts correction was presented based on combining TV-L1 model with guided image filtering (GIF) in the reconstruction image domain. The new correction method includes two main steps namely, the GIF step and the TV-L1 step. To validate the performance of this method, simulation data and real experimental synchrotron data are provided. The results demonstrate that TV-L1 model with GIF step can effectively correct the wide and faint ring artifacts for IL-PC-CT.
BoinM. and HaibelA., Compensation of ring artefacts in synchrotron tomographic images, Optics Express14 (2006), 12071–12075.
2.
GaoX., LuoS., YinH., et al., A micro-tomography method based on X-ray diffraction enhanced imaging for the visualization of micro-organs and soft tissues, Computerized Medical Imaging & Graphics30 (2006), 339–347.
3.
MayoS., DavisT., GureyevT.P., et al., X-ray phase-contrast microscopy and microtomography, Optics Express11 (2003), 2289–2302.
4.
ChenR.C., RigonL. and LongoR., Quantitative 3D refractive index decrement reconstruction using single-distance phase-contrast tomography data, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics44 (2011), 495401:1–495401:9.
5.
LiuJ., CaiW. and NingR., Evaluation of differential phase contrast cone beam CT imaging system, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology25 (2017), 357–372.
6.
DanonY., BlockR.C. and SlovacekR.E., Design and construction of a thermal neutron target for the RPI linac, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research352 (1995), 596–604.
7.
DilmanianF., ZhongZ., RenB., WuX., et al., Computed tomography of x-ray index of refraction using the diffraction enhanced imaging method, Physics in Medicine & Biology45 (2000), 933–946.
8.
WangZ., HuangZ., ChenZ., et al., Low-dose multiple-information retrieval algorithm for X-ray grating-based imaging, Nuclear Inst & Methods in Physics Research A635 (2001), 103–107.
9.
PfeifferF., KottlerC., BunkO. and DavidC., Hard x-ray phase tomography with low-brilliance sources, Physical Review Letters98 (1081), 108105:1–108105:4.
10.
MeiserJ., WillnerM., SchroterT., et al., Increasing the field of view in grating based X-ray phase contrast imaging using stitched gratings, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology24 (2016), 379–388.
11.
RavenC., SnigirevA., SnigirevaI. and SpanneP., Phase-contrast Microtomography with Coherent High-energy Synchrotron X-rays, Applied Physics Letters69 (1996), 1826–1828.
12.
JiD., HuC. and YangH., Image reconstruction algorithm for in-line phase contrast imaging computed tomography with an improved anisotropic diffusion model, Journal of X-ray science and technology23 (2015), 311–320.
13.
HermanG.T. and BrouwW.N., Book-review - image reconstruction from projections - the fundamentals of computerized tomography, 29 (1980), 64–68.
14.
DavisG.R. and ElliottJ.C., X-ray microtomography scanner using time-delay integration for elimination of ring artefacts in the reconstructed image, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research394 (1997), 157–162.
15.
GörnerW., HentschelM.P., MüllerB.R., et al., BAMline: The first hard X-ray beamline at BESSY II, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research s467-468 (2001), 703–706.
16.
MünchB., TrtikP., MaroneF. and StampanoniM., Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet–Fourier filtering, Optics Express17 (2009), 8567–8591.
17.
HuoQ.R., LiJ.W. and LuY., Removing ring artifacts in CBCT images via L0 smoothing, Imaging Systems and Technology26 (2016), 284–294.
18.
SijbersJ. and PostnovA., Reduction of ring artefacts in high resolution micro-CT reconstructions, Physics in Medicine & Biology49 (2004), 247–253.
19.
PrellD., KyriakouW.A. and KalenderY., Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT, Physics in Medicine & Biology54 (2009), 3881–3895.
20.
YuanC., QiH.. ChenZ., et al, CT image ring artifact reduction based on prior image, Med Phys43 (2016), 3388.
21.
PierreP. and AlessandroM., Ring artifacts correction in compressed sensing tomographic reconstruction, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation22 (2015), 1268–1295.
22.
RavenC., “Numerical removal of ring artifacts in microtomography, Review of Scientific Instruments69 (1998), 2978–2980.
23.
HeK., SunJ. and TangX., Guided image filtering, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence35 (2013), 1397–1409.
24.
JiD., QuG. and LiuB., Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique based on guided image filtering, Optics Express24 (2016), 15897–15911.
25.
TibshiraniR.J., Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J R Stat Soc B, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society58 (1996), 267–288.
26.
ShiJ., et al., Enhanced spatial resolution in fluorescence molecular tomography using restarted l1-regularized nonlinear conjugate gradient algorithm, Journal of Biomedical Optics19 (2014), 046018:1–046018:11.
27.
LaroqueS.J., SidkyE.Y. and PanX., Accurate image reconstruction from sparse data in diffraction tomography using a total variation minimization algorithm, Proc SPIE6513 (2017), 651302–651306.
28.
WangG. and YuH., A soft-threshold filtering approach for reconstruction from a limited number of projections, Physics in Medicine and Biology55 (2010), 3905–3916.
29.
JiD.J., QuG.R., HuC.H., et al., Anisotropic total variation minimization approach in in-line phase-contrast tomography and its application to correction of ring artifacts, Chinese Physics B26 (2017), 060701:1–060701:8.
30.
GaoH. and ZhaoH., Multilevel bioluminescence tomography based on radiative transfer equation part 2: Total variation and l1 data fidelity, Optics Express18 (2010), 1854–1871.
31.
LiuL.K., ChanS.H. and NguyenT.Q., Depth reconstruction from sparse samples: Representation, algorithm, and sampling, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing24 (2015), 1983–1996.
32.
DraperN. and SmithH., Applied Regression Analysis (John Wiley, 1981).
33.
LauzierP.T. and ChenG.H., Characterization of statistical prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): II. Application to dose reduction, Medical Physics40 (2013), 021902:1–021902:14.
34.
JiangS., LiuJ., AnY., et al., Novel l 2,1-norm optimization method for fluorescence molecular tomography reconstruction,:, Biomedical Optics Express7 (2016), 2342–2359.
35.
CorreiaT., et al., Wavelet-based data and solution compression for efficient image reconstruction in fluorescence diffuse optical tomography, Journal of Biomedical Optics18 (2013), 086008:1–086008:13.
36.
BoydS., ParikhN., ChuE., et al., Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers, Foundations & Trends ® in Machine Learning3 (2011), 1–122.
37.
NgM.K., ChanR.H. and TangW.C., A Fast Algorithm for Deblurring Models with Neumann Boundary Conditions, Siam Journal on Scientific Computing21 (1999), 851–866.
38.
LiC., An efficient algorithm for total variation regularization with applications to the single pixel camera and compressive sensing, Dissertations & Theses - Gradworks (2011).
39.
WangZ., BovikA.C., SheikhH.R. and SimoncelliE.P., Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Trans. Image Process13 (2004), 600–612.
