Electroclinical semiology of the bilateral asymmetric tonic seizures observed in patients with supplementary sensorimotor area epilepsy confirmed by pre- and post-operative MRI
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March 21, 2017
Electroclinical semiology of the bilateral asymmetric tonic seizures observed in patients with supplementary sensorimotor area epilepsy confirmed by pre- and post-operative MRI
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively reappraise characteristics of the electro-clinical seizure semiology of the bilateral asymmetric tonic seizure (BATS) in the patients with supplementary sensorimotor area (SSMA) epilepsy.
METHODS: From the retrospective analysis of the pre- and post-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data involving 386 patients who received epilepsy surgery, 123 BATS were identified meeting the clinical criteria and included in the study. For comparison in four extremities involvement, limbs were paired and comparatively evaluated between the contralateral and ipsilateral sides, proximal and distal segments, and upper and lower limbs. For evaluation of sequential events, each tonic phase of the BATS was chronologically divided into 10 equal epochs. In each epoch, distribution of tonic events in 4 extremities and axes was visually evaluated and comparatively analyzed.
RESULTS: Asymmetric tonic posturing was the most constant findings in 6 patients, whose upper limbs contralateral to epileptogenic cortex were kept in abduction in all 123 (100%) seizures and extension in 118 (95.9%) seizures. This type of asymmetry became visible and remained stable in the initial three epochs of the tonic phase in 107 out of 123 (87.0%) seizures. In each epoch, especially the initial one, the contralateral upper limbs were involved more frequently than those ipsilateral to the epileptogenic cortex (p < 0.05). By pairwise comparison, an earlier involvement of the contralateral side to epileptogenic cortex was visually observed in 53 out of 280 (18.9%) limb pairs, in which the ipsilateral limbs were preceded by the contralateral ones 4.6 (0.1–16.0) seconds earlier. Both of the proximal and distal segments were simultaneously involved in 260 out of 298 (87.2%) limb pairs, although the former were 4.3 (0.5–16.0) earlier than the latter in 34 out of 298 (11.4%) limb pairs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that by studying the restricted epileptogenic lesion limited to pure SSMA, unilateral extension and abduction posturing in upper limb were the most prominent and valuable sign for the lesion lateralization in SSMA neurosurgery decision-making.
KingD.W. and SmithJ.R., Supplementary sensorimotor area epilepsy in adults, Adv Neurol70 (1996), 285–291.
2.
LaichE., KuznieckyR., MountzJ., LiuH.G., GilliamF., BebinM. and MorawetzR., Supplementary sensorimotor area epilepsy. Seizure localization. cortical propagation and subcortical activation pathways using ictal SPECT, Brain120(Pt 5) (1997), 855–864.
3.
LudersH.O., Textbook of Epilepsy Surgery: Informa Healthcare, (2008), pp. 274–284.
4.
DinnerD.S. and LudersH.O., Human supplementary sensorimotor area, Electrical stimulation and movement-related potential studies. Adv Neurol, 66 (1995), 261–269; discussion 269–271.
5.
LudersH.O., Textbook of Epilepsy Surgery: Informa Healthcare, (2008), 991–1000.
6.
KellinghausC. and LudersH.O., Frontal lobe epilepsy, Epileptic Disord6(4) (2004), 223–239.
7.
UluM.O., TanrioverN., OzlenF., SanusG.Z., TanriverdiT., OzkaraC. and UzanM., Surgical treatment of lesions involving the supplementary motor area: Clinical results of 12 patients, Turk Neurosurg18(3) (2008), 286–293.
8.
IkedaA., SatoT., OharaS., MatsuhashiM., YamamotoJ., TakayamaM. and ShibasakiH., “Supplementary motor area (SMA) seizure” rather than “SMA epilepsy” in optimal surgical candidates: A document of subdural mapping, J Neurol Sci202(1-2) (2002), 43–52.
9.
ElazabA., AbdulAzeemY.M., WuS. and HuQ., Robust kernelized local information fuzzy C-means clustering for brain magnetic resonance image segmentation, J Xray Sci Technol24(3) (2016), 489–507.
10.
LudersH.O., NajmI., NairD., Widdess-WalshP. and BingmanW., The epileptogenic zone: General principles, Epileptic Disord8(Suppl 2) (2006), S1–S9.
11.
LudersH.O., Textbook of Epilepsy Surgery: Informa Healthcare, (2008), 711–715.
BassN., WyllieE., ComairY., KotagalP., RuggieriP. and HolthausenH., Supplementary sensorimotor area seizures in children and adolescents, J Pediatr126(4) (1995), 537–544.
14.
ChassagnonS., MinottiL., KremerS., VerceuilL., HoffmannD., BenabidA.L. and KahaneP., Restricted frontomesial epileptogenic focus generating dyskinetic behavior and laughter, Epilepsia44(6) (2003), 859–863.
15.
OharaS., IkedaA., KuniedaT., YazawaS., TakiJ., NagamineT. ... and ShibasakiH., Propagation of tonic posturing in supplementary motor area (SMA) seizures, Epilepsy Res62(2-3) (2004), 179–187.
16.
WongC.H., MohamedA., LarcosG., McCredieR., SomervilleE. and BleaselA., Brain activation patterns of versive, hypermotor, and bilateral asymmetric tonic seizures, Epilepsia51(10) (2010), 2131–2139.
17.
KikuchiT., MatsumotoR., MikuniN., YokoyamaY., MatsumotoA., IkedaA. and HashimotoN., Asymmetric bilateral effect of the supplementary motor area proper in the human motor system, Clin Neurophysiol123(2) (2012), 324–334.
18.
IkedaA., NagamineT., KuniedaT., YazawaS., OharaS., TakiW. and ShibasakiH., Clonic convulsion caused by epileptic discharges arising from the human supplementary motor area as studied by subdural recording, Epileptic Disord1(1) (1999), 21–26.
19.
GrefkesC., EickhoffS.B., NowakD.A., DafotakisM. and FinkG.R., Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM, Neuroimage41(4) (2008), 1382–1394.
