The interior and exterior problems have been extensively studied in the field of reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images, which lead to important theoretical and practical results. In this study, we formulate a middle problem of CT image reconstruction, which is more challenging than either the interior or exterior problems. In the middle problem of CT image reconstruction, projection data are measured through and only through the middle dough-like region, so that each projection profile misses data not only internally but also on both sides. For an object with a radially symmetric exterior, we proved that the middle problem could be uniquely solved if the middle ring-shaped zone is piecewise constant or there is a known sub-region inside this middle region. Then, we designed and evaluated a POCS-based algorithm for middle tomography, which is to reconstruct a middle image only from the available data. Finally, the remaining issues are also discussed for further research.
NattererF., The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Classics in applied mathematics 2001, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
2.
WangG., YuH.Y., The meaning of interior tomography, Phys Med Biol58(16) (2013), R161–R186.
3.
YeY.B., YuH.Y., WeiY.C. and WangG., A general local reconstruction approach based on a truncated Hilbert transform, International Journal of Biomedical Imaging (2007), Article ID: 63634, 8pages.
4.
KudoH., CourdurierM., NooF. and DefriseM., Tiny a priori knowledge solves the interior problem in computed tomography, Phys Med Biol53(9) (2008), 2207–2231.
5.
YuH.Y. and WangG., Compressed sensing based Interior tomography, Phys Med Biol54(9) (2009), 2791–2805.
6.
YangJ.S., YuH.Y., JiangM. and WangG., High-order total variation minimization for interior tomography, Inverse Problems26(3) (2010), Article ID: 035013, 29 pages.
7.
YangJ.S., YuH.Y., JiangM. and WangG., High order total variation minimization for interior SPECT, Inverse Problems28(1) (2012), Article ID: 015001, 24 pages.
8.
YuH.Y., YangJ.S., JiangM. and WangG., Supplemental analysis on compressed sensing based interior tomography, Phys Med Biol54(18) (2009), N425–N432.
9.
LiuB.D., ZengL., and LiL., Iterative reconstruction algorihtm of projection data truncation problem caused by the long chords of pipe wall, Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument32(1) (2011), 52–56.
10.
WangG., SnyderD.L., O’SullivanJ.A. and VannierM.W., Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction, IEEE Trans Med Imaging15(5) (1996), 657–664.
11.
HsiehJ., Computed tomography: Principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. Third edition. ed. pages cm.
12.
VranaN.E., IniewskiK., Cell and material interface: Advances in tissue engineering, biosensor, implant, and imaging technologies, Devices, circuits, and systems. xxiv, 270pages.
13.
ShiD., Frontiers in nanobiomedical research. volumes cm, The World Scientific encyclopedia of nanomedicine and bioengineering.
14.
GeY., ZhangR., LiK. and ChenG.H., Improving radiation dose efficiency of X-ray differential phase contrast imaging using an energy-resolving grating interferometer and a novel rank constraint, Opt Express24(12) (2016), 12955–12968.
15.
MorimotoN., FujinoS., OhshimaK., HaradaJ., HosoiT., WatanabeH. and ShimuraT., X-ray phase contrast imaging by compact Talbot-Lau interferometer with a single transmission grating, Opt Lett39(15) (2014), 4297–4300.
16.
BechM., JensenT.H., BunkO., DonathT., DavidC., WeitkampT., Le DucG., BavirnA.CloetensP. and PfeifferF., Advanced contrast modalities for X-ray radiology: Phase-contrast and dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer, Z Med Phys20(1) (2010), 7–16.
17.
PfeifferF., BechM., BunkO., KraftP., EikenberryE.F., BronnimannC., GrunzweigC. and DavidC., Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer, Nat Mater7(2) (2008), 134–137.
18.
TaubertA., ManoJ.O.F. and Rodriíguez-CabelloJ.C., Biomaterials surface sciencexxxii, 581pages.
19.
BregmanL.M., The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics7 (1967), 200–217.
20.
WangG. and JiangM., Ordered-Subset Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques (OS-SART), Journal of X-ray Science and Technology12(3) (2004), 169–177.
21.
YuH.Y. and WangG., Finite detector based projection model for high spatial resolution, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology20(2) (2012), 229–238.
22.
YuH.Y. and WangG., A soft-threshold filtering approach for reconstruction from a limited number of projections, Phys Med Biol55(13) (2010), 3905–3916.
23.
BeckA. and TeboulleM., A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems, Siam Journal on Imaging Sciences2(1) (2009), 183–202.
24.
WangY., WangG., MaoS., CongW., JiZ., CaiJ., YeY., A spectral interior CT by a framelet-based reconstruction algorithm, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology24(6) (2016), 771–785.
