The Precision of geometric parameters is the key requirement for grating-based phase-contrast CT and attenuation-based CT in cone-beam geometry. By extending our fan-beam geometric calibration work via Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) into the cone-beam case, here we calibrate the geometric parameters of our in-house phase-contrast CT system with attenuation projection data. Numerical and experimental studies show that the LLE-based calibration method is feasible to calibrate 8 parameters of the cone-beam geometry that improves reconstruction quality significantly.
ElliottJ.C. and DoverS.D., X-ray microtomography, Journal of Microscopy126(2) (1982), 211–213.
2.
PaulusM.J., GleasonS.S., KennelS.J., HunsickerP.R. and JohnsonD.K., High resolution X-ray computed tomography: An emerging tool for small animal cancer research, Neoplasia2(1) (2000), 62–70.
3.
PfeifferF., BechM., BunkO., KraftP., EikenberryE.F., BrönnimannC., GrünzweigC. and DavidC., Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer, Nature materials7(2) (2008), 134–137.
4.
WeitkampT., DiazA., DavidC., PfeifferF., StampanoniM., CloetensP. and ZieglerE., X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer, Optics express13(16) (2005), 6296–6304.
5.
PfeifferF., WeitkampT., BunkO. and DavidC., Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources, Nature physics2(4) (2006), 258–261.
6.
NooF., ClackdoyleR., MennessierC., et al., Analytic method based on identification of ellipse parameters for scanner calibration in cone-beam tomography, Phys Med Biol45 (2000), 3489–3508.
7.
PanettaD., BelcariN., GuerraA.D., et al., An optimization-based method for geometrical calibration in cone-beam CT without dedicated phantoms, Med Biol53 (2008), 3841–3861.
8.
WeinW., LadikosA. and BaumgartnerA., Self-calibration of geometric and radiometric parameters for cone-beam computed tomography, in: Fully 3D, Potsdam, (2011), 327–330.
9.
PatelV., ChityalaR.N., HoffmannK.R., et al., Self-calibration of a cone-beam micro-CT system, Med Phys36 (2009), 48–58.
10.
RoweisS.T. and LawrenceS.K., Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding, Science290(5500) (2000), 2323–2326.
11.
RoweisS.T. and Lawrence.S.K., An introduction to locally linear embedding, unpublished. Available at: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/∼roweis/lle/publications.html (2000).
12.
ChenM., XiY., CongW., LiuB., WeiB. and WangG., X-ray CT geometrical calibration via locally linear embedding, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology24(2) (2016), 241–256.
13.
YuH. and WangG., Data consistency based rigid motion artifact reduction in fan-beam CT, Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on26(2) (2007), 249–260.
14.
YuH., WeiY., HsiehJ., et al., Data consistency based translational motion artifact reduction in fan-beam CT, Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on26(5) (2006), 792–803.
15.
LengS., NettB., SpeidelM., et al., Motion artifact reduction in fan-beam and cone-beam computed tomography via the fan-beam data consistency condition (FDCC). Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2007.
16.
VogtmeierG., EngelK.J., GellerD., et al., Calibration of differential phase-contrast imaging systems. U.S. Patent Application 13/514,166.
WangG. and JiangM., Ordered-subset simultaneous algebraic reconstruction techniques (OS-SART), Journal of X-ray Science and Technology12(3) (2004), 169–177.
20.
SiddonR.L., Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array, Medical Physics12(2) (1985), 252–255.
21.
ZhaoJ., HuX., ZouJ. and HuX., Geometric parameters estimation and calibration in cone-beam micro-CT, Sensors15(9) (2015), 22811–22825.
22.
GordonR., BenderR. and HermanG.T., Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography, Journal of Theoretical Biology29(3) (1970), 471–481.
23.
SidkyY.E., KaoC.M. and PanX., Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology14(2) (2006), 119–139.
