Addressing OSH challenges in non-standardized work practices in small-scale FMCG units by introducing context-specific ergonomic pouch/sachet cutting apparatus
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November 8, 2024
Addressing OSH challenges in non-standardized work practices in small-scale FMCG units by introducing context-specific ergonomic pouch/sachet cutting apparatus
The FMCG manufacturing industry in industrially developing countries operates in a manual or semi-automatic setup, employing a vast labor force. Several non-standardized work activities prevail on the FMCG shop floor and remain prone to safety-related risks involving repetitive motions, forceful exertions, and awkward postures. Among those, the rework of defective pouches/sachets is an unsafe activity of prime concern. It is prone to minor nicks, cuts, and injuries due to inadequate tools being used. It involves sharp cutters/blades and extensive forceful manual hand squeezing, which leads to drudgery and safety concerns. There lies the lack of standardized tools/apparatus for rework activity, and efforts towards its mitigation are required.
OBJECTIVE:
Current research aims to address occupational safety-related issues in non-standardized rework activity in small-scale FMCG units through an innovative product design approach.
METHODS:
An ergo-audit was conducted in eight small-scale FMCG units to identify the prevailing ergonomic stressors and safety concerns. The most critical area of concern, i.e., rework activity, was chosen through card-sorting sessions and discussions held with the stakeholders. An appropriate context-specific apparatus was designed/developed to ensure better safety and occupational health utilizing a systematic product design method involving three phases: initial field survey, design and development, and field trials.
RESULTS:
The apparatus, which was developed and factory-trialed, was evaluated for productivity improvement and ensuring user compatibility from various human factors’ perspectives.
CONCLUSION:
In field trials, the developed apparatus was found effective in mitigating safety concerns and various ergonomic stressors associated with FMCG rework.
IBEF (2024). FMCG industry in India –Industry Report. www.ibef.org/industry/fmcg [last accessed on 01 May 2024]
3.
SinghG, KarmakarS. Scope of improvement in assemblyline of FMCG industries through ergonomic design. In: Design for Tomorrow –Volume 3: Proceedings of ICoRD 2021. 2021 (pp. 201-214). Springer Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_16
4.
FredrikssonK, BildtC, HäggG, KilbomÅ. The impact on musculoskeletal disorders of changing physical and psychosocial work environment conditions in the automobile industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2001;28(1):31–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00011-7
5.
XuZ, KoJ, CochranDJ, JungMC. Design of assembly lines with the concurrent consideration of productivity and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders using linear models. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2012;62(2):431–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.008
6.
OttoA, BattaïaO. Reducing physical ergonomic risks at assembly lines by line balancing and job rotation: A survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2017;111:467–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.011
7.
HanssonGÅ, BaloghI, OhlssonK, PålssonB, RylanderL, SkerfvingS. Impact of physical exposure on neck and upper limb disorders in female workers. Applied Ergonomics. 2000;31(3):301–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00047-2
WernerRA, GellN, HartiganA, WiggermanN, KeyserlingWM. Risk factors for plantar fasciitis among assembly plant workers. PM & R. 2010;2(2):110–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.11.012
10.
ZwetslootGI, KinesP, WyboJL, RuotsalaR, DrupsteenL, BezemerRA. Zero Accident Vision based strategies in organizations: Innovative perspectives. Safety Science. 2017;91:260–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.016
11.
MöllerN, HanssonSO, HolmbergJE, RollenhagenC, editors. Handbook of safety principles. John Wiley & Sons; 2018 Feb 21.
12.
SinghG, KarmakarS. Innovative Hand-Tool Design for Cleaning of Slippery Floor and Broken Glass Pieces in Shopfloor of FMCG Sector. In: NERC 2022 May 20 (pp. 1-21). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6468-0_1
13.
KarmakarS, & SolomonR. (2018). Ergonomic evaluations and design interventions for shopfloors dealing with chemical conversion coatings: A case study from India. In: Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017. Vol. 58 (pp. 857-868). Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_87
14.
SinghG, KarmakarS. Preliminary Survey in FMCG Shopfloors to Understand Operational Activities for Identifying Ergonomic Stressors: A Case Study from North-East India. In: International Conference of the Indian Society of Ergonomics 2021 Dec 8 (pp. 93-106). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94277-9_9
15.
SinghG, KarmakarS. Identification of appropriate tools and techniques for ergonomic evaluation in FMCG industrial shop floor. In: International Conference on Research into Design 2023 Jan 9 (pp. 103-116). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0293-4_9
16.
KyungM, LeeSJ, DancuC, HongO. Underreporting of workers’ injuries or illnesses and contributing factors: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15487-0
17.
PranskyG, SnyderT, DembeA, HimmelsteinJ. Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: A case study and review of the literature. Ergonomics. 1999;42(1):171–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185874
International Ergonomics Association. Ergonomic Checkpoints: Practical and easy-to-implement solutions for improving safety, health, and working conditions. International Labour Organization; 1996.
22.
International Ergonomics Association. Ergonomic Checkpoints: Practical and easy-to-implement solutions for improving safety, health and working conditions. International Labour Organization; 2010.
23.
Cal/OSHA Consultation Service (Calif.). Education, Training Unit, United States. Occupational Safety, Health Administration. Easy Ergonomics: A Practical Approach for Improving the Workplace. California Department of Industrial Relations, Cal/OSHA Consultation Service, Education and Training Unit; 1999.
FaiksA, HylandN. Gaining user insight: A case study illustrating the card sort technique. College & Research Libraries. 2000;61(4):349–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.4.349
26.
Navas de MayaB, KhalidH, KurtRE. Application of card-sorting approach to classify human factors of past maritime accidents. Maritime Policy & Management.75-90. 2021;48(1):75–90. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2020.1754481
VermaIK, KarmakarS. Mounting a smartphone on a steering wheel to facilitate ease of visibility of the navigation screen: A systematic product design approach. Work. 2021;70(3):985–96. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213618
29.
NorrisKW. The morphological approach to engineering design. InConference on design methods 1963. Macmillan.
30.
PughS. Total design: Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley Wokingham; 1991.
31.
ChakrabartiD. Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice. National institute of design; 1997.
32.
SinghG, KarmakarS, SinghA, VermaA, ChaudhuriSB, SB, inventors. Handheld apparatus for extracting contents of sachet/pouch. United States Patent; US 11,319,103. 2022 May 3. doi: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov/applications/17092144
33.
BridgerR. Introduction to human factors and ergonomics. CRC Press; 2017 Oct 30.
HartSG, StavelandLE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in psychology 1988 Jan 1 (Vol. 52, pp. 139-183). North-Holland. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
36.
BrookeJ., BrookeJ SUS —Aquick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability evaluation in industry. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 1996. pp. 189-94.
37.
FebrianaSA, SoebonoH, CoenraadsPJ. Occupational skin hazards and prevalence of occupational skin diseases in shoe manufacturing workers in Indonesia. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2014;87:185–94. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0844-2
38.
SileyewKJ. Systematic industrial OSH advancement factors identification for manufacturing industries: A case of Ethiopia. Safety Science. 2020;132:104989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104989
39.
Saw BinW, RichardsonS, YeowP.H.. An ergonomics study of a semiconductors factory in an IDC for improvement in occupational health and safety.. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2010;16(3):345–56. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2010.11076849
40.
TripathiV, SaraswatS, GautamG, SinghD. Shop floor productivity enhancement using a modified lean manufacturing approach. In: Recent Trends in Industrial and Production Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICAST 2020 2022 (pp. 219-227). Springer Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3135-1_23
PanditS. New hand-cart for Old-Delhi wholesale market designed and engineered using generic product development process. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 2020. doi:10.56042/ijpav58i9.38424
43.
JayendranR, NishokPR, SwaminathanR. Design and Development of Ergonomic and Customizable Walking Cane. In: International Conference on Research into Design 2023 Jan 9 (pp. 53-63). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0264-4_5
44.
GhazaliH, Mas’audNH, RahmanNA. Design and Fabrication of Kayak Carrier. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021;11761:012022. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1176/1/012022
45.
NarainJ, MishraY, SainMK, MeenaML, DangayachGS, PosinasettiNR. Zero Accident Vision: Literature review and future directions in the Indian context. Recent Pat Eng. 2021;15(5) doi: 10.2174/1872212114666200124144848
46.
BeheraRK, HassanMI. Regulatory interventions and industrial accidents: A case from India for ‘Vision Zero’ goals. Saf Sci. 2019;113:415–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.013
