Low back pain has a high economic burden in Germany due to back pain-related sick leave, disability pensions, and health care utilization. Work-related factors can predict disabling back pain. Job exposure matrices can be used to consider job demands and occupational characteristics in routine data analysis.
OBJECTIVE:
This longitudinal analysis tested whether rehabilitation utilization due to musculoskeletal disorders is associated with occupation-linked job exposures in employees with back pain.
METHODS:
Data from a German cohort study were used, including employees aged 45 to 59 years with self-reported back pain in the last three months. Individuals’ job titles were assessed in the baseline survey in 2017 and matched with parameters of aggregated job exposure indices. Administrative data from the German Pension Insurance were used to extract information on rehabilitation utilization. Proportional hazard models tested the associations.
RESULTS:
We considered data of 6,569 participants (mean age: 52.3 years; 57.7% women). During follow-up, with a maximum of 21 months, 296 individuals (4.5%) utilized medical rehabilitation due to musculoskeletal disorders. Adjusted analyses showed that high physical (HR = 2.87; 95% CI 1.74; 4.75) and overall (HR = 2.34; 95% CI 1.44; 3.80) job exposures were associated with a higher risk of rehabilitation utilization.
CONCLUSION:
Individuals with back pain working in occupations with high physical job exposures have a higher risk for rehabilitation utilization. To prevent work disability in individuals with back pain, occupational groups with high physical job exposures should be actively informed about tailored intervention options.
Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pr Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):356–73.
2.
GBD 2021 Low Back Pain CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020 its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(6):e316–29.
3.
von der LippeE, KrauseL, PorstM, WenglerA, LeddinJ, MüllerAet al. Prevalence of back and neck pain in Germany. Results from the BURDEN 2020 Burden of Disease Study. J Health Monit. 2021;6(Suppl 3):2–14.
4.
WenigCM, SchmidtCO, KohlmannT, SchweikertB. Costs of back pain in Germany. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(3):280–6.
5.
DornerTE, AlexandersonK, SvedbergP, RopponenA, SteinKV, Mittendorfer-RutzE. Sickness absence due to back pain or depressive episode and the risk of all-cause and diagnosis-specific disability pension: A Swedish cohort study of 4,823,069 individuals. Eur J Pain Lond Engl. 2015;19(9):1308–20.
6.
DunnKM, HestbaekL, CassidyJD. Low back pain across the life course. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27(5):591–600.
7.
KongstedA, KentP, AxenI, DownieAS, DunnKM. What have we learned from ten years of trajectory research in low back pain? BMC Musculoskelet Disord2016;17(1):220.
8.
Costa daLCM, MaherCG, HancockMJ, McAuleyJH, HerbertRD, CostaLOP. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysisCMAJ. 2012;184(11):E613–24
.
9.
ItzCJ, GeurtsJW, van Kleef M, NelemansP. Clinical course of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies set in primary careEur J Pain. 2013;17(1):5–15.
10.
HartvigsenJ, HancockMJ, KongstedA, LouwQ, FerreiraML, GenevaySet al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67.
11.
ChouR, ShekelleP. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA. 2010;303(13):1295–302.
12.
Costa-BlackKM, LoiselP, AnemaJR, PranskyG. Back pain and work. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):227–40.
13.
SoucyI, TruchonM, CôtéD. Work-related factorscontributing to chronic disability in low back pain. Work Read Mass. 2006;26(3):313–26.
14.
Post Sennehed C, GardG, HolmbergS, StigmarK, ForsbrandM, GrahnB. “Blue flags”, development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors –a validation study in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):318.
15.
ShawWS, van der Windt DA, MainCJ, LoiselP, LintonSJ. “Decade of the Flags” Working GrouEarly patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“blue flags”) in back disability J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.
16.
DraganoN, SchneiderL. Work related psychosocial factors and the risk of early disability pensioning: a contribution to assessing the need for rehabilitation. Rehabil. 2011;50(1):28–36.
17.
BrüngerM, SpyraK. Importance of job demands for rehabilitation patients –application of an index according to occupations. Rehabil. 2018;57(4):239–47.
18.
Bondo Petersen S, FlachsEM, PrescottEIB, TjønnelandA, OslerM, AndersenIet al. Job-exposure matrices addressing lifestyle to beapplied in register-based occupational health studies. Occup EnvironMed. 2018;75(12):890–7.
19.
SørensenJK, PedersenJ, BurrH, HolmA, LallukkaT, LundTet al. Psychosocial working conditions and sickness absence amongyounger employees in Denmark: a register-based cohort study usingjob exposure matrices. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023;49(4):249–58.
20.
BrüngerM, BernertS, SpyraK. Occupation as a proxy for jobexposures? Routine data analysis using the example ofrehabilitation. Gesundheitswesen. 2020;82(S 01):S41–51.
21.
ConnellyR, PlayfordCJ, GayleV, DibbenC. The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Soc Sci Res. 2016;59, 1–12.
22.
PortaM A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 5 ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
23.
BethgeM, MattukatK, FauserD, MauW. Rehabilitation access and effectiveness for persons with back pain: the protocol of a cohort study (REHAB-BP, DRKS00011554). BMC Public Health. 2017;18(1):22.
24.
FauserD, SchmittN, GollaA, ZimmerJM, MauW, BethgeM. Effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in persons with back pain –lessons learned from a German cohort study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(23):7039–47.
25.
Kroll LE. Konstruktion und Validierung eines allgemeinen Index für die Arbeitsbelastung in beruflichen Tätigkeiten auf Basis von ISCO-88 und KldB-92. Methoden Daten Anal. 2011;5(1):63–90.
26.
KrollL. Aktualisierung und erneute Validierung eines Index für Arbeitsbelastungen auf Basis von KldB-2010, KldB-92, ISCO-08 und ISCO-88. Gesundheitswesen. 2015;77(8/9):A363.
27.
SchmidtCO, RaspeH, PfingstenM, HasenbringM, BaslerHD, EichWet al. Back pain in the German adult population: prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multiregional survey. Spine. 2007;32(18):2005–11.
28.
Von Korff M, OrmelJ, KeefeFJ, DworkinSF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;50(2):133–49.
29.
KlasenBW, HallnerD, SchaubC, WillburgerR, HasenbringM. Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in primary care back pain patients. Psychosoc Med.. 2004;1, Doc07.
30.
FauserD, ZimmerJM, GollaA, SchmittN, MauW, BethgeM. Self-reported prognosis of employability as an indicator of need for rehabilitation: a cohort study in people with back pain. Rehabil. 2022;61(2):88–96.
31.
BethgeM, SpanierK, KöhnS, SchlumbohmA. Self-reported work ability predicts health-related exit and absence from work, work participation, and death: longitudinal findings from a sample of German employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(4):591–9.
32.
Deutsche Rentenversicherung. Reha-Bericht 2021. Berlin: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund; 2021.
33.
PaulusW, MatthesB The German classification of occupations 2010: structure, coding and conversion table. FDZ-Methodenreport [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 9]; Available from: https://ideas.repec.org//p/iab/iabfme/201308(en).html
34.
MatthesB, MeinkenH, NeuhauserP Berufssektoren und Berufssegmente auf Grundlage der KldB 2010. (Methodenbericht der Statistik der BA). Bundesagentur fur Arbeit; 2015.
35.
Kroll LE Job Exposure Matrices (JEM) for ISCO and KldB (Version 2.0) [Internet]. GESIS Data Archive; 2015 [cited 2023 Jan 9]. p. 75508, 121101, 1855. Available from: https://search.gesis.org/research_data/SDN-10.7802-1102?doi=10.7802/1102
36.
HallA, Rohrbach-SchmidtD BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey 2012. Bonn: Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB); 2013.
37.
Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4(1):87–90.
38.
Enders CK Applied missing data analysis. NewYork: Guilford Press; 2010.
39.
RoystonP, WhiteIR. Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(1):1–20.
40.
KontopantelisE, WhiteIR, SperrinM, BuchanI. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):2.
41.
LittleRJA, RubinDB Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley; 2014.
42.
Slesina W Arbeitsbedingte Erkrankungen und Arbeitsanalyse: Arbeitsanalyse unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Gesundheitsvorsorge. Stuttgart: Enke; 1987.
43.
van der Molen HF, de Vries S, SluiterJK. Occupational diseases among workers in lower and higher socioeconomic positions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2849.
44.
FauserD, DötschS, LangerC, KleinekeV, KindelC, BethgeM. A comprehensive diagnostic service to clarify intervention needs when work participation is at risk: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (GIBI, DRKS00027577). Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1142.
45.
LinJH, LeeW, SmithCK, YraguiNL, FoleyM, ShinG. Cleaning in the 21st Century: The musculoskeletal disorders associated with the centuries-old occupation –a literature review. Appl Ergon. 2022;105, 103839.
46.
CharlesLE, LoomisD, DemissieZ. Occupational hazards experienced by cleaning workers and janitors: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Work. 2009;34(1):105–16.
47.
BethgeM, SpanierK, StreibeltM. Using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability: a cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):376–82.
48.
FauserD, ZeunerAK, ZimmerJM, GollaA, SchmittN, MauWet al. Work ability score as predictor of rehabilitation, disability pensions and death? A German cohort study among employees with back pain. Work. 2022;73(2):719–28.
49.
MadsenIEH, GuptaN, Budtz-JørgensenE, BondeJP, FramkeE, FlachsEMet al. Physical work demands and psychosocial working conditions as predictors of musculoskeletal pain: a cohort study comparing self-reported and job exposure matrix measurements. OccupEnviron Med. 2018;75(10):752–8.
50.
HanvoldTN, SterudT, KristensenP, MehlumIS. Mechanical and psychosocial work exposures: the construction and evaluation of a gender-specific job exposure matrix (JEM). Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(3):239–47.
51.
ZimmerJM, FauserD, GollaA, WienkeA, SchmittN, BethgeMet al. Barriers to applying for medical rehabilitation: a time-to-event analysis of employees with severe back pain in Germany. J Rehabil Med.jrm. 2022;54, 00274.
52.
BurchardiJM, SpyraK, BrüngerM. Effectiveness of a screening tool to assess prevention and rehabilitation needs of 45 to 59 years old in primary care –study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PReHa45). BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):382.
53.
FauserD, BoosN, DötschS, LangerC, KleinekeV, KindelCet al. Holistic clarification of the need for intervention at the interface of rehabilitation and occupational medicine when work participation is at risk. Zentralblatt Arbeitsmedizin Arbeitsschutz Ergon. 2023;28:1–13.
