The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for Lifting is a manual material handling (MMH) assessment method to identify weight limits that nearly all workers may be exposed to without developing work-related low back disorders (LBD). However, this assessment method only applies to lifting with the torso within 30° asymmetry of the sagittal plane.
OBJECTIVE:
Estimate TLV weight limits while lifting with torso asymmetry greater than 30° beyond the sagittal plane.
METHODS:
Lifting tasks were performed from various horizontal and vertical locations, at torso asymmetry angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°, using ACGIH identified TLVs. Validated MMH assessment methods (NIOSH Lifting Equation, Ohio State University LBD Risk Model) were utilized to estimate TLVs at torso asymmetries greater than 30°.
RESULTS:
The current ACGIH TLVs resulted in low- to moderate-risk risk levels for torso asymmetries from 0° to 30°, and the risk incrementally increased as torso asymmetry increased to 90°. With the intention to keep the risk levels to that found at 30° torso asymmetry, lower TLV weight limits in the vertical and horizontal zones investigated were estimated for torso asymmetries from 45° to 90°. The resulting adjusted TLVs were consistent with weight limits identified for similar lifting conditions from other assessment methods that account for torso asymmetry.
CONCLUSIONS:
This research found current ACGIH-defined TLVs possess less than high-risk for LBD, and provided guidance to practitioners for reduced TLVs when torso asymmetry is greater than 30° from the sagittal plane.
HoyD, MarchL, BrooksP, BlythF, WoolfA, BainC, WilliamsG, SmithE, VosT, BarendregtJ, MurrayC, BursteinR, BuchbinderR. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases2014;73:968–974.
2.
FergusonSA, MerryweatherA, ThieseMS, HegmannKT, LuM-L, KapelluschJM, MarrasWS. Prevalence of low back pain, seeking medical care, and lost time due to low back pain among manual materials handling workers in the United States. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2019;20:243–250.
3.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022, Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Requiring Days away from Work, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
4.
DielemanJL, BaralR, BirgerM, BuiA, BulchisAet al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013. JAMA2646;316(24):2627–2646. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16885.
5.
DagenaisS, CaroJ, HaldemanS. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. The Spine Journal2008;8:8–20.
6.
DunningKK, DavisKG, CookC, KotowskiSE, HamrickC, JewellG, LockeyJ. Costs by industry and diagnosis among musculoskeletal claims in a State workers compensation system: -American Journal of Industrial Medicine2010;53:276–284.
7.
CoenenP, GouttebargeV, van der BurghtASAM, van Dieen JH, Frings-DresenMHW, van der Beek AJ, BurdorfA. The effect of lifting during work on low back pain: a health impact assessment based on a meta-analysis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine2014;71:871–877.
8.
da Costa BR, VieiraER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine2010;53:285–323.
9.
GriffithLE, ShannonHS, WellsRP, WalterSD, ColeDC, CoteP, FrankJ, Hogg-JohnsonS, LangloisLE. Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain. American Journal of Public Health2012;102:309–318.
10.
KuiperJI, BurdorfA, VerbeekJHAM, Frings-DresenMHW, van der BeekAJ, Viikari-JunturaERA. Epidemiologic evidence on manual materials handling as a risk factor for back disorders: a systematic review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics1999;24:389–404.
11.
HoogendoornWE, BongersPM, de Vet HCW, DouwesM, KoesBW, MiedemaMC, AriensGAM, Bouter LM. Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain. Spine2000;25(23):3087–3092.
12.
HoogendoornWE, BongersPM, de Vet HCS, AriensGAM, Bouter LM. High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med2002a;59:323–328.
13.
HoogendoornWE, BongersPM, de Vet HCW, TwiskJWR, von MechlenW. Comparison of two different approaches for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study: an application to work related risk factors for low back pain. Occup Environ Med2002b;59:459–465.
14.
PunnettL, LawrenceLJ, KeyserlingWM, HerrinGD, ChaffinDB. Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health1991;17:337–346.
15.
van der HeuvelSG, AriensGAM, BoschuizenHC, HoogendoornW, BongersPM. Prognostic factors related to recurrent low-back pain and sickness absence. Scand J Work Environ Health2004;30(6):459–467.
16.
MarrasWS, GranataKP. A biomechanical assessment and model of axial twisting in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine1995;20(13):1440–1451.
17.
MarrasWS, DavisKG. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands. Ergonomics1998;41(6):817–834.
18.
MarshallLW, McGillSM. The role of axial torque in disc herniation. Clinical Biomechanics2010;25:6–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.003.
19.
VeresSP, RobertsonPA, BroomND. The influence of torsion on disc herniation when combined with flexion. European Spine Journal2010;19:1468–1478. doi: 10.1007/s00586-101-1383-0.
20.
DrakeJDM, AultmanCD, McGillSM, CallaghanJP. The influence of static axial torque in combined loading on intervertebral joint failure mechanics using a porcine model. Clinical Biomechanics2005;20:1038–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.003.
21.
NIOSH, 1994, Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. By Waters TR, Putz–Anderson V, Garg A, Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-110 (Revised 9/2021), https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB94110revised092021
22.
WatersTR, Putz-AndersonV, GargA, FineLJ. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics1993;36(7):749–776.
23.
SnookSH, CirielloVM. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics1991;34:1197–1213.
24.
FergusonSA, MarrasWS, BurrDL. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs low-back-injured workers. Applied Ergonomics2005;36:85–95.
25.
MarrasWS, LavenderSA, LeurgansSE, RajuluSL, AllreadWG, FathallahFA, FergusonSA. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. Spine1993;18(5):617–628.
26.
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists), 2004. TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. (www.acgih.org).
27.
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists), 2021. TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. (www.acgih.org).
28.
LoweBD, DempseyPG, JonesEM. Ergonomics assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals. Applied Ergonomics2019;81:102882.
29.
BeliveauPJH, JohnstonH, van Eerd D, FischerSL. Musculoskeletal disorder risk assessment tool use: A Canadian perspective. Applied Ergonomics2022;102:103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103740
30.
AllreadWG, MarrasWS The economic impact of integrating ergonomics within an automotive production facility. In: RouseWB,editor.HumanSystems Integration:Valuation of Investments in People’s Training and Education, safety and Health, and Work Productivity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010. p. 267-286.
31.
HurleyK, MarshallJ, HoganK, WellsR. A comparison of productivity and physical demands during parcel delivery using a standard and a prototype courier truck. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics2012;42:384–391.
32.
BaoS, HowardN, LinJ-H. Are work-related musculoskeletal disorders claims related to risk factors in workplaces of the manufacturing industry? Annals of Work Exposures and Health2020;64(2):152–164.
33.
FergusonSA, AllreadWG, BurrDL, HeaneyC, MarrasWS. Biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors predicting low back functional impairment among furniture distribution employees. Clinical Biomechanics2012;27:117–123.
34.
DempseyPG. A survey of lifting and lowering tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics2003;31:11–16.
35.
AmickRZ, ZarzarMC, JorgensenMJ. Estimation of low back disorder risk for the ACGIH TLVs. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting2011;55(1):1025–1028.
36.
MarrasWS, FathallahFA, MillerRJ, DavisSW, MirkaGA. Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics1992;9:75–87.
37.
MarrasWS, AllreadWG, BurrDL, FathallahFA. Prospective validation of a low-back disorder risk model and assessment of ergonomic interventions associated with manual materials handling tasks. Ergonomics2000;43(11):1866–1886.
38.
HafezK, JorgensenMJ, AmickRZ. Comparison of ACGIH lifting threshold limit values to validated low back disorder lifting assessment methods outcomes. Work2023;76(3):1047–1060. doi: 10.3233/WOR-22036.
39.
GallagherS, SesekRF, SchallMC, HuangfuR. Development and validation of an easy-to-use risk assessment tool for cumulative low back loading: The Lifting Fatigue Failure Tool (LiFFT). Applied Ergonomics2017;63:142–150.
40.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, Lifting Calculator, 2023, https://lni.wa.gov/safetyhealth/docs/HazardZoneChecklist.pdf (accessed 7/24/2023).
41.
Silverstein M. Ergonomics and regulatory politics: The Washington State case. American Journal of Industrial Medicine2007;50:391–401.
42.
RussellSJ, WinnemullerL, CampJE, JohnsonPW. Comparing the results of five lifting analysis tools. Applied Ergonomics2007;38(1):91–97.
