Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Occupational health factors such as shift work, sleep, fatigue, and work environment jeopardise the health and safety of gas station workers. This calls for new research to investigate how the working environment and characteristics impact the occupational health of workers at gas stations. However, minimal research has been conducted in this field, especially those involving psychological and behavioural factors, occupational stress, and so forth.

OBJECTIVE:

This review was performed to investigate the present condition of the occupational risk of gas station workers in this safety-critical position.

METHODS:

Five databases (Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO) were searched for relevant peer-reviewed studies. Results were selected according to these criteria: studies on fatigue, shift work, sleep, and physical and mental health of gas station employees; published on or before November 11, 2021; papers in English.

RESULTS:

Twenty studies were considered for the final analysis. The results showed that shift work at gas stations leads to psychological and physiological problems. The psychological consequences included anxiety, stress, and depression, while the physiological consequences included biochemical changes and lifestyle consequences.

CONCLUSION:

Shift work and the specific working environment of gas station employees adversely affect their sleep, stress levels, physical and mental health, and turnover intention. This systematic review allowed us to consider the occupational risk factors that can lead to sickness or accidents and contribute to reducing these risk factors. Realistic countermeasures ought to be established and interventions must be explored to mitigate risks to life, property, and the environment in operating gas stations.

Keywords

Oil and gas industry occupational health workload dyssomnias safety

1 Introduction

In recent years, with the continuous acceleration of urbanisation and the rapid improvement of people’s living standards, the number of gas stations has been increasing every year. As an important link in the oil industry chain, the gas station industry has also made great contributions to the economy [1]. The working responsibilities of gas station employees in different countries and regions are different. On the one hand, some countries such as the UK and United States adopt self-service refuelling [2], and many gas stations only need to employ a few workers. Other services such as pumping gas and filling water are also done by customers themselves after fuelling up. On the other hand, other countries such as China still rely on gas station workers for refuelling operations [3], which drives the increase in the number of gas station workers. However, regardless of the operational mode, gas station workers are faced with common occupational health problems and hazards.

Little research has focused on the occupational health of gas station workers in comparison to the range of risk factors they are exposed to. Gas station workers are frequently under extreme stress and have heavy workloads, including not only refuelling up and selling but also additional safety duties [4]. At work, they stand for long periods and work in shifts, and are typically exposed to noise [5], fumes, and organic solvents [6]. Also, they must maintain high degrees of focus and attentiveness at work to ensure a correct operation and avoid accidents. Moreover, gas stations provide favourable conditions for workplace accidents [7]. Thus, improving both the mental and physical health of gas station workers, avoiding accidents and disasters, and promoting their well-being are of great importance, and concrete countermeasures should be devised.

1.1 Job characteristics of gas station workers

Owing to the nature of the gas station industry, workers generally work for a long time daily, and most do shift work. Shift work is a common work schedule that includes hours outside of the traditional 8-hour workday, which has been linked to several inappropriate consequences such as cancer [8] and cardiovascular disease [9]. Shift work is also related to some problems such as reduced work safety [10, 11] and productivity [12], of which the most important is fatigue [13].

In terms of workload, several job characteristics have been presented in the context of working. The job of gas station workers includes not only refuelling, selling, and communicating with customers or colleagues but also additional security tasks [14]. As a service industry, they also need to be emotionally intelligent while providing high-quality service at all times. When job demands overload the abilities and coping skills of workers, they become a risk factor, generating stress and other health problems [15]. Workers must fulfil certain job demands and complete repetitive and mundane daily tasks in a fast-paced and dangerous work environment [16, 17], which often lead to high-workload fatigue and job burnout.

Workers’ well-being, both during work and time off work, may be harmed by such job characteristics, which may prevent them from pursuing other occupations and interests. Furthermore, physical and psychological factors are interconnected and influence one another. As a result, health issues not only impair work performance and efficiency, resulting in fatigue and stress, but also affect the quality of life outside of work and even life expectancy. Currently, only a few studies have focused on the negative impact of work-related health issues on workers’ well-being both at work and outside work in gas stations.

1.2 Chemical and physical risks in the workplace

Organic solvents are unavoidable in gas stations. Thus, gas station workers are chronically exposed to a chemical risk factor associated with inhalation or exposure to organic solvents, a volatile compound present in various materials and widely used in in gas stations. Chemical hazards are acknowledged in the literature and have been reported to pose higher health risks and to be linked to a higher potential loss over time.

Among the chemical risk factors, benzene is the most harmful to gas station workers. Automobiles are thought to be the primary source of benzene because they are associated with gasoline fumes, gas stations, and gas emissions. Benzene is a colourless, volatile, soluble, flammable liquid with a high carcinogenic potential that poses a considerable danger to human health even at small doses [18]. Benzene is associated with gasoline and vehicle exhaust emissions, which permeate gas stations, and workers are inevitably exposed to them in the course of their work [19]. The World Health Organisation has identified benzene as a strong carcinogen. Workers chronically exposed to organic solvents especially benzene can develop various health conditions such as immune [20], endocrine [21] and haematological conditions [22, 23], hepatic and renal dysfunctions [23, 24], visual disorders [25], and peripheral auditory disorders [26]. In addition to their physiological effects, organic solvents have toxic effects on the central nervous system. Evidence shows that the brain is susceptible to organic solvents, which can cause serious changes in neural development and ultimately lead to cognitive deficits [27 –30]. In a previous study, petrol sniffing had an immediate effect on psychomotor performance that occurred within 3–5 minutes and continued for 5–6 hours [31].

The hazards posed by organic solvents can obviously affect work safety and performance, and physical and psychological health [32 33]. However, only few empirical studies have been conducted in this area, and the mechanism underlying the relationships between exposure to organic solvents, work performance, mental health, and well-being is still unclear.

The use of protective equipment and the occurrence of occupational accidents among gas station workers are closely related to chemical risk factors. Protective equipment such as masks, gloves, goggles, and uniforms are required to reduce the intensity of exposure and prevent occupational exposure [34]. This can easily lead to workplace accidents and health problems if workers are regularly exposed to organic solvents without adequate protection [17]. Workers may experience anxiety and insecurity as a result of their low job security, which lead to negative emotions and affect their well-being. This emphasises the significance of psychological variables.

1.3 Work-related health problems

With an average daily work length of up to 10 hours, staying longer in such environment would most certainly expose workers to greater dangers, perhaps resulting in more health concerns. The hazards reported in the previous studies include musculoskeletal disorders, dizziness, low back pain, headaches, eye irritation, cough, and nausea [35, 36]. Musculoskeletal disorders can cause increased absenteeism, costs, and injuries. Data suggests that approximately nine in every ten oil workers in Nigeria have musculoskeletal disorders [37]. When working for lengthy periods, workers inhale and are exposed to more organic solvents, which exacerbate the adverse symptoms. A study reported that chemical occupational accidents are frequent among gas station workers with longer exposure times [38]. While these studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of the effects of job characteristics in specific situations or workplaces, their primary focus was on the working environment and physical outcomes, paying little attention to the psychological aspects of the situation and how workers might be able to relieve it.

Concerning sleep problems, humans have a fundamental physiological need for sleep and a steady biological clock, but in gas stations, workers usually work two or three shifts, which involve irregular working hours. They are more likely to have sleep problems than people who do not work shifts. When people are required to work shifts, their biological clocks are messed up, their sleep-wake cycle is disrupted [39], and they become sleep deprived [40], all of which reduce work performance [41].

Occupational stress can be considered unavoidable in the workplace. Gas station workers not only experience a massive workload, but also maintain a high level of motivation and alertness to do their jobs. Some of them must deal with sales advertising and customer complaints and even shoulder additional safety duties. Thus, they often face a certain degree of stress.

To sum up, gas station employees are facing a series of occupational-related risk factors, such as shift work, high workload, poor work environment, fatigue and sleep problem, and work stress, which will ultimately affect their physical and mental health.

1.4 The present study

Gas station workers face occupational health risk factors in their daily work. As they play a significant role in the gas station industry, their occupational health needs must be given attention. However, no systematic review has been conducted on this topic. This study helps to assess the current state of literature on mental and physical health statuses of gas station workers. In doing so, the present study though a systematic overview investigated the current condition of the occupational risk of gas station workers in this safety-critical position, and thereby fill in the research gap on this topic. In this study, we first conducted a literature search and screening, and then a systematic description, analysis, and assessment, paying special attention to the occupational health statuses and outcomes of gas station employees. Lastly, we propose recommendations for possible interventions to mitigate risk factors that affect the health of gas station employees.

2 Methods

2.1 Search strategy

A systematic search of the existing literature was conducted to find suitable articles for inclusion in this study. Papers were identified from the following electronic databases: Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. The keywords used in the search included gas/petrol/filling station staff/attendant/worker/employee, sleep, fatigue, shift work, pressure. This study, as a literature review, is exempt from Institutional Review Board approval.

2.2 Study selection

The literature included in this review must meet the following requirements: (1) studies on fatigue, shift work, sleep, and physical and mental health of gas station employees; (2) published on or before November 11, 2021; and (3) papers in English.

The literature search was divided into two rounds. In the first round of searches, the titles and abstracts of all online articles in the selected database were reviewed. In the second search, the full texts of all articles selected in the first search were reviewed, and studies that did not meet the requirements were subsequently removed.

2.3 Research framework (DRIVE model)

The Demands-Resources-Individual Effects (DRIVE) model is our research framework, which is one of the models in the field of occupational fatigue [42, 43]. The DRIVE model includes work and personal characteristics that may influence well-being outcomes and considers both psychological processes and environmental workplace factors. The model is considered to be quite robust with abundant empirical evidence. It has been applied to various aspects of occupational health, such as psychiatric staff [44], teachers [45], office workers [46], UK railway staff [47], and outsourcing industry [48]. According to the DRIVE model, individual differences (e.g. coping styles, personality, and health-related behaviours) play a significant role in fatigue, which demonstrates not only the effects of job demands and resources but also the impact of individual differences on work fatigue and health outcomes.

Gas station workers often experience high job demands and heavy workloads, which result in fatigue and stress and negatively impact mental health. However, a dearth of research has investigated the specific causes of fatigue and stress among gas station workers in this field. Few researchers have considered both causes and outcomes of occupational health. Therefore, in this review, we adopted the DRIVE model (Fig. 1) as our research framework and focused on factors related to occupational health, such as job demands, job resources, stress, individual differences, and work-related health outcomes.

Fig. 1

DRIVE model.

3 Results

This review finally included 20 research articles. A total of 2331 citations were found using the search method. On the basis of the title and/or abstract screening, 1839 articles were deemed potentially relevant. Then, 20 studies were considered for the final analysis after excluding articles that did not meet the predetermined inclusion criteria and duplicates. Figure 2 displays the flowchart of the search strategy. Table 1 summarises how gas station employees were assessed in detail and shows the outcomes and conclusions of the studies.

Fig. 2

Flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of articles.

Table 1

Results of the included studies

Reference	Simple	Study objectives	Measurement	Results	Conclusion
Domínguez et al. 2019	N = 10299% maleAge: 24-25	To investigate the effects caused by the sleep disorder in workers of service stations with rotating shift.	Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)	14.7% of workers reported severe difficulty sleeping (>1 h) and 24.5% of workers sleep problem (30 min to 60 min).	75% of the participants report some degree of sleep disorders.
Liu et al. 2013	N = 34557% maleAge: 20–56	To understand the influence of gasoline on gas station employees and investigate their sleep and emotional conditions.	Occupational health examination and anxiety questionnaire	73.3% of the refueling workers had neurasthenia symptoms 8%, and 63.8% had sleep disorders or decreased sleep quality 5%.	The working environment of gas station may affect the psychological state and sleep status of operators.
Rocha et al. 2014	N = 18088% maleAge: 19–64	To identify the use of personal protective equipment by gas stations’ workers in the city of Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.	Using a questionnaire and non-participative and symmetrical observation	1. Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis which obtained a result of 0.96.2. Only boots and uniforms were actually used.	Lack of PPE use and inappropriate self-care measures.
Marta et al. 2012	N = 22190% maleAge: 11–64	To identify the perceptions of gas station workers about risk factors to which they are exposed in work environment and report the development of socioenvironmental intervention.	A quantitative study and structured interviews	The participants identified the following risk types: chemical (93.7%), physical (88.2%), physiological (64.3%) and biological (62.4%).	Workers perceive risks, and that they tend to relate risks with the occurrence of occupational accidents as an indicator of the dangerous nature of their work environment.
Roggia et al. 2019	N = 7788% maleAge: 19–67	To examine the auditory system of Brazilian gasoline station workers.	The audiological evaluation included a questionnaire, pure-tone audiometry, acoustic immittance tests, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), auditory brainstem response (ABR) and P300 auditory-evoked potentials	1. 59.7% reported difficulties in communication in noisy places.2. Gasoline station workers showed significantly poorer results than non-exposed control participants in one or more conditions of each of the audiological tests used, except P300.	Gasoline station workers have both peripheral and central auditory dysfunctions that could be partly explained by their exposure to gasoline.
Chiang et al. 2005	N = 20000	To observe a decrease of traffic injuries after shift among gasoline workers.	The occupational injury registry data of 1991–2000 in a petrochemical company were analyzed	The CIR dropped 3.14 times during 1997–2000 for commuting accidents on the way back home compared with that during 1991–1992, and the PWDL and PSL dropped 25.2 and 21.5 times, respectively, which corresponded with the time of installments of GVRD.	The decrease of commuting injuries on journey back home for gasoline workers were probably related to the effective reduction of solvent exposure.
Pranjic et al. 2002	N = 37Age: 35–48	To made assessment of health effects in workers exposed to gasoline, and its constituents at gasoline stations between 1985 and 1996.	Medical/occupational history, haematological. And biochemical examination, a physical exam, standardized psychological tests, and ultrasound examination of kidneys and liver	Chronic exposed gasoline workers had haematological disorders. These results significantly differed from those of controls.	In 13 out of 37 workers at gasoline stations exposed to gasoline for more than 5 years the symptom of depression and decreased reaction time and motor abilities were identified.
Wang and Wang 2020	N = 42158.19% male	To examine the effect of perceived organizational support (POS) on burnout and turnover intention in the Chinese context.	Self-administered questionnaires	1. The relationship between burnout and turnover intention is positive and significant (β= 0.515, p < 0.001).2. Burnout has a mediating effect when POS interacts with turnover intention.	POS has a significant negative impact on burnout and turnover intention, and that job resources cannot substitute POS.
Neto et al. 2019	N = 76100% male	To evaluate the neurocognitive aspects and eye-tracking of gas station workers.	Trail Making Tests A and B (TMT-A and -B), the Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT), eye-tracking using a 250-Hz eye tracker, and the Psychological-Neurological Questionnaire (PNQ)	Approximately 52.60% of the workers reported neuropsychological symptoms, and they mainly reported constant burning in the eyes. Chronic exposure from 1 to 3 years reduced RCFT performance (p < 0.0083), and exposure for at least 7 years impaired performed on almost all of the tests (p < 0.0083) except the TMT-B.	Gas station workers without adequate protection experience premature losses related to attention, memory, and eye-movement attributes.
Oe and Qm 2018	N = 21545.6% maleAge: 24.3±4.6	To determine the occupational hazards, health problems and safety practices of petrol station attendants in Uyo, Nigeria.	Structured interviewer-administered questionnaire	1. There was a statistically significant association between having headache, nausea, cough and inhalation of petrol vapour (p < 0.01) or car exhaust fumes (p < 0.05).2. Awareness about personal protective equipment was 30.7%, while use was 7.0%.	Petrol station attendants in this study were exposed to various hazards and health problems. Awareness and use of PPE was very low.
Albán-Pérez et al. 2017	N = 14667.7% maleAge: 18–63	To determine the association between the psychosocial factors at work and occupational stress in gas station attendants in Ecuador.	Survey of Psychosocial Factors at Work and Stress Evaluation Survey	1. About the occupational stress, we observed high levels of psychoemotional symptoms (88.4%), followed by those regarding social behavior (74%).2. The factors Content and characteristics of the task (p < 0.005) and Job role and carrier development (p < 0.005) presented the higher number of associations with the presence of occupational stress symptoms.	Gas station attendants perceive a high exposition to different psychosocial factors at work, which are associated with the presence of high levels of occupational stress.
Zucki et al. 2017	N = 4486.4% male	To characterize the hearing profile of gas station attendants.	An audiological evaluation was performed, composed by pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry and acoustic impedance tests	Hearing loss was verified in gas station attendants characterized by impairment of the peripheral auditory system, suggesting toxic effects of exposure to fuels.	Retrocochlear impairment sugguests that it is considered relevant to include the acoustic reflex research in the auditory evaluation of the gas station attendants, as well as the integration of this professional category into hearing loss prevention programs.
Batubara 2017	N = 34	To get an overview of the level stress at work of gas station operators.	A questionnaire about demographic data and measurement tools, that was adopted from a stress diagnostic survey from the theory of Ivancevich and Matteson (1980) and modified by the researcher	The results indicated the stress levels of operators as being low (18 respondents – 52.94%), moderate (15 respondents – 44. 12%) and high (1 respondent – 2.94%).	Most of the operators have work stress work at the low and moderate levels.
Pommerehn et al. 2016	N = 32	To evaluate the understanding of noise and the perception about quality of life of gas station workers.	A questionnaire on noise and hearing health and by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref)	1. Most workers believe that exposure to noise can lead to hearing loss as well as tinnitus and dizziness. The working environment was indicated as noisy, but the workers do not perceive noise producers and do not adopt preventive measures.2. Concerning the quality of life, the lowest score was for the environmental domain.	The majority of workers does not have significant knowledge about the need for protective measures against noise.
Wang 2013	N = 256	To investigate the stress management of Henan gas station employees based on their stress status.	Interviews, open-ended questionnaires, etc. about stress among gas station employees	1. All of the employees at the gas station feel different levels of stress, with 27.6 % of them feeling very stressed.2. The majority of employees feel varying degrees of physical discomfort.	Excessive occupational pressure has caused one-third of gas station employees to lack a sense of identity and belonging to their own profession, thus reflecting the current occupational pressure situation of employees is not optimistic.
Lacerda et al. 2011	N = 3187.1% maleAge: 31.5±8.4	To evaluate achromatic and chromatic vision of workers chronically exposed to organic solvents through psychophysical methods.	Psychophysical tests were achromatic tests (Snellen chart, spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity, and visual perimetry) and chromatic tests (Ishihara’s test, color discrimination ellipses, and Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test—FM100)	1. Spatial contrast sensitivities of exposed workers were lower than the control at spatial frequencies of 20 and 30 cpd.2. The exposed workers group had higher error values of FM100 and wider color discrimination ellipses area compared to the controls.	Workers occupationally exposed to organic solvents had abnormal visual functions, mainly color vision losses and visual field constriction.
Monney et al. 2018	N = 150	To assess the health and safety standards, occupational hazards and health problems among pump attendants in Fuel Service Stations (FSS) in Ghana.	Data was collected using structured questionnaires and an observation check-list	1. The top three occupational hazards were exposure to extreme weather conditions (99%); inhalation of vehicle exhaust fumes and petrol vapour (98%) and fire outbreaks (88%).2. Common illnesses experienced by pump attendants are all work-related and were dominated by musculoskeletal disorders [MSDs] (n = 141), low-back pain [LBP] (n = 81), headaches (62) and dizziness (n = 36).	Pump attendants in FSS are predisposed to dire health risks due to their working conditions and require urgent measures to protect them.
Valen et al. 2019	N = 137	To describe the neuropsychological course of chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy (CSE) after first diagnosis and to detect prognostic factors for neuropsychological impairment after diagnosis.	Follows a Dutch cohort of CSE patients who were first diagnosed between 2001 and 2011 and underwent a second neuropsychological assessment 1.5–2 years later	1. There was a significant improvement on neuropsychological subdomains at follow-up, with effect sizes between small and medium (Cohen’s d 0.27–0.54).2. There was a significant overall improvement of neuropsychological impairment with a medium effect size (Cohen’s d 0.56).	Results are in line with previous research on the course of CSE, stating that CSE is a non-progressive disease after cessation of exposure.
Chen et al. 2000	N = 792100% female	To investigate the association between birth weight and exposure to benzene, work stress, and other occupational and environmental hazards.	Occupational and environmental exposures and personal information, including perceived work stress, exposure to noise, physical exertion at work, and passive smoking, were obtained by an interview questionnaire	1. In the univariate model, birth weight was negatively associated with exposure to benzene (–58 g (95% confidence interval (95% CI), –115 to –2)) and with work stress (–84 g (95% CI, –158 to –10)).2. In the multivariate model, there was 183 g (95% CI 65 to 301) reduction in birth weight among those with both exposure to benzene and work stress compared with those with neither exposure.	Low level exposure to benzene and work stress interact to reduce birth weight in this population.
Chaiklieng, Suggaravetsiri, and Autrup 2019	N = 150(137 fueling workers and 13 cashiers)	To assess the health risk of inhalation exposure to benzene among gasoline station workers.	The ambient benzene concentration was measured and additional data of working characteristics were collected by interviews and on-site observations	Risk assessment of inhalation exposure showed a high risk of adverse health effect (Hazard Quotients (HQ) >1) in 51.33% of workers. The cancer risk was increased from 1.35×10^–8 to 1.52×10^–4, and 70.67% of the workers had a lifetime cancer risk (>Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR): 2.2×10^–6).	A significantly higher risk was found in fueling workers compared to cashiers, and in workers at gasoline stations in inner-city zones (suburban and urban), compared to rural zones.

3.1 Study characteristics

Of the 20 studies included, eight were conducted in Asia; seven, in South America; two, in Africa; one, in North America, and one, in Europe. Thirteen studies specified the sex of the participants, of which eleven included both male and female workers, two included only female participants, and one included only male participants. The subjects in the study included gas station operators, salespeople, bookkeepers, and gas station managers.

3.2 Statistical pooling

The study designs, research methods, shift schedules, and outcome measures varied widely among the studies, making statistical pooling nearly impossible. Therefore, the results were qualitatively summarised.

3.3 Workload and stress problem

As mentioned earlier, gas station employees face huge workloads and must maintain high levels of enthusiasm and attentiveness to serve customers. For some employees, the tasks include sales promotion and addressing customer complaints, which confers even greater pressure. Pérez et al. evaluated various symptoms related to occupational stress in a group of gas station employees and found higher reports of psycho-emotional symptoms, with >70% of participants mentioning a “very high” frequency [49]. This suggests that the employees might have experienced significant stress at work. In addition, the results of a survey conducted by Batubara et al. in a gas station in Bandung, Thailand, showed that the stress levels of gasoline operators were low (18 respondents, 52.94%), moderate (15 respondents, 44.12%), and high (1 respondent, 2.94%) [50]. That indicates that most operators work at low and medium levels of stress. Compared with those in foreign countries, gas station employees in China seem to experience higher stress levels. The results of another stress survey among gas station employees in Henan, China, showed that all employees surveyed felt different stress levels [51]. An analysis revealed that excessive occupational stress caused a lack of sense of identity and belongingness to the profession in one-third of gas station employees, reflecting that their current occupational stress situation was not optimistic.

3.4 Shift work and sleep problem

Decreased sleep quality or sleep disturbance caused by shift work is a major health problem among gas station workers. The symptoms of sleep disorders include poor concentration, weariness, anxiety, and disorientation [52]. One study found that 14.7% of workers reported severe difficulty sleeping (>1 h) and 24.5% had sleep problems [53]. Liu et al. observed neurasthenia in 36.6% of administrators and 73.8% of employees participating in the refuelling operation [54]. Of the refuelling personnel, 65.2% tested positive for state anxiety, whereas 64.0% tested positive for typical anxiety. State and typical anxiety were found in 35.0% and 35.0% of the administrators, respectively, and 148 refuelling staff and 35 administrators had sleep issues or inadequate sleep.

3.5 Work-related health problems

In addition to sleep and stress, the physical health of gas station employees were also at risk. In an interview with Nigerian gas station employees, 183 (85.1%) experienced various health problems since they started working as gas station attendants [35]. The most common health problems reported were headaches (98, 53.6%), back pain (61, 33.3%), and eye irritation (54, 29.5%). Moreover, Monney et al. also found that musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) (97%), headache (56%), and low back pain (43%) were the top three most common diseases among gas station workers [36]. Another study that included standardised psychological and haematological tests and biochemical examinations also provided evidence supporting these findings. Pranjić et al. compared 61 healthy non-exposed controls and 25 gas stations workers who had been exposed to organic lead for only 9 months [23]. Haematological disorders and liver problems (chronic renal impairment) were found in the workers exposed to gasoline for a long time. These findings were significantly different from those obtained from the controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, the symptoms of depression and impaired response time and motor abilities were found in 13 of 37 gas station personnel who had been exposed to gasoline for >5 years.

With regard to hearing function, gas station workers are exposed to loud and distracting noises from vehicles, which can lead to irritability and hearing loss. A study in Brazil demonstrated that 67% of 77 gas station employees tested had audiometric results within the normal range, whereas 59.7% reported difficulty communicating in noisy environments [5]. The findings imply that gas station employees develop both peripheral and central auditory dysfunctions, which could be explained in part by their exposure to gasoline.

3.6 Work environment

Gas station employees are exposed to various occupational dangers caused by chemical, physical, biological, and physiological risk factors during the course of their workday. In the survey conducted by Cezar-Vaz et al., gas stations staffs are exposed to physical risk factors such as noise from automobiles and excessive air temperatures (hot and cold) over the seasons [38]. Chemical risk factors include exposure to fuel. Bacteria, viruses, and fungi are major biological risk factors. Moreover, physiological risk factors include repetitive movements of the same type. The above-mentioned factors can cause or exacerbate occupational diseases and accidents.

In terms of occupational injuries, most companies focus their efforts on preventing illnesses or injuries from occurring inside the plant, but the costs of transportation injuries by commuting were estimated to be two to six times higher than those of work-related injuries [55]. Petrol sniffing had an immediate effect on psychomotor performance that lasted 3 to 5 minutes and continued for 5 to 6 hours [31]. Therefore, the psychomotor functioning of employees can be severely affected after inhaling gasoline vapours throughout their shift. Chiang et al. investigated whether commuting injuries increase after a full day of occupational exposure to solvents such as gasoline fumes [56]. The study showed that the reduction in the frequencies and severity of traffic injuries on the way home could be related to the installation of effective gasoline recovery devices.

3.7 Effects of the physical environment on health

Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) are the most soluble elements of gasoline and are utilised mostly in solvents and fuels. Despite their importance, when handled improperly, they can cause health problems, especially with regard to the brain. One study compared neurocognitive attributes and eye-movement patterns between gas station workers who had been exposed to organic solvents for a long time and did not use protective gear and ordinary workers who had no history of chemical exposure [57]. The results indicated that the gas station employees developed impairments in neurocognitive attributes and eye movement patterns. They exhibited slow processing, poor mental flexibility, reduced working memory, and deficits in visual perception activities. A prospective study also confirmed that organic solvents may cause neurological damage of varying degrees of severity. A small group of workers chronically exposed to organic solvents were found to have a syndrome called chronic solvent encephalopathy (CSE) [30]. Van Valen et al. followed a cohort of Dutch patients with CSE and found that CSE is indeed a non-progressive disease after cessation of exposure to the causative agents [30]. Neuropsychological impairment and psychological symptoms improved over time in patients with CSE.

Many diseases affecting the immune, endocrine, cardiovascular, respiratory, and reproductive systems have also been attributed to benzene, which is considered the most harmful contaminant in gasoline. The visual system is a main target of organic solvent intoxication [58]. Lacerda et al. assessed achromatic and chromatic vision in gas station workers with chronic exposure to organic solvents [25]. The study found abnormal visual function, most commonly loss of colour vision and visual field constriction, in workers occupationally exposed to organic solvents. Another study confirmed the cancer risk from long-term exposure to benzene in gas station employees. Chaiklieng et al. found that benzene exposure may increase cancer risk in 70.67% of workers [59]. Gas workers were at significantly higher risk than cashiers, and gas station workers in inner-city areas (suburban and urban) were at higher risk than those in rural areas.

Furthermore, gas station attendants are also exposed to noise and air pollution, which are harmful to health. Solvent-induced hearing loss is considered a complex disorder that can be caused by a combination of ototoxicity and neurotoxicity, which is distinct from the deleterious effects of noise on hearing [60]. The study by Zucki et al. confirmed hearing loss in gas station workers, characterised by an impaired peripheral auditory system, indicating toxic effects from fuel exposure [26]. In addition to hearing disorders, one study investigated female employees whose primary occupational exposures were benzene, toluene, styrene, and xylene, and showed that low benzene exposure was significantly associated with lower birth weight [61]. A significant interaction was found between benzene exposure and work stress, resulting in a much greater decrease in birth weight in those exposed to both benzene and work stress than in those without such exposure.

3.8 Factors affecting turnover intention

As the liaison between a company and its customers, service industry staffs are often under tremendous pressure to meet the work demands of their colleagues, superiors, and customers, which often leads to burnout. Burnout can affect an employee’s job performance and may generate a tendency to quit [62]. Wang and Wang analysed the burnout and turnover tendencies of gas station employees in the context of China [63]. The results showed that burnout was significantly higher in men than in women and played a mediating role between perceived organisational support (POS) and turnover. In other words, employee’s POS can effectively reduce their turnover intention.

3.9 Measurement methods used in the retrieved literature

3.9.1 Subjective measurement method

Among the selected studies, eleven were conducted using subjective questionnaires or interviews as research tools. Rocha et al. and Cezar-Vaz et al. used structured questionnaires to investigate gas station employees in relation to their work characteristics, time in job function, workload and wage income, variables connected to the organisation of the work process, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) [34, 38]. Moreover, to orient the observations towards aspects related to the study problem, a script was used.

From the perspective of sleep, Domínguez et al. used the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to assess the sleep quality of gas station employees [53]. Liu et al. conducted occupational health examinations and used anxiety questionnaires to investigate the sleep and emotional statuses of gas station operators and managers [54]. To study stress levels in gas station employees, all questionnaires used to conduct surveys were retrieved in the literature, such as the Cuestionario de Evaluación del Estrés (Stress Evaluation Survey), a modified Stress Diagnostic Survey (SDS) questionnaire, and a self-made questionnaire [49 –51].

Regarding the occupational hazards and health of gas station employees, the studies of Johnson and Umoren and Monney et al. were both based on a descriptive cross-sectional approach, including face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires and extensive field observations [35, 36]. The impact of the gas station environment on the hearing function of gas station employees was examined using a questionnaire on noise and hearing health and the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref) questionnaire [64].

3.9.2 Objective measurement method

By contrast, most studies used objective research methods to examine the impact of gas station environmental risk factors on employee health. In studies that examined the effects of solvent exposure on the hearing function of gas station personnel, the audiological evaluation included pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, acoustic impedance tests, visual inspection of the ear canal, pure-tone audiometry (PTA), acoustic immittance, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and so on [5, 26].

From the perspective of the effects of organic solvents on the neurocognition and achromatic and chromatic vision of gas station workers, specific research tools were used, including Trail Making Tests A and B, which are traditional neurocognitive tests that efficiently evaluate the effects of solvent exposure, eye movement evaluation, achromatic tests (Snellen chart, spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity, and visual perimetry), and chromatic tests (Ishihara’s test, colour discrimination ellipses, and Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test) [25, 57].

To assess the overall health statuses of gas station employees, one study measured benzene concentrations in the environment surrounding the gas station, and another study conducted comprehensive examinations of gas station employees, including medical/occupational history taking, haematological and biochemical examinations, physical examinations, and ultrasonographies of the kidneys and liver [23, 59].

In addition, the remaining two studies were prospective studies. For 11 years, van Valen et al. followed a cohort of Dutch patients who were diagnosed with CSE for the first time and later performed a second neuropsychological assessment [30]. Moreover, pregnant workers (N = 792) in a large petrochemical industry were enrolled and followed up until delivery (1996–1998) to investigate the effects of benzene exposure and occupational stress on infant birth weight [61].

3.10 Use of personal protective equipment

According to Azari et al., gas station attendants are more susceptible to benzene-related health risks than to health risks caused by other compounds [65]. At low doses, gasoline vapours can irritate the eyes, respiratory tract, and skin. Exposure to higher concentrations may have effects on the central nervous system [66]. A study in gas station employees in Nigeria showed that 128 employees (59.5%) reported accidental occurrences, of which the most common was fuel splash on the skin (109, 85.2%). Therefore, the use of PPE by gas station employees is an important safety measure. A survey of self-reported PPE use among Brazilian gas station employees revealed that boots were the most frequently mentioned equipment, followed by aprons [34].

From the perspective of hearing function, noise from traffic and gas station work equipment poses a real risk to hearing function. One study found that to the question of hearing protection, 20 participants (62.5%) responded, ‘No measures are taken, even if they know that hearing noise can cause hearing loss’ [64]. The same number of employees also reported other factors related to noise: stress, headaches, communication difficulties, imbalance, and behavioural changes.

4 Discussion

This review shows that the present literature provides evidence about the adverse consequences of poor work design, shift work, and poor work environment on the physical and mental health of gas station employees. The main findings showed that the shift work at gas stations leads to psychological and physiological problems. The physiological consequences mainly included biochemical changes and lifestyle consequences, such as the impact of the physical environment on hearing function and memory, while the psychological consequences mainly included anxiety, stress, and depression. However, at the same time, it clearly indicates that there is a distinct lack of research on certain types of factors such as work demands, fatigue and well-being, especially psychosocial aspects, individual differences, and lifestyle factors.

4.1 Job characteristics

Our findings suggest that the work characteristics of gas station employees include heavy workload, shift work and a risky work environment. Due to the peculiar nature of the gas station industry, gas station workers generally have long working hours and irregular work schedules. Specifically, they have to engage in repetitive movements and stand for a long time every day, which will cause physical fatigue. In addition, as a service industry, gas station employees also need to maintain a full mood to communicate with a large number of customers, which is likely to lead to emotional fatigue. For shift work, due to the irregular circadian rhythm caused by shifts, gas station employees are more prone to operational errors, low productivity, and even physical problems such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. For example, the metabolic syndrome is a complex of interdependent risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. An Iranian study [67] found that an association between metabolic syndrome and shift work in petrochemical workers.

In addition, the environment of gas stations has brought many safety risks to gas station employees. For example, long-term exposure to major chemicals in gas stations such as gasoline and benzene will have a serious negative impact on the human nervous system, hematopoietic system and urinary system.

Work in shifts is one of the critical work characteristics of gas station employees. In recent years, shift work has been crucial to the modern industrialized economy, and there are many other occupations that share job characteristics similar to gas station workers, especially in healthcare, public safety, transportation, and other industries that require 24-hour service. Shift work has been linked to increased risk for safety and health of shift workers, globally [68]. Compared to gas station employees, a large number of studies have confirmed that shift work has many negative effects on employees of these occupations mentioned above. However, domestic and foreign scholars pay little attention to the gas station staff. Whether the adverse effects found in other shift workers also exist in gas station employees who take safe-critical job shifts is an important direction and worth focussing on in the future.

Similar to the working characteristics of gas stations are maritime personnel, railway employees, nurses, etc., all of whom need to work in shifts. Shift work has been associated with poor health, sleep and fatigue problems and low satisfaction with working hours [69]. The resulting circadian rhythm disturbance and sleep problems are one of the main manifestations of their fatigue. In a previous study investigating the causes of fatigue in maritime personnel, the risk factors affecting fatigue are classified into four categories: 1) sleep, rest and rhythm, 2) working characteristics, 3) personal characteristics, and 4) the working environment [70]. This study found that maritime personnel is mainly suffering physical fatigue, and their physical fatigue is directly caused by the high workload (as a work characteristic factor) and the ship movement (as a work environment factor), while their psychological fatigue is indirectly caused by the work pressure generated in both situations above [70]. In a systematic review study of fatigue among railroad personnel, Fan and Smith found that workload, work hours, shift work, inadequate rest and sleep, poor sleep quality, job roles, and so forth were associated with occupational fatigue among employees [71]. Qiu et al. confirmed that work stress is the main influencing factor of occupational fatigue [72]; the higher level of work stress is associated with the higher level of fatigue, as proposed in the DRIVE model. In terms of cognitive function, shift work can affect some aspects of nurses’ cognitive function (working memory and attention), and this effect is more pronounced after night shifts [73].

Shift work also exacerbates work risks and affects social functioning. For sailors who work shifts like gas station workers, the cumulative effect of shift risk is very significant, with the risk index on the 20th day being 2-3 times higher than that of the first day, meaning that the shift risk is greatest near the end of the work cycle [51]. Likewise, gas station employees may also have a cumulative effect of shift risk. When they shift to a certain day of the month, it can be the peak of fatigue for gas station workers. Once they reach the peak, they are likely to make mistakes in their operations, and even lead to major risk accidents. What’s more, shift arrangements in the nursing industry are similar to those in the gas station industry, where shift work is mostly 8-hour shifts or 12-hour shifts, that is, 2 or 3 shifts in 24 hours. One study demonstrated the impact of shift patterns on social functioning, with nurses reporting that interference with their social activities was a significant problem [74]. As a service industry, they all need to communicate with many people every day, which consumes a lot of emotional resources. In addition, shift work is likely to cause them to have different circadian rhythms from their friends and family members, resulting in their lack of social interaction, being less talkative on rest days, and affecting social interaction.

4.2 Stress and fatigue population

The review results showed that stress and fatigue problems are common among gas station workers, while the number of studies focused on their fatigue was less than on stress. Both occupational stress and fatigue can adversely affect employees’ psychology, behaviour, and physiology. As the key position of safety, the fatigue and stress of gas station employees should be paid more attention to and studied. In order to develop prevention and health promotion strategies for gas station employees, it is necessary to conduct studies on fatigue and stress from different perspectives, such as individual differences, lifestyle, satisfaction and quality of both work and life.

4.3 Sleep and other health problems

In addition to stress and fatigue, gas station employees also face a variety of physical health problems. Summarising the retrieved articles, we found that common health problems among gas station employees included sleep disturbances, headaches, back pain and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Other standardised psychological and biochemical examinations have also found gas station employees suffered from auditory dysfunctions, gastrointestinal diseases, liver diseases, genitourinary diseases, cardiovascular diseases and endocrine diseases.

As is known to all, physiological and psychological factors are interrelated and influence each other. Therefore, health problems not only affect the performance and productivity of gas station employees, causing fatigue and stress, but also affect the quality of life outside of work, and even affect the life expectancy of employees. However, few studies have focused on the negative effects of work-related health problems on employees’ well-being at work and beyond, which will need to be supplemented in the future.

In addition, employers should take action to improve the health of gas station employees. A previous study found that the planned educational interventions via training sessions, designed educational booklets and leaflets effectively reduced the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms [75]. The potential ways to improve health and well-being of gas station worker includes organising routine check-up, providing training sessions and educational leaflets on occupational disease prevention, continuously improving the working conditions of employees, arranging gas station shift scientifically, increasing break time and reducing overtime work.

4.4 Measurements and limitation

Summarising the literature retrieved, we found that many studies used subjective measures such as questionnaires or interviews, and relatively few studies used objective techniques such as real-time physiological monitoring and activity maps. We considered that this is most likely due to the limitations of the working environment and the convenience of sampling.

In future studies, objective measurements can be used to measure their sleep and stress. For example, ActiGraph can be used when investigating the sleep disorders of gas station employees. The psychological stress level can be measured by monitoring the individual’s physiological indicators, such as pulse, heartbeat, and pupil contraction. In addition, it is necessary to consider physical and psychological factors together because they are interrelated and affect each other, and studying only one part of the physical or psychological aspects may not yield the most thorough and accurate results.

4.5 Current protective equipment and its limitation

Our findings showed that PPE is the main equipment used to protect gas station employees in the working environment. However, it is not widely used in the actual work by gas station employees. For example, most employees only consider work clothes as PPE, but with short or long sleeves rolled up in hot weather, their arms are still exposed. This is most likely due to the relatively low level of education of petrol station employees, who lack knowledge of the health hazards of organic solvents, particularly benzene. Therefore, it is necessary for gas stations to provide employees with a full set of necessary PPE and make it mandatory for employees to use it at work. Safety attitude positively affects safety performance [76]. Gas station management should educate their employees about the risks they face on the job, stress the importance of using personal protective equipment, and raise their awareness of being responsible for their health.

In addition, there is no effective protection currently for gas station employees other than PPE. Generally, gas station employees need to work 8–12 hours a day, which makes chemical reagents gradually accumulate in the body of employees and there is a risk of cancer and other diseases. Therefore, it can be considered to control the working time of each shift of employees within six hours, reduce their exposure to chemical reagents through methods such as sound warnings, and provide employees with appropriate dining places and times and raise wages as compensation.

4.6 Implications

This study systematically searched, sorted and analysed the occupational health-related research on gas station workers. Surprisingly, studies on the occupational health risk factors among gas station workers were few, particularly those that dealt specifically with fatigue, job characteristics, work environment, and health outcomes. Gas station employees, as a typical representation of shift work and a critical safety role, should not be overlooked and should be valued. Based on the DRIVE model, our research finds that there are indeed certain problems in the occupational health of gas station employees. Occupational health-related factors such as workload, shift work and working environment have adverse consequences on the sleep problems, stress, fatigue and other health-related problems of gas station workers. This has some important implications, which include individual level, industry level and population level.

At the individual level, there has a considerable impact on the work and life of gas station workers. It not only allows individuals to be aware of risk factors at work, but also encourages them to make changes, such as active use of protective equipment and awareness of the negative impacts of shift work, to cope with the negative effects at work and improve their physical and mental health.

At the industry level, front-line employees serve as liaisons between firms and customers, and their work performance is crucial to enterprises. Turnover is directly related to the performance of front-line employees, while occupational fatigue and occupational health risk factors may reduce their job performance and increase turnover rate. As a result, this is a key issue that businesses must address. A three-layer model comprising organizational, supervisory and operator level influencing factors with 16 categories were found influence factors of occupational safety [77]. Employers should pay greater attention to their employees’ occupational health and develop a more complete and effective employee care strategy.

At the public level, the current findings have implications for disseminating information to the public about personnel in gas stations. To avoid economic and human losses, relevant government departments should protect employees’ rights and interests, as well as their physical and mental health, and maintain the gas industry’s long-term viability. Similar issues need to be addressed in several vocations with similar job characteristics and working environments as gas stations, such as oil and gas extraction and seafarers. Similar studies can be repeated in these domains.

4.7 Study limitations and future research

In conclusion, owing to the limited sample size, we recommend further in-depth research on this topic to contribute to the health care of workers exposed to chemical and physical hazards and shift workers. Employees can use advanced medical technology to treat diseases, but this is far less effective than mastering safety and self-protection knowledge. Occupational health education is not only responsible for the health of workers but also for their families. Therefore, further research is essential to assess and improve the health of gas station employees and reduce work-related stress. In the future, intervention training for gas station employees must be explored according to the uniqueness of each individual to determine how to reconcile shift work and a healthy lifestyle. This is an intervention and practice that could benefit the health of gas station employees. Each country should establish occupational health and safety policies especially addressing the special needs of the oil and gas sectors to mitigate risks to life, property, and the environment.

5 Conclusion

This review shows that shift work and the specific working environment of gas station employees adversely affect their sleep, stress levels, physical and mental health, and turnover intention. There is a distinct lack of research on certain types of factors such as work demands, fatigue and well-being, especially psychosocial aspects, individual differences, and lifestyle factors. To improve gas station workers’ health and well-being, strengthening workers’ self-protection knowledge according to their work statuses and formulating measures to avoid health problems caused by shift work. The research results can provide a reference for relevant studies in the future.

Author contributions

JF contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by YY and XT. All authors contributed to screening, full-text reading and data extraction. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical approval

This study, as a literature review, is exempt from Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board approval.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

None to report.

Funding

The authors report no funding.

References

. Research on the development trend of gas stations in China. [Wo Guo Jia You Zhan Fa Zhan Qu Shi Yan Jiu]. Chemical Management [Internet]. 2017;31:1. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=FGGL201731005&DbName=CJFQ2017

Egeghy

, Tornero-Velez

, Rappaport

. Environmental and biological monitoring of benzene during self-service automobile refueling. Environ Health Perspect [Internet]. 2000;108(12):1195–202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1289/eh001081195

Yin

. Management and development trend of gas stations in China. [Wo Guo Jia You Zhan Jing Ying Guan Li Ji Fa Zhan Qu Shi]. China Petroleum Enterprise. 2007;03:74–6.

Liu

, Kong

, Zhang

. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for the security of the supply chain system of the gas station in China. Ecotox Environ Safe [Internet]. 2018;164:325-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.028

Roggia

, de França

, Morata

, Krieg

, Earl

. Auditory system dysfunction in Brazilian gasoline station workers. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2019;58(8):484–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1597286

Vainiotalo

, Peltonen

, Ruonakangas

, Pfäffli

. Customer exposure to MTBE, TAME, C6 alkyl methyl ethers, and benzene during gasoline refueling. Environ Health Perspect [Internet]. 1999;107(2):133–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1289/eh99107133

, Huang

. Safety assessment of explosions during gas stations refilling process. J Loss Prev Proc [Internet]. 2019;60:133-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.04.012

Costa

, Haus

, Stevens

. Shift work and cancer—considerations on rationale, mechanisms, and epidemiology. Scand J Work Env Hea [Internet]. 2010:163-79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2899

Frost

, Kolstad

, Bonde

. Shift work and the risk of ischemic heart disease-a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Scand J Work Env Hea [Internet]. 2009:163-79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1319

10.

Wagstaff

, Lie

. Shift and night work and long working hours-a systematic review of safety implications. Scand J Work Env Hea [Internet]. 2011:173-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3146

11.

Folkard

, Lombardi

, Tucker

. Shiftwork: Safety, sleepiness and sleep. Ind Health [Internet]. 2005;43(1):20–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.43.20

12.

Folkard

, Tucker

. Shift work, safety and productivity. Occup Med [Internet]. 2003;53(2):95–101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg047

13.

Ummul

, Rao

. Shift work and fatigue. J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol. 2012;1(3):17–21.

14.

Sirdah

, Al Laham

, Al Madhoun

. Possible health effects of liquefied petroleum gas on workers at filling and distribution stations of Gaza governorates. E Mediterr Health J [Internet]. 2013;19(3):289–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26719/2013.19.3.289

15.

Gimaeva

, Bakirov

, Karimova

, Gimranova

, Mukhammadiyeva

, Karimov

. Production and genetic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases among petrochemical industry workers. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. [Internet]. 2018;90(1):49–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26442/terarkh201890149-53

16.

Al-Jaff

. Evaluation of renal and liver function in petrol station workers in Kirkuk city. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2019;10(2):1029–34.

17.

Getu

, Shiferaw

, Melku

. Assessment of hematological parameters of petrol filling workers at petrol stations in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. Environ Health Prev Med [Internet]. 2020;25(1):44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00886-1

18.

Chaiklieng

. Risk assessment of workers’ exposure to BTEX and hazardous area classification at gasoline stations. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249913

19.

Figueiredo

, Carvalho

LVB

, Borges

, Costa-Amaral

, Santos

MVCD

, et al. Assessment of exposure to BTEX in vehicle filling stations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and risks to workers’ health. [Avaliação da exposição a BTEX em postos de revenda de combustíveis no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, e os riscos à saúde do trabalhador]. Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2021;37(11). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00351520

20.

Chauhan

, Saini

, Yadav

. Recent trends of volatile organic compounds in ambient air and its health impacts: A review. Int J Technol Res Eng. 2014;1(8):667.

21.

Ekpenyong

, Davies

, Daniel

. Effects of gasoline inhalation on menstrual characteristics and the hormonal profile of female petrol pump workers. J Environ Prot [Internet]. 2013;4(08):65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/je2013.48A1009

22.

Abou-ElWafa

, Albadry

, El-Gilany

, Bazeed

. Some biochemical and hematological parameters among petrol station attendants: A comparative study. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2015;2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/418724

23.

Pranjić

, Mujagić

, Nurkić

, Karamehić

, Pavlović

. Assessment of health effects in workers at gasoline station. Bosnian J Basic Med [Internet]. 2002;2(1-2):35–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2002.3579

24.

Nwanjo

, Ojiako

. Investigation of the potential health hazards of petrol station attendants in Owerri Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manage [Internet]. 2007;11(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v11i2.55040

25.

Lacerda

EMDC

, Lima

, Rodrigues

, Teixeira

CEC

, de Lima

LJB

, Ventura

, et al. Psychophysical evaluation of achromatic and chromatic vision of workers chronically exposed to organic solvents. J Environ Public Hea [Internet]. 2012;2012(4):784390. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/784390

26.

Zucki

, Corteletti

LCBJ

, Tsunemi

, Munhoz

, Quadros

IAD

, Alvarenga

KDF

. Characterization of hearing profile of gas station attendants. Audiol Commun Res [Internet]. 2017;22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2016-1759

27.

Cairney

, Maruff

, Burns

, Currie

. The neurobehavioural consequences of petrol (gasoline) sniffing. Neurosci Biobehav R [Internet]. 2002;26(1):81–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00040-9

28.

Maruff

, Burns

, Tyler

, Currie

. Neurological and cognitive abnormalities associated with chronic petrol sniffing. Brain [Internet]. 1998;121(10):1903–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.10.1903

29.

Sabbath

, Gutierrez

, Okechukwu

, Singh-Manoux

, Amieva

, Goldberg

, et al. Time may not fully attenuate solvent-associated cognitive deficits in highly exposed workers. Neurology [Internet]. 2014;82(19):1716–23. Available from: . https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000000413

30.

van Valen

, Wekking

, van Hout

, van der Laan

, Hageman

, van Dijk

, et al. Chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy: Course and prognostic factors of neuropsychological functioning. Int Arch Occ Env Hea [Internet]. 2018;91(7):843–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1328-1

31.

Poklis

, Burkett

. Gasoline sniffing: A review. Clin Toxicol [Internet]. 1977;11(1):35–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3109/15563657708989817

32.

Tong

, Zhang

, Yang

, Zhu

, Ren

. Source analysis and environmental health risk assessment of VOCs in furniture manufacturing. [Jia Jv Zhi Zao Guo Cheng Zhong VOCs De Lai Yuan Fen Xi Ji Jian Kang Feng Xian Ping Jia]. Huanjing Kexue [Internet]. 2018;39(2):672–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201710114

33.

Zheng

, Kong

, Xing

, et al. Monitoring of volatile organic compounds (vocs) from an oil and gas station in northwest china for 1 year. Atmos Chem Phys [Internet]. 2018;18(7):4567–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4567-2018

34.

Rocha

, Cezar-Vaz

, Almeida

MCVD

, Bonow

, Silva

MSD

, Costa

VZD

. Use of personal protective equipment by gas stations workers: A nursing contribution. Texto Contexto Enfer [Internet]. 2014;23:193-202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072014000100023

35.

Johnson

, Umoren

. Assessment of occupational hazards, health problems and safety practices of petrol station attendants in Uyo, Nigeria. J Commun Med Prim Health Care. 2018;30(1):47–57.

36.

Monney

, Dramani

, Aruna

, Tenkorang

, Osei-Poku

. Health and safety in high-risk work environments: A study of fuel service stations in Ghana. J Environ Occup Hea [Internet]. 2015;4(3):132–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5455/jeos.20150903100137

37.

Omojunikanbi

, Akinpelu

, Ekechukwu

END

. Prevalence, pattern and predictors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among oil workers in Nigeria. Work [Internet]. 2022;71(1):151–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-205005

38.

Cezar-Vaz

, Rocha

, Bonow

, Da Silva

MRS

, Vaz

, Cardoso

. Risk perception and occupational accidents: A study of gas station workers in southern Brazil. Int J Env Res Pub Hea [Internet]. 2012;9(7):2362–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9072362

39.

Ferguson

, Lamond

, Kandelaars

, Jay

, Dawson

. The impact of short, irregular sleep opportunities at sea on the alertness of marine pilots working extended hours. Chronobiol Int [Internet]. 2008;25(2-3):399–411. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520802106819

40.

Costa

. Sleep deprivation due to shift work. In: Lotti

, Bleecker

, editors.Handbook of Clinical Neurology [Internet]. 2015;131;437-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-62627-1.00023-8

41.

Dall Ora

, Ball

, Recio-Saucedo

, Griffiths

. Characteristics of shift work and their impact on employee performance and wellbeing: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2016;57:12-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.007

42.

Mark

, Smith

. Stress models: A review and suggested new direction. In: Houdmont

, Leka

, editors. Occupational Health Psychology: European Perspectives on Research, Education and Practice. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2008, pp. 111–44.

43.

Margrove

, Smith

. The demands-resources-individual effects (DRIVE) model: Past, present and future research. In: Haque

, editor. Handbook of Research on the Complexities and Strategies of Occupational Stress [Internet]. US: IGI Global; 2022, pp. 13-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3937-1.ch002

44.

Fan

, Liu

, Smith

. The relationship between workload, fatigue and sleep quality of psychiatric staff. In: Longo

, Leva

, editors. Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. Communications in Computer and Information Science;2021;1493. p. 151-164. Cham: Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91408-0_10

45.

Smith

, James

. The well-being of staff in a welsh secondary school before and after a COVID-19 lockdown. J Educ Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. 2021;34(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2021/v34i430319

46.

Langer

, Taylour

, Smith

. Noise exposure, satisfaction with the working environment, and the wellbeing process. In: The 13th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Karolinska Institutet, 2021; Stockholm, Sweden. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12683.41768

47.

Fan

, Smith

. Positive well-being and work-life balance among UK railway staff. Open J of Social Sci [Internet]. 2017;05(06):1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.56001

48.

Smith

, Smith

. An international survey of the wellbeing of employees in the business process outsourcing industry. Psychology [Internet]. 2017;08(01):160–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.81010

49.

Albán-Pérez

, Pando-Moreno

, Laca-Arocena

, Colunga-Rodríguez

, Verdesoto-Galéas

ÁM

, Sarabia-López

, et al. Psychosocial factors at work and occupational stress in gas station attendants in Ecuador. Psychology [Internet]. 2017;8:2215-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.813141

50.

Batubara

. Stress at work and well-being: Study of stress level at work to improve employee well-being on Pertamina’s operators with standard ‘Pertamina Way’ in Bandung. In: Abdullah

, Hamidah

, Aisyah

, Danuwijaya

, Yuliani

, Munawaroh

HSH

, editors. Ideas for 21st Century Education. London: CRC Press; 2017, pp. 37–41.

51.

Wang

. Investigation on occupational stress of gas station employee and establishment of employee assistance program. [He Nan Shi You Jia You Zhan Yuan Gong De Zhi Ye Ya Li Yu Yuan Gong Bang Zhu Ji Hua Jian She De Tan Suo Yu Si Kao]. Oil Depot and Gas Station. 2013;22(02):40–4.

52.

Kim

, Dong

, Kim

, Chang

, Kim

. Effects of health on shift-work: General and psychological health, sleep, stress, quality of life. Korean J Occup Environ Med [Internet]. 2002;14(3):247–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.2002.14.3.247

53.

Domínguez

, Velasquez

, Alvarado

, Salas

. Study on sleep disorder in gasoline service stations workers. In 2019 International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2019;969:377–82 Cham: Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20497-6_35

54.

Liu

, Yao

, Tian

, Cheng

, Xx

. Influence of gasoline on psychology and nervous system of employees in gas station. [Qi You Dui Jia You Zhan Cong Ye Ren Yuan Xin Li Yu Shen Jing Xi Tong De Ying Xiang]. J Safety Sci and Tech. 2013;9(11):185–8.

55.

Miller

. Injuries to workers and their dependents. J Safety Res [Internet]. 1995;26(2):75–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(95)00003-9

56.

Chiang

, Chan

, Tseng

, Wang

. Reduction of post-shift traffic injuries among gasoline station workers: Are they related to the reduction of occupational gasoline vapor exposure? Accid Anal Prev [Internet]. 2005;37(5):956–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aa2005.04.016

57.

Campos Neto

, Andrade

MJO

, Oliveira

, Costa

, Santos

. The effects of organic vapors on neurocognitive measures and eye tracking among gas station workers. Psychol Neurosci [Internet]. 2020;13(2):176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000193

58.

Till

, Westall

, Rovet

, Koren

. Effects of maternal occupational exposure to organic solvents on offspring visual functioning: A prospective controlled study. Teratology [Internet]. 2001;64(3):134–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.1056

59.

Chaiklieng

, Suggaravetsiri

, Autrup

. Risk assessment on benzene exposure among gasoline station workers. Int J Env Res Pub Health [Internet]. 2019;16(14):2545. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142545

60.

Fuente

, Slade

, Taylor

, Morata

, Keith

, Sparer

, et al. Peripheral and central auditory dysfunction induced by occupational exposure to organic solvents. J Occ Environ Med [Internet]. 2009;1202-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181bae17c

61.

Chen

, Cho

, Chen

, Wang

, Damokosh

, Ryan

, et al. Exposure to benzene, occupational stress, and reduced birth weight. Occup Environ Med [Internet]. 2000;57(10):661–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.10.661

62.

Babakus

, Yavas

, Ashill

. The role of customer orientation as a moderator of the job demand–burnout–performance relationship: A surface-level trait perspective. J Retailing [Internet]. 2009;85(4):480–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2009.07.001

63.

Wang

, Wang

. Reducing turnover intention: Perceived organizational support for frontline employees. Frontiers of Business Research in China [Internet]. 2020;14(1):1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-020-00074-6

64.

Pommerehn

, Filha

VAVD

, Miolo

, Fedosse

. Noise and quality of life in the perspective of gas station workers. Revista CEFAC [Internet]. 2016;18:377-84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201618213515

65.

Azari

, Konjin

, Zayeri

, Salehpour

, Seyedi

. Occupational exposure of petroleum depot workers to BTEX compounds. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2012;3(1):39–44.

66.

Micyus

, McCurry

, Seeley

. Analysis of aromatic compounds in gasoline with flow-switching comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A [Internet]. 2005;1086(1-2):115-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.06.015

67.

Rashnuodi

, Afshari

, Shirali

, Amiri

, Zadeh

, Samani

. Metabolic syndrome and its relationship with shift work in petrochemical workers. Work [Internet]. 2022;71(4):1175–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205223

68.

d’Ettorre

, Pellicani

, Vullo

, Ceccarelli

, La Torre

. Preliminary assessment of rotating shiftwork risk in a 24-hours metal industry. Work [Internet]. 2020;65(2):369–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203089

69.

Ihlström

, Kecklund

, Anund

. Split-shift work in relation to stress, health and psychosocial work factors among bus drivers. Work [Internet]. 2017;56(4):531–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172520

70.

Pan

. The cause of human fatigue and scenario analysis in the process of marine transportation. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition) [Internet]. 2020;36(1):107–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2020.01.014

71.

Fan

, Smith

. A preliminary review of fatigue among rail staff. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2018;9:634. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00634

72.

Qiu

, Zhang

, Wang

, Jing

, Gong

, Xie

. Investigation on status of occupational fatigue among clinical nurses in three grade-A tertiary hospitals of Mianyang City. [Mian Yang Shi 3 Suo San Ji Jia Deng Yi Yuan Lin Chuang Hu Shi Zhi Ye Pi Lao Xian Zhuang Diao Cha]. Occup Health. 2020;36(16):2172–5.

73.

Esmaily

, Jambarsang

, Mohammadian

, Mehrparvar

. Effect of shift work on working memory, attention and response time in nurses. Int J Occup Saf Ergo [Internet]. 2022;28(2):1085–90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2020.1863656

74.

Bosch

, Lange

. Shift work in health care. Ergonomics [Internet]. 1987;30(5):773–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138708969767

75.

Khoshakhlagh

, Majdabadi

, Yazdanirad

. The impact of ergonomic-educational interventions on reduction of musculoskeletal symptoms among employees of oil and gas installations in Iran. Work [Internet]. 2022;71(3):651–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205231

76.

Karimpour

, Jahani

, Shirali

. The relationship between safety attitude and safety performance in the petrochemical industry: The mediating role of safety climate. Work [Internet]. 2021;68(2):507–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203353

77.

Naghavi-Konjin

, Mortazavi

, Mahabadi

, Hajizadeh

. Identification of factors that influence occupational accidents in the petroleum industry: A qualitative approach. Work [Internet]. 2020;67(2):419–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203291

Occupational fatigue and health of gas station workers: A review

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

OBJECTIVE:

METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSION:

Keywords

1 Introduction

1.1 Job characteristics of gas station workers

1.2 Chemical and physical risks in the workplace

1.3 Work-related health problems

1.4 The present study

2 Methods

2.1 Search strategy

2.2 Study selection

2.3 Research framework (DRIVE model)

3.2 Statistical pooling

3.3 Workload and stress problem

3.4 Shift work and sleep problem

3.5 Work-related health problems

3.6 Work environment

3.7 Effects of the physical environment on health

3.8 Factors affecting turnover intention

3.9 Measurement methods used in the retrieved literature

3.9.1 Subjective measurement method

3.9.2 Objective measurement method

3.10 Use of personal protective equipment

4 Discussion

4.1 Job characteristics

4.2 Stress and fatigue population

4.3 Sleep and other health problems

4.4 Measurements and limitation

4.5 Current protective equipment and its limitation

4.6 Implications

4.7 Study limitations and future research

5 Conclusion

Author contributions

Ethical approval

Informed consent

Conflict of interest

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Funding

References