Exposure to artificial stone machining, under the conditions in which marble workers work with this new product, can cause silicosis.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the experiences of marble workers affected, both in workshop and during home installation of countertops, before diagnosis of silicosis.
METHODS:
Qualitative study in which 10 open-ended semistructured interviews were conducted with marble workers diagnosed with silicosis after machining artificial stone countertops in Cádiz, Spain. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using a directed content analysis. Codes were organized into themes.
RESULTS:
Interviews up to 120 minutes and transcript analysis revealed three themes: 1) Heavy exposure for piecework: construction boom in an environment of labor deregulation and high demand for the novel product; 2) Poor working conditions: dry machining of artificial stone without proper protection in the workshop and greater exposure during home installation of countertops; 3) Concatenated legal transgressions: deficiencies in prevention and health surveillance without safety conditions for the correct handling of artificial stone.
CONCLUSIONS:
The fight against an emerging occupational disease—artificial stone silicosis—should focus on detecting affected workers and avoiding new cases, forcing joint efforts to achieve rigorous compliance with health surveillance and protecting marble workers to achieve healthy and safe workplaces.
FernándezR, MartínezC, QueroA, BlancoJJ, CarazoL, PrietoA. Guidelines for the diagnosis and monitoring of silicosis. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51(2):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbr.2014.07.002.
3.
GüngenAC, AydemirY, çobanH, DüzenliH, TasdemirC. Lung cancer in patients diagnosed with silicosis should be investigated. Respiratory Medicine Case Reports. 2016;18(1):93–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2016.04.011.
Álvarez ZaralloJF, Cabrera EismanJP, Córdoba DoñaJA, et al. Integral Silicosis Program of Andalusia in the manipulation of quartz agglomerates. Sevilla. Consejería de Salud, Consejería de Empleo, Empresa y Comercio; 2017. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/export/drupaljda/Programa_Silicosis.pdf. Accessed August 13, 2019.
6.
Pérez-AlonsoA, Córdoba-DoñaJA, Millares-LorenzoJL, Figueroa-MurilloE, García-VadilloC, Romero-MorilloJ. Outbreak of silicosis in Spanish quartz conglomerate workers. Int J Occup Environ Health . 2014;20(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000049.
7.
MartínezC, PrietoA, GarcíaL, QueroA, GonzálezS, CasanP. Silicosis: a disease with an active present. Arch Bronconeumol. 2010;46(2):97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2009.07.008.
8.
PascualS, UrrutiaI, BallazA, ArrizubietaI, AltubeL, SalinasC. Prevalence of silicosis in a marble factory after exposure to quartz conglomerates. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47(1):50–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2010.09.004.
9.
Pérez-AlonsoA, Córdoba-DoñaJA, García-VadilloC. Silicosis: Relevant Differences Between Marble Workers and Miners. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51(1):53–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2014.01.008.
10.
Pascual Del PobilMA, GarcíaR, GarcíaMDM, BarrosoE, FloresE, GilJ. Silicosis: A former occupational disease with new occupational exposure scenarios. Rev Clin Esp. 2019;219(1):26–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2018.06.006.
11.
Pérez-AlonsoA, Córdoba-DoñaJA, León-JiménezA. Silicosis Caused by Artificial Quartz Conglomerates: Keys to Controlling an Emerging Disease. Arch Bronconeumol. 2019;55(7):394–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2019.01.015.
12.
KramerMR, BlancPD, FiremanE, et al. Artificial stone silicosis: disease resurgence among artificial stone workers. Chest. 2012;142(1):419–24. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-1321.
13.
ShtraichmanO, BlancPD, OllechJE, et al. Outbreak of autoimmune disease in silicosis linked to artificial stone. Occup Med (Lond). 2015;65(6):444–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv073.
14.
RosengartenD, FoxBD, FiremanE, et al. Survival following lung transplantation for artificial stone silicosis relative to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Ind Med. 2017;60(3):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22687.
PaolucciV, RomeoR, SisinniAG, BartoliD, MazzeiMA, SartorelliP. Silicosis in Workers Exposed to Artificial Quartz Conglomerates: Does It Differ From Chronic Simple Silicosis?Arch Bronconeumole. 2015;51(12):57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2014.12.010.
17.
GuarnieriG, BizzottoR, GottardoO, et al. Multiorgan accelerated silicosis misdiagnosed as sarcoidosis in two workers exposed to quartz conglomerate dust. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(3):178–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105462.
18.
MatarE, FrankelA, BlakeLKM, SilverstoneEJ, JohnsonAR, YatesDH. Complicated silicosis resulting from occupational exposure to engineered stone products. Med J Aust. 2017;206(9):385–6. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00257.
19.
HoyRF, BairdT, HammerschlagG, et al. Artificial stone-associated silicosis: a rapidly emerging occupational lung disease. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104428.
20.
EdwardsG. Accelerated Silicosis-An Emerging Epidemic Associated with Engineered Stone. Comment on Leso, V. et al. Artificial Stone Associated Silicosis: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(7):1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071179.
21.
KirbyT. Australia reports on audit of silicosis for stonecutters. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30478-7>.
22.
FriedmanGK, HarrisonR, BojesH, WorthingtonK, FiliosM. Notes from the field: silicosis in a countertop fabricator—Texas 2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:129–30. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6405a5.htm. Accessed August 13, 2019.
23.
RoseC, HeinzerlingA, PatelK, et al. Severe Silicosis in Engineered Stone Fabrication Workers —California, Colorado, Texas, and Washington, 2017–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:813–8. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6838a1.
24.
RonsmansS, DecosterL, KeirsbilckS, VerbekenEK, NemeryB. Artificial stone-associated silicosis in Belgium. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(2):133–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105436.
25.
OphirN, ShaiAB, AlkalayY, et al. Artificial stone dust-induced functional and inflammatory abnormalities in exposed workers monitored quantitatively by biometrics. ERJ Open Res. 2016;2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104428.
NoreñaAL, AlcárazN, RojasJG, RebolledoD. Applicability of the Criteria of Rigor and Ethics in Qualitative Research. Aquichan. 2012;12(3):263–74. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2012.12.3.5.
32.
PhillipsML, JohnsonDL, JohnsonAC. Determinants of respirable silica exposure in stone countertop fabrication: a preliminary study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(7):368–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.789706.
33.
MishaliM, WeilerD. Psychological factors causing nonadherence to safety regulations in Israel’s stone and marble fabrication industry: Unveiling the source of worker noncompliance. Cogent Business & Management. 2017;4(1):140471710.1080/23311975.2017.1404717.
34.
CooperJ, JohnsonD, PhillipsM. Respirable Silica Dust Suppression During Artificial Stone Countertop Cutting. Ann Occup Hyg. 2015;59(1):122–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meu083.
35.
SunJ, WengD, JinC, et al. The value of high resolution computed tomography in the diagnostics of small opacities and complications of silicosis in mine machinery manufacturing workers, compared to radiography. J Occup Health. 2008;50(5):400–5. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.L8015.
36.
PavanC, PolimeniM, TomatisM, et al. Editor's highlight: Abrasion of artificial stones as a new cause of an ancient disease. Physicochemical features and cellular responses. Toxicol Sci. 2016;153(1):4–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfw101.
