Future competencies in human-machine interaction: An interdisciplinary approach for the anticipation of strategically relevant competencies in the field of automotive human-machine interaction
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August 11, 2022
Future competencies in human-machine interaction: An interdisciplinary approach for the anticipation of strategically relevant competencies in the field of automotive human-machine interaction
Digitalization and technological progress lead to an increasingly fast development of promising fields for action and new technologies whereas the time required to qualify employees for new activities and work content has remained largely the same. Organizations have to establish anticipative competence measures to secure their competitiveness.
OBJECTIVES:
Those developments suggest that a new approach to develop human resource development strategies is required.
METHODS:
This article describes the results of a competence survey that was developed in an interdisciplinary approach between organizational psychology and futurology and conducted in the field of automotive Human-Machine Interaction (HMI) research. The content of the questionnaire is based on a series of expert interviews focusing and a data-driven approach that scanned significant patents for competence demand data.
RESULTS:
The conducted ANOVAs show that both sources for data retrieval create relevant items even though experts from the conceptual field rate data-based items significantly less relevant than the other participants. Moreover, interview-based items lead to significantly more relevant ratings in methodological fields while data-driven items were rated significantly more relevant for the technological area.
CONCLUSIONS:
Even though there are some uncertainties to examine, the displayed approach seems promising for the derivation of more detailed and enriched future competency demands in technological fields.
RachingerM, RauterR, MüllerC, VorraberW, SchirgiE. Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation, JMTM .2019; 30(8): 1143–60.
2.
DrahokoupilJ, JepsenM. The digital economy and its implications for labour, 1. The platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research .2017; 23(2): 103–7.
AcemogluD, AutorD. Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. In: : Elsevier;
2011. pp. 1043-171 (Handbook of Labor Economics).
5.
World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2016. Global Challenge Insight Report [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFFuture_of_Jobs.pdf.
TischM, HertleC, CachayJ, AbeleE, MetternichJ, TenbergR. A Systematic Approach on Developing Action-oriented, Competency-based Learning Factories, Procedia CIRP .2013; 7: 580–5.
8.
JohnsonA, DeyS, NguyenH, GrothM, JoyceS, TanL, et al. A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being, Australian Journal of Management .2020; 45(3): 402–24.
9.
VieitezJC, La CarcíaADT, RodríguezMTV. Perception of job security in a process of technological change: Its influence on psychological well-being, Behaviour & Information Technology .2010; 20(3): 213–23.
10.
SchaufeliWB, BakkerAB, van RhenenW. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism, J Organiz Behav .2009; 30(7): 893–917.
HarveySB, ModiniM, JoyceS, Milligan-SavilleJS, TanL, MykletunA, et al. Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems, Occup Environ Med .2017; 74(4): 301–10.
13.
ChisholmD, SweenyK, SheehanP, RasmussenB, SmitF, CuijpersP,et al.Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: A global return on investment analysis, The Lancet Psychiatry .2016; 3(5): 415–24.
14.
BenYoussef A, BoubakerS, DedajB, Carabregu-VokshiM. Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intention, Technological Forecasting and Social Change .2021; 164(5): 120043.
MietznerD, HartmannF, FahrenkrugMSzenariobasierte Geschäftsmodellentwicklung als Ansatz der strategischen Vorausschau in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen: Ein Leitfaden. In: Prokom 4.0, editor. Facharbeit und Digitalisierung: Ergebnisse aus dem BMBF-Verbundprojekt ≫Kompetenzmanagement für die Facharbeit in der High- Tech-Industrie≪. Bottrop / Duisburg / Erkrath / Flensburg / Rheine / Rostock / Wildau; 2015-2017. pp. 130–1 [cited 2020 Feb 3]. Available from: URL: https://www.prokom-4-0.de/downloads/instrumente-zum-kompetenzmanagement..
17.
ButschanJ, NestleV, MunckJC, GleichR. Kompetenzaufbau zur Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0 in der Produktion. In: Seiter M, Grünert L, Berlin S, editors. Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte von Industrie 4.0. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2017. pp. 75–110.
PatschaC, GlocknerH, StörmerE, KlaffkeT. Kompetenzund Qualifizierungsbedarfe bis 2039: Ein gemeinsames Lagebild der Partnerschaft für Fachkräfte; 2017.
Oliver SchwarzJ. Assessing the future of futures studies in management, Futures .2008; 40(3): 237–46.
30.
MüllerAW, Müller-StewensG. Strategic Foresight:Trendund Zukunftsforschung in Unternehmen - Instrumente, Prozesse, Fallstudien. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag für Wirtschaft Steuern Recht GmbH; 2009.
31.
WilsonJH, KeatingB. Business forecasting: With ForecastX. 6. ed., internat. ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
32.
KajikawaY, YoshikawaJ, TakedaY, MatsushimaK. Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: Toward a roadmap for sustainable energy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change .2008; 75(6): 771–82.
33.
Jimenez-MarquezJL, Gonzalez-CarrascoI, Lopez-CuadradoJL, Ruiz-MezcuaB. Towards a big data framework for analyzing social media content, International Journal of Information Management (2019) 44(3), 1–12.
34.
ChaudhuriS, DayalU, NarasayyaV. An overview of business intelligence technology, Commun. ACM .2011; 54(8): 88–98.
35.
LeDeist FD, WintertonJ. What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International .2005; 8(1): 27–46.
36.
OberländerM, BeinickeA, BippT. Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace, Computers & Education .2020; 146: 1–13.
37.
RobothamD, JubbR. Competences: Measuring the unmeasurable, Management Development Review .1996; 9(5): 25–9.
38.
ChouhanVS, SrivastavaS. Understanding Competencies and Competency Modeling@ A Literature Survey, IOSR Journal of Business and Management .2014; 16: 14–22.
39.
McClellandDC. Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”, Am Psychol .1973; 28(1): 1–14.
40.
JandildinovM, BaimukhanbetovB, AknazarovS, UaidullakyzyE. Evaluation Experience of Competence of the Future pecialist, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences .2013; 89: 932–8.
41.
CampionMA, FinkAA, RuggebergBJ, CarrL, PhillipsGM, OdmanRB. Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology. 2011;64(1):225–62.
42.
KauffeldSNachhaltige Personalentwicklung undWeiterbildung: Betriebliche Seminare und Trainings entwickeln, Erfolge messen, Transfer sichern. 2.,überarbeitete Auflage. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. Available from: URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48130-1.
HeyseV. Strategien - Kompetenzanforderungen - Potenzialanalysen. In: Heyse V, Erpenbeck J, editors.Kompetenzmanagement: Methoden, Vorgehen, KODE® und KODE®X im Praxistest. Münster, New York, München, Berlin: Waxmann; 2007. pp. 11–80.
45.
WildgrubeM. Kompetenzen in der Beschaffung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2018.
46.
KauffeldS. Self-directed work groups and team competence, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology .2006; 79(1): 1–21.
47.
DeciusJ, SchaperN. The Competence Management Tool (CMT) - A New Instrument to Manage Competences in Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Enterprises, Procedia Manufacturing .2017; 9: 376–83.
48.
KauffeldSKompetenzen messen, bewerten, entwickeln: Ein prozessanalytischer Ansatz für Gruppen. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag; 2006. (Betriebswirtschaftliche AbhandlungenNeue Folge, Band 128). Available from: URL: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10556142..
BayginM, YetisH, KarakoseM, AkinE. Aneffect analysis of industry 4.0 to higher education. In: 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET). pp. 1–4.
.
51.
WilhelmyA, KleinmannM. Selektion und Attraktion: Wie Organisationen und Bewerbende sich gegenseitig auswählen und beeinflussen. In: Kauffeld S, Spurk D, editors. Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2019. pp. 135–66 (Springer Reference Psychologie).
52.
HäderM, HäderS. DELPHI-Befragung. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung.Wiesbaden: Springer FachmedienWiesbaden; 2019. pp. 701–8 [cited 2020 Dec 5].
53.
AichholzerG. Das Expertinnen-Delphi: Methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungsfeld Technology Foresight. In: Bogner A, Littig B, Menz W, editors. Das Experteninterview. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2002. pp. 133–53 [cited 2019 Nov 15]. Available from: URL: https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783322932709.
54.
LinstoneHA, TuroffM, HelmerO, editors. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
HelfferichCLeitfaden- und Experteninterviews. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung.Wiesbaden: Springer FachmedienWiesbaden; 2019. pp. 669–86 [cited 2020 Dec 5].
59.
RobinsonMA, SparrowPR, CleggC, BirdiK. Design engineering competencies: Future requirements and predicted changes in the forthcoming decade, Design Studies .2005; 26(2): 123–53.
60.
BohlouliM, MittasN, KakarontzasG, TheodosiouT, AngelisL, FathiM. Competence assessment as an expert system for human resource management: A mathematical approach, Expert Systems with Applications .2017; 70: 83–102.
61.
AkremiL. Stichprobenziehung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer FachmedienWiesbaden; 2019. pp. 313–32 [cited 2020 Dec 5].
62.
MorgesonFP, DierdorffEC. Work analysis: From technique to theory. In: Zedeck S, editor. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2011. pp. 3–41.
63.
MayringP, FenzlT. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2019. pp. 633–48 [cited 2020 Dec 5]. Available from: URL: https://www.springerprofessional.de/qualitative-inhaltsanalyse/16489422..
64.
HatzijordanouN, BohnN, TerzidisO. A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: Status quo and start-up specifics, Manag Rev Q .2019; 69(4): 415–58.
65.
ChoiJ, YoonJ, ChungJ, CohB-Y, LeeJ-M. Social media analytics and business intelligence research: A systematic review, Information Processing & Management .2020; 57(6): 1–18.
66.
KarwehlLJ, FrischkornJ, WalterL, KauffeldS. Identification of inventor competencies in patents: An approach for partially automated competence retrieval in technological fields. Work. In press.
67.
KelleUMixed Methods. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2019. pp. 159–72 [cited 2020 Dec 5].
68.
AntonE, BehneA, TeutebergF. The Humans Behind Aritificial Intelligence: An Operationalisation of AI Competencies. Research Papers 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 17]; (141). Available from: URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020rp/141..
69.
BrislinRW, FreimanisC. Back-translation. An Encyclopaedia of Translation: Chinese-English, EnglishChinese. 2001;22.
70.
Vargas-HalabíT, Mora-EsquivelR, SilesB. Intrapreneurial competencies: Development and validation of a measurement scale, EJMBE .2017; 26(1): 86–111.
71.
RodriguezD, PatelR, BrightA, GregoryD, GowingMK. Developing competency models to promote integrated human resource practices, Hum Resour Manage .2002; 41(3): 309–24.
72.
MartoneD. A guide to developing a competency-based performance-management system, Employer Relations Today (Employment Relations Today) .2003; 30(3): 23–32.
73.
CatanoVM, DarrW, CampbellCA. Perormance Appraisal of Behavior-based Competencies: A Reliable and Valid Procedure, Personnel Psychology .2007; 60(1): 201–30.
74.
AppelfellerW, FeldmannC, editors. Die digitale Transformation des Unternehmens. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2018.
AbolhassanF, editorThe Drivers of Digital Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
(Management for Professionals).
77.
ZimmermannA, SchmidtR, JainLCArchitecting the Digital Transformation: Digital Business, Technology,
Decision Support, Management. 1st ed. 2021; 2021. (Intelligent Systems Reference Library). Available from: URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49640-1.
78.
HessTDigitale Transformation strategisch steuern: Vom Zufallstreffer zum systematischen Vorgehen: Springer Verlag; 2019.
JedingerA, MichaelT. Intervieweffekte. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung.Wiesbaden: Springer FachmedienWiesbaden; 2019. pp. 365–76 [cited 2020 Dec 5].
81.
WeichboldM. Pretest. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2019. pp. 349-56 [cited 2020 Dec 5].
82.
PfeilP, MüllerM, editors. Evaluation in der Sozialwirtschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2020. (Basiswissen Sozialwirtschaft und Sozialmanagement).
83.
KarwehlLJ, KauffeldS.Identifikation von Zukunftskompetenzen im Bereich “Human Machine Interaction”: Ein Interview-Pilot. In: ARBEIT HUMAINE gestalten: 67. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft83; 2021.
84.
WalterL, SchnittkerFC. Patentmanagement: Recherche - Analyse - Strategie. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg; 2016. (De Gruyter Studium).Available from: URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110443431..
85.
ErnstH, OmlandN. The Patent Asset Index –A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios, World Patent Information .2011; 33(1): 34–41.
86.
LeeM, LeeS. Identifying new business opportunities from competitor intelligence: An integrated use of patent and trademark databases, Technological Forecasting and Social Change .2017; 119(3): 170–83.
87.
DavisonHK, MaraistCC, HamiltonRH, BingMN. To Screen or Not to Screen?: Using the Internet for Selection Decisions, Employ Respons Rights J .2012; 24(1): 1–21.
88.
BalsL, SchulzeH, KellyS, StekK. Purchasing and supply management(PSM) competencies: Current and futurerequirements, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management .2019; 25(5): 100572.
89.
HecklauF, GaleitzkeM, FlachsS, KohlH. Holistic Approach for Human Resource Management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP .2016; 54: 1–6.
90.
BlanzMForschungsmethoden und Statistik für die Soziale Arbeit: Grundlagen und Anwendungen:Kohlhammer Verlag; 2021.
GlassGV, PeckhamPD, SandersJR. Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance. Review of Educational Research. 1972;42(3):237–88.
96.
BlancaMJ, AlarcónR, ArnauJ, BonoR, BendayanR. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema .2017; 29(4): 552–7.
97.
LixLM, KeselmanJC, KeselmanHJ. Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test, Review of Educational Research .1996; 66(4): 579–619.
98.
SchmiderE, ZieglerM, DanayE, BeyerL, BühnerM. Is It Really Robust?Methodology .2010; 6(4): 147–51.
99.
MorgesonFP, CampionMA. Social and Cognitive Sources for Potential Inaccuracy in Job Analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology [cited Jul 12]. 2021; 82(5): 627–55.
100.
FinchH. Comparison of the Performance of Nonparametric and Parametric MANOVA Test Statistics when Assumptions Are Violated, Methodology .2005; 1(1): 27–38.
101.
HarlowLLThe essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods: Routledge; 2014.
SnowerDJ, BrownAJG, MerklC. Globalization and the Welfare State: A Review of Hans-Werner Sinn’s Can Germany Be Saved?Journal of Economic Literature. 2009;47(1):136–58.
105.
Müller-FrommeyerLC, AymansSC, BargmannC, KauffeldS, HerrmannCIntroducing Competency Models as a Tool for Holistic Competency Development in Learning Factories: Challenges, Example and Future Application, Procedia Manufacturing. 2017;9:307–14.
106.
AptW, BovenschulteM, HartmannEA, WischmannS
Foresight-Studie “Digitale Arbeitswelt”: für das Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. Berlin: Institut für Innovation und Technik; 2016 [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: 1514 URL: https://www.iit-berlin.de/publikation/foresight-studie-digitale-arbeitswelt/.
