The participative design of work processes is hampered by as-yet unresolved challenges. A root cause is seen in high information-pass-on-barriers. Virtual Reality (VR) may have a significant potential to overcome these challenges. Yet, there is no systematic understanding of which advantages provided by VR can support the participative design of work processes.
OBJECTIVE:
The present study aims to assess the potential of VR to support the participative design of work processes by conducting an integrative literature review identifying the advantages of VR in general work contexts and mapping them to known challenges in participative design of work processes.
METHODS:
The integrative literature review was conducted based on 268 sources of which 52 were considered for an in-depth analysis of the advantages offered by VR.
RESULTS:
The resulting conceptual framework consisted of 13 characteristic-related advantages (e.g., immersion, interactivity, flexibility) and 10 effect-related advantages (e.g., attractivity, involvement, cost efficiency) which readily address known challenges in the participative design of work processes.
CONCLUSION:
Mapping the advantages of VR to the challenges in participative design of work processes revealed a substantial potential of VR to overcome high information-pass-on-barriers. As such, employing VR in work process design initiatives represents a fruitful avenue for the promotion of prevention and employee health.
Moşteanu NR. Challenges for Organizational Structure and design as a result of digitalization and cybersecurity. BMR. 2020;11:278–86.
2.
DumasM, La RosaM, MendlingJ, ReijersHA.Introduction to Business Process Management. Funda- mentals of Business Process Management [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2018 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. pp. 1–33. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-41.
3.
KumarS, StrehlowR. Business process redesign as a tool for organizational development. Technovation. 2004;24:853–61.
4.
BaethgeA, RigottiT, RoeRA. Just more of the same, or different? An integrative theoretical framework for the study of cumulative interruptions at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2015;24:308–23.
5.
BoxallP, HuoM-L, MackyK, WintertonJ. High-involvement Work Processes and Systems: A Review of Theory, Distribution, Outcomes, and Tensions. In: Buckley MR, Wheeler AR, Baur JE, Halbesleben JRB, editors. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management [Internet]. Emerald Publishing Lim- ited; 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 7]. pp. 1-52. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0742-730120190000037002/full/html
VyasN, TripathiM, GuptaD. Application of Process Maturity Model: A Case Study in the Services Industry. IUP Journal of Operations Management. 2014;13:17–30.
8.
ErolS, GranitzerM, HappS, JantunenS, JenningsB, JohannessonP, et alCombining BPM and social software: contradiction or chance? J Softw Maint Evol: Res Pract2010;22:449–76.
9.
TriaaW, GzaraL, VerjusH. Exploring the influence of Social software on Business Process Management. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2017;50:12968–78.
10.
Rito SilvaA, RosemannM. Processpedia: an ecological environment for BPM stakeholders’ collaboration. Business Process Mgmt Journal. 2012;18:20–42.
11.
SmithEA. The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. J of Knowledge Management. 2001;5:311–21.
12.
BittencourtJ, DuarteF, BéguinP. From the past to the future:Integrating work experience into the design process. WORK. 2017;57:379–87.
13.
HeweltM, PufahlL, MandalS, WolffF, WeskeM. Toward a methodology for case modeling. Softw Syst Model. 2020;19:1367–93.
14.
Silva e Santos M. The PhOCoe Model –ergonomic pattern mapping in participatory design processes. Work. 2012;41:2643–50.
15.
MunirF, YarkerJ, DuckworthJ, ChenY-L, BrinkleyA, Varela-MatoV,et al. Evaluation of a natural workspace intervention with active design features on movement, interaction and health. Work. 2021;70:1229–41.
16.
Van den Broeck A, VansteenkisteM, De Witte H, LensW. Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress. 2008;22:277–94.
17.
DeciEL, RyanRM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000;11:227–68.
18.
KoppR, HowaldtJ, SchultzeJ. Why Industry 4.0 needs Workplace Innovation: a critical look at the German debate on advanced manufacturing. European . Journal of Workplace Innovation. 2016;2:7–24.
19.
OregS, VakolaM, ArmenakisA. Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2011;47:461–524.
20.
StraatmannT, KohnkeO, HattrupK, MuellerK. Assessing employees’ reactions to organizational change: An integrative framework of change-specific and psychological factors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2016;52:265–95.
21.
BandaraW, IndulskaM, ChongS, SadiqSMajor Issues in Business Process Management: An Expert Perspective. In:Winter E, editor. InWinter, R (Ed) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems University of St Gallen, Switzerland, Switzerland. 2007. pp. 1240-51.
22.
JenningsB, FinkelsteinAFlexible Workflows. In:Voudouris C, Lesaint D, Owusu G, editors. Service Chain Management [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. pp. 171–85. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-40-75504-312
23.
AntunesP, MourãoH. Resilient Business Process Management: Framework and services. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011;38:1241–54.
24.
PoehlerL, TeutebergF Closing spatial und moti- vational gaps: Virtual Reality in Business Process Improvement. ECIS 2021 Research Papers [Inter- net]. Marrakech; 2021. pp. 1827. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021rp/151
25.
BögelS, StieglitzS, MeskeC. A role model-based approach for modelling collaborative processes. Business Process Mgmt Journal. 2014;20:598–614.
26.
BadakhshanP, ConboyK, GrisoldT, vom BrockeJ. Agile business process management: A systematic literature review and an integrated framework. BPMJ. 2019;26:1505–23.
27.
BrunoA, MarraP, MangiaLThe Enterprise 2.0 adoption process: A participatory design approach. 13th International Conference on Advanced Communi- cation Technology (ICACT2011) [Internet]. Gangwon, Korea (South); 2011. pp. 1457-61. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5746079
28.
IndulskaM, GreenP, ReckerJ, RosemannMBusi- ness Process Modeling: Perceived Benefits. In: Laender AHF, Castano S, Dayal U, Casati F, de Oliveira JPM, editors. Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009 [Inter- net]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009 [cited 2019 Jun 28]. pp. 458–71. Available from: Berlin, Heidelberghttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_34
29.
BazanP, EstevezE. Social business process management: Assessing the state of the art and outlining a research agenda. BPMJ. 2019;26:191–211.
30.
McLoughlinC, LeeMJWSocial software and partic- ipatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings ascilite Sin- gapore 2007. 2007. pp. 664-75.
31.
AntunesP, SimõesD, CarriÕoL, PinoJA. An end-userapproach to business process modeling. Journal of Network andComputer Applications.. 2013;36:1466–79.
32.
KathleenN, RossB, KriglsteinSKriglstein S. Storyboard augmenta- tion of process model grammars for stakeholder commu- nication. 2014 International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications (IVAPP) [Inter- net]. Lisbon, Portugal; 2014. pp. 114-21. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7294407
33.
SimõesD, AntunesP, CarriÕcco L. Eliciting and Modeling Business Process Stories. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2018;60:115–32.
34.
AysolmazB, BrownR, BruzaP, ReijersHAA 3D Visualization Approach for Process Training in Office Environments. In: Debruyne C, Panetto H, Meersman R, Dillon T, Kuhn E, O’Sullivan D, et al., editors. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems:OTM2016 Confer- ences [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016 [cited 2021 Jun 28]. pp. 418-36. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-48472-324Available from:
35.
BrownR, Rinderle-MaS, KriglsteinS, Kabicher-FuchsSAugmenting and Assisting Model Elicitation Tasks with 3D Virtual World Context Metadata. In: Meers- man R, Panetto H, Dillon T, Missikoff M, Liu L, Pastor O, et al., editors. On the Move to Meaning- ful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Conferences [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014 [cited 2021 Jun 28]. pp. 39–56. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-45563-03
36.
BrownR, ReckerJ, WestS. Using virtual worlds for collaborative business process modeling. Business Process Mgmt Journal. 2011;17:546–64.
37.
PoppeE, BrownR, ReckerJ, JohnsonDImproving remote collaborative process modelling using embodiment in 3D virtual environments. In: Grossmann G, Ferrarotti F, editors. Conceptual Modelling 2013: Proceedings of the Ninth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling [Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Volume 143] [Internet]. Australia: Australian Computer Society; 2013. pp. 51-60. Available from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/54174/
38.
OberhauserR, PogolskiCVirtual RealityVisualization of Enterprise Architecture Models with ArchiMate and BPMN. In: Shishkov B, editor. Business Modeling and Software Design [Internet]. Cham: Springer Interntional Publishing; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. pp. 170–87. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-311
39.
ZennerA, MakhsadovA, KlingnerS, LiebemannD, KrugerA. Immersive Process Model Exploration in Virtual Reality. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2020;26:2104–14.
YanZ, LvZ. The Influence of Immersive Virtual Reality Systems on Online Social Application. Applied Sciences. 2020;10:1–19.
42.
WohlgenanntI, SimonsA, StieglitzS. Virtual Reality. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2020;62:455–61.
43.
BotellaC, Fernández-ÁlvarezJ, GuillénV, García-PalaciosA, BañosR. Recent Progress in VirtualReality Exposure Therapy for Phobias: A Systematic Review. CurrPsychiatry Rep. 2017;19:42.
44.
VogelJ, ThomasOVirtual Realitbased Process Elicitation System. In: Mayr HC, Rinderle-Ma S, Strecker S, editors. 40 Years EMISA 2019 [Internet]. Bonn: Gesellschaft fürInformatik e.V.; 2020. pp. 91-104. Available from: https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33142
45.
GrassiniS, LaumannKEvaluating the use ofVirtual Reality in Work Safety: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference [Internet]. Research Publishing Services; 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 22]. pp. 4964–71. Available from: https://rpsonline.com.sg/proceedings/9789811485930/html/3975.xml
46.
HowardMC. A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;70:317–27.
47.
WuB, YuX, GuX. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality usinghead-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta-analysis. Br JEduc Technol.. 2020;51:1991–2005.
48.
AlizadehsalehiS, HadaviA, HuangJC. Assessment of AEC Students’ Performance Using BIM-into-VR. Applied Sciences. 2021;11:1–23.
49.
Kim, Hyun-Jong, Hong, Jung-Wan, You, Yen-Yoo. The Korea Convergence Society A Study on the Optimization of Manufacturing Process through Motion Analysis and Virtual Reality. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 2017;8:23–8.
LeskovskýR, KuýceraE, HaffnerO, MatisákJ, RosinováD, StarkEA Contribution to Workplace ErgonomicsEvaluation Using Multimedia Tools and Virtual Reality. 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 317-26. Available from: https://fedcsis.org/proceedings/2019/drp/292.html
52.
Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2019;104:333–9.
53.
Rowe F. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems. 2014;23:241–55.
54.
vom BrockeJ, SimonsA, NiehavesB, NiehavesB, ReimerK, PlattfautR, et alReconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in docu- menting the literature search process. EUROPEAN CONFERENCEONINFORMATION SYSTEMS (ECIS) [Internet]. 2009. p. 14. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet. org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1145&context=ecis2009
55.
BurnhamJF. Scopus database: a review. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;3:1.
56.
JensenL, KonradsenF. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Educ Inf Technol. 2018;23:1515–29.
57.
SlaterM. Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. Br J Psychol. 2018;109:431–3.
58.
van EckNJ, WaltmanL. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523–38.
59.
CarpiniJA, ParkerSK, GriffinMA. A Look Back and a Leap Forward: A Review and Synthesis of the Individual Work Performance Literature. ANNALS. 2017;11:825–85.
60.
Escher I. Sustainable development in sport as a research field: a bibliometric analysis. JPES. 2020;20:2803–12.
61.
CohenJ. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. 1960;20:37–46.
62.
SchultheisMT, RizzoAA. The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2001;46:296–311.
63.
AlqahtaniAS, DaghestaniLF, IbrahimLF. Environments and System Types of Virtual Reality Technology in STEM: a Survey. ijacsa. 2017;8:1–13.
64.
CoburnJQ, FreemanI, SalmonJL. A Review of the Capabilities of Current Low-Cost Virtual Reality Technology and Its Potential to Enhance the Design Process. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 2017;17031013(15 pages).
65.
ElbertR, KniggeJ-K, MakhloufR, SarnowT. Experimental study on user rating of virtual reality applications in manual order picking. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;52:719–24.
66.
GallM, Rinderle-MaS. Assessing Process Attribute Visualization and Interaction Approaches Based on a Controlled Experiment. Int J Coop Info Syst. 2020;29:2050007
67.
Lacko JHealth Safety Training for Industry in Vir- tual Reality. 2020 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I) [Internet]. Velke Karlovice, Czech Republic: IEEE;
2020 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 1-5. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9039854/
68.
AbidiMH, Al-AhmariA, AhmadA, AmeenW, AlkhalefahH. Assessment of virtual reality-based manufacturing assembly training system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;105:3743–59.
69.
EirisR, JainA, GheisariM, WehleA. Safety immersive storytelling using narrated 360-degree panoramas: A fall hazard training within the electrical trade context. Safety Science. 2020;127:104703.
70.
WolfK, FunkM, KhalilR, KnierimPUsing virtual reality for prototyping interactive architecture. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia [Internet]. Stuttgart Germany: ACM; 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. pp. 457-64. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3152832.3156625
71.
MowerA, NguyenR, FrankKEvaluation of Technology Accessibility and User Sentiment in Learning Through Virtual Reality Modality. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [Internet]. Honolulu HI USA: ACM; 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 1-8. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480.3375205
72.
LiX, YiW, ChiH-L, WangX, ChanAPC. A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Automation in Construction. 2018;86:150–62.
73.
NykänenM, PuroV, TiikkajaM, KannistoH, LanttoE, SimpuraF, et alImplementing and evaluating novel safety training methods for construction sector workers: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Safety Research. 2020;75:205–21.
74.
AlcañizM, ParraE, Chicchi GiglioliIA. Virtual Reality as an Emerging Methodology for Leadership Assessment and Training. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1658.
75.
KretschmerV, TerharenASerious Games in Virtual Environments: Cognitive Ergonomic Trainings for Workplaces in Intralogistics. In: Ahram TZ, editor. Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 266-74. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-126
SoósR, BaloghB, DobosG, SzávaiS, DudraJ. Innovativetechnologies in training and education for maintenance team of NPPs. Garbil R, Davies C, Diaconu D, editors. EPJ Nuclear Sci Technol. 2019;5:1–5.
78.
SulaimanS binti, AliSSA, AdilSH, EbrahimM, RazaKVirtual Reality Training and Skill Enhancement for OffshoreWorkers. 2020 International Conference on Computational Intelligence (ICCI) [Internet]. Bandar Seri Iskandar, Malaysia: IEEE; 2020 [cited1264 Jun 21]. pp. 287–92. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9247819/
79.
PokornýP, Birosík MVirtual Training Environments in a Printing Company. In: Silhavy R, Silhavy P, Prokopova Z, editors. Software Engineering Perspectives in Intelligent Systems [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 728-38. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-63319-667
80.
JansenP, FischbachFhe Social Engineer: An Immersive Virtual Reality Educational Game to Raise Social Engineering Awareness. Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Inter-action in Play [Internet]. Virtual Event Canada: ACM; 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 59-63. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3383668.3419917
81.
XuX, ShenL, LiS, WangSResearch on 10kV Line Breaker Check Training System Based on Virtual Reality. 2019 International Conference on Smart Grid and Elec- trical Automation (ICSGEA) [Internet]. Xiangtan, China: IEEE; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 18-21.Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8901373/
82.
MartinettiA, ’K, Hartt, DamgraveR, DongenLAMV, TurkenburgR, et alThere is no spoon: applying virtual reality for maintenance training of rolling stock technicians. IJSSE. 2018;8:398–415.
83.
HafsiaM, MonacelliE, MartinHVirtual Reality Sim- ulator for Construction workers. Proceedings of the irtual Reality International Conference - Laval Vir- tual [Internet]. Laval France: ACM; 2018 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 1-7. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3234253.3234298
84.
PodgórskiD. The Use of Tacit Knowledge in Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2010;16:283–310.
85.
AlahuhtaP, NordbäckE, SivunenA, SurakkaT. Fostering Team Creativity in Virtual Worlds (2014;7:1–22.
86.
LiJ, SunE, LiZ, WangM, GaoDMetallurgi- cal Operation Safety Training System Based on 5G and VR. 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Con- ference (ITNEC) [Internet]. Chengdu, China: IEEE; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 2204-8. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8729462/
87.
JongelingR, OlofssonT. A method for planning of work-flow by combined use of location-based scheduling and 4D CAD. Automation in Construction. 2007;16:189–98.
88.
HerringtonA, TacyJ. Crossing the Power Line: Using Virtual Simulation to Prepare the First Responders of Utility Linemen. Informatics. 2020;7:1–9.
89.
HammerschmidSChances for Virtual and Aug- mented Reality Along the Value Chain. In: Stolfa J, Stolfa S, O’Connor RV, Messnarz R, editors. Sys- tems, Software and Services Process Improvement [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 352-9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-529
90.
LeyerM, AysolmazB, BrownR, TürkayS, ReijersHA. Process training for industrial organisations using 3D environments: An empirical analysis. Computers in Industry. 2021;124:1–11.
91.
ZawadzkiP, ZywickiK, BunP, GorskiF. Employee Training in an Intelligent Factory Using Virtual Reality. IEEE Access. 2020;8:135110–7.
92.
WismerP, Lopez CordobaA, BaceviciuteS, Clauson-KaasF, SommerMOA. Immersive virtual reality as a competitive training strategy for the biopharma industry. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:116–9.
93.
LeyerM, BrownR, AysolmazB, VanderfeestenI, TuretkenOVanderfeesten I,Turetken O. 3D Virtual World BPM Training Systems: Process Gateway Experimental Results. In: Giorgini P, Weber B, editors. Advanced Information Systems Engineer- ing [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 29]. pp. 415-29. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-226
94.
KloiberS, SchinkoC, SettgastV, WeinzerlM, SchreckT, PreinerRIntegrating assembly process design and VRbased evaluation using the unreal engine. VISIGRAPP2020 - Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications. 2020. pp. 271-8.
95.
JoshiS, HamiltonM, WarrenR, FaucettD, TianW, WangY,et alImplementing Virtual Reality technology for safety training in the precast/ prestressed concrete industry. Applied Ergonomics. 2021;90:103286.
96.
LaViolaJJJr. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM Sigchi Bulletin. ACM New York, NY, USA. 2000;32:47–56.
97.
PhamD-M, StuerzlingerWEfficient and Versatile Text Entry for Virtual Reality. 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology [Internet]. Parramatta NSW Australia: ACM; 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 14]. pp. 1-11. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3359996.3364265
98.
PoehlerL, SchuirJ, MeierP, TeutebergF2021–How Virtual Reality can encourage user engagement in process modeling. Austin, TXLet’s get immersive.
99.
AllcoatD, vonMühlenen ALet’s get immersive: How Virtual Reality can encourage user engagement in process modeling. Austin, TX; 2021.
100.
AndersenK, GaabSJ, SattarvandJ, HarrisFCMETS VR: Mining Evacuation Training Simulator in Virtual Reality for Underground Mines. In: Latifi S, editor. 17th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations (ITNG 2020) [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020[cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 325-32. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-43020-743
101.
BakarAA, SirotiakT, SharmaAConstruction Site Fire Safety Using BIM and Virtual Reality. In: Ahmed SM, Hampton P, Azhar S, D. Saul A, editors. Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 305-8. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-151
102.
BujdosoG, NovacOC, SzimkovicsTDeveloping cognitive processes for improving inventive thinking in system development using a collaborative virtual reality system. 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) [Internet]. Debrecen: IEEE; 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 29]. pp. 79-84.Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8268220/
103.
BushraN, CarruthD, DebSComparative Study of Virtual UI for Risk Assessment and Evaluation. In: Bebis G, Boyle R, Parvin B, Koracin D, Turek M, Ramalingam S, et al., editors. Advances inVisual Computing[Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 226-36. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-03801-421
104.
GrabowskiA, JankowskiJ. Virtual Reality-based pilot training for underground coal miners. Safety Science. 2015;72:310–4.
105.
HirtC, HolzwarthV, GislerJ, SchneiderJ, KunzAVirtual Learning Environment for an Industrial Assembly Task. 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE-Berlin) [Internet]. Berlin, Germany: IEEE; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 337-42. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8966169/
106.
JoshiA, KaleS, ChandelS, PalD. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 2015;7:396–403.
107.
LassoA, NamHH, DinhPV, PinterC, Fillion-RobinJ-C, PieperS, et alInteraction with Volume-Rendered Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Images in Virtual Reality. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2018;31:1158–60.
108.
NainggolanF, SiregarB, FahmiF. Design of Interactive Virtual Reality for Erection Steel Construction Simulator System Using Senso Gloves. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2015;1542:012019
109.
PalmasF, CichorJ, PlecherDA, KlinkerGAcceptance and Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality Public Speaking Training. 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) [Internet]. Beijing, China: IEEE; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 363-71. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8943733/
110.
PfeifferM, KrögerT, SeifertJ, SomaskantharajanS, JahnichL, SteinblumT, et al WONDER Enhancing VR Training with Electrical Muscle Stimulation. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Fac- tors in Computing Systems [Internet]. Glasgow Scotland Uk: ACM; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 1-6. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290607.3312780
111.
UlmerJ, BraunS, ChengC-T, DoweyS, WollertJGamified Virtual Reality Training Environment for the Manufacturing Industry. 2020 19th Inter- national Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatron- ika (ME) [Internet]. Prague, Czech Republic: IEEE; 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 21]. pp. 1-6. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9286661/
112.
van Halem C, BakkerA, BuiterW, van BennekomM, OlffMVirtual Reality Training for Professionals to Support Prevention of Patient Aggression Incidents in the Workplace: Preliminary Results in Mental Healthcare Employees. ESTSS2019 Rotterdam Poster Abstract Book, European Journal of Psychotraumatology,. 2016. pp. 57.
113.
ZahraniMA, SuwailehAA Engineering Education Gamification: A Framework and Learners’ Satisfaction Measurement on Case Study of Engineering Ethics Topic. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2019. pp. 26-8.
