A body-shaped lumbar-sacral support for improving car-seat comfort

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Nowadays, the ergonomic study of the driving position is a critical aspect of automotive design. Indeed, due to the rising needs on the market, one focus for car industries is to improve the perceived comfort related to the cars’ interior. Driving a car for a prolonged time could cause complaints in some body-regions, especially in the lumbar-sacral area. Thus, special lumbar-sacral supports for driver seat has been proposed for reducing this kind of complaints.

OBJECTIVE:

Development of two virtual and physical models of lumbar-sacral support for improving both the lumbar/sacral and overall perceived comfort while driving.

METHODS:

Two prototypes of lumbar/sacral support have been realized: the first one was integrated into the seat, and the second one was shaped as a removable pillow (removable support). Fifty participants were asked to rate the perceived comfort in lab tests performed on a seating-buck by comparing three configurations (5 min each): a standard seat, seat with the removable support, seat with integrated support. Subjective data (by questionnaires) and objective data (interface pressure between backrest and driver) have been acquired and statistically processed. In addition, real driving tests have been performed to test the actual performance of the removable support in term of perceived comfort comparing it with the standard seat.

RESULTS:

Statistical correlations between subjective and objective data showed interesting results in comfort improvement through the adopted solutions. Real driving tests showed an improvement in comfort perception with the lumbar-sacral support towards the standard seat.

CONCLUSIONS:

Thanks to the virtual prototyping and the application of previous knowledge, coming from literature and experience, a solution for improving the overall comfort and reduce the lumbar/sacral pain while driving has been developed, tested, and assessed.

Keywords

Car seat comfort seat design lumbar-sacral support body-shaped pillow

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wards Auto - world vehicle population in 2016 n.d. https://subscribers.wardsintelligence.com/analysis/world-vehicle-population-rose-46-2016.

Hiemstra-van Mastrigt

, Kamp

, van Veen

SAT

, Vink

, Bosch

. The influence of active seating on car passengers’ perceived comfort and activity levels. Appl Ergon. 2015;47:211–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.004.

Grujicic

, Pandurangan

, Xie

, Gramopadhye

, Wagner

, Ozen

. Musculoskeletal computational analysis of the influence of car-seat design/adjustments on long-distance driving fatigue. Int J Ind Ergon. 2010;40:345–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.01.002.

Rasmussen

, Tørholm

, de Zee

. Computational analysis of the influence of seat pan inclination and friction on muscle activity and spinal joint forces. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39:52–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.07.008.

Mergl

, Klendauer

, Mangen

, Bubb

. Predicting Long Term Riding Comfort in Cars by Contact Forces Between Human and Seat. 2005. https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-2690.

Zenk

, Franz

, Bubb

, Vink

. Technical note: Spine loading in automotive seating. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:290–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.004.

Grinten

. Development of a pratical method for measuring body part discomfort. S.K. Adv. Ind. Egonomics Saf. IV. Taylor Fr. London, 1992, pp. 331-318.

Corlett

, Bishop

. A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics. 1976;19:175–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137608931530.

Shen

, Parsons

. Validity and reliability of rating scales for seated pressure discomfort. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;20:441–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00068-6.

10.

Joshi

, Kale

, Chandel

, Pal

. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7:396–403.

11.

Kyung

, Nussbaum

. Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (Part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure. Int J Ind Ergon. 2008;38:526–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.08.011.

12.

DE LOOZE

, KUIJT-EVERS

LFM

, VAN DIEËN

. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics. 2003;46:985–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000121977.

13.

van Geffen

, Reenalda

, Veltink

, Koopman

HFJM

. Decoupled pelvis adjustment to induce lumbar motion: A technique that controls low back load in sitting. Int J Ind Ergon. 2010;40:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.015.

14.

Vergara

, Page

. Relationship between comfort and back posture and mobility in sitting-posture. Appl Ergon. 2002;33:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00056-4.

15.

Hiemstra-van Mastrigt

. Comfortable passenger seats: Recommendations for design and research. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:eedd25e6-c625-45e9-9d32-f818aa89c19d.

16.

Naddeo

, Cappetti

, Ippolito

. Dashboard reachability and usability tests:Acheap and effective method for drivers’ comfort rating. SAE Tech Pap. 2014;1. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0455.

17.

Cascioli

, Heusch

, McCarthy

. Does prolonged sitting with limited legroom affect the flexibility of a healthy subject and their perception of discomfort?Int J Ind Ergon. 2011;41:471–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.06.003.

18.

Kilincsoy

, Wagner

, Vink

, Bubb

. Application of ideal pressure distribution in development process of automobile seats. Work. 2016;54:895–904. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162350.

19.

Naddeo

, Cappetti

, Califano

, Vallone

. The Role of Expectation in Comfort Perception: The Mattresses’ Evaluation Experience. Procedia Manuf. 2015;3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.582.

20.

Vink

. Vehicle Seat comfort and design. 1st ed. 2016.

21.

Naddeo

, Califano

, Vallone

, Cicalese

, Coccaro

, Marcone

, et al. The effect of spine discomfort on the overall postural (dis)comfort. Appl Ergon. 2019;74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.025.