This study investigates work-related musculoskeletal disorders risk estimation by frequently as used as ergonomic methods in the field.
Objective:
To identify the difference in risk estimation by an in-house observational method and a self-reported questionnaire, and to evaluate the complementary aspects of these methods.
Methods:
A sample of 15 operators who worked on the assembly workstations was selected from a truck manufacturing plant. The risk assessment of these workstations (28 scenarios) was performed by the observational method and the self-reported questionnaire. The agreement between both methods to identify risk situations was measured with the weighted Kappa coefficient.
Results:
The observational method and the self-reported questionnaire deployed on the same activity estimated different risk situations.
Conclusion:
This analysis does not reveal that one tool is more powerful than the other one, but shows the probability of different risk estimation. The complementary effect of each method might be considered for further investigation concerning musculoskeletal risk factors.
AptelM, VézinaN. “What model for understanding and preventing MSDs ? For a comprehensive and dynamic approach.” [Quels Modèles Pour Comprendre et Prévenir Les TMS? Pour Une Approche Holistique et Dynamique.] Paper presented at the second French congress about MSDs, Montréal, Canada. 2008;1-27.
2.
L’Assurance Maladie - Risques professionnels. Paris: Rapport Annuel; 2017. Available from: https://bit.ly/39U7P3w
3.
Van der BeekAJ, MathiassenSE, WindhorstJ, BurdorfA. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding. Applied Ergonomics. 2005;36(2):213–22.
4.
DavidGC. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Lond). 1 mai. 2005;55(3):190–9.
5.
TakalaE-P, PehkonenI, ForsmanM, Hansson ÅkeG, MathiassenSE, NeumannWP, et al. Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2010;36(1):3–24.
6.
KochM, LundeL-K, GjulemT, KnardahlS, VeierstedKB. Validity of Questionnaire and Representativeness of Objective Methods for Measurements of Mechanical Exposures in Construction and Health Care Work. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0162881.
7.
ZareM, BiauS, BrunetR, RoquelaureY. Comparison of three methods for evaluation of work postures in a truck assembly plant. Ergonomics. 2017;60(11):1551–63.
8.
DempseyPG, McGorryRW, MaynardWS. A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Applied Ergonomics. 2005;36(4):489–503.
9.
HabibiE, ZareM, HaghiA, HabibiP, HassanzadehA, others. Assessment of physical risk factors among artisans using occupational repetitive actions and Nordic questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering. 2013;2(1):14.
10.
McAtamneyL, CorlettEN. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics. 1993;24(2):91–9.
11.
OcchipintiE. OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics. 1998;41(9):1290–311.
12.
HignettS, McAtamneyL. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics. 2000;31(2):201–5.
13.
DavidG, WoodsV, LiG, BuckleP. The development of the Quick Exposure Check (QEC) for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Applied Ergonomics. 2008;39(1):57–69.
14.
TörnströmL, AmprazisJ, ChristmanssonM, EklundJ. A corporate workplace model for ergonomic assessments and improvements. Applied Ergonomics. 2008;39(2):219–28.
15.
HäggGM. Corporate initiatives in ergonomics—an introduction. Applied Ergonomics. 2003;34(1):3–15.
16.
SchaubK, CaragnanoG, BritzkeB, BruderR. The European assembly worksheet. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2013;14(6):616–39.
17.
EliassonK, LindCM, NymanT. Factors influencing ergonomists’ use of observation-based risk-assessment tools. Work. 2019;64(1):93–106.
18.
RoquelaureY, HaC, LeclercA, TouranchetA, SauteronM, MelchiorM, et al. Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Arthritis Care & Research. 2006;55(5):765–78.
19.
StockSR, FernandesR, DelisleA, VézinaN. Reproducibility and validity of workers’ self-reports of physical work demands. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2005;409-37.
20.
TraskC, TeschkeK, MorrisonJ, VillageJ, JohnsonP, KoehoornM. Using observation and self-report to predict mean, 90th percentile, and cumulative low back muscle activity in heavy industry workers. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2010;54(5):595–606.
21.
SpielholzP, SilversteinB, MorganM, CheckowayH, KaufmanJ. Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics. 2001;44(6):588–613.
22.
DescathaA, RoquelaureY, CarolyS, EvanoffB, CyrD, MarielJ, et al. Self-administered questionnaire and direct observation by checklist: comparing two methods for physical exposure surveillance in a highly repetitive tasks plant. Applied Ergonomics. 2009;40(2):194–8.
23.
BarreroLH, KatzJN, DennerleinJT. Validity of self-reported mechanical demands for occupational epidemiologic research of musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2009;35(4):245.
24.
ZareM, Malinge-OudenotA, HöglundR, BiauS, RoquelaureY. Evaluation of ergonomic physical risk factors in a truck manufacturing plant: case study in SCANIA Production Angers. Industrial Health. 2016;54(2):163–76.
25.
WatersTR, Putz-AndersonV, GargA, FineLJ. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics. 1993;36(7):749–76.
26.
BerlinC, ÖrtengrenR, LämkullD, HansonL. Corporate-internal vs. national standard-A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2009;39(6):940–6.
27.
DescathaA, RoquelaureY, ChastangJF, EvanoffB, MelchiorM, MariotC, et al. Validity of Nordic-style questionnaires in the surveillance of upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33(1):58–65.
28.
SluiterJK, RestKM, Frings-DresenMH. Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2001;27(Suppl 1):1–102.
29.
TangW, HUJ, ZhangH, WuP, HeH. Kappa coefficient: a popular measure of rater agreement. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015;27(1):62–7.
ChiassonM-È, ImbeauD, MajorJ, AubryK, DelisleA. Influence of musculoskeletal pain on workers’ ergonomic risk-factor assessments. Appl Ergon. 2015;49:1–7.
32.
Barriera-ViruetH, SobeihTM, DaraisehN, SalemS. Questionnaires vs observational and direct measurements: a systematic review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2006;7(3):261–84.
33.
LoweBD, KriegEF. Relationships between observational estimates and physical measurements of upper limb activity. Ergonomics. 2009;52(5):569–83.
34.
Juul-KristensenB, HanssonG-Å, FallentinN, AndersenJH, EkdahlC. Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements. Applied Ergonomics. 2001;32(5):517–24.
35.
BurdorfA, LaanJ. Comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load on the back. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1991;17(6):425–9.
36.
LoweBD, WeirP, AndrewsD. Observation-based Posture Assessment: Review of Current Practice and Recommendations for Improvement. U.S. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 2014-131. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
37.
BaloghI, ØrbaekP, OhlssonK, NordanderC, UngeJ, WinkelJ, et al. Self-assessed and directly measured occupational physical activities—influence of musculoskeletal complaints, age and gender. Applied Ergonomics. 2004;35(1):49–56.
38.
ToomingasA, AlfredssonL, KilbomÅ. Possible bias from rating behavior when subjects rate both exposure and outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1997;23(5):370–7.
39.
HanssonG-A, BaloghI, ByströmJU, OhlssonK, NordanderC, AsterlandP, et al. Questionnarie versus direct technical measurements in assessing postures and movements of the head, upper back, arms and hands. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2001;27(1):30–40.
40.
LoweBD. Accuracy and validity of observational estimates of shoulder and elbow posture. Applied Ergonomics. 2004;35(2):159–71.
41.
LoweBD. Accuracy and validity of observational estimates of wrist and forearm posture. Ergonomics. 2004;47(5):527–54.
