This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed return-to-work program for workers with common mental disorders from the perspective of stakeholders (insurers, employers, unions, and workers).
METHODS:
We used a sequential mixed design. First, we conducted a survey to evaluate the levels of stakeholder agreement with the program’s feasibility. Second, we conducted a number of independent, homogeneous-group discussions or individual interviews to deepen stakeholders’ reflections and allow co-construction of a shared perspective of the program’s feasibility.
RESULTS:
Overall, the stakeholders (insurers (n = 6), employers (n = 7), unions (n = 8), and workers (n = 3)), agreed partly to totally with the feasibility of the specific/intermediate objectives, components/tasks, and duration of the components. They identified obstacles that could hinder program implementation. These obstacles pertained mainly to employers’ contexts, e.g., difficulty/impossibility of offering job accommodations. They also proposed facilitators to counteract most of these obstacles. Diverging views were found regarding both the role of union representatives and health professionals in the program, and for the duration of the components.
CONCLUSION:
Overall, the program was perceived as feasible to implement, provided that the potential factors discussed are taken into account. The next step will be to evaluate its implementation in real practice settings.
DewaC, McDaidD, Sultan-TaïebH. Aspects épidémio-logiques et économiques inhérents aux troubles mentaux [Epidemiological and economic aspects inherent to mental disorders]. In: Corbière M, Durand MJ, editors. Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail [From mental disorder to work disability]. Quebec: Presses de l’Université de Québec; 2011. pp. 15-40.
2.
RoelenCAM, NorderG, KoopmansPC, van RhenenW, van der KlinkJJL, BültmannU. Employees sick-listed with mental disorders: who returns to work and when?J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):409–17.
3.
CullenKL, IrvinE, CollieA, ClayF, GensbyU, JenningsPA, Hogg-JohnsonS, KristmanV, LabergeM, McKenzieD, NewnamS, PalagyiA, RuseckaiteR, SheppardDM, ShourieS, SteenstraI, Van EerdD, AmickBC3rd. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: An update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
4.
DurandMJ, LoiselP. Therapeutic return to work: rehabilitation in the workplace. Work. 2001;17(1):57–63.
5.
BriandC, DurandMJ, St-ArnaudL, CorbièreM. Work and mental health: Learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30(4–5):444–57.
6.
MaroisE,
DurandMJ,
CoutuMF. Logic models for the Therapeutic Return-to-Work Program as adapted for common mental disorders: A guide for health professionals. Work. in press. DOI:10.3233/WOR-203284
7.
CraigP, DieppeP, MacintyreS, MichieS, NazarethI, PettiecrewM. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337(a):1–6.
8.
AndersenMF, NielsenKM, BrinkmannS. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):93–104.
9.
de VriesG, KoeterMWJ, NabitzU, HeesHL, ScheneAH. Return to work after sick leave due to depression: A conceptual analysis based on perspectives of patients, supervisors and occupational physicians. J Affect Disord. 2012;136(3):1017–26.
10.
NielsenMBD, MadsenIEH, BültmannU, ChristensenU, DiderichsenF, RuguliesR. Encounters between workers sick-listed with common mental disorders and return-to-work stakeholders. Does workers’ gender matter? Scand J Public Health. 2013;41(2):191–7.
11.
ScheneAH, KoeterMWJ, KikkertMJ, SwinkelsJA, McCroneP. Adjuvant occupational therapy for work-related major depression works: randomized trial including economic evaluation. Psychol Med. 2007;37(3):351–62.
12.
VlasveldMC, van der Feltz-CornelisCM, AdèrHJ, AnemaJR, HoedemanR, van MechelenW, BeekmanATF. Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: A randomised controlled trial from the Netherlands Depression Initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(4):223–30.
13.
NoordikE, van der KlinkJJ, GeskusRB, de BoerMR, van DijkFJH, NieuwenhuijsenK. Effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work program for workers on sick leave due to common mental disorders: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(2):144–54.
14.
MartinMHT, NielsenMBD, PetersenSMA, JakobsenLM, RuguliesR. Implementation of a coordinated and tailored return-to-work intervention for employees with mental health problems. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):427–36.
15.
FassierJB. Identifying local obstacles and facilitators of implementation. In: LoiselP, AnemaJR, editors. Handbook of Work Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 441–59.
16.
BowenDJ, KreuterM, SpringB, Cofta-WoerpelL, LinnanL, WeinerD, BakkenS, KaplanCP, SquiersL, FabrizioC, FernandezM. Review and special article: How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:452–7.
17.
MooreGF, AudreyS, BarkerM, BondL, BonellC, HardemanW, MooreL, O’CathainA, TinatiT, WightD, BairdJ. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2015;350:h1258.
18.
MaroisE, CoutuMF, DurandMJ, editors. Implementation of the Therapeutic Return-to-Work Program for common mental disorders: A case-study analysis. Work, Disability, Prevention and Integration (WPDI) Conference; Septembre 26, 2016; Amsterdam.
19.
MorseJ. Procedures and practice of mixed methods design. In: TashakkoriA, TeddlieC, editors. Mixed Method in Social & Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2010. pp. 339–54.
20.
GervaisM, PépinG. TRIAGE: A new group technique gaining recognition in evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australia. 2002;2(2):45–9.
21.
GeoffrionP. editor. Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données [Social Research: From Problematic to Data Collect]. 4th ed. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2009. pp. 391-414.
22.
Savoie-ZajcL. L’entrevue semi-dirigée [Semi-directed interview]. In: Gauthier B, editor. Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données [Social Research: From Problematic to Data Collect]. 4th ed. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2009. pp. 335-60.
23.
DillmanDA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley; 2000.
24.
MuhrT. User’s Manual for ATLAS.ti. 5.0. In: Development AtSS, editor. Berlin 2004.
25.
LaperrièreA. Les critères de scientificité des méthodes qualitatives [The criteria of scientificity of the qualitative methods]. In: Poupart J, Groulx LH, Deslauriers JP, Laperrière A, Mayer R, Pires AP, editors. La recherche qualitative : Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques [Qualitative Research: Epistemological and Methodological Issues]. Boucherville: Gaëtan Morin; 1997. pp. 376-89.
26.
SainsburyR, IrvineA, AstonJ, WilsonS, WilliamsC, SinclairA. Mental health and employment. Norwich: Department of Work and Pension, 2008 R-513.
27.
LemieuxP, DurandMJ, HongQN. Supervisors’ perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):293–303.
28.
ThorpeK, ChénierL. Disability management: Opportunities for employer action. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada, 2013.
29.
ShawWS, KristmanVL, VézinaM. Workplace issues. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of Work Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 163-82.
30.
JamesC, SouthgateE, KableA, RivettD, GuestM, Bohatko-NaismithJ. The return-to-work coordinator role: Qualitative insights for nursing. J Occup Rehabil. . 2011;21(2):220–7.
31.
NastasiaI, DurandMJ, CoutuMF, CollingeC, CibotaruA. Pratiques des milieux de travail pour assurer un retour en emploi sain et durable [Workplace practices to ensure a healthy and sustainable return to work]. Montreal: IRSST, 2017 R-983.
32.
DurandMJ, NastasiaI, CoutuMF, BernierM. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–47.
33.
PomakiG, FrancheRL, KhushrushahiN, MurphyAJ, LampinenTM, MahP. Best practices for return-to-work/stay-at-work for workers with mental health conditions. Vancouver: OHSAH, 2010.
CorbièreM, St-ArnaudL, DurandMJ, CoutuMF, LecompteT, NegriniA, RenardM. Factors influencing the return-to-work after depression: The viewpoint and role of unions. Montreal: IRSST, 2014 R-847.
36.
St-ArnaudL, PelletierM, BriandC. The paradoxes of managing employees’ absences for mental health reasons and practices to support their return-to-work. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology. 2011;3(2):36–52.
37.
DurandMJ, SylvainC, FassierJB, TremblayD, ShawWS, AnemaJR, LoiselP, RichardMC, BernierM. Revue réaliste sur les bases théoriques des programmes de réadaptation incluant le milieu de travail: Troubles musculosquelettiques [Realistic reviewof theoretical foundations of rehabilitation programs involving the workplace: Musculoskeletal disorders]. Montreal: IRSST, 2017 R-942.
38.
DurandMJ, CorbièreM, CoutuMF, ReinharzD, AlbertV. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579.
39.
FrancheRL, BarilR, ShawWS, NicholasM, LoiselP. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–42.
40.
Costa-BlackKM, FeuersteinM, LoiselP. Work disability model: Past and present. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook ofWork Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 71-93.
41.
YoungAE. Return to work stakeholders’ perspectives on work disability. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook ofWork Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 409-23.
42.
GouinMM, CoutuMF, DurandMJ. Return-to-work success despite conflicts: An exploration of decision-making during a work rehabilitation program. Disabil Rehabil. 2017:1-11.
