Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Literature reports that paramedics represent an at-risk occupation for the development of health problems. At least half of the paramedic population presents at least one risk factor associated with a negative health condition. These reports may suffer a “mono-method bias” where most reported outcomes are based on a single screening tool approach (may attenuate or inflate the prevalence).
OBJECTIVE:
The current study characterizes the health status of a cohort of twenty-five experienced New Brunswick (Canadian province) paramedics.
METHODS:
To understand possible limitations of past research, health status was characterized using four different methods: two methods using only one health measure and two were combined methods, integrating outcomes from at least two health measures to determine the prevalence of a given health status.
RESULTS:
Mono-bias was observed when using the single health measure methods. The difference among the four methods highlighted that a third of the cohort seemed unaware of their health condition. This result shed additional light on paramedics’ health, where a high proportion of paramedics worked without knowledge of their health conditions. Based on a two health measures combined method, it was observed that only two-fifths of the current sample had no health conditions or could otherwise be considered as a “healthy”.
CONCLUSIONS:
Because the literature has focused on single screening methods, our results were difficult to compare. However, there was a consensus that paramedics represent an at-risk occupation comprised of health problems. This study was exploratory and should be the basis for further research.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
