Professional drivers are part of the active working population, so there is a need for continuous improvement of operating efficiency and safety in driving. Reaction time is a very important driver’s trait.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of age and driving experience on reaction times of professional drivers.
METHODS:
This study assesses part of driving efficiency of professional drivers by measuring simple reaction time and complex reaction time which are important to driving safety. Reaction times of 278 male professional drivers were tested using a hardware-software system for determining the speed of response to psychomotor simple and complex audio-visual stimuli.
RESULTS:
Our results showed a positive correlation between ageing and slowing of reaction times. This suggests that the natural ageing process clearly slows down reaction times.
CONCLUSIONS:
The response times of professional drivers are more dependent on age than on driving experience.
World Health Organisation. Global Health Estimates 2016: Deaths by cause, age, sex, by Country and by region, 2000-2016. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 2018.
2.
RainaP, SohelN, OremusM, ShannonH, MonyP, KumarR, LiW, WangY, WangX, YusoffK, YusoffR, IqdalR, SzubaA, OguzA, RosengrenA, KrugerA, ChifambaJ, MohammadifardN, DarwishEA, DagenaisG, DiazR, AvezumA, Lopez-JaramilloP, SeronP, RangarajanS, TeoK, YusufS. Assessing global risk factors for non-fatal injuries from road traffic accidents and falls in adults aged 35–70 years in 17 countries: a cross-sectional analysis of the prospective urban rural epidemiological study. Inj Prev. 2016;22:92–8.
3.
Official Journal of the European Union, Commission directive 2009/113/EC.L 223/31
4.
DIRECTIVE 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licenses (Recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (consolidated version – 30.12.2006, OJ L 403, pp. 18–60.
5.
WeberaS, BlumbK, ErnstbergeraA, FärbercB. Standard reactions – driver reactions in critical driving situations. In: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;3:2489–96.
6.
FildesB, OxleyJ, MorrisA, HelmanS, WeeklyJ. Review of medical fitness to drive in Europe. In: Van Nes N, Voegele C. (eds.). Proceedings of the 6th Humanist Conference. June 13-14, 2018, The Hague, The Netherlands. Lyon: Humanist publications, 2018:1–5.
7.
JureckiR, StanczykT. The test methods and the reaction time of drivers. Maintenance and Reliability. 2011;3:84–91.
8.
ZhengH, QinY, GuoF, XiongJ, Biao XuB, ChenY. Speed and reaction behaviour in different highway landscapes: A driving simulator study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19:880–4.
9.
JureckiRS, StańczykLT, JaśkiewiczMJ. Driver’s reaction time in a simulated, complex road incident. Transport. 2014;1:1–11.
10.
HindmarchI. Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58:720–40.
11.
KennefickM, MaslovatD, CarlsenAN. The time course of corticospinal excitability during a simple reaction time task. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113563.
12.
BoisgontierMP, GeorgeF, WittenbergGF, Fujiyama1H, LevinO, SwinnenSP. Complexity of central processing in simple and choice multilimb reaction-time tasks. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e90457.
13.
SimpsonHM. The evolution and effectiveness of graduated licensing. J Safety Res. 2003;34:25–34.
ChenD, AhnS, LavalJ, ZhengZ. On the periodicity of traffic oscillations and capacity drop: the role of driver characteristics. Transport Res. 2014;59:117–36.
16.
AsadamrajiM, SaffarzadehM, RossV, BorujerdianA, FerdosiT, SheikholeslamiS. A novel driver hazard perception sensitivity model based on drivers’ characteristics: A simulator study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(5):492–7.
17.
ScialfaCT, BorkenhagenD, LyonJ, DeschênesM, HorswillM, WettonMA. The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;45:547–53.
18.
ZhukM, KovalyshynV, TcirR. Defining duration of driver reaction time components using the neurocom complex. Econ Tech Mod. 2015;4(2):39–44.
19.
ZhukM, KovalyshynV, RoykoYu, BarvinskaKh. Research on drivers‘ reaction time in different conditions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2017;2(3):24–31.
20.
WangaY, MaaJ, WeibL. Investigating the effect of a long trip on driving performance, eye blinks, and awaeeness of sleepiness among commercial drivers: A naturalistic driving test study. Scientia Iranica. 2019;26(1):95–102.
21.
MichaelsJ, ChaumillonR, Nguyen-TriD, WatanabeD, HirschP, BellavanceF, GiraudetG, BernardinD, FaubertJ. Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0185909.
22.
Jiuh-BingS, Hsi-JenW. Driver perception uncertainty in perceived relative speed and reaction time in car following–A quantum optical flow perspective. Transport Res. 2015;8:257–74.
23.
WichmannT, BuchheimA, MenningH, SchenkI, CarolG, PokornyD. A Reaction Time Experiment on Adult Attachment: The development of a measure for neurophysiological settings. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:3–15.
24.
MillerJO, LowK. Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time task psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001;27:266–89.
25.
BaayenH, MilinP. Analyzing reaction times. Int J Psychol. 2010;3:1–27.
26.
KhodadadiM, KhodabakhshA, SahraeiH, AzadmarzabadiE, YadollahiS. Relationship between Intelligence and Reaction Time; A Review Study. Inter J Med Rev. 2014;1:63–9.
27.
CarlsenNA, Dana MaslovatD, FranksMI. Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: Evidence from startle. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:21–33.
28.
Van HuysduynenH, TerkenJ, EggenB. The relation between self-reported driving style and driving behaviour. A simulator study. Traffic Psychol Behav.. 2018;56:245–55.
29.
De WinterJCF, De GrootS, MulderM, WieringaPA, DankelmanJ, MulderJA. Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results. Ergonomics. 2009;52(2):137–53.
30.
JensenAR. Galton’s legacy to research on intelligence. J Biosoc Sci. 2002;34:145–72.
31.
StinearMC, CoxonPJ, ByblowDW. Primary motor cortex and movement prevention: Where Stop meets Go. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33:662–73.
32.
KeallMD, FrithWJ, PattersonTL. The influence of alcohol, age and number of passengers on the night-time risk of driver fatal injury in New Zealand. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:49–61.
33.
GreenM. How long does it take to stop? A methodological analysis of driver perception brake times. Transport Hum Factors. 2000;2:195–216.
34.
MaireanC, HavarneanuGM, PopusoiSA, HavarneanuCE. Traffic locus of control scale—Romanian version: psychometric properties and relations to the driver’s personality, risk perception, and driving behavior. Traffic Psychol Behav. 2017;45:131–46.
35.
RatcliffR, ThaparA, McKoonG. The effects of ageing on reaction time in a sign detection task. Psychol Aging. 2001;16:323–41.
36.
CampagneA, PebayleT, MuzetA. Correlation between driving errors and vigilance level: influence of the driver’s age. Physiol Behav. 2004;80:515–24.
37.
RatcliffR, ThaparA, McKoonG. Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin Rev. 2006;13:626–35.
38.
RatcliffR. Modeling ageing effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data. Psychol Aging. 2008;23:900–16.
39.
AdamJJ, PaasWC, BuekersMJ, WuytsIJ, SpijkersWC, WallmeyerP. Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics. 1999;42:327–35.
40.
BarralJ, DebuB. Aiming in adults: Sex and laterality effects. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body. Brain Cogn. 2004;9:299–312.
41.
ChoudharyP, VelagaNR. Effects of texting on accident risk during a sudden hazardous event: Analysis of predetection and postdetection phases. Traffic Inj Prev. . 2018;11:1–6.
42.
RedfernSM, MullerM, JenningsJR, FurmanMJ. Attentional dynamics in postural control during perturbations in young and older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:298–303.
43.
AndoS, KidaN, OdaS. Practice effects on reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields. Percept Mot Skills. 2002;95:747–51.
44.
GuillotA, ColletC. Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Res Rev. 2005;50:387–97.
45.
GuadagnoliAM, LeeDT. Challenge Point: A Framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behavior.. 2004;36:212–24.
46.
GhuntlaTP, MehtaHB, GokhalePA, ShahCJ. Influence of practice on visual reaction time. J Mahatma Gandhi Inst Med Sci. 2014;19:119–22.
47.
HorswillMS. Hazard perception in driving. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016;25:425–30.
48.
Čubranić-DobrodolacM, ČičevićS, DobrodolacM, NešićM. The risks associated with using a mobile phone by young drivers. Transport. 2013;28:381–8.
49.
NoyaYI, HorreyJW, PopkinMS, FolkardS, HowarthDH, CourtneyaKT. Future directions in fatigue and safety research. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:495–7.
50.
OgdenEJD, MoskowitzH. Effects of alcohol and other drugs on driver performance. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004;5:185–98.
51.
MeirA, BorowskyA, Oron-GiladT. Formation and evaluation of act and anticipate hazard perception training (AAHPT) intervention for young novice drivers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(2):172–80.
52.
ScialfaTC, DeschênesCM, FerenceJ, BooneJ, MarkS, HorswillSM, WettonM. A hazard perception test for novice drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:204–8.
53.
GrandjeanJ, ColletteF. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: A comparison of young and elderly participants. Brain Cognition. 2011;77:237–47.
54.
BalakrishnanG, UppinakudruG, Girwar SinghG, BangeraS, RaghavendraAD, ThangavelD. A comparative study on visual choice reaction time for different colours in females. Neurology Research International. 2014;ArticleID 301473:1-5.
55.
CassavaughDN, KramerFA. Transfer of computer-based training to simulated driving in older adults. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2014;58:2043–7.
56.
SalviaE, PetitC, ChampelyS, ChometteR, Di RienzoF, ColletC. Effects of age and task load on drivers’ response accuracy and reaction time when responding to traffic lights. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:1–9.
57.
AsadamrajiM, SaffarzadehM, TayeghaniM. Modeling driver’s hazard perception using driver’s personality characteristics. Int J Transportation Engineering. 2017;5(2):167–82.
58.
BortkiewiczA, GadzickaE, SiedleckaJ, KosobudzkiM, DaniaM, SzymczakW, JóźwiakZ, SzyjkowskaA, ViebigP, Pas-WyroślakA, Makowiec-Da̧browskaT, KapitaniakB, HickmanJS. Analysis of bus driver’s reaction to simulated traffic collision situations–eye-tracking studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health.. 2019;32(2):161–74.
59.
McGeheeD, MazzaeE, BaldwinG. Driver reaction time in crash avoidance research: Validation of a driving simulator study on a test track. Proceedings of the 14th Triennial congress of the International ergonomics association and 44th Annual meeting of the Human factors and ergonomics society, July 29-Avg 4, 2000, San Diego (USA). Santa Monica (USA): Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2000:320-3.
60.
CairdYR, ChisholmSL, EdwardsCJ, CreaserJI. The effect of yellow light onset time on older and younger drivers’ perception response time (PRT) and intersection behaviour. Transport Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 2007;10:383–96.
61.
MakishitaH, MatsunagaK. Differences of drivers’ reaction times according to age and mental workload. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:567–75.
62.
CantinV, LavalliereM, SimoneauM, TeasdaleN. Mental workload when driving in a simulator: effects of age and driving complexity. Accid Anal Prev. 2009:41;763–71.
63.
BartolozziR, FrendoF. Definition of simulated driving tests for the evaluation of drivers’ reactions and responses. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;7:1–28.
64.
SvetinaM. The reaction times of drivers aged 20 to 80 during a divided attention driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;6:1–23.
65.
AnderssonJ, PetersB. The importance of reaction time, cognition, and meta-cognition abilities for drivers with visual deficits. Cognition, Technology and Work. 2019;12:1–14.
66.
VetterM, SchünemannLA, BrieberD, DebelakR, GatschaM, GrünsteidelF, HerleM, MandlerG, OrtnerMT. Cognitive and personality determinants of safe driving performance in professional drivers. Transportation Research Part F. 2018;52:191–201.
67.
BroenN, ChiangD. Braking response times for 100 drivers in the avoidance of an unexpected obstacle as measured in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and ergonomics Society. 1996;40:900–4.
68.
BlaneA, FalkmerT, LeeHC, Dukic WillstrandT. Investigating cognitive ability and self-reported driving performance of poststroke adults in a driving simulator. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25:44–53.
69.
AnsteyKJ, WoodJ, LordS, WalkerJG. Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25:45–65.
70.
BélangerA, GagnonS, YaminS. Capturing the serial nature of older drivers’ responses towards challenging events: A simulator study. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:809–17.
71.
FerreiraIS, SimoesMR, MarôcoJ. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised as a potential screening test for elderly drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;49:278–86.
72.
CaseyBJ, JonesRM, SomervilleLH. Braking and accelerating of the adolescent brain. J Res Adolescence. 2011;21:21–33.
73.
WoodG, HartleyG, FurleyPA, WilsonMR. Working memory capacity, visual attention and hazard perception in driving. J App Res Mem Cogn. 2016;5:454–62.
74.
AnsteyKJ, WoodJ, LordS, WalkerJG. Cognitive, sensory, and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25:45–65.
75.
WickremaratchiMM, LlewelynJG. Effects of ageing on touch. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:301–4.
76.
PfisterM, LueJC, StefaniniFR, FalabellaP, DustinL, KossMJ, HumayunSM. Comparison of reaction response time between hand and foot controlled devices in simulated microsurgical testing. Biomed Res Int. 2014;ArticleID 769296:1-8.
77.
RoenkerLD, CissellMG, BallKK, WadleyGV, EdwardsDJ. Speed-of-processing and driving simulator training result in improved driving performance. Hum Factors. 2003;45:218–33.
78.
Road Safety Authority of Ireland. Medical fitness to drive guidelines (group 1 and group 2 drivers). Dublin(Ireland): National Office for Traffic Medicine, July 2019.
79.
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency of United Kingdom. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals. Swansea(UK): Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, February 2020.
80.
BallK, OwsleyC. Driving competence: it’s not a matter of age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1499–501.
81.
HorberryT, HartleyL, GobettiK, WalkerF, JohnsonB, GersbachS. et al. Speed choice by drivers: The issue of driving too slowly. Ergonomics. 2004;47:1561–70.
82.
AshokJ, SuganthiV, VijayalakshmiII. Comparison of brake reaction time in younger and older drivers. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(2):649–52.
83.
CharltonJL, OxleyJ, FildesB, OxleyP, NewsteadS, KoppelS. Characteristics of older drivers who adopt self-regulatory driving behaviours. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2006;9:363–73.
84.
BaldockMR, MathiasJL, McLeanAJ, BerndtA. Self-regulation of driving and its relationship to driving ability among older adults. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:1038–45.
85.
BlanchardRA, MyersAM. Examination of driving comfort and self-regulatory practices in older adults using in-vehicle devices to assess natural driving patterns. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1213–9.
