If I had stable housing I would be a bit more receptive to having a job. Factors influencing the effectiveness of Disability Employment Services reform
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April 23, 2020
If I had stable housing I would be a bit more receptive to having a job. Factors influencing the effectiveness of Disability Employment Services reform
Continual reforms of the Australian Disability Employment Services (DES) program aim to improve employment outcomes for people with disabilities, including people with a psychosocial disability who experience high levels of unemployment.
OBJECTIVE:
To understand contextual factors in the lives of DES participants with a psychosocial disability that influence their engagement with and potential benefits from the DES program in the context of the 2018 reforms.
METHODS:
Thematic analysis of 30 qualitative interviews with DES participants with a psychosocial disability was conducted as part of the Improving Disability Employment Study between November 2017 to October 2018.
RESULTS:
Findings highlight diverse life challenges experienced by DES participants including disrupted education, inadequate access to mental and general health services, and financial and housing insecurity.
CONCLUSIONS:
The life circumstances of DES participants with a psychosocial disability are often complex and undermine their engagement with employment services and access to labour markets. Despite considerable investment in ongoing reforms, these circumstances continue to undermine the effectiveness of the DES program.
UN General Assembly.Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, in GA Res. 2006. p. 106.
2.
StrauserDR. Career development, employment, and disability in rehabilitation: Fromtheory to practice. 2013, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
3.
SimonsenM, FabianE, EthridgeG. Youth and Adults With Psychiatric Disabilities: Improving Career and Employment, in Career Development, Employment, and Disability in Rehabilitation: From Theory to Practice, Strauser DR, Editor. 2013, Springer Publishing Company: New York. p. 401.
4.
BushPW, et al.The long-term impact of employment on mental health service use and costs for persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services.. 2009;60(8):1024–31.
5.
MueserKT, DrakeRE, BondGR. Recent advances in supported employment for people with serious mental illness. Current opinion in psychiatry,. 2016;29(3):196–201.
6.
MilnerA, et al. Employment status and mental health among persons with and without a disability: evidence from an Australian cohort study. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2014: p. jech-2014-204147.
7.
PerkinsDJ. Activation and inclusion of unemployed people facing severe personal barriers. 2011.
8.
Deloitte Access Economics. The economic benefits of increasing employment for people with disability. 2011, Commissioned by Australian Network on Disability.
9.
Council of Australian Governments. The Fifth National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan. 2017: Canberra.
10.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: summary of findings, 2015. 2016: Canberra.
11.
Department of Social Services.NewDisability Employment Services from 2018 Discussion Paper. 2016: Canberra.
12.
Department of Social Services. Disability Employment Services Reform 2018 Industry Information Paper. 2017: Canberra.
13.
NevileA. Submission in response to New Disability Employment Services 2018 Discussion Paper. 2016.
14.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Comments on the Discussion Paper on the new Disability Employment Services from 2018. 2017.
15.
Australian Federation of Disability Organisations. Consumers front and centre: What consumers really think about Disability Employment Services 2014, Australian Federation of Disability Organisations: Mebourne.
16.
Australian Government Department of Social Services. National Disability Employment Framework –Consultation Report September 2015. 2015, Department of Social Services: Canberra.
17.
MellifontD. DESperately Seeking Service: A narrative review informing a disability employment services reform framework for Australians with mental illness. Work. 2017;58(4):463–72.
18.
Orygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health. Submission to the New Disability Employment Services from 2018: Discussion Paper. 2016.
19.
National Mental Health Consumer & Carer Forum, Unravelling Psychosocial Disability. A Position Statement by the National Mental Health Consumer & Carer Forum on Psychosocial Disability Associated with Mental Health Conditions. 2011, National Mental Health Consumer & Carer Forum: Canberra.
20.
World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry. Implementation Manual for the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2008, World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry.
21.
SzymanskiE, EnrightM, HershensonD. Chapter 8 An ecological approach to the vocational behavior and career development of people with disabilities, in Rehabilitation counseling: basics and beyond, R.M. Parker and Patterson JB, Editors. 2012, PRO-ED: Austin, Tex. p. 199-258.
22.
LundC, et al.Social determinants of mental disorders and the Sustainable Development Goals: a systematic review of reviews. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(4):357–69.
23.
McClellandA, SmythP. Social policy in Australia: Understanding for action. 3 ed. 2014.
24.
HarveyC, et al.People living with psychosocial disability: Rehabilitation and recovery-informed service provision within the second Australian national survey of psychosis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2016;50(6):534–47.
25.
MorganVA, et al.People living with psychotic illness in the second Australian national survey of psychosis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;46(8):735–52.
26.
MithenJ, et al.Inequalities in social capital and health between people with and without disabilities. Social Science & Medicine. 2015;126, 26–35.
27.
ParlettaV, WaghornG. The financial viability of evidence-based supported employment for people with mental illnesses in a blended funding system. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2016(44):227–41.
28.
PaluchT, FosseyE, HarveyC. Social firms: building cross-sectoral partnerships to create employment opportunity and supportive workplaces for people with mental illness. Work. 2012;43(1):63–75.
29.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Employ outside the box: The business case for employing people with disability. 2014,AustralianChamber ofCommerce and Industry: Canberra.
30.
Australian Council of Social Services. Raise the Rate Fact Sheet 4. 2018, Australian Council of Social Services Canberra.
31.
Australian Government Former Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. Evaluation of Disability Employment Services 2010–2013 Final Report. 2014, Former Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations: Canberra.
32.
Australian Human Rights Commission. Willing to Work. National Inquiry into Employment Discrimination Against Older Australians and Australians with Disability 2016, Australian Human Rights Commission: Sydney. 1021
33.
National Disability Services. Response to the Discussion Paper on new Disability Employment Services from 2018. 2016.
34.
Australian Government Department of Social Services. National Disability Employment Framework Discussion Paper November 2015. 2015, Department of Social Services: Canberra.
35.
Australian Government Department of Social Services. Characteristics of Disability Support Pension Recipients. 2013, Department of Social Services: Canberra.
BuysN, MatthewsLR, RandallC. Contemporary vocational rehabilitation in Australia. Disability and rehabilitation. 2015;37(9):820–4.
38.
ByrnesC, LawnS. Disability employment services in Australia: a brief primer. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling. 2013;19(1):46–56.
39.
RamptonN, et al.Employment service provider knowledge of service user assistance needs. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. 2010;13(1):22–39.
40.
KingJ, WaghornG. How Higher Performing Employment Specialists Engage and Support Job-seekers with Psychiatric Disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation. 2018;84(2):48–56.
41.
MatthewsLR, et al.Function, health and psychosocial needs in job-seekers with anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders who access disability employment services. Work. 2014;49(2):271–9.
42.
WaghornG, et al. A multi-site randomised controlled trial of evidence-based supported employment for adults with severe and persistent mental illness. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 2014(61).
43.
SherringJ, et al.A working reality: Evaluating enhanced intersectoral links in supported employment for people with psychiatric disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 2010;57(4):261–7.
44.
WaghornG, et al.Challenges to implementing evidence-based supported employment in Australia. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2007(27):29–37.
45.
WaghornG, HielscherE. The availability of evidence-based practices in supported employment for Australians with severe and persistent mental illness Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 2015(62):141–4.
46.
SuijkerbuijkYB, et al. Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(9).
47.
ParlettaV. Evaluating evidence-based supported employment implemented within an Australian Disability Employment Service for adults with mental illness. 2015, University of Newcastle: Newcastle.
48.
KingR, et al.Enhancing employment services for people with severe mental illness: the challenge of the Australian service environment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;40(5):471–7.
49.
MorrisA, et al.Implementation of evidence-based supported employment in regional Australia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2014;37(2):144.
50.
GladmanB, WaghornG. Personal experiences of people with serious mental illness when seeking, obtaining and maintaining competitive employment in Queensland, Australia. Work. 2016;53(4):835–43.
51.
HarrisLM, et al.Perspectives on barriers to employment for job seekers with mental illness and additional substance-use problems. Health & social care in the community. 2014;22(1):67–77.
52.
NevileA, LohmannR. “It is like they just don’t trust us”: Balancing trust and control in the provision. The Australian National University, Canberra, 2011.
53.
RitchieJ, et al. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. 2013: Sage.
54.
BraunV, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
55.
SchofieldTP, ButterworthP. Are Negative Community Attitudes Toward Welfare Recipients Associated With Unemployment? Evidence From an Australian Cross-Sectional Sample and Longitudinal Cohort. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2018;9(5):503–15.
56.
KavanaghAM, et al.Inequalities in socio-economic characteristics and health and wellbeing of men with and without disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of the baseline wave of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(3):23.
57.
KavanaghAM, et al.Intersections between disability, type of impairment, gender and socio-economic disadvantage in a nationally representative sample of 33,101 working-aged Australians. Disability and health journal. 2015;8(2):191–9.
58.
LawsonJ, et al. Social housing as infrastructure: an investment pathway. 2018.
59.
Commission AG-P. Rising inequality? A stocktake of the evidence. 2018, Productivity Commission Research Paper.
60.
Deloitte Access Economics. Analysis of the impact of raising benefit rates. Commissioned by the Australian Council of Social Service. 2018, Deloitte Access Economics: Melbourne.
61.
TrajkovicG. Disability Employment Reform, Social Inclusion and Mental Health. 2008: Centre of Full Employment and Equity, University of Newcastle.
