Despite the ability to and interest in work, people with disabilities are employed at significantly lower rates than nondisabled people. Employment disparities highlight persistent social and cultural stereotypes that equate disability with unemployability.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between employment of people with disabilities and disability prejudice in the United States. This study had the following research question: how does disability prejudice impact state disability employment rates?
METHODS:
To explore these questions, we used secondary data about state disability employment (2016), as well as disability prejudice data from 270,000 nondisabled people residing in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
RESULTS:
Findings from this study revealed states with higher disability prejudice scores have lower disability employment rates, suggesting employment disparities are intertwined with disability prejudice.
CONCLUSIONS:
Cultures and systems must be rid of harmful disability stereotypes to ensure people with disabilities can truly partake in their human and civil rights.
Office of Disability Employment Policy. April 2018 disability employment statistics ages 16 years and over Washington, D.C.: United States Deparment of Labor; 2018 [Available from: http://www.dol.gov/odep/].
3.
RussellM. The political economy of disablement. Dollars & Sense. 2000:13-5.
4.
LysaghtR, Ouellette-KuntzH, LinC-J. Untapped potential: Perspectives on the employment of people with intellectual disability. Work. 2012;41(4):409–22.
5.
RoganP, RinneS. National call for organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2011;49(4):248–60.
6.
BarnesC. A legacy of oppression: A history of disability in Western culture. In: Baron L, Oliver M, editors. Disability studies: Past, present and future. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1997:3-24.
7.
CharltonJ. Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998.
8.
ErevellesN. In search of the disabled subject. In: Wilson JC, Lewiecki-Wilson C, editors. Embodied rhetorics: disability in language and culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University; 2001:92-111.
9.
GoodleyD. Disability Studies. An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE; 2011.
10.
FleischerDZ, ZamesF. The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2001.
11.
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328, (1990).
12.
Parker HarrisS, RenkoM, CaldwellK. Social entrepreneurship as an employment pathway for people with disabilities: Exploring political–economic and socio-cultural factors. Disability & Society. 2014;29(8):1275–90.
13.
RavaudJ-F, MadiotB, VilleI. Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment. Social Science & Medicine. 1992;35(8):951–8.
14.
AmeriM, SchurL, AdyaM, BentleyFS, McKayP, KruseD. The disability employment puzzle: a field experiment on employer hiring behavior. ILR Review. 2015;71(2):329–64.
15.
SnyderLA, CarmichaelJS, BlackwellLV, ClevelandJN, ThorntonGC. Perceptions of discrimination and justice among employees with disabilities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 2010;22(1):5–19.
16.
ChanF, McMahonBT, CheingG, RosenthalDA, BezyakJ. Drivers of workplace discrimination against people with disabilities: The utility of attribution theory. Work. 2005;25(1):77–88.
17.
Van WierenTA, ReidCA, McMahonBT. Workplace discrimination and autism spectrum disorders: The National EEOC Americans with Disabilities Act Research project. Work. 2008;31(3):299–308.
18.
McMahonBT, WestSL, MansouriM, BelongiaL. Workplace discrimination and diabetes: The EEOC Americans with Disabilities Act research project. Work. 2005;25(1):9–18.
19.
HammelJ, SymonsJ. Evaluating Reasonable Accomodation in the Workplace: A Team Approach. Work. 1993;3(4):12–20.
20.
NeathJ, RoesslerRT, McMahonBT, RumrillPD. Patterns in perceived employment discrimination for adults with multiple sclerosis. Work. 2007;29(3):255–74.
21.
GewurtzRE, LanganS, ShandD. Hiring people with disabilities: A scoping review. Work. 2016;54(1):135–48.
22.
GoldbergSG, KilleenMB, O’dayB. The disclosure conundrum: How people with psychiatric disabilities navigate employment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2005;11(3):463–500.
23.
AntonakR, LivnehH. Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2000;22(5):211–24.
24.
AmodioDM, MendozaSA. Implicit intergroup bias: Cognitive, affective, and motivational underpinnings. In: Gawronski B, Payne BK, editors. Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York City: Guilford Press; 2011:353-74.
25.
DovidioJF, GaertnerSL, AnastasioPA, SanitiosoRK. Cognitive and motivational bases of bias: Implications of aversive racism for attitudes toward Hispanics. In: Knouse SB, Rosenfeld P, Culbertson A, editors. Hispanics in the workplace. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications; 1992:75-106.
26.
DovidioJF, GaertnerSL. Aversive racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2004;36(1):1–52.
27.
GaertnerSL, DovidioJF. The aversive form of racism. In: Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF, editors. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Theory and research. Orlando: Academic Press; 1986:61-89.
28.
NailPR, HartonHC, DeckerBP. Political orientation and modern versus aversive racism: Tests of Dovidio and Gaertner’s (1998) integrated model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;84(4):754–70.
29.
DovidioJF, MannJ, GaertnerSL. Resistance to affirmative action: The implications of aversive racism. In: Blanchard F, Crosby FJ, editors. Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer; 1989.
30.
DovidioJF, GaertnerSL. Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science. 2000;11(4):319–23.
31.
LintonS. Claiming Disability, Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press; 1998.
32.
Kumari-CampbellF. Contours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire. London: Palgrave MacMillan; 2009.
LauerEA, HoutenvilleAJ. 2017 Annual Disability Statistics Compendium. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability; 2018.
35.
KarpinskiA, HiltonJL. Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;81(5):774–88.
36.
AabergVA. A path to greater inclusivity through understanding implicit attitudes toward disability. The Journal of nursing education. 2012;51(9):505–10.
37.
GreenwaldAG, NosekBA, BanajiMR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85(12):197–16.
38.
XuK, NosekB, GreenwaldA. Psychology data from the race implicit association test on the project implicit demo website. Journal of Open Psychology Data. 2014;2(1):e1–e3.
39.
HoffD. Disability, unemployment, and poverty. Communities and Banking. Fall. 2013:16-8.
40.
HarrisLT, FiskeST. Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2007;2(1):45–51.
41.
ReidK, StoughtonEH, SmithRM. The humorous construction of disability: ‘Stand-up’ comedians in the United States. Disability & Society. 2006;21(6):629–43.
42.
SusmanJ. Disability, stigma and deviance. Social Science & Medicine. 1994;38(1):15–22.
43.
LukyanovaVV, BalcazarFE, OberoiAK, Suarez-BalcazarY. Employment outcomes among African Americans and Whites with mental illness. Work. 2014;48(3):319–28.
44.
RandolphDS. The meaning of workplace discrimination for women with disabilities. Work. 2005;24(4):369–80.
45.
JuliusE, WolfsonH, Yalon-ChamovitzS. Equally unequal: Gender discrimination in the workplace among adults with mental retardation. Work. 2003;20(3):205–13.
46.
TringoJL. The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups. The Journal of Special Education. 1970;4(3):295–306.
47.
BoneKM. Trapped behind the glass: crip theory and disability identity. Disability & Society. 2017;32(9):1297–314.
48.
MarotoM, PettinicchioD. Twenty-Five Years after the ADA: Situating Disability in America’s System of Stratification. Disability Studies Quarterly. 2015;35(3).
KistlerDS. A Business Case for Disability Human Rights?-Assessing affirmative action measures as a tool for enhancing the right to work and employment of persons with disabilities (Master’s thesis). Oslo: University of Oslo; 2015.
51.
BataviaAI, SchrinerK. The Americans With Disabilities Act as engine of social change: Models of disability and the potential of a civil rights approach. Policy Studies Journal. 2001;29(4):690–702.
52.
HahnH. Antidiscrimination laws and social research on disability: The minority group perspective. In: Blanck P, editor. Disability Rights. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 2005:343-61.
NielsenLB, NelsonRL, LancasterR. Individual justice or collective legal mobilization? Employment discrimination litigation in the post civil rights United States. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2010;7(2):175–201.
60.
United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights (217 [III] A). Paris: Author; 1948.
