Return-to-work (RTW)/back-to-work (BTW) interventions that are designed to rehabilitate individuals impaired from fulfilling employment roles are facing challenges. Ethics discourses, including ethics theories, principles and concepts, are meant to give guidance on what one ought to do or not to do and RTW professionals could use them to respond to their challenges.
OBJECTIVE:
A scoping review was performed to investigate to what extent 33 ethics concepts, theories, and principles are employed in RTW/BTW academic literature, and to what extent RTW/BTW is engaged with in ethics linked academic journals.
METHODS:
Three academic databases were searched, and 147 article results were extracted from our literature review to be thematically analyzed.
RESULTS:
Searches with n = 11 ethics concepts and n = 4 ethics theories generated results. The content of 20 RTW/BTW article results demonstrated conceptual engagement between RTW and ethics discourses. Only one article in ethics-related journals conceptually engaged with RTW/BTW.
CONCLUSION:
Ethics theories and principles were not used extensively in RTW/BTW academic literature and RTW/BTW is a topic under-engaged within ethics-related journals. Our findings indicate opportunities for further research, like conducting interviews, to better understand our findings and how to respond to them.
Stergiou-KitaM, MollS, WalshA, GewurtzR. Health professionals, advocacy and return to work: Taking up the challenge. Work. 2010;37(2):217–23.
2.
MaiwaldK, MeershoekA, de RijkA, NijhuisFJN. Policy on professional support in return-to-work: Occupational health professionals’ experiences in a Canadian setting. Work. 2016;53(1):143–56.
3.
SaundersSL, MacEachenE, NedelecB. Understanding and building upon effort to return to work for people with long-term disability and job loss. Work. 2015;52(1):103–14.
4.
SaundersS, NedelecB. What work means to people with work disability: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2014;24(1):100–10.
5.
DellveL, FallmanS, AhlstromL. Return to work from long-term sick leave: A six-year prospective study of the importance of adjustment latitudes at work and home. International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health. 2016;89(1):171–9.
6.
PremjiS. Barriers to return-to-Work for linguistic minorities in Ontario: An analysis of narratives from appeal decisions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2015;25(2):357–67.
OpsahlJ, EriksenHR, TveitoTH. Do expectancies of return to work and Job satisfaction predict actual return to work in workers with long lasting LBP?BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016;17:1–10.
9.
Stergiou-KitaM, YantziA, WanJ.The personal and workplace factors relevant to work readiness evaluation following acquired brain injury: Occupational therapists’ perceptions. Brain Injury. 2010;24(7/8):948–58.
10.
Stergiou-KitaM, MansfieldE, DaiterL, ColantonioA. Good intentions? Employer representative conceptualizations and challenges to the workplace accommodation process: The case of electrical injuries. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal. 2015;27(1):1–25.
11.
TregowethJ, WaltonJA, ReedK. The experiences of people who re-enter the workforce following discharge from a forensic hospital. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2012;37(1):49–62.
12.
Stergiou-KitaM, MansfieldE, SokoloffS, ColantonioA. Gender influences on return to work after mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2016;97:S40–S45.
13.
ŠvajgeraA, WindingK. Perceptions of possibilities of returning to work with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Work. 2009;32(4):443–54.
14.
DurandM-J, NastasiaI, CoutuM-F, BernierM. Practices of return-to-Work coordinators working in large organizations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2017;27(1):137–47.
15.
KarenR, Ellie, HatchardK, HendersonJ, StantonS. Workers’ perspectives on self-directing mainstream return to work following acute mental illness: Reflections on partnerships. Work. 2012;43(1):43–52.
16.
PetitA, RozenbergS, FassierJB, RousseauS, MairiauxP, RoquelaureY. Pre-return-to-work medical consultation for low back pain workers. Good practice recommendations based on systematic review and expert consensus. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;58(5):298–304.
17.
SturessonM, EdlundC, FalkdalAH, BernspångB. Healthcare encounters and return to work: A qualitative study on sick-listed patients’ experiences. Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK). 2014;15(4):464–75.
18.
van HalLBE, MeershoekA, de RijkA, NijhuisF. Going beyond vocational rehabilitation as a training of skills: Return-to-work as an identity issue. Disabil Soc. 2012;27(1):81–93.
19.
WolbringG. Employment, disabled people and robots: What is the narrative in the academic literature and Canadian newspapers?Societies. 2016;6(2):15.
20.
BallN, WolbringG. Cognitive enhancement: Perceptions among parents of children with disabilities. Neuroethics. 2014;7:345–64.
21.
SirianniS, WolbringG. Lack of ethical reasoning in the innovcation narrative of occupational therapy and occupational science. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics. 2017;27(2):53–62.
22.
FryerM. A role for ethics theory in speculative business ethics teaching. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016;138(1):79–90.
23.
MagelssenM, PedersenR, FørdeR. Four roles of ethical theory in clinical ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics. 2016;16(9):26–33.
24.
GarrettJR. The poverty of value clarification: Using ethical theory to critique and transcend the “hivens” of clinical ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics. 2016;16(9):48–51.
25.
BaylisF, KennyNP, SherwinS. A relational account of public health ethics. Public Health Ethics. 2008;1(3):196–209.
26.
SherwinS. Looking backwards, looking forward: Hope for bioethics’ next twenty five years. Bioethics. 2011;25(2):75–82.
27.
RudmanDL, MolkeD. Forever productive: The discursive shaping of later life workers in contemporary Canadian newspapers. Work. 2009;32(4):377–89.
28.
KvamL, VikK. Discourses of participation in work among men and women in vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Occupational Science. 2015;22(3):345–57.
29.
KvamL, EideAH. Gender differences in the importance of participation associated with injured workers/persons perceived barriers to returning to work in the context of vocational rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):78–85.
TondaniD. Universal basic income and negative income tax: Two different ways of thinking redistribution. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2009;38(2):246–55.
33.
StraubhaarT. On the economics of a universal basic income. Intereconomics. 2017;52(2):74–80.
34.
ButaruLT. Towards a universal basic income. An evolutionary approach. Studia Europaea. 2017;62(3):81–103.
35.
StoneD. Behind the jargon: Moral hazard. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law. 2011;36(5):886–96.
36.
ArnoldD. Misapplying moral hazard in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2016;16(7):41–2.
37.
TumennasanN. Moral hazard and stability. Social Choice and Welfare. 2014;43(3):659–82.
38.
WalkerRL, FloreaL. Easy-come-easy-go: Moral hazard in the context of return to education. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;120(2):201–17.
39.
DoganMK. Transparency and political moral hazard. Public Choice. 2010;142(1/2):215–35.
40.
JacobsonN, SilvaDS. Dignity promotion and beneficence. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2010;7(4):365–72.
PowersTM. Deontology. In: MitchamC, editor. Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics. 2. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA; 2005, pp. 496–9.
43.
MisselbrookD. Duty, Kant, and deontology. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(609):211.
44.
HainR, SaadT. Foundations of practical ethics. Medicine. 2016;44(10):578–82.
45.
SpielthennerG. The principle-based method of practical ethics. Health Care Analysis. 2017;25(3):275–89.
46.
Schor NFMDP. Comment: Autonomy vs beneficence. Neurology. 2014;83(15):1370.
47.
GardnerM. Beneficence and procreation. Philosophical Studies. 2016;173(2):321–36.
48.
de VriesMC, VerhagenAAE. A case against something that Is not the case: The Groningen Protocol and the moral principle of non-maleficence. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2008;8(11):29–31.
49.
CaseyP. Beneficence and non-maleficence: Confidentiality and carers in psychiatry. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2015;33(4):203–6.
50.
LeeLM. Public Health ethics theory: Review and path to convergence. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2012;40(1):85–98.
51.
SassH-M. Asian and European roots of bioethics. Asian Bioethics Review. 2009;1(3):185–197.
52.
PetriniC. Theoretical models and operational frameworks in public health ethics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010;7(1):189–202.
53.
KrollB. Arguing about Public Issues: What can we learn from practical ethics?Rhetoric Review. 1997;16(1):105–19.
54.
VeruggioG, editor The euron roboethics roadmap. Humanoid Robots, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on; 2006: IEEE.
55.
KopacekP, HershM. Roboethics. Ethical Engineering for International Development and Environmental Sustainability: U; 2015. p. 65–102.
56.
MajeedA. Roboethics-making sense of ethical conundrums. Procedia computer science. 2017;105:310–5.
57.
DiepL, CabibihanJ-J, WolbringG. Social Robotics through an Anticipatory Governance Lens. In: BeetzM, JohnstonB, WilliamsM-A, editors. Social Robotics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 8755: Springer International Publishing; 2014, pp. 115–24.
58.
ParviainenJ, PirhonenJ. Vulnerable Bodies in Human–Robot Interactions: Embodiment as Ethical Issue in Robot Care for the Elderly. Transformations. 2017;29:105–115.
59.
NokelainenP, NevalainenT, NiemiK. Mind or Machine? Opportunities and Limits of Automation. The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace: Springer; 2018. p. 13–24.
60.
PrahlA, EnrightRD. Forgiving Computers: The rise of automation and implications for counseling. Counseling and Values. 2017;62(2):144–58.
61.
ChoiY, BakerB. The impact of automation on business and employment in South Korea. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2017;14(4):23–37.
62.
EtzioniA, EtzioniO. The ethics of robotic caregivers. Interaction Studies. 2017;18(2):174–90.
63.
LeenesR, PalmeriniE, KoopsB-J, BertoliniA, SalviniP, LuciveroF. Regulatory challenges of robotics: Some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation & Technology. 2017;9(1):1–44.
64.
GruioniuO. The universal basic income and a new welfare state. Revista de Stiinte Politice. 2013;37/38(January–April):132–40.
65.
Van ParijsP. The universal basic income: Why utopian thinking matters, and how sociologists can contribute to it*. Politics & Society. 2013;41(2):171–82.
66.
ChakrabortiA, RainaD, SharmaK. Can an interdisciplinary field contribute to one of the parent disciplines from which it emerged?The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2016;225(17):3127–35.
67.
TillyC. Three visions of history and theory. History and Theory. 2007;46(2):299–307.
68.
WhettenDA, FelinT, KingBG. The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. J Manage. 2009;35(3):537–63.
69.
VertovecS. Migration and other modes of transnationalism: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. International Migration Review. 2003;37(3):641–65.
70.
SigelmanL, Goldfarb,RS. The diffusion of concepts from economics to political science: Disciplinary dependency meets disciplinary imperalism. SSRN. 2008.
71.
BeauchampTL, ChildressJF. The principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.
72.
LisitzaA, WolbringG. Sustainability within the academic EcoHealth literature: Existing engagement and future prospects. Sustainability. 2016;8(3):202.
73.
GrantMJ, BoothA. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108.
ArkseyH, O’MalleyL. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32.
76.
PhamMT, RajićA, GreigJD, SargeantJM, PapadopoulosA, McEwenSA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85.
77.
DavisK, DreyN, GouldD. What are scoping studies?A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009;46(10):1386–400.
78.
DalyKJ. Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks, California, United States: Sage; 2007.
79.
MayringP. Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2000;1(2):online no pages.
80.
BaxterP, JackS. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 2008;13(4):544–59.
81.
LincolnYS, GubaEG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications; 1985.
82.
ShentonAK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information. 2004;22(2):63–75.
83.
BaxterP, JackS. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 2008;13(4):544–559.
84.
ConnVS, ValentineJC, CooperHM, RantzMJ. Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nursing Research. 2003;52(4):256–61.
85.
DwyerCP, DurandH, MacNeelaP, ReynoldsB, HammRM, MainCJ, et al.Effectiveness of a biopsychosocial e-learning intervention on the clinical judgements of medical students and GP trainees regarding future risk of disability in patients with chronic lower back pain: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5).
86.
StirlingBV, HarmstonJ, AlsobayelH. An educational programme for nursing college staff and students during a MERS- coronavirus outbreak in Saudi Arabia. BMC Nursing. 2015;14(1):1–7.
87.
WekslerB, PolliceM, SouzaZBB, GavinaR. Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel to electrocautery in patients undergoing endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2009;88(4):1138–41.
88.
MüellerD, SauerlandS, NeugebauerEAM, ImmenrothM. Reported effects in randomized controlled trials were compared with those of nonrandomized trials in cholecystectomy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010;63(10):1082–90.
89.
SamsonA, LavigneRM, MacPhersonP. Self-fulfillment despite barriers: Volunteer work of people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2009;21(11):1425–31.
90.
SheweyHM. GN management. Identification and assistance for chemically dependent nurses working in long-term care. Geriatric Nursing. 1997;18(3):115–8.
91.
SheweyHM. Identification and assistance for chemically dependent nurses working in long-term care: Gaining a better understanding of the disease and educating all levels of staff is an appropriate and effective way to intervene with the chemically dependent nurse. Geriatric Nursing. 1997;18(3):115–8.
92.
BrumbackGB. Getting the right people ethically. Public Personnel Management. 1996;25(3):267–76.
93.
DesaiR, RobertsR. Deficiencies in the Code of Conduct: The AICPA rhetoric surrounding the tax return preparation outsourcing disclosure rules. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013;114(3):457–71.
94.
StoneSD. Workers without work: Injured workers and well-Being. Journal of Occupational Science. 2003;10(1):7–13.
95.
KochL, EgbertN, CoelingH, AyersD. Returning to work after the onset of illness: Experiences of right hemisphere stroke survivors. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2005;48(4):209–18.
96.
RyanCG, LauchlanD, RooneyL, Hollins MartinsC, GrayH. Returning to work after long term sickness absence due to low back pain – the struggle within: A qualitative study of the patient’s experience. Work. 2014;49(3):433–44.
97.
Van Den AkkerC. The impact of psychosocial factors on claims outcomes in the group income protection market: Findings from a prospective pilot study. Int J Disabil Manage Res. 2014;9.
98.
Quick return to work. Professional Safety. 1996;41(7):1.
99.
WeirR, NielsonWR, SmithB, GribbinM. Interventions for disability management. Clinical Journal of Pain. 2001;17(4 SUPPL.):S128–S32.
100.
CollinsA, CartwrightS. Why come into work ill?Individual and organizational factors underlying presenteeism. Employee Relat. 2012;34(4):429–42.
101.
GroverC, StewartJ. Modernizing Social Security? Labour and its welfare-to-work strategy. Social Policy & Administration. 2000;34(3):235–52.
102.
MackenzieCR. ‘It is hard for mums to put themselves first’: How mothers diagnosed with breast cancer manage the sociological boundaries between paid work, family and caring for the self. Social Science & Medicine. 2014;117:96–106.
103.
MaguireB, BergerV, JoyceM. Do psychosocial factors influence return to employment following liver transplantation?Transplant Nurses Journal. 2013;22(3):19–26.
104.
HabeckRV, HuntHA, SaundersJ. Economic incentives and disincentives in vocational rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 1997;8(2):263–82.
105.
LemstraM, OlszynskiWP, EnrightW. The sensitivity and specificity of functional capacity evaluations in determining maximal effort: A randomized trial. Spine. 2004;29(9):953–9.
106.
KulichRJ, DriscollS, ScrivoniSJ, McAlaryP, MehtaN. A survey of medico-legal practice patterns among pain specialists. Pain Medicine. 2004;5(1):98–103.
107.
CooleC, RadfordK, GrantM, TerryJ. Returning to work after stroke: Perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2013;23(3):406–18.
108.
LevineSB, RisenCB, AlthofSE. Professionals who sexually offend: Evaluation procedures and preliminary findings. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 1994;20(4):288–302.
109.
CapozziJD, RhodesR, GantsoudesG, CapozziJD, RhodesR, GantsoudesG. Ethics in practice. Terminating the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume. 2008;90(1):208–10.
110.
StenbergG, HolmnerEP, StalnackeBM, EnthovenP. Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care - a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2016;38(20-21):2085–94.
111.
HadjistavropoulosT, BielingP. File review consultation in the adjudication of mental health and chronic pain disability claims. Consulting Psychology Journal. 2001;53(1):52–63.
112.
MokokaMT, RataemaneST, dos SantosM. Disability claims on psychiatric grounds in the South African context: A review. South African Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;18(2):34–41.
113.
BrijnathB, MazzaD, KosnyA, BunzliS, SinghN, RuseckaiteR, et al.Is clinician refusal to treat an emerging problem in injury compensation systems?BMJ Open. 2016;6(1).
114.
de GaudemarisR. Clinical issues: Return to work and public safety. Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa). 2000;15(1):223–30, v.
115.
HaylettC. Class, care, and welfare reform: Reading meanings, talking feelings. Environment and Planning A. 2003;35(5):799–814.
116.
YueAR. Acquired disability and returning to work: Towards a stakeholder approach. Journal of Workplace Rights. 2008;13(1):73–91.
117.
SiuGE, WightD, SeeleyJ. How a masculine work ethic and economic circumstances affect uptake of HIV treatment: Experiences of men from an artisanal gold mining community in rural eastern Uganda. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2012;15(Suppl 1):1–9.
118.
SeingI, MacEachenE, EkbergK, StahlC. Return to work or job transition? Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2015;37(18-19):1760–9.
119.
StåhlC, MüssenerU, SvenssonT. Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: Experiences of four actors. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2012;34(16):1404–11.
120.
StåhlC, MacEachenE, LippelK. Ethical perspectives in work disability prevention and return to work: Toward a common vocabulary for analyzing stakeholders’ actions and interactions. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;120(2):237–50.
LinKH, LinKY, SiuKC. Systematic review: Effect of psychiatric symptoms on return to work after occupational injury. Occupational Medicine. 2016;66(7):514–21.
123.
CarneyT. Reforming social security: Improving incentives and capabilities?Griffith Law Review. 2007;16(1):1–26.
124.
RobisonGA. Addiction treatment for the nurse. Orthopaedic Nursing. 1994;13(6):33–6.
125.
NolanP. Practise what you preach: Helping service users find dignity through work. Mental Health Practice. 2007;10(6):16–9.
126.
DwyerRE. Student work and paying for college: How the jobs crisis affects college affordability. Research in the Sociology of Work2016. p. 129–53.
127.
FrazierLM, MillerVA, MillerBE, HorbeltDV, DelmoreJE, Ahlers-SchmidtCR. Cancer-related tasks involving employment: Opportunities for clinical assistance. Journal of Supportive Oncology. 2009;7(6):229–36.
128.
LippelK. Preserving workers’ dignity in workers’ compensation systems: An international perspective. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2012;55(6):519–36.
129.
StapelfeldtCM, LabriolaM, JensenAB, AndersenNT, MomsenA-MH, NielsenCV. Municipal return to work management in cancer survivors undergoing cancer treatment: A protocol on a controlled intervention study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–11.
130.
CamfieldD. Neoliberalism and working-class resistance in British Columbia: The hospital employees’ union struggle, 2002-2004. Labour / Le Travail. 2006;57:9–41.
131.
AmineS, OuattaraP. The effect of incentive return-to-work policies on single-parent families: A comparative approach / Podsticajne mere za povratak samohranih roditelja na tržište rada: Uporedni pristup. European Journal of Applied Economics. 2015;12(2):9–15.
132.
VidorC, LeroyerA, ChristopheV, SeillierM, FoncelJ, Van de MaëleJ, et al.Decrease social inequalities return-to-work: Development and design of a randomised controlled trial among women with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):1–20.
133.
RortyR. Can American egalitarianism survive a globalized economy?Business Ethics Quarterly. 1998(1):1–6.
134.
KaufmanG, WhiteD. “For the good of our family”: Men’s attitudes toward their wives’ employment. Journal of Family Issues. 2016;37(11):1585–610.
135.
WeldonWC. Future agenda for government-industry relations. Ethics and the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2005, pp. 282–99.
136.
BarrDA. The ethics of withholding care: As good as it gets. The Picture of Health: Medical Ethics and the Movies2015. p. 1–5.
137.
CheungJ, WolbringG. Staff’s views from one Canadian organ procurement organization on organ donation and organ transplant technologies: A content analysis. NanoEthics. 2017;11(2):187–202.
138.
StåhlC, ToomingasA, ÅborgC, EkbergK, KjellbergK. Promoting occupational health interventions in early return to work by implementing financial subsidies: A Swedish case study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1).
139.
BialkaCS, MorroD. “What’s disability got to do with it?” Examining ability privilege in a disability studies course. Journal of College and Character. 2017;18(1):28–45.
140.
WolbringG. Ethical theories and discourses through an ability expectations and ableism lens: The case of enhancement and global regulation. Asian Bioethics Review. 2012;4(4):293–309.
141.
RoseLM. Legally public but privately practiced: Segregating the lactating body. Health Communication. 2012;27(1):49–57.
142.
MittyE. Iatrogenesis, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. Geriatric Nursing. 2010;31(5):368–74.
143.
ThomasJC. An agenda for public health ethics. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice July/August. 2008;14(4):329–31.
