Physically demanding occupations such as the military, firefighting and law enforcement have adopted physical employment standards (PES). The intent of PES is to match the physical capacity of personnel with the physical demands of job tasks. Inadequate physical capacity can affect occupational task performance as well musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) risk.
OBJECTIVE:
To present contemporary evidence on the relationship(s) between PES, physical training, physical capacity and MSKI in physically demanding occupations, and provide recommendations regarding physical training for improved occupational performance and reduced MSKI risk.
METHODS:
This narrative review draws on evidence from 104 published sources.
RESULTS:
Physical training is central to the development and maintenance of occupationally-relevant physical capacity, as well as mitigating MSKI risk associated with job performance. In addition, given the prevalence of manual handling tasks, strength training needs to be emphasised in physical training regimen.
CONCLUSIONS:
PES development can inform both physical training and injury prevention strategies in physically demanding occupations. Furthermore, a physical performance continuum is essential to through-career maintenance of occupational performance and health, and the preservation of organisational capability. Finally, organisations should consider the potential to implement PES as maximal performance tests to better understand the relationship between occupational task performance and MSKI risk.
RobertsD, et al.Current considerations related to physiological differences between the sexes and physical employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 (Suppl. 2)):S108–20.
2.
GreevesJP. Physiological implications, performance assessment and risk mitigation strategies of women in combat-centric occupations. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:S94–100.
ReillyT, et al.The influence of anthropometrics on physical employment standard performance. Occup Med. 2016;66(7):576–9.
5.
MilliganGS, et al.Validity and reliability of physical employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 (Suppl. 2)):S83–91.
6.
JamnikV, GumienakR, GledhillN. Developing legally defensible physiological employment standards for prominent physically demanding public safety occupations: A Canadian perspective. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(10):2447–57.
7.
PetersenSR, et al.Towards best practice in physical and physiological employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 (Suppl. 2):S47–62.
8.
PayneW, HarveyJ. A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards. Ergonomics. 2010;53(7):858–71.
9.
FoulisSA, et al.U.S. army physical demands study:Development of the occupational physical assessment test for combat arms soldiers. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:S74–8.
10.
TaylorN, BillingD. Physiological and physical employment standards. in First Australian Conference on Physiological and Physical Employment Standards. Canberra, Australia: University Of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, 2012.
11.
LarsenB, AisbettB. Subjective job task analyses for physically demanding occupations: What is best practice? Ergonomics. 2012;55(10):1266–77.
12.
SharpMA, et al.U.S. Army physical demands study: Identification and validation of the physically demanding tasks of combat arms occupations. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:S62–7.
13.
CarstairsGL, et al.A method for developing organisation-wide manual handling based physical employment standards in a military context. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(11):1162–7.
14.
KnapikJJ, ReynoldsKL, HarmanE. Soldier load carriage: Historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med. 2004;169(1):45–56.
15.
SharpM, RosenbergerM, KnapikJ. Common military task: Materials handling. NATO. 2009.
16.
SolJA, et al.Metabolic demand of hiking in wildland firefighting. Wilderness Environ Med. 2018;29(3):304–14.
17.
GledhillN, JamnikVK. Characterization of the physical demands of firefighting. Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17(3):207–13.
18.
PhillipsM, et al.Identification of physically demanding tasks performed during bushfire suppression by Australian rural firefighters. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(2):435–41.
19.
RoyTC, et al.Lifting tasks are associated with injuries during the early portion of a deployment to afghanistan. Mil Med. 2012;177(6):716–22.
20.
RoyTC, et al.Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries for soldiers deployed to afghanistan. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012;83(11):1060–6.
21.
RoyTC, LopezHP, PivaSR.. Loads worn by soldiers predict episodes of low back pain during deployment to afghanistan. Spine. 2013;38(15):1310–7.
22.
KnapikJJ, et al.Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6):946–54.
23.
BellNS, et al.High injury rates among female army trainees: A function of gender? Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3 Suppl):141–6.
24.
BlackerSD, et al.Risk factors for training injuries among british army recruits. Mil Med. 2008;173:278–86.
25.
LarocheM, et al.Comparison Of Force Test Results And Injuries At Canadian Forces Leadership And Recruit School, in Canadian Institute of Military Veterans Health Research. Regina, SK, Canada. 2018.
26.
HauretKG, et al.Musculoskeletal injuries: Description of an under-recognized injury problem among military personnel. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(1):S61–S70.
27.
BellNS, et al.The changing profile of disability in the U.S. Army: 1981-2005. Disabil Health J. 2008;1(1):14–24.
28.
SharpMA, et al.Physical fitness and body composition after a 9-month deployment to afghanistan. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(9):1687–92.
29.
DyrstadSM, et al.Physical fitness, training volume, and self-determined motivation in soldiers during a peacekeeping mission. Mil Med. 2007;172:121–7.
30.
RuzicL, et al.Increased occupational physical activity does not improve physical fitness. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(12):983–5.
31.
TomkinsonGR, OldsTS, eds Secular Trends and Geographic Variability. In Pediatric Fitness (Vol. 50, 46-66). Karger Publishers.
32.
Bigland-RitchieB, et al.Central and peripheral fatigue in sustained maximum voluntary contractions of human quadriceps muscle. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1978;54(6):609–14.
33.
van MechelenW, et al.Physical activity of young people: The Amsterdam Longitudinal Growth and Health Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):1610–6.
34.
VandewaterEA, ShimM, CaplovitzAG. Linking obesity and activity level with children’s television and video game use. J Adolesc. 2004;27(1):71–85.
35.
SanttilaM, et al.Physical fitness profiles in young Finnish men during the years 1975-2004. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(11):1990–4.
36.
KusyK, ZielińskiJ. Aerobic capacity in speed-power athletes aged 20–90 years vs endurance runners and untrained participants. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(1):68–79.
37.
JacksonAS, et al.Role of lifestyle and aging on the longitudinal change in cardiorespiratory fitness. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1781–7.
38.
SeilerKS, SpirdusoWW, MartinJC. Gender differences in rowing performance and power with aging. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(1):121–7.
39.
LarssonL, GrimbyG, KarlssonJ. Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol. 1979;46(3):451–6.
40.
PeakeJ, et al.The health and cost implications of high body mass index in Australian defence force personnel. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):451.
41.
KodamaS, et al.Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(19):2024–35.
42.
SaupeK, SothmannM, JasenofD. Aging and the fitness of fire fighters: The complex issues involved in abolishing mandatory retirement ages. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(9):1192–4.
43.
AbtJ, et al.Effects of age and military service on strength and physiological characteristics of U.S. Army Soldiers. Mil Med. 2016;181(2):173–9.
44.
WalkerA, et al.The ageing Australian firefighter: An argument for age-based recruitment and fitness standards for urban fire services. Ergonomics. 2014;57(4):612–21.
45.
GerberM, et al.Fitness moderates the relationship between stress and cardiovascular risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(11):2075–81.
46.
TraustadóttirT, BoschPR, MattKS. The HPA axis response to stress in women: Effects of aging and fitness. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30(4):392–402.
47.
TaylorMK, et al.Physical fitness influences stress reactions to extreme military training. Mil Med. 2008;173(8):738–42.
48.
TyyskäJ, et al.Association with physical fitness, serum hormones and sleep during a 15-day military field training. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(3):356–9.
49.
TuchC, et al.Physical fitness level affects perception of chronic stress in military trainees. Stress Health. 2017;33(5):490–7.
50.
HamerM, SteptoeA. Association between physical fitness, parasympathetic control, and proinflammatory responses to mental stress. Psychosomatic Med. 2007;69(7):660–6.
51.
GroellerH, et al.How effective is initial military-specific training in the development of physical performance of soldiers?J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:S158–62.
52.
WilliamsAG, RaysonMP, JonesBH. Effects of basic training on material handling ability and physical fitness of British Army recruits. Ergonomics. 1999;42(8):1114–24.
53.
BrockJR, LeggSJ. The effects of 6 weeks training on the physical fitness of female recruits to the British army. Ergonomics. 1997;40(3):400–11.
54.
LeggSJ, DugganA. The effects of basic training on aerobic fitness and muscular strength and endurance of British Army recruits. Ergonomics. 1996;39(12):1403–18.
55.
BurleySD, et al.Positive, limited and negative responders: The variability in physical fitness adaptation to basic military training. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21:1168–72.
56.
DyrstadSM, et al.Physical fitness and physical training during norwegian military service. Mil Med. 2006;171:736–41.
57.
SanttilaM, et al.Cardiovascular and neuromuscular performance responses induced by 8 weeks of basic training followed by 8 weeks of specialized military training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(3).
58.
CamposGE, et al.Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: Specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;88(1):50–60.
59.
GormleySE, et al.Effect of intensity of aerobic training on VO 2 max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(7):1336.
60.
HendricksonNR, et al.Combined resistance and endurance training improves physical capacity and performance on tactical occupational tasks. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(6):1197–208.
61.
SanttilaM, et al.Effects of basic training on acute physiological responses to a combat loaded run test. Mil Med. 2010;175(4):273–9.
62.
WilliamsAG, RaysonMP, JonesDA. Resistance training and the enhancement of the gains in material-handling ability and physical fitness of British Army recruits during basic training. Ergonomics. 2002;45(4):267–79.
63.
KnapikJJ, et al.A systematic review of the effects of physical training on load carriage performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(2):585–97.
64.
SanttilaM, et al.Changes in cardiovascular performance during an 8-week military basic training period combined with added endurance or strength training. Mil Med. 2008;173(12):1173–9.
65.
SharpMA, et al.Physical fitness of soldiers entering and leaving Basic Combat Training. DTIC Document, T00-13, 2000, pp. 44.
66.
DrainJR, et al.Hormonal response patterns are differentially influenced by physical conditioning programs during basic military training. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:S98–103.
67.
DrainJ, BurleyS, GroellerH. Investigation of an alternate physical conditioning regimen for australian army recruits. DST Group, TN-1537. 2016, p. 51.
68.
GordonNF, et al.The south african defence force physical training programme. Part I. Effect of 1 year’s militarytraining on endurance fitness. Sth African Med J. 1986;69(8):477–82.
69.
SörensenL, et al.Physical activity, fitness and body composition of finnish police officers: A 15-year follow-up study. Occup Med. 2000;50(1):3–10.
70.
BillingDC, DrainJR.. International congress on soldiers’ physical performance 2017: Research priorities across the service members operational lifecycle. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:S1–3.
71.
FyfeJJ, BishopDJ, SteptoNK. Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: Molecular bases and the role of individual training variables. Sports Med. 2014;44(6):743–62.
72.
SabagA, et al.The compatibility of concurrent high intensity interval training and resistance training for muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Sci. 2018;36(21):2472–83.
73.
JonesTW, et al.Performance and endocrine responses to differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(3):693–702.
74.
WilsonJM, et al.Concurrent training: A meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2293–307.
75.
RobineauJ, et al.Specific training effects of concurrent aerobic and strength exercises depend on recovery duration. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(3):672–83.
76.
JonesTW, et al.Performance and neuromuscular adaptations following differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3342–51.
77.
KraemerWJ, et al.Effects of concurrent resistance and aerobic training on load-bearing performance and the army physical fitness test. Mil Med. 2004;169(12):6.
78.
HarmanEA, et al.Effects of two different eight-week training programs on military physical performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(2):524–34.
79.
WilliamsAG, RaysonMP, JonesDA, Training diagnosis for a load carriage taskJ Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(1):30–4.
80.
WilkinsonDM, RaysonMP, BilzonJLJ. A physical demands analysis of the 24-week British Army Parachute Regiment recruit training syllabus. Ergonomics. 2008;51(5):649–62.
81.
CardenPPJ, et al.Force and acceleration characteristics of military foot drill: Implications for injury risk in recruits. BMJ Open Sport & Exerc Med. 2015;1(1).
82.
HavenetidisK, KardarisD, PaxinosT. Profiles of musculoskeletal injuries among greek army officer cadets during basic combat training. Mil Med. 2011;176(3):297–303.
83.
BullockSH, et al.Prevention of physical training–related injuries: Recommendations for the military and other active populations based on expedited systematic reviews. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(1, Supplement):S156–81.
84.
WardleSL, GreevesJP. Mitigating the risk of musculoskeletal injury: A systematic review of the most effective injury prevention strategies for military personnel. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:S3–S10.
85.
TrankTV, et al.Running mileage, movement mileage, and fitness in male U.S. Navy recruits. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6):1033–8.
86.
WestcottWL, et al.Comparison of two exercise protocols on fitness score improvement in poorly conditioned air force personnel. Percept Mot & Skills. 2007;104(2):629–36.
87.
LundbergTR, et al.Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(1):81–9.
88.
LundbergTR, Fernandez-GonzaloR, TeschPA. Exercise induced AMPK activation does not interfere with muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in men. J Appl Physiol. 2014;116(6):611–20.
89.
PaavolainenL, et al.Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(5):1527–33.
90.
RønnestadBR, MujikaI. Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(4):603–12.
91.
PunnettL, WegmanDH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):13–23.
92.
LismanP, et al.Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(4):636–43.
93.
TaanilaHP, et al.Predictors of low back pain in physically active conscripts with special emphasis on muscular fitness. Spine J. 2012;12(9):737–48.
94.
KnapikJJ, et al.The fitness training unit in U.S. Army basic combat training: Physical fitness, training outcomes, and injuries. Mil Med. 2001;166(4):356–61.
95.
ValimakiVV, et al.Risk factors for clinical stress fractures in male military recruits: A prospective cohort study. Bone. 2005)37.
96.
CraigBN, et al.Correlation of injury occurrence data with estimated maximal aerobic capacity and body composition in a high-frequency manual materials handling task. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998;59(1):25–33.
97.
RosendalL, et al.Incidence of injury and physical performance adaptations during military training. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(3):157–63.
98.
HootmanJM, et al.Association among physical activity level, cardiorespiratory fitness, and risk of musculoskeletal injury. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(3):251–8.
99.
O’LearyTJ, et al.Sex differences in training loads during british army basic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(12):2565–74.
100.
BlackerSD, WilkinsonDM, RaysonMP. Gender differences in the physical demands of British Army recruit training. Mil Med. 2009;174(8):811–6.
101.
McGillS, et al.Can fitness and movement quality prevent back injury in elite task force police officers? A 5-year longitudinal studyErgonomics. 2015;58(10):1682–9.
102.
FaberA, et al.Does muscle strength predict future musculoskeletal disorders and sickness absence?Occup Med. 2012;62(1):41–6.
103.
BattieMC, et al.Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports. Spine. 1989;14(8):851–6.
104.
RosenblumKE, ShankarA. A study of the effects of isokinetic pre-employment physical capability screening in the reduction of musculoskeletal disorders in a labor intensive work environment. Work. 2006;26(2):215–28.
