Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-12-05
A pilot study: Exploring the musculoskeletal risk exposure associated with drying laundry using the public housing pipe-socket system amongst women in Singapore
The biomechanics of homemakers has been minimally studied. The way laundry-drying is performed in Singapore public-housing, using the pipe-socket-system (PSS), could expose the homemakers to musculoskeletal disorder risk.
OBJECTIVE:
This study aims to quantify the musculoskeletal risk exposure (MRE) associated with laundry-drying amongst female homemakers using the PSS in Singapore public-housing.
METHODS:
Using snowball sampling approach, five female homemakers familiar with the described laundry-drying method were recruited. The postures of the participants were analysed from video-recorded data and scored using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA).
RESULTS:
This pilot study revealed very strong evidence (p = 0.001) that the participants were exposed to medium risk (REBA score 4.3) when performing this housework task.
CONCLUSIONS:
Extreme awkward postures and repetitive motions were observed from the participants during the analysis. High REBA scores were frequently associated with the awkward postures adopted due to constraints of physical work space.
HabibM, RahmanSU. Musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) and their associations with ergonomic physical risk factors of the women engaging in regular rural household activities: A picture from a rural village in Bangladesh. Work. 2015;50(3):347–56.
2.
FongKN, LawCY. Self-perceived musculoskeletal complaints: Relationship to time use in women homemakers in Hong Kong. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2008;18(3):273–81.
3.
ApostoliP, SalaE, CurtiS, CookeRM, ViolanteFS, MattioliS. Loads of housework? Biomechanical assessments of the upper limbs in women performing common household tasks. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental health. 2012;85(4):421–5.
4.
BianchiSM, MilkieMA, SayerLC, RobinsonJP. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces. 2000;79(1):191–228.
5.
HabibRR, FathallahFA, MessingK. Full-time homemakers: Workers who cannot “go home and relax”. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2010;16(1):113–28.
6.
YangZ, CheungTWC. The inclusion of homemakers as an occupation amongst people with upper limb repetitive stress injuries. Work. 2016;55(1):181–6.
7.
MarrasWS. Biomechanical basis for ergonomics.In: WilliamS., MarrasWK, editor. Fundamentals and assessment tools for occupational ergonomics. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006, p. 11–1–43.
8.
SinayJ, PacaiovaH, KopasM, OravecM. Application of risk therapy in man-machine-environment systems. In: WilliamS, MarrasWK, editor. Fundamentals and assessment tools for occupational ergonomics. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis. 2006, pp. 81–8-11.
9.
LehtoMR, CookBT. Occupational Health and Safety Management. In: GavrielSalvendy, editor. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4th Edition, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 2012, pp. 699–733.
10.
YipV, HungL. The musculoskeletal discomforts among Hong Kong housewives. Medical Section. 2002;7(2):3–4.
11.
HabibR, El ZeinK, HojeijS. Hard work at home: Musculoskeletal pain among female homemakers. Ergonomics. 2012;55(2):201–11.
CochranD, StentzT, StonecipherB, HallbeckM. Guide for videotaping and gathering data on jobs for analysis for risks of musculoskeletal disorders. In: KarwowskiW, MarrasWS, editors. Ther occupational ergonomics handbook. Florida: CRC Press. 1999, pp. 511–23.
17.
QuesadaP. Video-based measurements of human movement. In: KarwowskiW, MarrasWS, editors. The occupational ergonomics handbook. Florida: CRC Press. 1999, pp. 549–64.
18.
StantonN, SalmonP, WalkerG, BaberC, JenkinsD. Data collection methods. In: StantonN, SalmonP, WalkerG, BaberC, JenkinsD, editors. Human factors methods: A practical guide for engineering and design. Hampsire: Ashgate. 2005, pp. 21–8.
HicksC. Research methods for clinical therapist: Applied project design and analysis. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier. 2009.
21.
NemethC. Human factors in research and development. In: NemethC, editor. Human factors methods for design: Making systems human-centred. Florida: CRC Press. 2004, pp. 99–123.
22.
HignettS, McAtamneyL. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics. 2000;31(2):201–5.
23.
CoyleA. Comparison of the Rapid Entire Body Assessment and the New Zealand Manual Handling’Hazard Control Record’, for assessment of manual handling hazards in the supermarket industry. Work. 2005;24(2):111–6.
24.
BlandM. An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford Publishing Press; 2000.
25.
CohenJ. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112(1):155.
26.
MorseT, BruneauH, Michalak-TurcotteC, SandersM, WarrenN, DussetschlegerJ, et al.Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and shoulder in dental hygienists and dental hygiene students. American Dental Hygienists Association. 2007;81(1):10.
27.
WeonJ-H, OhJ-S, CynnH-S, KimY-W, KwonO-Y, YiC-H. Influence of forward head posture on scapular upward rotators during isometric shoulder flexion. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2010;14(4):367–74.
28.
McLeanL. The effect of postural correction on muscle activation amplitudes recorded from the cervicobrachial region. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2005;15(6):527–35.
29.
EdmondstonSJ, ChanHY, NgaiGCW, WarrenMLR, WilliamsJM, GlennonS, et al.Postural neck pain: An investigation of habitual sitting posture, perception of ‘good’posture and cervicothoracic kinaesthesia. Manual Therapy. 2007;12(4):363–71.
GriecoA, MolteniG, VitoGd, SiasN. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders due to biomechanical overload. Ergonomics. 1998;41(9):1253–60.
32.
MuggletonJ, AllenR, ChappellP. Hand and arm injuries associated with repetitive manual work in industry: A review of disorders, risk factors and preventive measures. Ergonomics. 1999;42(5):714–39.
33.
BarrAE, BarbeMF, ClarkBD. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and wrist: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and sensorimotor changes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2004;34(10):610–27.
34.
DiasJ, BurkeF, WildinC, Heras-PalouC, BradleyM. Carpal tunnel syndrome and work. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2004;29(4):329–33.
35.
ReidCR, BushPM, KarwowskiW, DurraniSK. Occupational postural activity and lower extremity discomfort: A review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2010;40(3):247–56.
LimJ, HoffmannE. Appreciation of the zone of convenient reach by naive operators performing an assembly task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1997;19(3):187–99.
41.
KeeD. A method for analytically generating three-dimensional isocomfort workspace based on perceived discomfort. Applied Ergonomics. 2002;33(1):51–62.
42.
PheasantS, HaslegraveC. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis. 2003.
43.
YangJJ, Abdel-MalekK. Human reach envelope and zone differentiation for ergonomic design. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 2009;19(1):15–34.
44.
NordanderC, OhlssonK, ÅkessonI, ArvidssonI, BaloghI, HanssonG-Å, et al.Risk of musculoskeletal disorders among females and males in repetitive/constrained work. Ergonomics. 2009;52(10):1226–39.
45.
SalavatiM, MoghadamM, EbrahimiI, ArabAM. Changes in postural stability with fatigue of lower extremity frontal and sagittal plane movers. Gait & Posture. 2007;26(2):214–8.
46.
FullerJR, LomondKV, FungJ, CôtéJN. Posture-movement changes following repetitive motion-induced shoulder muscle fatigue. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2009;19(6):1043–52.
47.
LomondKV, CôtéJN. Differences in posture–movement changes induced by repetitive arm motion in healthy and shoulder-injured individuals. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011;26(2):123–9.
48.
BowlingA. Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. 3rd ed. McGrawHill: Open University Press. 2009.
49.
WilkinsonJ. Direct observation. In: BreakwellG, HammondS, Fife-SchawC, editors. Research methods in psychology. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications. 2000, pp. 224–38.
50.
FedorakC, AshworthN, MarshallJ, PaullH. Reliability of the visual assessment of cervical and lumbar lordosis: How good are we?Spine. 2003;28(16):1857–9.
